Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Health Impact Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Slovenian experience MEASURES TO STRENGHTEN THE CIVIL DIALOGUE AND PARTNERSHIP Irma Mežnarič Brussels - 10 October 2006.
Health impact assessment explained
From Research to Advocacy
Public Health Core Functions
Presentation by Cambodian Participants Phuket, Thailand February 2012 Health Impact Assessment Royal Government of Cambodia.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Small Area Analysis.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using Internet-based Tools to Promote Community Health and Development.
ASSESSMENT IN HIAs Elizabeth J. Fuller, DrPH, MSPH Georgia Health Policy Center.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the PAHO Guide for Documenting Health Promotion Initiatives.
HEADQUARTERS Strategic Environmental Assessment ”SEA is a systematic process for evaluating the environmental consequences of proposed policy, plan or.
Health Impact Assessment for Healthy Places: A Guide for Planning and Public Health.
The Chaplain as Spiritual Guide in Ethics Consults 2006.
Institutionalizing HIA in Québec: Section 54 of the Public Health Act Dr. Alain Poirier, National Public Health Director and Assistant Deputy Minister.
Community Development Core Competencies for Extension Professionals in the North Central Region.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Health Impact Assessment: Premium Outlet Mall Berkshire Township Susan Sutherland, R.S., MPH Public Health Planner June 17, 2015 Delaware General Health.
Endeavors in Transportation Health Impact Assessment LCDR Joseph Ralph, MPH, CHES Healthy Community Design Initiative June 2015 National Center for Environmental.
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
Just What is a Nutrition Policy? Sample Policies, What to Include and Why You Should Have a Nutrition Policy. Vonda Fekete, M.S., R.D., L.D.N Nutrition.
Analysing News Articles. Questions for Analyzing Social Issues 1. What are the social issues associated with a particular IT development? 2. How did.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Addressing Ethics Conflicts Recognizing and addressing is essential for quality health care Training materials from Rural Health Care Ethics: A Manual.
Introduction to module Ann McNeill
Knowledge on HIA IN CAMBODIA Constructing a Caring and Sharing Community Roles of HIA 4-6 October 2012 Bangkok.
Outcomes of Public Health
Occupational health nursing
Towards the Development of Health Promotion Competencies Laying the Foundation for Discipline-Specific Competency Development Marco Ghassemi, MSc Chronic.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
Health inequalities post 2010 review – implications for action in London London Teaching Public Health Network “Towards a cohesive public health system.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
The basics of health impact assessment (HIA): Part 1 Erica Ison Specialist Practitioner in HIA and HiAP Expert Adviser in HIA, WHO Network of European.
A Comparison of 42 Local, National, and International HIA Guidelines Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH Katherine Hebert, MCRP Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH Sarah.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Granada | 14 April 2011, Department of Ethics, Equity, Trade and Human Rights 1 |1 | The Conceptual Framework for Social Determinants of Health: which.
Semester 2 Situation analysis TESL 3240 Lecture 3.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Refining the Program Intervention Based on Research.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Developing and Using Criteria and Processes to Set Priorities.
Community-based Participatory Action
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
DESIGNING A PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM. By the time you select techniques you should know The target stakeholders What has to be accomplished with them.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Arranging Assessments that Span Jurisdictions.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Fifth Session of the Islamic Conference of Health Ministers Panel Discussion IV: NGO Involvement in the Improvement of Health Services in OIC Member Countries.
PRECEDE/PROCEED.
Program Evaluation Overview. Definitions of Program Evaluation systematic collection of information abut the activities, characteristics, and outcome.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Community-based Participatory Action.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas The Strategic Prevention Framework.
Learning Outcomes Discuss current trends and issues in health care and nursing. Describe the essential elements of quality and safety in nursing and their.
HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT: WHAT WE SHOULD DO IN MEXICO JULIETA PISANTY-LEVY.
1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.
Assessment PS502 Dr. Lenz. When and why assessments are performed Pre-employment screenings Evaluation and placement of children in school programs Determination.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
3-9 June COEX Convention Center, Seoul, Korea Build up a suitable model for health impact assessment on current situation of Vietnam Doan Ngoc Hai,
Health Impact Assessment as a tool to influence public policy and work on inequalities National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy Louise St-Pierre.
Better regulation in the Commission Jonathon Stoodley Head of Unit C.1 Evaluation, Regulatory Fitness and Performance Secretariat General of the European.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
9 th International HIA Conference A framework for public health officials to integrate HIA considerations in municipal project undertakings for the City.
Accreditation Canada Medicine Accreditation 2016.
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
What is PACE EH? PACE EH is a process for assessing and analyzing the environmental health of communities and for creating plans to address threats and.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Health Impact Assessment

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas What is a Health Impact Assessment? A Health Impact Assessment is a combination of procedures, methods, and tools by which a policy, program [a series of projects over time], or project may be judged as to its potential effects on the health of a population, and the distribution of those effects within that population. An HIA is intended not to determine, but to support decision-making. An HIA may be conducted as a desktop, rapid, or comprehensive process. An HIA may be prospective, concurrent, or retrospective. HIA’s guiding values are democracy, equity, sustainability, and the ethical use of evidence. HIA takes a community or broader perspective on health, and considers the social, psychological, economic, environmental, and political determinants of health as important as specific health issues in assessing health impacts.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Why conduct a Health Impact Assessment? HIAs make for better decisions. HIAs promote cross-sectoral cooperation. HIAs raise the profile of health and health issues, and make it more likely that they’ll be considered in all circumstances. HIA champions a participatory approach that values, includes, and empowers the community. HIAs bring the community together. HIAs promote equity. HIAs promote healthy behaviors and practices.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Why conduct a Health Impact Assessment? HIAs can be used in numerous and varied situations. Prospective HIAs provide information before the fact, leaving time to make adjustments in plans. HIAs can promote sustainable development and environmental responsibility. HIAs are adaptable to the needs of many different groups. HIAs can assist policy development. HIAs help EU and some other policy makers address policy making requirements. HIA recognizes that other factors besides health guide decisions. HIA is a proactive process that improves positive outcomes and decreases negative outcomes.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas When should you conduct a Health Impact Assessment? If possible, HIAs should be conducted before the proposed project or policy is fully planned or implemented, so that it can take advantage of the information the HIA provides.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Who should be involved in conducting a Health Impact Assessment? HIAs should involve representatives of all stakeholders. These include: Those who are directly affected by the proposed actions or policies. Those who are involved in carrying out the proposed actions or policies. Nonprofit and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) concerned with the issues and/or the populations affected. Advocacy groups.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Who should be involved in conducting a Health Impact Assessment? The decision-makers themselves. Government agencies that have responsibility for the issues and/or populations in question. Representatives of other sectors that are affected by the proposal. Health workers at local, national or international levels. Employers and unions. The commissioner(s) of the HIA – those who set it in motion (and pay for it, in many cases.) Those who actually conduct the HIA.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas How do you conduct a Health Impact Assessment? Political aspects of conducting an HIA In order for HIA to become common, and particularly for it to be institutionalized, politicians and government agencies have to understand: That health is important enough to be integral to any project or policy that can have an impact on it. That health is not simply an individual issue, but has to be viewed in a larger – community, regional, national, or international – context, depending on the scope of the project or policy proposed.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas How do you conduct a Health Impact Assessment? Political aspects of conducting an HIA That health is more than the alleviation, elimination, or prevention of disease, injury, or medical conditions, but also includes the promotion, psychological implications, and other aspects of health. That the social and other determinants of health are both real and crucially important to creating a healthy community and society. That health transcends any one department or ministry – i.e., that more than public health agencies need to be involved in examining the health impacts of a project or policy, and that interdepartmental and inter-sectoral collaboration is necessary in order to fully understand the health impacts of projects or policies. That they need the best, most accurate, most nearly complete information possible in order to make good decisions that take health impacts into account.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas HIAs won’t happen with any regularity or quality control unless they’re institutionalized by a legal basis of some sort – a law, an agency regulation, a clear policy, permit requirements, etc.. HIAs have to be paid for, either directly by government, or by developers and contractors as part of the permit process. Government agencies have to collaborate for an HIA to be of high quality. Government has to be willing to involve, and listen to (and heed) the concerns and advice of those who will be affected.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Practical aspects of conducting an HIA The first step is to choose people to conduct the HIA. HIA practitioners ideally are trained and experienced, or, at the very least, have the professional, interpersonal, and organizational skills needed to conduct an HIA successfully.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Conducting an HIA HIA consists of five stages: 1. Screening 2. Scoping 3. Assessment 4. Reporting and recommendations 5. Evaluation

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Conducting an HIA 1. Screening is the examination of the project or policy to see if an HIA is needed.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Conducting an HIA 2. Scoping is actually the planning of the HIA – identifying ways in which the decision could affect health, the people who might be affected, how impacts should be assessed, whose expert opinion you need to get the full picture, what resources are needed to conduct the HIA, what kinds of evidence should be gathered, etc.. A general guideline for developing a plan might take these steps: Using logic, prior knowledge, and the concerns of the community, make an educated guess about the possible health impacts of the proposed project or policy. Determine the sectors, populations, groups, and individuals that need to be consulted and/or drawn into the process. Assemble a team from among them, representing all stakeholders, to plan and do the groundwork for the HIA. Become familiar with the current state of the project or policy, possible alternatives to current options, and the decisions that can and/or must be made. Assign responsibilities for all parts of the HIA.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Conducting an HIA 3. P erform the actual assessment. Review existing evidence. Familiarize yourself with the proposed project or policy. Learn what the range of options is. Conduct individual and group interviews, hold meetings, administer surveys, etc., to gather other evidence and obtain community input. Gather or compile statistics and other evidence currently unavailable which is necessary for a full picture of the situation. Gather information available from the various agencies, NGOs, think tanks, businesses, institutions, and other groups whose responsibilities or concerns are directly or indirectly relevant to the HIA or the issue, sector, geographic area, or population potentially affected. Assess the impacts of the proposed project or policy on the health of populations affected. Determine the impacts that come with different options.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Conducting an HIA 4. Compose and deliver an understandable two-part report to all stakeholders and the public, describing the HIA process and conclusions, and making recommendations for maximizing the positive health impacts and minimizing the negative health impacts of the project or policy. 5. Evaluate the HIA’s effectiveness. Continue to use the HIA conclusions and recommendations to guide the implementation of the project or policy, making adjustments and revisions as necessary to reflect changing conditions or new information.