1. Debate
Ch. 18
Group One

2. Chapter Outlines
Part One

3. WHAT IS DEBATE?
Debate: Formalized public speaking in which participants prepare and present speeches on opposite sides of an issue to determine which side has the strongest argument.
Controversy: Formal debate begins with a controversy expressed as a proposition.
Proposition: A persuasive specific purpose that establishes a fact, establishes or changes a belief, or recommends a policy.
Two Sides: The two sides in a debate are called the affirmative and the negative.
Speakers: Each side has at least two speakers, except in the Lincoln-Douglas debate, in which each side has only one speaker.
Status Quo: The existing state or affairs - Currently held beliefs and currently followed courses of action.
Burden of proof: The obligation of the affirmative team to present sufficient reason for changing the existing system.
Constructive and Rebuttal Speeches: Each speaker has a chance to speak twice; During a formal debate each speaker presents a constructive speech and a rebuttal speech.

4. THE PROPOSITION
The Proposition: Propositions are extremely important. They determine the scope of the debate, therefore precisely wording the proposition is crucial.
Types of Propositions: There are three types of propositions organized by purpose: 1) To establish a fact 2) To establish or change belief 3) To recommend a policy
Propositions Affirming a Fact:
These propositions determine what is true or false.
These propositions are mostly seen in courts of law.
Propositions Establishing or Changing Belief:
These propositions seek to establish or change a belief.
Most of these propositions include evaluative words.
The propositions cannot be verifiedㅡresults are a matter of judgement.
Propositions Recommending a Policy:
These propositions determine what action should be taken.
By far, the greatest number of propositions facing debaters in real world settings are propositions of policy.
Wording Propositions
The proposition must be worded to give the “burden of proof” to the affirmative.
the proposition must be focused on one topic only.
The meaning of the words used in the proposition should be clear to debaters and listeners.

5. PREPARING YOURSELF FOR DEBATE
Discovering Key Issues
In debates, Issues are key questions that must be answered to determine who will win the debates.
The two key issues could be worded as...
Do present conditions create significant problems that cannot be solved under the status quo?
Will the suggested policy solve the problem?

6. THE PROOF
Once the issue is clear, you must gather information to support your position.
Reasons are statements that justify the proposition.
Affirmative Reasons
Negative Reasons
Evidence includes the facts and the opinions given to support each reason.

7. THE EVIDENCE
Before using facts and quotations as evidence and proof, you must make sure…
Is the evidence recent enough to be relevant to issue?
Is the evidence well documented?
Is the source reliable?
Is the evidence objective?

8. THE CONSTRUCTIVE SPEECH
Constructive speech: a speech that builds an argument for an affirmative or a negative case.
Case: consists of arguments and evidence on which a team bases its stand on a given proposition
Affirmative case: presents reasons and evidence that indicate a problem with the present system and that show why the action stated in the proposition offers the best solution to that problem.
Prima facie case: is one that contains sufficient evidence to win a debate if the other side presented no argument.
Problem-Solution Pattern (also called “need-plan pattern”): organizes information to demonstrate that the problem cannot be solved by the status quo and to show that the proposal stated in the proposition will solve the problem both practically and beneficially.
a problem must exist
that adopting the proposal will help solve said problem
that adopting the proposal is the best way of solving said problem
Comparative-Advantages Pattern: organizes information to demonstrate that the proposal would have significant advantages over the status quo.

9. THE CONSTRUCTIVE SPEECH - CONT.
Negative case: gives reasons and evidence that (1) acts as straight refutation of the affirmative case, (2) defends the status quo, or (3) presents a counterpoint.
Straight-Refutation Approach: straight refutation means that the entire negative case will be a denial of each affirmative argument stated. In other words, the negative side will deny any points made by the affirmative team.
Defense of the Status Quo: The negative team that elects to defend the status quo will explain what the status quo is and will show either how it is already meeting the alleged problems or how it could meet them.
Counterplan: a counterplan is the presentation of a different solution.
Side Note: Your choice of approach will depend on the material you have. Most of the time, you will use either straight refutation or defense of the status quo.

10. THE ART OF DEBATE

11. Learning Objectives
Part Two

12. Objectives: Define debate Write and test a debate proposition
Identify three kinds of propositions
Write the major issues of a proposition recommending a policy
Identify two kinds of affirmative cases
Identify two kinds of negative cases

13. Objective #1 Define Debate:
Debate is a formalized public speaking in which participants prepare and present speeches on opposite sides of an issue to determine which side has the stronger argument.
Debate is one of the major ways people in a democratic society makes decisions.

14. Objective #2 Write and test a debate proposition:
Proposition: a persuasive specific purpose that establishes a fact. establishes or changes beliefs, or recommends a policy. For a debate, the proposition must be controversial; that is, a proposition must deal with a question that has valid evidence for at least two solutions that divide public opinion relatively evenly.
Which one would be a better proposition?
“Resolved,That students should get paid for getting good grades in school.”
“Resolves, Murder should be legal”

15. Objective #3 Identify three kinds of propositions:
Proposition - A persuasive specific purpose that establishes a fact, establishes or changes a belief, or recommends a policy. For a debate, it must be controversial.
3 Types:
Propositions Affirming a Fact: determines what is true or false; most common in courts of law where the prosecution tries to prove such propositions as “Marie is guilty of taking Sam’s pencil from Sam’s desk.”
Propositions Establishing or Changing Belief: states the relative merit of a person, place, or thing; always includes evaluative words such as “good”, “worthy”, “better”, or “the opposites”.
Propositions Recommending a Policy: recommends a policy that determines what action should be taken; focuses on a specific plan of action that is to be considered by the debaters.

16. Objective #4
Write the major issues of a proposition recommending a policy
Propositions should be worded as a question but propositions recommending a policy have both a problem and a solution.
Also, there are two key issues that are very broad so they have to be narrowed down.
The two key questions are: 1) DO presented conditions create significant problems? 2) Would greater freedom for law enforcement agencies solve the problems?
When these questions are narrowed down they have to be more specific issues.

17. Objective #5 Identify two kinds of affirmative cases
Affirmative case- reasons and evidence presented to indicate a problem with the present system and show why the action stated in the proposition is the best solution
Types of affirmative cases:
Problem-Solution Pattern: organizes information to show that the problem cannot be solved by status quo instead by the proposition given
Comparative-Advantages Pattern: organizes information to demonstrate that the proposal would have significant advantages over the status quo

18. Objective #6 Identify two kinds of negative cases
Negative Case- gives reason and evidence that act as straight refutation of affirmative case, defends the status quo, or presents a counterplan
Types of negative cases:
Straight-Refutation Approach: the entire negative case will be a denial of each affirmative case stated.
Counterplan: presentation of a different solution

20. Plan of Action Learning Objectives: Andrea: Objectives 1, 2
Morgaine: Objectives 3, 4
Marie: Objectives 5, 6
Section Outlines:
Ryan: What is Debate
Mirae: The Proposition
Eunho: Preparing Yourself for Debate (The Proof, The Evidence)
Sam: The Constructure Speech

21. Speech Communication: Chapter 18
Part II

22. Refutation Refutation means: Attacking the ideas of the opposition.
You may refute your opposition’s:
Quantity of Evidence
Quality of Evidence
Reasoning from the Evidence

23. Four Most Common Types of Arguments
Generalization:
A conclusion based on one or more specific instances.
Causation:
Provides a conclusion that is a direct result of one or more given sources or conditions.
Analogy:
An argument based on a comparison of something with a similar event, state, or set of circumstances.
Sign:
Draws a conclusion based on certain signs or indicators.

24. The Four Steps of Refutation
1. State clearly and concisely the argument you are going to refute.
2. State what you will prove.
3. Present the proof completely with documented evidence.
4. Draw a conclusion.

25. The Five Steps of Rebuttal
1. Restate the argument you made originally.
2. State what your opponent said against your original point.
3. State your position on your opponent’s attack.
4. Present the proof completely with documented evidence.
5. Draw a conclusion.

27. Judging Debates For affirmative team to win For negative team to win
Judges give points based on their estimation of how well each performance met the standard.
Affirmative team uses problem-solution pattern
Affirmative team uses comparative-advantages pattern
For affirmative team to win
Prove that there is a significant problem
The affirmative side’s proposition will solve the problem
The proposition offers the best solution
For negative team to win
Proving that no problem exists
Prove that the affirmative sides would not solve the problem
Prove that the affirmative sides proposition is either not the best way to solve the problem or will cause new problems.
For affirmative team to win
Prove that the proposition offers significant advantages over the status quo
Prove that its proposition will not create significant problems when implemented
For negative team to win
Prove that the advantages are not significant
Prove that the significant disadvantages will result

28. Responsibilities Claudia 10. List the five steps of rebuttal Clicker
Katie
8. List the four most common types of arguments used in debate
Dejure
9. List the four steps of refutation
Brent
7. Define refutation
Matthew
12. Judge a debate
Speaker
Viniana
11. Prepare a flow sheet