Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data Peter Stopher, Jun Zhang and Eoin Clifford Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TURKEY AWOS TRAINING 1.0 / ALANYA 2005 TRAINING COURSE ON AUTOMATED WEATHER OBSERVING SYSTEMS ( AWOS ) MODULE C.2: COMMUNICATION SONER KARATAŞ ELECTRONIC.
Advertisements

GPS and Multi-Week Data Collection of Activity-Travel Patterns Harry Timmermans Eindhoven University of Technology 4/19/2015.
Regional Bicycle Demand Model: In Use Today in Portland Bill Stein, Metro TRB Transportation Applications Conference Reno, Nevada – May 9, 2011.
Smith Myung, Cambridge Systematics Sean McAtee, Cambridge Systematics Cambridge Systematics.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
Lec 7. Ch.3P3 Characteristics of urban travel Trip types (purposes) Three approaches for modeling trips Travel behaviors of men and women Trip purpose/temporal,
Trip Generation Modeling
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Trip Reconstruction Tool for GPS- Based Personal Travel Surveys Eui-Hwan Chung.
Conversion of Volunteer-Collected GPS Diary Data into Travel Time Performance Measures Research Project Conducted for PC : Terry Keener PD : Michael.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Development of a Tour-Based Truck Travel Demand Model using.
GIS Techniques and Algorithms to Automate the Processing of GPS- Derived Travel Survey Data Praprut Songchitruksa, Ph.D., P.E. Mark Ojah Texas A&M Transportation.
Office of Highway Safety Bridge Load Rating Dan Walsh.
COMMUTE Atlanta A Comparison of Geocoding Methodologies for Transportation Planning Applications Jennifer Indech Nelson Dr. Randall Guensler Dr. Hainan.
2010 Travel Behavior Inventory Mn/DOT TDMCC- Jonathan Ehrlich October 14, 2010.
KY Module 3: Geocoding and GPS. What is the single hardest information to get from a travel survey? Location, location, location What is the address of.
Workshop B4. The Collection and Processing of Survey Data Using Mobile Technologies.
Lecture 2 TCP/IP Protocol Suite Reference: TCP/IP Protocol Suite, 4 th Edition (chapter 2) 1.
Chapter 15 Travel Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only.© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Objectives List the two major segments of the.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Evaluating GPS Technology Used for Household Surveys Kathy Yu, Arash Mirzaei, Behruz Paschai North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) 15 th.
Rochdale Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 998 – GMATS Rochdale Key Centre report Whereas report.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
Wen He Tsinhua University, Beijing, China and Xi'an Communication Institute, Xi'an, China Deyi Li Tsinhua University, Beijing, China and Chinese.
PRESENTATION OF IRP BALLOTS 2008 IFTA / IRP Audit Workshop.
MOBILE APPS FOR MODERN COMMUTING Tim Kitchell Marketing & Education Specialist 36 Commuting Solutions February 22, 2012.
Travel Speed Study of Urban Streets Using GPS &GIS Tom E. Sellsted City of Yakima, Washington Information Systems and Traffic.
USING SENSECAM TO PURSUE “GROUND TRUTH” FOR GPS TRAVEL SURVEY Ohio, May th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Li Shen and Peter.
On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP
Wigan Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1001 – GMATS Wigan Key Centre report Whereas report.
GPS Leader™ In-vehicle Data Collection Ben Pierce By.
Using an Odometer and a GPS Panel to Evaluate Travel Behaviour Changes Peter Stopher and Natalie Swann Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The.
Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. Second Day Response Rates: Implications for CMAP’s Travel Tracker Survey 13th TRB.
Tameside Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 999 – GMATS Tameside Key Centre report Whereas report.
Alabama Driver Manual Chapter 2 You May Lose Your LIcense.
Stockport Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 947 – GMATS Stockport Key Centre report Whereas.
Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.
Trafford Park Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 995 – GMATS Trafford Park report Whereas report 995 presents.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
Joint Development of Land Use and Light Rail Stations The Case of Tel Aviv Regional Science Association International -The Israeli Section Daniel Shefer,
Oldham Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 997 – GMATS Oldham Key Centre report Whereas report.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
Higher Education Precinct Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1055 – GMATS Higher Education Precinct report.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
An Enhanced Framework for Link and Mode Identifications for GPS-Based Personal Travel Surveys Amy Tsui and Amer Shalaby University of Toronto June 13,
ANALYSIS TOOL TO PROCESS PASSIVELY- COLLECTED GPS DATA FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLE DEMAND MODELLING APPLICATIONS Bryce Sharman & Matthew Roorda University of.
Trafford Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1000 – GMATS Trafford Key Centre report Whereas report.
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
Topics Survey data comparisons to “old” model Bluetooth OD data findings Freight model design Q & A.
Processing GPS Data from Travel Surveys Peter Stopher and Camden FitzGerald Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney Qingjian.
Manchester Regional Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 996 – GMATS Manchester Regional Key Centre.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Address Resolution Protocol Yasir Jan 20 th March 2008 Future Internet.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Third International Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge.
DOiT Dynamic Optimization in Transportation Ragnhild Wahl, SINTEF (Per J. Lillestøl SINTEF)
FACTS -a freight transport survey using GPS Prof. Tony Richardson The Urban Transport Institute Melbourne, Australia.
Applications in Mobile Technology for Travel Data Collection 2012 Border to Border Transportation Conference South Padre Island, Texas November, 13, 2012.
CS408/533 Computer Networks Text: William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, 6th edition Chapter 1 - Introduction.
Mathematical Modelling of Pedestrian Route Choices in Urban Areas Using Revealed Preference GPS Data Eka Hintaran ATKINS European Transport Conference.
Crowd Density Estimation for Public Transport Vehicles
Routing and Logistics with TransCAD
TransCAD Vehicle Routing 2018/11/29.
Geocoding of 2007 WMATA Rail Survey
Presentation transcript:

Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data Peter Stopher, Jun Zhang and Eoin Clifford Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney and Camden FitzGerald Parson Brinkerhoff, Sydney April 2007

Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 2 Introduction  Increasing use of and interest in GPS devices to measure travel  Used primarily to validate standard diary surveys  Also used in Australia to evaluate VTBC interventions  Recent developments have produced small and lightweight personal devices that are very sensitive

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 3 Introduction  GPS collects accurate data on:  Location at each instant  Time at each instant  Speed of movement at each instant  Heading  Data quality measures  Data can be collected as often as every second or as long as desired

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 4 Introduction  For transport planning applications:  Logging devices are all that is required  Transmission in real time is not advantageous and may be expensive  4-8 Mb of on-board memory will collect second-by-second data for 1-3 months

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 5 Introduction  To substitute for conventional surveys, additional data are needed:  Mode of travel  Purpose of travel  GPS cannot collect these  With certain supplemental data, these can be determined

Mode and Purpose Identification

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 7 Supplemental Data Requirements  For mode:  GIS of the street network  GIS of all public transport routes (including rail and subway lines)  For purpose:  Locations used frequently by household members  A GIS of the land use at the parcel level

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 8 Frequently Visited Locations  Our surveys collect:  Address of each workplace for each household member  Address of each educational establishment attended by a household member  Two most frequently-used grocery stores  Home address is known already  These locations are all then geocoded

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 9 Preliminary Steps  Assumes that the data have been subdivided into trips  We define a trip end as occurring whenever the device is stationary for more than 120 seconds  Visual inspection is also used to cross-check and correct some trip ends  About 5 percent of identified trip ends are just traffic stops  About 5 percent of actual trip ends are shorter than 120 seconds and not identified by software

Mode Identification

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 11 Mode Identification  Proceeds in a hierarchical process:  Identify walk trips first – based on maximum speed  Identify rail, ferry, and other off-network modes next – determined by location of path  Identify bus trips next – based on maximum speed and acceleration and beginning and ending on a bus route

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 12 Mode Identification  Identify bicycle trips next – household must have bicycles available  If bicycle is available:  Check maximum speed and acceleration  Check that trip origin is home or is a location to which bicycle has already been used  If all of these are acceptable, then trip is allocated to bicycle

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 13 Mode Identification  Remaining trips should be car  Check maximum speed and acceleration  Check that travel remains on the roadway network  If these check out, then trip is car, probably driver  Check to see if origin is home or car was used previously to reach the origin  If not, and car is still identified, classify as car passenger

Trip Purpose

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 15 Trip Purpose  Examine trip end locations and check against frequently-used locations  Following purposes should be evident:  Home-based work  Home-based school  Some home-based shop  Non-home-based work  Non-home-based school  Non-home-based shop (some)

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 16 Trip Purpose Trip List (n) End Points (n+1) Private Level Home Address Work Address Education Address Shopping Address … Public Level Shopping Centre Education Institutes Commercial Places Residence Area … Link Match (Geocoded) To Private Level Destination Link Match (Geocoded) To Public Level Destinations (>1) To Public Level Destination (Best) FAIL Trip Purpose Explanation * search radius: 200 meters

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 17 Trip Purpose  30 percent of trips are usually home- based work/school  13 percent of trips are home-based shop  About 5-10 percent of trips are non- home-based work, school or shop  About 70 percent of trips are home- based  This process identifies about 50 percent of trip purposes completely  About 35 percent will have either origin or destination purpose identified

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 18 Trip Purpose  Remaining trips are examined with respect to:  Duration of stop  Frequency of visits in GPS period  Nature of land use at the trip ends  These provide further identification of about percent of other trip end purposes

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 19 Trip Purpose  Problems are:  Multi-use parcels  Shopping centres – people may  Use personal services  Eat a meal  Shop  Visit medical facilities  If the purposes are to be split to HBW, HBSchool, HBOther, and NHB – no problem

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 20 Example  The following slides provide an example of the processing steps  GPS data are collected by having respondents carry GPS devices with them for a period of time  Devices are retruned to us and the data are downloaded

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 21 Data File from GPS Device  Data are stored as binary in the device  Data are downloaded and converted to.csv file using software  Information is stored with filename which includes deployment information  Gives us information on position, time, heading, speed etc for each data point V,07/03/2006,12:58:49, , ,500,78,3,3,8.3 V,07/03/2006,12:58:51, , ,500,77,3,3,8.3 V,07/03/2006,12:58:53, , ,500,65,2,3,8.3 V,07/03/2006,12:58:55, , ,500,66,3,3,8.3 V,07/03/2006,12:58:57, , ,500,68,2,3,8.3 A,07/03/2006,12:59:00, , ,500,26,8,4,11.6 A,07/03/2006,12:59:02, , ,500,34,3,4,11.6 A,07/03/2006,12:59:04, , ,500,53,3,4,11.6 A,07/03/2006,12:59:06, , ,500,53,3,4,11.5 A,07/03/2006,12:59:08, , ,500,28,4,4,11.5 A,07/03/2006,12:59:11, , ,500,30,2,4,11.5 A,07/03/2006,12:59:14, , ,500,38,2,4,11.4 A,07/03/2006,12:59:16, , ,500,56,4,4,11.4 A,07/03/2006,12:59:18, , ,499,63,4,4,11.4 A,07/03/2006,12:59:20, , ,499,72,3,4,11.4 A,07/03/2006,12:59:22, , ,499,77,4,4,11.3 A,07/03/2006,12:59:25, , ,498,82,2,4,11.3 A,07/03/2006,12:59:30, , ,498,84,2,4,11.3 A,07/03/2006,12:59:32, , ,497,86,2,4,11.2 A,07/03/2006,12:59:34, , ,497,89,2,4,11.2 A,07/03/2006,12:59:37, , ,496,93,2,4,11.2 A,07/03/2006,12:59:39, , ,496,75,3,4,11.1 A,07/03/2006,12:59:41, , ,495,73,3,4,11.1 A,07/03/2006,12:59:45, , ,494,76,2,4,11.1 A,07/03/2006,12:59:54, , ,492,95,2,4,11.0 A,07/03/2006,12:59:57, , ,491,107,2,4,11.0 A,07/03/2006,12:59:59, , ,491,110,2,4,10.9 A,07/03/2006,13:00:01, , ,490,109,2,4,10.9

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 22 GPS Data Processing Procedure Pre-processingTrip IdentificationMode DetectionPurpose Detection GPS Data Base Map Trip Identification Trip Validation Trip Manual Checking General Mode Detect Public Mode Detect Public Transport Network Household Addresses List Public Places List Position Matching & Purpose Detect Convert Format GPS Record Validation Trip List Trip MapFinal Trip List Deployment Information

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 23 Data Prior to Editing

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 24 Post Editing

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 25 With Mode Added

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 26 With Purpose Added

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 27 Conclusions  Both mode and purpose can be identified from GPS records  Requires supplemental data such as GIS layers  Requires supplemental questions on:  Bicycle availability  Addresses of frequently-used locations  All other information is available from the GPS record

April 2007Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data -- Case Studies 28 Questions ? Please use the Microphone.