1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Hazardous Solid Waste and Waste Sites
Advertisements

Facility Lead Corrective Action Approaches Voluntary Agreements RCRA National Meeting August 13, 2003 Jennifer Shoemaker EPA Region 3.
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
Chapter 51 Environment Law and Land Use Controls Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF POST-CLOSURE CARE INNOVATION Mr. Charles G. Johnson Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Hazardous Material and.
Overview the local, state, and federal regulatory authorities which affect the interim housing mission Identify vital stakeholders with regulatory authority.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF DOE POLICY -- USE OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS COLLEEN OSTROWSKI (202)
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
1 LAND USE CONTROLS THE ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Presented by MGP Partners LLC December 7, 2000.
Airport Planning. errata Traditional forecasting techniques are still in play, but are considered archaic. US airlines are focused on international travel.
Module 7: Management Strategies and Potential ARARs.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Gary W. Baughman, Division Director 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Facility Lead Corrective Action Opportunities with Union Carbide RCRA National Meeting May, 2005 Bob Greaves EPA Region 3.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Tier 1 Module 6 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Public Record & Institutional Controls.
1 Institutional Controls LTS “Framework” EPA Post-ROD Authority State and Tribal Government Working Group March 14, 2002.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Institutional Controls at BRAC Sites July 19, 2011.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced or distributed without authorization. ASSET Safety Management.
Environmental Management System Definitions
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Web Resources Michael Gage New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection County Environmental and Waste Enforcement Special Investigations and Oversight.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Module 9: Natural Resource Assessment and Damages (NRD)
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
1 Welcome to the CLU-IN Internet Seminar Tribal Consultation Informational Webinar - Institutional Controls in Indian Country Sponsored by: U.S. EPA Office.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
EPA P-1 Corrective Action Streamlined Consent Orders Bob Greaves Region 3 Deb Goldblum Region 3 Tom Krueger Region 5.
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
EPA P-1 Institutional Control Tracking EPA Superfund Perspective November 2006.
RCRA 2020 Vision… A View from a Facility Owner Lloyd E. Dunlap Atlantic Richfield Company, BP.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
The City of Rochester New York Environmental Institutional Control System Prepared By: Mark Gregor City of Rochester, New York Division of Environmental.
Copyright © 2009 Holland & Knight LLP All Rights Reserved Uniform Environmental Covenants Act November 18, 2009 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202) Brownfields.
Estimating the Costs of Implementing Institutional Controls Brownfields 2009 New Orleans November 17, 2009 John Pendergrass.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Avoiding Future Shock: Long Term Solutions for Brownfields Ignacio Dayrit, City of Emeryville Brownfields 2004.
THE UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT—THE EPA PERSPECTIVE BROWNFIELDS 2009 Michael A. Hendershot Senior Assistant Regional Counsel United States Environmental.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Wisconsin’s New Approach to Land Use Controls Presented by Mark F. Giesfeldt Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Long-Term Stewardship: Institutional Controls on Department of Energy Sites Steve Schiesswohl, Senior Realty Officer November 2006.
Brownfields 2004 Putting the Pieces Together - Effective and Reliable Institutional Controls September 21, 2004 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202)
BOR Real Property Conveyances and Restrictions Anita Bain, Director Natural Resource Management Division August 18, 2006 Anita Bain, Director Natural.
1 Introduction to safety case and safety assessment: purpose and content of safety case Ian Crossland Crossland Consulting
Long-Term Stewardship: Ensuring the Safe Use of Contaminated Sites Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Uniform Environmental Covenants
“Designing an Institution to Track Institutional Controls” Federal Perspective Brownfields 2003 October 28, 2003.
Office of Legal Affairs
RESTORING CONTAMINATED SITES TO PRODUCTIVE USE
Interim Air Quality Policy on Wildland and Prescribed Fires
Implementing RCRA Land Revitalization Measures
Presentation transcript:

1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program

2 Objectives of the Module Define institutional controls (ICs) Identify when ICs are needed Discuss types of ICs used in Corrective Actions program Explain planning and analysis considerations Discuss how to implement ICs Address emerging issues surrounding the use of ICs

3 Definition of Institutional Controls Not defined under federal hazardous waste program IC’s are non-engineering measures that minimize the potential for exposure Examples of ICs –Land and resource use restrictions –Well drilling prohibitions/well use advisories –Building permits –So called “Deed restrictions*” and deed notices –Zoning restrictions

4 Types of Institutional Controls Informational: non-enforceable advisories Proprietary: legal tools based in real property laws that restrict or affect the use of property Governmental: restrictions by state or local governments Enforcement and permitting tools: controls implemented as part of the RCRA enforcement and permitting processes

5 Roles of ICs in Remedies ICs have two primary purposes –Minimize the potential for exposure –Protect the integrity of the remedy ICs should be considered during all stages of corrective action ICs can be used under both the RCRA corrective action and closure programs EPA expects use of ICs in remedies under RCRA to be consistent with their use under CERCLA in order to achieve consistency

6 Evaluating the Need for ICs in Remedies and When to Use ICs Timing of evaluation –During interim measures –During RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) –During Corrective Measures Study (CMS) –During Corrective Measures –Implementation (CMI) –During post-closure When ICs need to be considered (discussion)

7 IC Tools - Typical Land Use Restrictions Informational devices –Deed notices –Records and community involvement Proprietary devices –Easement –Covenant –Other real property devices (reversionary interest, state statutes, conservation easements)

8 IC Tools - Typical Land Use Restrictions (continued) Governmental controls –Federal, state, and local laws and regulations –Land use restrictions –Groundwater use restrictions –Advisories –State registries

9 IC Tools - Typical Land Use Restrictions (continued) Enforcement and Permitting Controls –ICs may be implemented through RCRA enforcement authorities or through permit conditions Enforcement tools - Section 3008(h) of RCRA - Section 7003 of RCRA Permitting tools - Section 3004(u) of RCRA - Section 3004(v) of RCRA

10 Planning and Integrating ICs During Remedy Selection ICs are subject to evaluation criteria similar to other components of the remedy ICs should be analyzed during the RFI or CMS ICs should not be considered an “add-on” or afterthought Authorized states typically have primary responsibility for ICs “Corrective Action Completion with Controls” means that cleanup expectations are met through both engineering controls and ICs

11 Involvement of Stakeholders State and local “buy-in” to the selected remedy and associated ICs is critical to its success Consultation should occur as early as possible

12 ICs in the Decision Documents The remedy selection criteria should be applied to IC evaluation The remedy decision document should clearly state the purposes and performance goals of the ICs The decision document should fully evaluate the IC component of the remedy The decision document must indicate how the ICs will be implemented, monitored, and enforced

13 ICs in the Decision Documents (Cont.) IC “layering” Using ICs in series Contingency planning in the decision document Making all stakeholders aware of the existence and impact of ICs at a facility When to reopen or modify the decision document

14 Monitoring ICs During remedy construction and operation Periodic inspections At RCRA sites with a permit or order in place –Monitoring and reporting requirements should be specified in a separate document or in the permit and/or order itself

15 Enforcing ICs Enforcement authorities: Orders under RCRA may require additional restrictions Section 3008(a) of RCRA Enforcement policies for ICs vary within EPA Regions and authorized states Authorized states will typically be the implementing, enforcing, and overseeing agency.

16 Failures of IC Actions prohibited by ICs may occur Remedy must be designed to identify potential failures of ICs Need for monitoring and enforcement

17 Emerging Issues Guidance on estimating the life cycle costs of ICs Imprecise language used to discuss ICs Information infrastructure, management, and dissemination for tracking ICs Lack of uniformity in applicable state laws

18 Emerging Issues (continued) Planning documents for ICs Guidance on community involvement for ICs Guidance on implementation planning for ICs and enforcement

19 IC Advantages May allow lower costs to achieve protectiveness in a remedy Addresses exposure issues related to long-term occupation of site after remedy is completed Supplements and protects engineered controls

20 IC Disadvantages May rely on cross-jurisdictional support May increase long-term maintenance costs Introduces uncertainty with regard to effects of remedy failure

21 In Review ICs are non-engineering response measures Project managers should identify key issues that may affect the ability to establish, monitor, or enforce ICs ICs must be evaluated on whether they are protective of human health and the environment over time. Project managers need to coordinate with all potential stakeholders