SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Renewal Focus Area February 8,

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Agenda SHRP2 Overview –What is SHRP2? –Focus Areas –Implementation Assistance Technical Product Description Product Implementation Questions? Wrap-up: Implementation Timeline 2

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 What is SHRP2? Products developed from objective, credible research Solutions that respond to challenges of the transportation community – safety, aging infrastructure, congestion Collaborative effort of AASHTO, FHWA, and TRB Tested products, refined in the field 3 Tools to save lives, save money, save time. SHRP2 Solutions offer new technologies and processes to enhance the efficiency of transportation agencies

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February Safety: fostering safer driving through analysis of driver, roadway and vehicle factors in crashes, near crashes, and ordinary driving Renewal: rapid maintenance and repair of the deteriorating infrastructure using already-available resources, innovations and technologies Reliability: managing non-recurring events to create more predictable travel times Capacity: planning and designing a highway system that offers minimum disruption and meets the environmental, and economic needs of the community Focus Areas

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Implementing SHRP2 Solutions Moving forward More than 30 high-priority products introduced over two years Users run the gamut of the transportation industry Selected products integrated into current transportation practices 5

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Products Ready for First Round Implementation Capacity Implementing Eco-Logical (C06) Renewal Next-Generation Project Management Tools –Managing Risk on Rapid Construction Projects(R09) –Managing Complex Projects (R10) Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal (R04) Preservation Techniques for Heavily-Traveled Roadways (R26) Reliability Organizational Assessment and Leadership to Improve Operations (L01/L06 ) 6

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Implementation Assistance Levels of Engagement Proof of Concept Pilot Funds for piloting products to evaluate readiness for implementation Contractor support to collect data and evaluate the application Lead Adopter Incentive Funds for early adopters to offset implementation cost and mitigate risks Recipients required to provide specific deliverables designed to further refine the product User Incentive Funds for implementation support activities after early adopter use Used to conduct internal assessments, build capacity, implement system process changes, organize peer exchanges, or offset other implementation costs 7

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Implementation Assistance Products & Solicitation 8 ProductProof of Concept Pilot Lead Adopter Incentive User Incentive R09 – Managing Risk200 R10 – Complex Projects040 R04 - Bridge070 R26 – Pavement Preservation010 C06 – Eco-Logical0620 L01/L06 – Ops Organization0200

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Implementation Assistance Selection Criteria 9 General criteria for participants (will vary somewhat among products) Geographic diversity of participants Demonstration of culture to implement new products or processes Demonstration of past interest and/or efforts to implement similar products or processes High commitment to making institutional/organizational changes Commitment to conduct demonstration workshops Willingness to share experience by facilitating peer-to-peer activities Commitment to dedicate staff to the implementation project

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Today’s Products Strategies for managing risk and complex projects Versatile, scalable tools lead to fewer surprises Prefabricated elements for small- and medium- sized bridges Accelerates construction, increases competition, minimizes traffic impacts Pavement preservation techniques to extend service life Prolongs need for major rehabilitation projects 10 R09 R10 R04 R26

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Practical Solutions to Rapidly Reconstruct our Aging Highways Renewal Focus Area – Technical Product Description 11 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Next Generation Project Management Tools Challenge Rapid construction projects typically involve complex logistical requirements, complicated contractual procedures, and restrictive regulatory requirements. Solution Guidelines to accelerate sound decision making and reduce risks during rapid construction projects. 12

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Next Generation Project Management Tools Suite of products to: Manage Risk in Rapid Construction Projects (R09) Manage Complex Projects (R10) 13

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Risk in Rapid Renewal Projects – R09 Guide for the Process of Managing Risks on Rapid Construction Projects –Formal risk management process –Practical methods for identifying, assessing, mitigating, allocating, and monitoring risk –Tools include: Risk/action checklist Implementation tools Forms & MS Excel spreadsheets Course to train DOT staff 14

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Risk in Rapid Renewal Projects – R09 Goal of R09 Risk Management Process: Optimize project performance –Project delivery (cost, schedule, disruption) –Longevity (O&M/replacement cost/disruption/life) Major Concepts: Base performance = set of assumptions about planned project Risks = potential events that impact performance Total performance = base performance + risks 15

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS Managing Risk in Rapid Renewal Projects – R09 16

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Risk in Rapid Renewal Projects – R09 17

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Risk in Rapid Renewal Projects – R09 Benefits Reduces potential for cost overruns Versatile, can be used on projects of any size Increases the likelihood of on-time delivery by anticipating and managing risks Reduced costs through better management of budget and schedules Fewer surprises 18

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Complex Projects – R10 Guide for Project Management Strategies for Complex Projects (R10) –Expands dimensional project management model –Integrates project teams across entire project lifecycle –Works for projects of all sizes and complexity –Tools: Training program for DOT staff Case studies on various types of projects Forms 19

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Complex Projects – R Dimensional Project Management 3 Dimensional Project Management

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Complex Projects – R10 21 Complexity Mapping

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Complex Projects – R10 22 Critical Success Factors

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Complex Projects – R10 23

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Managing Complex Projects – R10 Benefits: First stop for project management guidance Earlier consideration of all aspects of planning complex projects Earlier identification of critical success factors Easy to use step-by-step process Reduces uncertainties Project plan for success 24

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Practical Solutions to Rapidly Reconstruct our Aging Highways Renewal Focus Area – Product Implementation 25 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Next Generation Management Suite – Implementation Strategies Strategies to promote use of both tools: Train DOT staff on processes and how to conduct workshops Conduct demonstration workshops that apply processes on DOT projects Create cadre of expert trainers/facilitators Host peer-to-peer exchanges Identify best practices from first users Incorporate processes into FHWA procedures 26

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Next Generation Management Suite – Solicitation 27 First Round - Feb 2013Proof of Concept Pilot Lead Adopter Incentive User Incentive R09 – Managing Risk200 Pilots will evaluate and validate R09 by applying process to DOT project DOT will provide feedback on process and benefits of product No implementation assistance funding Participation will not preclude DOT from future Lead Adopter or User Incentive opportunities for the product

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Next Generation Management Suite – Solicitation 28 First Round - Feb 2013 Proof of Concept Pilot Lead Adopter Incentive User Incentive R10 – Complex Projects040 Implementation assistance includes training courses, demonstration workshops, peer-to-peer exchanges, and technical assistance DOT will become champion for product implementation in other states Implementation assistance funding: $100,000

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Next Generation Management Suite Final reports available in 2013 For more information: 29 LaToya Jim Keith James Jerry

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Practical Solutions to Rapidly Reconstruct our Aging Highways Renewal Focus Area – Technical Product Description Bridge Designs and Construction 30

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Innovative Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal – R04 Challenge Thousands of bridges need to be replaced. Increased traffic demands and work-zone safety concerns call for rapid approaches for bridge replacement. Solution Design toolkit for rapid bridge construction including standard plans and details for foundation systems, sub/superstructure systems, subsystems, and components. 31

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Innovative Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal – R04 SHRP2’s solution provides: Sample design concepts Small-to-medium sized bridges No special cranes or equipment needed Concepts includes: –Sample design plans and details –Design examples –Design specifications –Construction specifications 32 Bridge installation over Keg Creek, Iowa.

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Innovative Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal – R04 - Benefits Allows standardization of design sections Can be built by any bridge contractor No special equipment needed Decks Superstructure Wingwalls Columns Footings Decks Superstructure Wingwalls Columns Footings Increases competition Enables use of local contractors Increases competition Enables use of local contractors No SPMTs No large gantry cranes No specialized contractors needed Onsite fabrication of bridge elements No SPMTs No large gantry cranes No specialized contractors needed Onsite fabrication of bridge elements 33

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Deck Bulb Tees Double Tees Modular Decked Beams 2 Lane bridge with shoulders shown – customize width for site Prefabricated Decked Beam Elements – R04 34

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Prefabricated Substructure Elements – R04 ABUTMENTS & WINGWALLS –Semi Integral Abutments –Integral Abutments –In-line or U type Wingwalls –Supported on Piles or Spread Footings PIERS –Precast Conventional Pier –Precast Straddle Bent –Drilled Shaft and Spread Footing Options 35

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Connections for Prefabricated Elements – R04 Rapid-set concrete options for longitudinal & transverse joints between superstructure modules Grouted splice couplers in piers replace the typical lap splice Self Consolidating Concrete (SCC) pile connections and abutment to wingwall connections Grouted cap pockets / grouted ducts for substructure connections (seismic) 36

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Erection Concepts for Bridge Replacement Using Cranes - R04 Short single span over a stream Cranes selected for 90 kips Longer spans over a roadway Weight up to 200 kips 37

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Above Deck Erection Systems – R04 Allows fast rate of erection Rides on existing bridge, new bridge Sites with limited ground access or long spans 38

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Sample Design Calculations - R04 Three design examples for prefabricated systems Modular Decked Beams Decked Precast Prestressed Girder Precast Pier Stages for design are demonstrated Prefabrication Stage (many support options) Erection Stage (many lift options) Final Stage (modules are assembled on site) 39

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Recommended Special Requirements for ABC construction Focus heavily on means and methods requirements for rapid construction. Proposed Section in LRFD Construction Specifications Sample Construction Specifications – R04 XX.1 GENERAL XX.2 RESPONSIBILITIES XX.3 MATERIALS XX.4 FABRICATION XX.5 SUBMITTALS XX.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE XX.7 HANDLING, STORING, AND TRANSPORTATION XX.8 GEOMETRY CONTROL XX.9 CONNECTIONS XX.10 ERECTION METHODS XX.11 ERECTION PROCEDURES 40

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Practical Solutions to Rapidly Reconstruct our Aging Highways Renewal Focus Area – Product Implementation Innovative Bridge Designs 41

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal – Implementation Strategies – R04 42 Implementation Workshop –Potential Users –Benefits of the Products –Strategies for Implementation Implementation Plan Developed Tactical Plan Now Under Development

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal – Implementation Strategies – R04 Implementation Goals –Goal 1: Demonstration Projects –Goal 2: Widespread Awareness –Goal 3: Training and Support 43

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Initial Solicitation – R04 No proof of concept pilots –Piloting done prior to implementation 7 Lead Adopter Incentives up to $500,000 each –Prefabrication is an appropriate construction method –Repeatable techniques and design elements –Project will not require any special equipment First Round Products February 2013 Proof of Concept Pilot Lead Adopter Incentive User Incentive R04 – Bridge070 44

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Innovative Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal – R04 Final report: Video of Keg Creek bridge replacement project: HRP2/Pages/ABC_for_Everyday_Bridges_618.aspx HRP2/Pages/ABC_for_Everyday_Bridges_618.aspx For more information: 45 Shay Kelley Jerry

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Practical Solutions to Rapidly Reconstruct our Aging Highways Renewal Focus Area – Technical Product Description Preservation 46

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 Challenge Limited documentation exists about the durability and performance of many pavement preservation techniques on high-traffic volume roads. As a result, techniques have primarily only been applied to low-volume roads. Solution Test and document the performance of standard preservation techniques on heavily-traveled roads, and create a guide for matching techniques with road conditions. 47

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 SHRP2’s solution (R26) provides: Step-by-step process to identify the best repair techniques based on specific pavement needs and conditions Method for weighing various technical inputs and selecting the most appropriate treatments Decision matrices Summaries of treatment options and examples Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 48

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 - Decision Process Evaluate Current and Historical Pavement Performance Data (from field surveys and testing and/or agency PMS database)  Overall Condition Indicator (PCI, PSR, etc.)  Individual Distress Types, Severities, and Extents  Smoothness (IRI, PI, etc.)  Surface and Subsurface Drainage Characteristics  Safety Characteristics  friction/texture (FN, MPD/MTD, IFI, etc.)  crashes  Pavement–Tire Noise Develop Preliminary Set of Feasible Preservation Treatments Review Historical Design, Construction, and Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) Data  Pavement Type and Cross- Sectional Design  Materials and As-Built Construction  M&R Treatments (materials, thicknesses, etc.) Decision 49

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Assess Specific Needs and Constraints of Project Performance Needs  Treatment Life  traffic effects (functional class and/or traffic level)  climate/environment effects  Risk  Availability of qualified contractors  Availability of quality materials Construction Constraints  Funding  Time (of year) of construction  Geometrics  Work duration (facility downtime)  Traffic accommodation Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 - Decision Process Develop Preliminary Set of Feasible Preservation Treatments Select the Preferred Preservation Treatment  Conduct Cost-Effectiveness Analysis  Benefit-Cost Analysis  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)  Evaluate Economic and Non-Economic Factors Develop Final Set of Feasible Preservation Treatments 50

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 Example Application Rural HMA roadway –4-lane interstate, 8 miles long –Deep-freeze climate, flat to mildly rolling terrain –ADT=14,000, 11% trucks –Treatment performance goal: ≥ 4 yrs –Existing structure (built in 2001) 8.5 inches HMA, 8 inches aggregate base, lime- treated subgrade Past condition surveys and tests indicate: 51

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 – Example Application, cont’d. Existing Pavement Condition Parameters Condition Survey Year Smoothness Testing Year Friction Testing Year PCR Raveling, LS (% area) Raveling, MS (% area) Segregation, LS (% area)0.0 Segregation, MS (% area)0.0 Trans Thermal Cracking, LS (cracks/mi) Trans Thermal Cracking, MS (cracks/mi) Long Cold-Joint Cracking, LS (ft/mi) ,798 Long Cold-Joint Cracking, MS (ft/mi) Stable Rutting, LS (0.125 to in) (ft/mi) ,987 Stable Rutting, MS (0.5 to 1.0 in) (ft/mi)01511,268 Fatigue Cracking, LS (% wheelpath area) IRI (Average ± Std Dev) (in/mi)88.5± ±10.3 FN40S (Average ± Std Dev)45.4± ±2.6 Key Deficiencies 52

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 Preliminary Feasibility Several candidate treatments for addressing INDIVIDUAL key deficiencies Four candidate treatments for addressing ALL key deficiencies –Double microsurfacing –Single-course conventional chip seal –Ultrathin HMA overlay –Thin HMA overlay 53

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 Selecting Preferred Alternative Three Feasible Alternatives: –Double microsurfacing –Single-course conventional chip seal –Thin HMA overlay Final Selection should consider:  Economic analysis  Materials and contractors  Customer satisfaction  Sustainability  Other factors 54

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Practical Solutions to Rapidly Reconstruct our Aging Highways Renewal Focus Area – Product Implementation Preservation 55

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Pavement Preservation Guide – R26 – Benefits Smarter selection of pavement options for high-traffic volume roadways Save DOTs money by reducing the frequency of major pavement reconstruction and extending asset service life Reduce risk through better technique selection process Support shorter-duration maintenance and rehabilitation, thus reducing worker exposure 56

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Communicate value of guidelines to all states and a representative number of local governments Provide technical assistance to early implementers Develop a technical support toolkit Host product demonstrations and peer exchanges Conduct training Pavement Preservation Guide – R26 – Implementation Strategies 57

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Pavement Preservation Guide – R26 – Implementation Strategies 58 First Round - Feb 2013 Proof of Concept Pilot Lead Adopter Incentive User Incentive R26 – Preservation Projects010 Implementation assistance includes training courses, demonstration workshops, peer-to-peer exchanges, and technical assistance DOT will construct 1-4 projects using technology Implementation assistance funding: $30-40K per project

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Pavement Preservation Guide – R26 – Participation Opportunities 59 1.Lead Adopter States Experienced with some Preservation Activities Have capacity to construct pilot projects Interest in preserving High-Traffic-Volume Roadways Willing to be champion for program Program will provide: Technical Assistance Financial Incentives for several projects Documentation of Processes and Case Studies Participation in Peer Exchanges with other States Opportunities for sharing experiences

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February User Incentive States Have capacity to construct projects Interest in preserving High-Traffic-Volume Roadway Program will provide: Technical Assistance Financial Incentives Documentation of Processes and Case Studies Participation in Peer Exchanges Pavement Preservation Guide – R26 – Participation Opportunities 60

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February Summarize State Experiences 2.Training Course / Webinars / Outreach 3.Marketing Program 4.Refining Selecting and Design Tools 5.Evaluating Future Needs R26 Team will: Preservation for High Volume Roadways – Other Activities 61

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Preservation for High Volume Roadways – R26 Final report: For more information: 62 Thomas Keith James

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Renewal Product Timeline Looking ahead: Performance Specs for Rapid Construction (R07)2013 Identifying and Managing Utility Conflicts (R15B)2013 Railroad-DOT Institutional Mitigation Strategies (R16)2013 Long-Life Pavements (R23) 2013 Web Tool for Nondestructive Testing (R06)

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Implementation Timeline Solicitation opens: Mid-February Solicitation closes: Mid-March First awards: Mid-April 64

SHRP2 Renewal Implementation | February 2013 Questions? 65 SHRP2 Research: SHRP2 at AASHTO: