SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Department of Farm Power & Machinery Submission of initial Draft of Self Assessment Report Initial Draft of Self Assessment Report was returned.
Advertisements

By, Huda Fatima College of Computer Science & Information Systems Quality Assurance Unit Academic Campus for Girls.
ABET PRIMER What is ABET, What Does ABET Do, How Do We Do Well With ABET.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
College Strategic Plan by
SEQUENCE OF MEETING  Welcome Note by the Rector  Confirmation of Minutes of 1st Meeting  Progress on Agenda Items of 1st Meeting  Discussion on Fresh.
University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi.
Program Assessment Team Visit Exit Meeting. Mechanical Engineering Program.
University of Health Sciences, Lahore 2nd Meeting of Phase-III QECs [Reporting Period: July – Nov 2010 Presented By: Prof. Dr. Arif Rashid Khawaja FRCS(Ed),
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 12 th Meeting of QECs Heads By Dawar Hameed Mughal Deputy Director QEC
17 th Meeting of QECs Heads Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director QEC.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION
وحدة الاعتماد الأكاديمي 8/16/2015. ACCREDITATION Dr. ABD EL-SLAM HEMAID BADR A.A.U. DIRECTOR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING JAZAN UNIVERSITY 8/16/2015.
QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL University of the Punjab,
Quality Assurance Programme Higher Education Commission, Islamabad (Prof. Dr. Riaz Hussain Qureshi)
Enhancing the Quality of Education through Self Assessment Procedures
QEC initiates SA through the dean one semester prior to the assessment Department forms the PT that will be responsible for preparing SAR QEC reviews.
TEQIP Phase II Seventh Review Meeting Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology Kottayam Presented By Dr. K. P. Indiradevi Principal.
Impact of QEC on Higher Educational Institutions
SEQUENCE OF MEETING  Welcome Note by the Rector  Confirmation of Minutes of 1st Meeting  Progress on Agenda Items of 1st Meeting  Discussion on Fresh.
1 st Phase Model Department Institute of Food Sciences & Technology.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Institutional Performance Evaluation (IPE) Prof. Dr. Farman Ullah Quality Enhancement Cell.
SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student.
QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL University of the Punjab Current Location: Institute of Quality & Technology Management.
DIMENSIONS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND CHALLENGES OF FUTURE.
A Landmark Initiative of Higher Education Commission (HEC) for Quality Assurance in Teaching and Research at Higher Degree Level Quality Enhancement Cell.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
SELF ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE PROF. DR. AAMIR IJAZ DIRECTOR QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore
1 Department of Information Technology Centre Submission of initial Draft of Self Assessment Report Initial Draft of Self Assessment Report.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
Copyright © 2008 by ABET, Inc. 1 Conducting a Visit Using the New Criteria Conducting a Visit Using the New Criteria 1.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday Sep 26,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.7 How to write the Self-Study Report ? Presented by: JIC ABET COMMITTEE.
1 Department of Animal Product Technologies Submission of initial Draft of Self Assessment Report Initial Draft of Self Assessment Report was.
1 Department of Veterinary Parasitology Submission of initial Draft of Self Assessment Report Initial Draft of Self Assessment Report was returned.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
2 LATEST STATUS OF FACULTY OF ISLAMIC STUDIES DepartmentProgram TeamsSAR Received Sent Back For Changes SAR Received After Improvement Audit Completed.
1 Department of Entomology Submission of initial Draft of Self Assessment Report Initial Draft of Self Assessment Report was returned back by.
1 Department of Soil Science Submission of initial Draft of Self Assessment Report Initial Draft of Self Assessment Report was returned back.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Presentation to the SLIS Community on Accreditation Planning Dr. Kimberly B. Kelley Dean, SLIS February 11, 2008.
RESEARCH TEAM Dr. S. Shabib ul Hasan, Lead Researcher Dr. Muhammad Bux Burdey,Member Mr. Shahid Zaheer Zaidi, Member Ms. Afsheen Nizam, Member RESEARCH.
" NCAAA ACTIVITY" PRESENT STATUS & FUTURE PLAN
Infinity-project.org The Caruth Institute for Engineering Education Engineering Education for today’s classroom. Quality Improvement Plan for the BSc Programme.
ABET ACCRIDITATION STATUS AND TASKS AHEAD By Dr. Abdul Azeem.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
1 Department of Plant Protection Submission of initial Draft of Self Assessment Report Initial Draft of Self Assessment Report was returned.
Presenter Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, University of the Punjab, Lahore,
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Department of Statistics
by Salih O. Duffuaa Professor of Systems Engineering KFUPM
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Fort Valley State University
Undergraduate Research and Mentoring Education at Queens College
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student Support and Guidance 5.Faculty 6.Process Control 7.Institutional Facilities 8.Institutional Support

Criterion-3: Laboratories & Computing Facilities Intent: Laboratories and computing facilities must be adequately available and accessible to faculty members and students to support teaching and research activities. In addition departments may benchmark with similar departments in reputable institutions to identify their shortcomings if any. Criterion-4: Student Support & Advising Intent: Student must have an adequate support to complete the program in a timely manner and must have ample opportunity to interact with their instructors and receive timely advice about program requirements and career alternatives.

Criterion-5: Process Control Intent: The processes by which major functions are delivered must be in place, controlled, periodically reviewed and continuously improved. To meet this criterion a set of standards must be satisfied. Criterion-6: Faculty Intent: Faculty members must be current and active in their discipline and have the necessary technical depth and breadth to support the program. There must be enough faculty members to provide continuity and stability, to cover the curriculum adequately and effectively, and to allow for scholarly activities.

Criterion-7: Institutional Facilities Intent: Institutional facilities, including library, computing facilities, classrooms and offices must be adequate to support the objective of the program. Criterion-8: Institutional Support Intent: The institution’s support and the financial resources for the program must be sufficient to provide an environment in which the program can achieve its objectives and retain its strength.

6 Latest Status of Faculty of Economics & Management Sciences DepartmentProgram TeamsSAR received Sent back for changes SAR received after improvement Audit completed Executive Summary Implementa tion Plan Department of Economics √ Prof. Dr. Khuda Dad Dr. Hafiz Khalil Ahmad xxxxxx Department of Library & Information Sciences √ Prof. Dr. Kanwal Amin Dr. Nousheen Fatima Warriach Ms. Syeda Hina Batool √√√√√√ Institute of Administrative Sciences √ Ms. Ayesha Hanif Ms. Saba Yaseen Mr. Ali Rehman √√√√√√ Institute of Business Administration √ Prof. Dr. M. Ehsan Malik Ms. Saba Latif xxxxxx Institute of Business & Information Technology √ Mr. Mansoor Mahmood Ashiq Mr. Asim Tanveer √√xxxx

SURVEY FORMS Teacher & Course Evaluation Form Proforma - 1 Student Course Evaluation Questionnaire Proforma - 2 Faculty Course Review Report Proforma - 3 Survey of Graduating Students Proforma - 4 Research Student Progress Review Form Proforma - 5 Faculty Survey Proforma - 6 Survey of Department Offering Ph.D. Programs Proforma - 7 Alumni Survey Proforma - 8 Employer Survey Proforma - 9 Faculty Resume Proforma - 10 Teacher Evaluation Form Teaching / Learning Process Survey Form

REVIEW Meeting for Expediting Self Assessment Activities of Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences held on (Tuesday) in the committee room of Dean Faculty of Economics & Management Sciences, University of the Punjab. PROGRESS: Follow up with the Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences for the submission of their SARs is done but overall response rate is very slow.

LATEST STAUTS OF QEC Program Teams for most of the departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been formed. Self Assessment Reports of 38 departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been received and reviewed by QEC according to Self Assessment Manual (SAM). At the same time, executive summaries & implementation plans of 19 audited departments/ institutes/ colleges/ centers have been sent to the respective departments, HEC and Worthy Vice Chancellor of the University for further necessary action to enhance the quality of education.

TEACHERS & COURSES EVALUATION In order to enhance the quality of education, QEC has already circulated newly developed survey forms related to the teachers and courses evaluation. HODs will interact & coordinate with QEC staff to conduct survey at the end of each semester and also bring any change if required.

FUTURE PLAN To motivate the program team members for the implementation of Self Assessment Manual (SAM) by carrying out the meetings at departmental level. It may also include the visits of individual departments by QEC team if found necessary. Follow up of changes suggested by QEC with departments who have sent their SARs is also underway. Follow up for the submission of SARs has already done and will continue as well. Follow up of the Teachers and Courses Evaluation survey forms is also underway. Implementation plans submitted by different departments will also be followed up.

THANK YOU