Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LANCASTER UNIVERSITY DEBATING SOCIETY luds Advanced debating.
Advertisements

Working Together in Faith, Hope and Love
(Counter) Plans Because they didn’t limit the topic.
STRUCTURES & STRATAGIES PRINCIPLES OF PLACE
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
China Debate Education Network: Analyzing a Debate Motion.
Applied business studies leadership
Volunteering and ageing: Pathways into social inclusion in later life Jeni Warburton John Richards Chair of Rural Aged Care Research La Trobe University,
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Constructing a Case for the Proposition International Debate Education Association.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
+ Debate Basics. + DEBATE A debate is a formal argument in which two opposing teams propose or attack a given proposition or motion in a series of speeches.
Constructing a Case for a Proposition International Debate Education Association.
Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University Constructing a Case for the Proposition 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and.
Kris Stroup, Longview Community College Constructing Opposition Arguments 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
Debate Notes: Arguments Building the Affirmative and the Negative Constructive Arguments.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Basics of Argumentation 2010 Advocacy Institute International Debate Education Association and Willamette University.
Revision Questions. The questions in this resource do not cover each of the Intermediate topics entirely, you should therefore ensure that you study your.
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
Higher Physical Education Volleyball.  Strategy  Methods of Analysis  Non Specialised Roles (Serving and Receiving)  Strengths of this Strategy 
Sexual Harassment and Gender Discrimination Recommendations for the Mexico City Police Department My Linh Do, Bill Schmitt, Julia Styles, Hsiu-Ching Wang,
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for the Prime Minister.
Propositions A proposition is the declarative statement that an advocate intends to support in the argument. Some propositions are stated formally, some.
Teaching BP Lessons, Practices, and Drills China Debate Education Network.
Judging British Parliamentary Debate
Stock Issues of Proposition of Policy. Stock issues: are hunting grounds for arguments. They provide the general phrasing of potential issues that correspond.
China Debate Education Network Constructing Arguments for Leader of Opposition Note: Constructing arguments is not the only job of the First Opposition,
Mechanisms and Counter Mechanisms Permission for use granted to HISD and HUDL.
Finding your way through Debate… A guide to successful argumentation…
Teaching IDEA Four-Team Debate: Refutation
The SSMP Process 1. The Servicing and Settlement Master Plan A plan to encompass the community’s visions and ideas, while approaching planning and servicing.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
Debate A contest of argumentation.. Argument A reason to support your side of the debate.
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
Providing mentor support for practice educators in training Exploring and evaluating approaches used by Bournemouth University 2010.
The Affirmative And Stock Issues By: Matt Miller.
Chairing an Adjudication Panel China Debate Education Network:
Chapter Study Guide GROUP COMMUNICATION. Chapter What are the 4 steps in the problem solving process? Describe and understand the problem.
Poverty Alleviation performance in China Experiences and lessons XU Lin National Development and Reform commission PRC.
Speech and Debate Terms Basic Definitions Every Speechie Should Know!
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Debate Ch. 18 Group One.
Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette.
“Analysis” Training Session 6 Feb Why do I need analysis? Most of the things debaters say are true (or at least plausible) Therefore both sides.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
Constructing a Case for the Opposition International Debate Education Association.
Preliminary Business Plan. Challenge, needs What is the business challenge your product offers a solution to? Describe the pains/costs of not using your.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Lincoln- Douglas. Building your arguments.  Each argument makes a statement of a possible truth  Gives support for that argument in terms of some reason.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Constructing Opposition Arguments International Debate Education Association Prepared for IDEA Youth Forum Summer, 2010 Prepared by Robert Trapp Willamette.
How to Generate Benefits for Local Forest Resource User Groups
Persuasive Messages Module Twelve McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Workshop for Debate Teachers
Aphg unit 6: development and industry
Chapter 18: Supporting Your Views
Debate: The Basics.
Chapter 16 Persuasive Speaking.
Four Step Refutation International Debate Education Association
Constructing a Case for a Proposition
Constructing a Case for a Proposition
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I)
Getting To Know Debate:
Debate.
The British Parliamentary Debate Format
Presentation transcript:

Robert Trapp, Willamette University Yang Ge, Dalian Nationalities University 2010 BFSU Tournament International Debate Education Association and Willamette University

Constructing Arguments is one part of an overall opposition strategy. The other part, refutation, is subject for later Opposition constructive arguments, sometimes called an opposition case, should deal with the Proposition’s model, not just with the resolution in general. An excellent opposition case will include A statement of the Opposition’s stance Constructive arguments that simultaneously support the Opposition’s stance and oppose the Proposition’s model

Defend an alternative value system Explicitly defend the actions of the present system Defend the actions of the present system in principle and offer minor repairs Offer a counterproposal

Some Common Kinds of Arguments No need for change in the status quo The proposed plan will not succeed Disadvantages of the Proposition’s plan Alternative moral or ethical principles Show that a counter proposal is better

Show that the problems described by the Proposition team are not occurring or are not significant Show that the problems do not exist Show that the problems are not significant quantitatively or qualitatively Show that the present system is able to solve the problems The gaps are being closed The barriers are being overcome

Example One No Need to Change the Status Quo Resolution: The Peoples Republic of China should significantly reform its Hukou policy. The status quo is already removing barriers. China already is moving to phase out the nongzhuanafei process. Removal of this process is allowing many people to give up their agricultural status and work in the cities. The process of reform is underway. Therefore the plan to eliminate the Hukou policy is unnecessary and premature.

This argument is designed to show that the plan will not solve the problems or gain the advantages. Show how the problems described by the Proposition team are not caused by the status quo. Show how the plan is not sufficient to solve the problem or to produce the advantage or to solve the problem.

Example Two Show the Plan Will Not Succeed Resolution: The Peoples Republic of China should reform its Hukou policy. The status quo problems are not caused by the Hukou policy. The lack of employment opportunities is caused as much by lack of training as by the Hukou system. Therefore if the Hukou policy is eliminated, people still will not have employment opportunities.

Disadvantages are particularly important because the overcome potential weaknesses in the other opposition arguments. Describe some feature of the Proposition Team’s plan Relate that feature to some effect Show how the effect is worse than the problem the Proposition Teams claim to solve

Example Three Disadvantages of the Proposition Team’s Plan Resolution: The Peoples Republic of China should reform its Hukou policy. Disadvantage: Eliminating Hukou may put many in worse economic circumstances. The feature of the Proposition team’s plan that will cause this disadvantage is the central feature of eliminating Hukou. Elimination of the Hukou policy causes people to give up their agricultural lands. When they move from the agricultural areas to the city, they will by necessity give up these lands. Agricultural lands will become more valuable in the future. Therefore, people with marginal technical skills will leave their agricultural lands behind in hopes of finding better employment situations in urban areas. Many of them will fail to get better employment because of lack of skills and in the process they will have given up their agricultural lands and hence will even be in worse shape than before.

Present this kind of argument when the proposition uses a principles case or when you want to suggest a principle that argues against the Proposition’s proposed action Show that the Proposition’s principle is inappropriate Designate an alternative moral or ethical principle Identify an alternative principle Create an argument in favor of the alternative Show that the alternative is preferable Apply the alternative principle to the Proposition’s proposed action.

Example Four: Alternative Moral or Ethical Principle Resolution: The Peoples Republic of China should significantly reform its Hukou policy. The ethical or moral principles advanced by the Proposition team are not appropriate: Their principle is equality of individuals. Equality is more important to individualistic societies than to collectivist societies. Since the PRC is a collectivist society, equality is not a universal principle. Alternative ethical or moral principles. The Opposition may decide to support the principle of community. The principle of community suggests that every person has a role so that if everyone fulfils their role, the community benefits. A community principle is more important than an individualistic principle because the former benefits all whereas the later only benefits particular individuals. Apply the alternative principle: The Hukou policy is consistent with community principles because in the Hukou policy, each citizen has a defined role that helps the overall Chinese economic system.

Present an alternative course of action. Show why your counterproposal is a true alternative – Why should your alternative preclude the Proposition Team’s plan of action. Show why the counterproposal is a better proposal than the Proposition team’s proposal. Does the counterproposal solve the problem outlined by the Proposition Team? Does the counterproposal avoid some of the disadvantages of the Proposition Team’s plan?

Example Five Counterproposal Resolution: The Peoples Republic of China should reform its Hukou policy. An Alternative Proposal: The Opposition side proposes keeping the Hukou policy and providing government subsidies to people in rural areas. A True Alternative: The Opposition side wants to eliminate the policy. We want to maintain it. The Opposition side wants rural peoples to improve their economic status by moving to the cities. We want them to continue doing the important work they do for the community and we will reward them with economic subsidies. A Better Alternative: 1. The Opposition counterproposal helps to alleviate the economic problems of rural citizens through government subsidies. Whereas the Proposition plan has rural citizens moving to urban areas to get better employment, the Opposition plan allows them to continue to work in agriculture and to have higher incomes. 2. The Opposition counterproposal does not force rural people to give up agricultural land and therefore helps to ensure their long-term economic security.