Applying FACT in the case of Puantani’s members on Enterprise Development FACT Lesson Learn Workshop Bali, 3-5 May 2014

THE PLAN 1 st FACT Workshop Jakarta Tentatively proposed advocacy of Women access on water farm facility in Pagon1 Village group member 1 st general consultation process, PagonKrojo village Oct, 2013 Nov, 2013 Dec, 2014 Internal coordination: subang district focal point (coordinator) Recommendations of discussion: coverage area (target group); target member involved; effective consultation Consultation with CD expert about consultation process Advisory: PRA as methodology of Consultation Sustainable Rural Women Enterprise as the 1 st priority agenda 1 st Special consultation on Sustainable Rural Women Enterprise Top priority collective enterprise: Fruits Processing Innovation. Final Plan (Changed on Tittle) informed to Agrittera Puantani is nterested to see the whole FACT Implementation that embedded along the development (Consultation - Participatory Research - SMART Proposal - Lobby), not limited to certain pillar. ?

Actions : Pillar1-Consultation Consultation with resource person: Local women farmer, subang district coordinator/ focal point in the organization) Dec, 2014 Jan, st general consultation to discussed and identified top priority need within the group member (pagonkrojo village) 1 st special consultation on developing enterprise: to define 1 st priority enterprise to be developed (pagonkrojo village) Consultation with Community Development expert about methodolgy of consultation Pillar 2. Participatory Research Input on : Certain issues;Target group/member involved; Right time and situation to held consultation Key FACT : + CROP Implementation: Open discussion on general issue ; 24 woman; Sunday consultation. good facilitator; Every woman speak; Plano pepper to record the process of identifing group issues and interest ; challenges; solutions, defining 1 st priority need Key FACT : Advisory on : PRA as methodoly consultation; instrument + tools in ordering and select priority issue Implementation: Open discussion on spesific issue ; 24 woman in group; Saturday consultation.good facilitator; Every woman speak; Plano pepper t orecord the process of identifing ideas, best potential; challenges; solutions; defining 1 st priority enterprise to be launch : Fruits Processing innovation Key FACT : + CROP = AIR

Actions : Pillar2-Participatory Research Survey to member group (primary data) on Identification of Modality within the group : (Raw material, Human Resource, Utility and equipment, Capital, Market access, Group institutionalizing) Jan, 2014 Feb-March, identifing experts : individually and institutionally dealing with fruits processing technology and innovation Pillar 3. SMART PROPOSAL 1.Training on Fruit Processing Innovations and Technology 2.Introduction of Technology 3.Advisory on innovation process, packaging technology (module) 4.Advisory on sertification 2 1.Informal meeting with institution 2.Formal corresponden ce to request expert assistance 1.Waiting for letter of acceptance in Partnership 2.Second meeting with Partnership division + expert coordinator 3.Waiting for Letter of Expert designation 4.Demo Agenda April, Desk research on local Market potential (in subang district): present product exist, market volume 2. Consumer preferences survey (organoleptic test) May, 2014 Delay Instrument: Form essay+quistionare Methode : Direct survey- individual Q& A Key FACT: AIR + KSK

Actions: Pillar 3 SMART Proposal+Pillar 4 Lobby Mapping ( The Delay) 1.Reasons of Delay 1.1 External factor : Expert collaboration Institutional partnership really takes time, went through a beurocracy process and rely on the partner condition 1.2 Internal and External Factor : - The dinamic of communication of actions between organization and counterpart also within the structure in the organization. - Dicipline on time constraint committed by parties 1.3 Complementary activity - intersession : Training on fruit innovation and technology introduction need to be conducted in order to show/prove that innovation can be process 2.Up to date Result 2.1 Simultaniously with market potential survey, process of proceeding SMART Proposal and Lobby Mapping will be conducted. 2.2 Enthusiastic process for members group as well as organization 3.Future Expectation 2.3 Expected to be finished within June –july 2014

CONCLUSION : The Plan and Expectation There are many valuable facts found along the process need to be adjusted to strengthen the plan to achieve the goal !

CONCLUSION : Implementation Accomplished: - Pillar 1 : Consultations - Pillar 2 : Participatory Research Not Accomplished: - Pillar 3 : SMART proposal, (particularly feed back process) - Pillar 4 : Lobby mapping Points of lack in implementation : 1. External factor : Expert collaboration Institutional partnership really takes time, went through a beurocracy process and rely on the partner condition 2. Internal and External Factor : - The dinamic of communication of actions between organization and counterpart also within the structure in the organization. - Dicipline on time constraint committed by parties 3. Complementary activity - intersession : Training on fruit innovation and technology introduction need to be conducted in order to show/prove that innovation can be process

CONCLUSION : Main Insight of FACT concepts 1. FACT is the system of thinking to approach advocacy process 2. Consultation process is a key process in order to approach the target group 3. Expert advisory help very much the organization to understand the methodology and to implement the plan

CONCLUSION : Main Lesson Learned Difficulty encountered - Communication gap - Time frame dicipline Possibility discovered - finding other potentials instead of planned

Terima Kasih… Thank You !