Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage II: Understanding Data Purposes & Uses.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

Assessment types and activities
Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
Assessment Photo Album Science Fair Project
Analyzing Student Work
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Analysis I: Summarizing, Representing, and Sharing Data.
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Managing Learning and Knowledge Capital Human Resource Development: Chapter 11 Evaluation Copyright © 2010 Tilde University Press.
Science Breakout New Teacher Meeting 6, Year 2 March 31, 2011.
Consistency of Assessment
Unit 15 Assessment in Language Teaching. Teaching objectives By the end of the lesson, students should be able to:  know what assessment is and how it.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Data Analysis Protocol Identify – Strengths – Weaknesses – Trends – Outliers Focus on 3 – Strengths – Weaknesses.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Informed Decision Making IV: Monitoring and Assessing Progress.
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Chapter 1 Assessment in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms
Principles of Assessment
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Analysis II: Examining & Interpreting Data.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION FOR IMPROVED STUDENT LEARNING:
Data Interpretation Workshop Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Data Interpretation Workshop (February 2008) 2 Purposes for the Day Bring context.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Informed Decision Making III: Creating Action Plans.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Gathering I: Establishing Outcomes.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
+ Equity Audit & Root Cause Analysis University of Mount Union.
Evaluation Basics Principles of Evaluation Keeping in mind the basic principles for program and evaluation success, leaders of youth programs can begin.
Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.
CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.
Clear Purpose: Assessment for and of Learning: A Balanced Assessment System “If we can do something with assessment information beyond using it to figure.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Gathering III: Identifying & Valuing Different Types of Data.
A Network Approach To Improving Teaching and Learning Center Point High School Instructional Rounds in Education.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Assessment Workshop College of San Mateo February 2006.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage I: Engaging Stakeholders.
Professional growth Objectives 1)Pilot program 2)Familiarize/re-familiarize ourselves with new Standards and Indicators 3)Consider the importance of data.
Let’s Talk Assessment Rhonda Haus University of Regina 2013.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Gathering IV: Collecting and Collating Data.
Second session of the NEPBE I in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 22, 2013.
Classroom Evaluation & Grading Chapter 15. Intelligence and Achievement Intelligence and achievement are not the same Intelligence and achievement are.
Reading Literacy Standards Learning Goal: –To understand college and career readiness (CCR) implications and connections to Educational Planning and Assessment.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Oct. 11, 2011– May 8, 2012 Facilitators: Carol Mayer & Ginni Winters.
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Data Analysis III: Extending the Assessment.
The selection of appropriate assessment methods in a course is influenced by many factors: the intended learning outcomes, the discipline and related professional.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
Assessment My favorite topic (after grammar, of course)
1 Classroom Assessment Compiled by Linda Blocker.
GOING DEEPER WITH INDEPENDENT READING AND FURTHER THAN INDEPENDENT READING.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
Assessment & Feedback Sociology of Assessment Lecturer: Dr Justin Rami School of Education Studies Dublin City University lecturer – Dr Justin Rami.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 7 Assessing and Grading the Students.
SCIENCE Assessment Amanda Cantafio.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades The primary purpose of assessment and evaluation is to improve student learning.
AAC Assessment Glossary
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Assessment in Language Teaching: part 1 Lecture # 23
Differentiating Mathematics Instruction
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage II: Understanding Data Purposes & Uses

2 Setting the Stage II: Understanding Data Purposes & Uses Part One Understanding Data

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Learning the Lingo Your group has been given a number of terms (green paper) and definitions (blue paper). Match the terms to their definitions. In what areas do we hold shared understandings about the vocabulary of assessment and evaluation? What areas may require further study and review?

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Data Have No Meaning Data are simply information. Individuals and groups create meaning by organizing, analyzing and interpreting data. Interpretation is subjective; data are objective. Frames of reference, the way we see the world, influence the meaning we derive from the data we collect and select. (Wellman & Lipton, 2004) Take a stand on the above statement: Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Understanding Data Individually, then as a table group, brainstorm and list as many different kinds of data as you can that are available to the staffs in your schools. Data SourcePotential Uses

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Discussion Questions What are you noticing about data and its uses? What are the possibilities for the use of data? What are the potential pitfalls? What type of assessment does your local public think best informs them about student learning? Consider the business community, community members without children in school, etc.

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February The Nature of Data For each of the different assessments (individual/classroom, school, etc.), please individually indicate, by shading a rectangular area upwards, the extent to which you think the assessment and their results could potentially contribute to improved student learning.

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February The Nature of Data With a partner, share your graph and try to come to a mutual consensus or your rationale about the potential value the different student assessments and their results will have on improving student learning. As a table group, similarly share your “pair” graphs with each other and discuss the potential value student assessments and their results will have on improving student learning.

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Discussion Questions What are the main purposes for each of the student assessments shown on the chart and how to they vary from one another? Overall, what level of assessment(s) does your table think will most improve student learning in schools? Why? Thinking about the different levels at which we can gather assessment data, which levels provide more definitive data about students and which levels provide more indicative data about students? Overall, what level of assessment(s) does your table think will inform your local public the best about the extent to which students are learning? Why?

10 Setting the Stage: Understanding Data Purposes & Uses Part Two Types and Sources of Data

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Types of Data QuantitativeQualitative Numerical in form Efficient to analyze Objective Not numerical in form Can be more than words or text – pictures, artifacts, etc. More complex to analyze Subjective

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Sources of Data Individually, then as table groups, complete the “Sources of Data” grid. Refer to the data sources you brainstormed earlier. (Adapted from Wellman and Lipton, 2003) Review grids and discuss: –In which areas do we have the most data? –Which areas might be lacking? –What are the respective benefits and drawbacks of the different categories of data?

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Sources of Data Identify something in your own work/ classroom/school that you are interested in learning more about. –Develop a question or hypothesis –Determine at least three data sources you might “tap” to explore your issue –Triangulating Data - How will the information from each of those sources help paint a clearer picture for you? Do different sources point to similar conclusions?

14 Setting the Stage II: Understanding Data Purposes & Uses Part Three Principles of the Saskatchewan Assessment for Learning Program

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Principles of the Saskatchewan AFL Program 1.Cooperation and Shared Responsibility 2.Equity and Fairness 3.Comprehensiveness 4.Continuous Improvement that Promotes Quality and Excellence 5.Teacher Professionalism 6.Authenticity and Validity 7.Honesty and Openness

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Principles of the Saskatchewan AFL Program Read and Connect –Everyone at the table reads the first numbered statement. After reading, one person at the table offers an insight or connection they are making to that statement. –Repeat the process with all seven statements. At the end, discuss the practical impact of the principles on the working lives of teachers. What is the most important message within the principles?

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Assessment of/for Learning (Sutton, 2001) Assessment of Learning Checks what has been learned to date Is designed for those not directly involved in daily learning and teaching Is presented in a periodic report Usually gathers information into easily digestible numbers, scores and marks Usually compares the student’s learning with either other students or the standard for a grade level Does not need to involve the student Assessment for Learning Checks learning and decides what to do next Is designed to assist teachers and students Is used in marking and conversation Usually detailed, specific, and descriptive feedback in words as well as (or instead of) numbers, scores, and marks Usually focused on improvement, compared with the student’s previous best Needs to involve the student – the person most able to improve learning

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Discussion Questions Thinking back to the definitions of quantitative and qualitative data, which seems to apply to assessment of and assessment for learning? In what ways are both of these processes necessary in schools? Which of these processes would have the most positive impact on the day-to-day lives of students and teachers?

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Types of Referencing Criterion-referenced: Comparing how students perform relative to curriculum objectives, level attribution criteria (rubrics), and the level of difficulty inherent in the assessment tasks. Standards-referenced: Comparing how students performed relative to a set of professionally or socially constructed standards. Experience or self–referenced: Comparing how students perform relative to the assessment data gathered by teachers during the school year. Norm-referenced: Comparing how students in a school performed relative to the performance of students in the division, region, or project. Longitudinal-referenced: Comparing how students perform relative to earlier years’ performance of students. From Assessment for Learning Math 2006 Understanding the Numbers Workshop.

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Types of Assessment Diagnostic –Diagnostic assessment should be done informally and continuously. It is used to assess the strengths and needs of students and to make program modifications. It is used for "diagnosis" rather than "grading". Formative –Formative assessment should be conducted continuously. It is used to improve instruction and learning and to keep both students and teachers aware of the course objectives and the students' progress in meeting those objectives. –The results of formative assessment are analyzed and used to focus the efforts of the teacher and students. Summative –Summative assessment occurs at the end of a unit or program. It is used with formative evaluation to determine student achievement and program effectiveness. –Summative assessment should form only part of students' grades. Definitions from Saskatchewan Learning, 1997

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Understandings Referring to the principles of the Saskatchewan Assessment for Learning Program, discuss the relationship between the types of referencing and types of assessments with the processes used in the provincial AFL program.

Advancing Assessment Literacy Modules: Setting the Stage II - February Present Understanding As a table group, craft a statement, visual representation or both which details your present understanding of the Assessment for Learning Program.