Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Advertisements

Site-Based Decision Making and Planning. (TEC , ) Committee Members: Provide assistance to the superintendent or campus principal in the development,
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Campus Improvement Plans
Educational Services and Choices: Information for Parents Florida PIRC at USF (Parental Information and Resource Center)
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
State Board of Education: Online Learning Presented by Jan McComb, Board Staff.
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
Margaretville Central Superintendent’s Goals.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
School Board’s Role in Special Education Vermont School Boards Association.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Compliance Considerations Keeping Up in an Age of Accountability Presented by Jean E. Taraskiewicz.
Ivy Academy Appeal Hearing. Introduction Brief Procedural Background Comment on Evaluation Process Essence of Ivy Academy Standard for Review Evidence.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Cindy Hunt, Government and Legal Affairs Manager Oregon Department of Education.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
Effective Family and Community Connections: Challenges at the Middle/High School Level Opening the Next Level of Involvement Southwest Educational Development.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
ELISE PAGE EDAD 689 What Every Principal Should Know About Charter Schools.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Presented by: Office of Independent Education and Parental Choice July 2012.
Supplemental Education Service Providers Becoming a Supplemental Education Service Provider.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Accountability and Data-Driven Decision Making The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 8 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom.
MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM CHARTER SYSTEM PETITION PUBLIC HEARINGS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 5:00 PM TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 6:00 PM PROFESSIONAL.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Update on Charter Schools. What is the SBE’s role for charter schools? Washington State Board of Education Approve or deny applications by school districts.
OREGON CHARTER SCHOOLS 2012 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION RETREAT Oregon Department of Education Office of Educational Improvement & Innovation Charter Schools.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
FACSA Performance Management for Florida Authorizers St. Petersburg, Florida June 16, 17 and 18, 2009.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
INNOVATION ZONES NOVEMBER 10, WHAT ARE INNOVATION ZONES? A designation by the West Virginia Board of Education that provides schools with the support.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
Oregon Public Charter School Program Accountability Oregon Department of Education August 4, 2004.
What is a Performance Audit or Performance Auditing?
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
SPED 494/594 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
The final chapter.  An improved WA model ◦ Incorporates key features of “White Paper”  Quality  Sending District Accountability  Choice  Accountability.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING GLENN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 7, 2015 School System Flexibility Options.
Opening a Quality Charter School in the Los Angeles Unified School District Charter Schools Division February 27, 2008.
Texas Title I Priority Schools (TTIPS) Grant Cycle 3 Grant Overview & Applicant Conference 1 © Texas Education Agency, 2014.
1 © 2016 Dannis Woliver Kelley SAN FRANCISCO | LONG BEACH | SAN DIEGO | NOVATO | CHICO | SACRAMENTO | SAN LUIS OBISPO This.
Hillsborough County Charter Schools
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
School Boards.
CHARTER SCHOOLS: THE TOP 5 ISSUES
Roles and Responsibilities
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Roles and Responsibilities
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007

Presentation will include: Brief overview of Oregon Charter Schools State Board Sponsored Charter Schools When online instruction and charter schools collide Definition of issues and policy discussion

Charter Schools - National Overview 41 States with charter school laws State charter school laws vary widely Federal support Large Federal Charter School Grant Program Increasing degree of accountability and regulatory oversight

Statewide Charter School Context 80 schools in operation Approximately 10,000 students Variety of special focus and grade configurations Two SBE sponsored charter schools

Charter Schools – Intent of Law To take “responsible risks to create new, innovative and flexible ways of educating children within the public school system.” “To serve as models and catalysts for the improvement of other public schools.”

Charter Schools – Intent of Law Increase student learning and achievement; Increase choices of learning opportunities for students; Better meet individual student academic needs and interests; Build stronger working relationships among educators, parents and other community members; Encourage the use of different and innovative learning methods; Provide opportunities in small learning environments for flexibility and innovation, which may be applied, if proven effective, to other public schools; Create new professional opportunities for teachers; Establish additional forms of accountability for schools; and Create innovative measurement tools.

Public charter schools/traditional public schools Similar Open to all students Non-selective Certain laws must be followed (Civil rights, IDEA, due process, open meetings, etc.) Per pupil funding formula Different Created by application/proposal Schools of choice (staff and students) Operates pursuant to performance agreement (charter) Evaluated on outcomes written in charter

Accountability External AYP School Report Card Annual Reports and Audits Charter School Evaluation Annual Grant Performance Report Internal Schools of choice-Must deliver product and be true to mission statement Charter School Board of Directors and broader community

Charter Schools ODE Perspective Charter School Law is working Districts, working with community members, are using charter schools as one strategy for providing school choice Tension between highly flexible and autonomous charter school law and more rigid NCLB Value of rigorous evaluation process

Issues and Challenges Roles and responsibilities of sponsors (within the context of diminishing resources) Definition of “value” in relationship to “adverse impact” Readiness of charter school operators Facilities and Funding State Board Sponsorship

SBE Sponsorship Necessary to qualify for Public Charter School Grant Allows for quality educational opportunities to exist Perceived challenge to local district’s decision to deny The optimal relationship is for a charter school to be sponsored by district in which they are located SBE/ODE is not set up to perform role of charter school sponsor State School Funding Accountability Staffing

State Board Sponsorship Appeal Process Procedural or Substantive review? Set criteria, based on ORS and 055 Substantive review of application Same application as reviewed by local district Recommendation to Superintendent to sponsor or deny Recommendation by Superintendent to SBE-First Read Action Taken at next SBE meeting Policy/procedural question Continue with substantive review? At what point, if any, should the applicants and the local school district address the SBE?

Online Instruction Different types (district/ESD/Oregon Virtual School District) Based on fee per course All teachers licensed and highly qualified Resident district must approve Online Charter Schools Must provide comprehensive educational program Based on % of ADMw All teachers licensed or registered and highly qualified If there is space available, any student in the state may attend Fifty percent in-district requirement Virtual Instruction in Oregon

Virtual Charter Schools The National Context Policies from other states Lessons learned in this fast- changing frontier

Virtual Charter Schools in Oregon- The Current Status Oregon Connections Academy (Scio School District) serves approximately 1500 students residing through out the state. ORCA is operating outside of the requirement that at least 50% of charter school enrollment reside in the sponsoring district (until 2010). Several other virtual education providers are interested in contracting with public charter schools in Oregon. State Board may waive this requirement.

Broad Policy Considerations for Oregon What role does the State Board play in the approval and oversight of virtual charter school? Case-by-case waivers Statewide charter=state approval and sponsorship

Board Policy Considerations Should online schools be funded at the same level as bricks-and-mortar school? To what degree should there be financial ‘transparency’ and accountability between the charter school and the for-profit that is providing the educational services?

Board Policy Considerations Should sending districts have any control over whether its students can leave the district to attend a virtual charter school ? Is there adequate transparency if an online charter school board contracts with a private entity, one that is not subject to public record laws?