Laura Waugh University of North Texas 16 th International Symposium on ETDs September 25, 2013 Creating Order Out of Chaos: Introducing Name Authority.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IRRA DSpace April 2006 Claire Knowles University of Edinburgh.
Advertisements

The worlds libraries. Connected. VIAF & ISNI Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) & International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) by Titia van der.
ORCID – Institutional Uses Minimizing contributor disambiguation costs Use-case: MIT Libraries support for OA initiative Need to determine Institute scholarly.
LIFECYCLE METADATA FOR DIGITAL OBJECTS Danielle Cunniff Plumer School of Information The University of Texas at Austin Summer 2014.
MARC 21 MAchine Readable Cataloging Laura Hawley and Cara Orban.
RLG Programs Karen Smith-Yoshimura OCLC Research CEAL, Philadelphia 24 March 2010 Cooperative Identities Hub.
Authorities in a connected world Indiana Library Federation 2011 November 16 Thomas Hickey OCLC Chief Scientist.
Administration & Workflow
The world’s libraries. Connected. Single-search access to Tenn-Share library resources through WorldCat Group Catalog September 28, 2012 Suzanne Butte.
How do you squeeze all of a research project into the repository? Michael Wood Institutional Repository Manager ARROW Community Day, Melbourne 27 th September.
ETD’s at the University of Saskatchewan or… David Fox & Darryl Friesen University of Saskatchewan October 4, 2003.
MIT’s DSpace A good fit for ETDs Margret Branschofsky Keith Glavash MIT LIBRARIES.
IMLS Grant: University of Michigan’s Role Kat Hagedorn
Collaborative Information Systems for Student Projects Chapter Extension 2.
Catalog: Batch delete old Patron Records How to conduct global/batch updates to records – patron Adding Faculty and Patron/Student Records Manually Standardizing.
Leveraging Names with Linked Data Karen Smith-Yoshimura Ralph LeVan 2010 RLG Partnership Annual Meeting Chicago, IL 9 June 2010.
Is Cataloging Dead: Advocacy for Bibliographic Control Randy Roeder and Rebecca Routh ILA/ACRL Spring Conference Davenport, Iowa March 3, 2008.
Publishing Digital Content to a LOR Publishing Digital Content to a LOR 1.
Teaching Metadata and Networked Information Organization & Retrieval The UNT SLIS Experience William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences.
ETD Metadata T. Hickey ETD 2006 U.S. Regional University of Missouri-St. Louis 27 October 2006.
5-7 November 2014 DR Workflow Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
Building an Online Academic Profile Laura Waugh & Mark Phillips Toulouse Graduate School Spring Workshop March 6, 2015.
ECHO DEPository Project: Highlight on tools & emerging issues The ECHO DEPository Project is a 3-year digital preservation research and development project.
Dec 9-11, 2003ICADL Challenges in Building Federation Services over Harvested Metadata Hesham Anan, Jianfeng Tang, Kurt Maly, Michael Nelson, Mohammad.
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHITECTS & BUILDERS: A BIOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY Catherine W. Bishir Joseph Ryan Markus Wust June 16, 2009.
ERIC and the WorldCat Registry Lawrence Henry ERIC Program Manager Joanna White WorldCat Registry Product Manager.
University of North Texas Enhancing the Quality of Metadata: Modular Approach to Digital Resource Lifecycle Management Daniel Gelaw Alemneh & Mark E. Phillips.
MAINTAINING QUALITY METADATA: TOWARD EFFECTIVE DIGITAL RESOURCE LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Daniel Gelaw Alemneh University of North Texas.
University of North Texas Libraries Building Search Systems for Digital Library Collections Mark E. Phillips Texas Conference on Digital Libraries May.
Virtual International Authority File – introduction & implications Basil Dewhurst Project Manager, ARDC Party Infrastructure Project | National Library.
VIAF Update T. Hickey, OCLC Chief Scientist Strasbourg
A Future for the Library Catalogue T. Hickey ACRL/DVC Bryn Mawr 3 November 2006.
UNT Scholarly Works Laura Waugh Repository Librarian for Scholarly Works
Beyond EAD: Tools for Creating and Editing EAC-CPF Records and “Remixing” Archival Metadata Remixing Archival Metadata Project (RAMP) editor 9 January.
Archival authority files and the representation of literary networks: first steps and opportunities Cataloguing Creativity, 15/11/2013: Bill Stockting,
The ResearcherID Project James Pringle VP Product Development Scientific and Scholarly Research Thomson Reuters Source: Science, March 28, 2009.
CyberCemetery Preserving At-Risk Government Web Content.
Managing Learning Objects in Large Scale Courseware Authoring Studio Ivo Marinchev, Ivo Hristov Institute of Information Technologies Bulgarian Academy.
Oct 12-14, 2003NSDL Challenges in Building Federation Services over Harvested Metadata Kurt Maly, Michael Nelson, Mohammad Zubair Digital Library.
After the RAE: Continuing to manage research outputs Morag Watson Digital Library Development Manager University of Edinburgh.
METADATA FOR ACCESS Monica Figueroa & Eve Grünberg.
EuroCRIS strategic membership meeting Barcelona – 9-11 November 2015 Role of ISNI in research information management Titia van der Werf-Davelaar Senior.
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
Collaborative Approach to Address Scholarly Communications and Digital Curation Challenges Kris Helge, Laura Waugh, Daniel Alemneh SCDC Affinity Group.
Greater Visibility, Greater Access QSpace QSpace Queen’s University Research & Learning Repository.
Santi Thompson - Metadata Coordinator Annie Wu - Head, Metadata and Bibliographic Services 2013 TCDL Conference Austin, TX.
Authority Control Mary Marchio What is Authority Control? Formulation and recording of authorized heading forms in a library catalog Headings must be.
Memory Masters Preserving Digitized Histories— for today, for tomorrow, and for the future This project is made possible by a grant from the federal Institute.
| Barbara Pfeifer | VIAF workshop Strasbourg | VIAF partners: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) Barbara Pfeifer.
Automating the Audit: Updates from the Metadata Upgrade Project at the University of Houston Libraries Andrew Weidner, Metadata Librarian Santi Thompson,
PREPARING FOR LINKED DATA IN DIGITAL REPOSITORIES Sai Deng, University of Central Florida Libraries ACRL Technical Services Interest Group ALA.
Exploring EAC-CPF with the Remixing Archival Metadata Project (RAMP) 8 May 2014 Society of Florida Archivists Annual Meeting Allison Jai O’Dell
Enhancing the Quality of Metadata by using Authority Control Thorsten Trippel, Claus Zinn LDL 2016 Workshop at LREC May 23-28, Portorož (Slovenia)
A Complex Standard and Its Use Results from an empirical analysis of MARC 2004 Texas Library Association Annual Conference, March 18, 2004, San Antonio,
CONTENTdm A proven solution September A complete digital collection management software solution Stores, manages and provides access for all digital.
Slides Template for Module 3 Contextual details needed to make data meaningful to others CC BY-NC.
From MARC to LOD June Tomlinson, 1st September, 2016
Tiewei (Lucy) Liu Metadata Librarian June 26, 2016
Moving on : Repository Services after the RAE
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000
Publishing to OCLC Yoel Kortick Senior Librarian.
Building Search Systems for Digital Library Collections
A Linked Data Authority Service at the University of Houston Libraries
A Future for the Library Catalogue
Digital Repositories The management of learning objects
Sobek for Curators and Collection Managers
WorldCat: Broad Web visibility for our collection
Onboarding Webinar 13 April 2019 Presented by and.
Web of Science 5.18.
Beyond OA: Additional methods for enhanced exposure NMU Open Access Seminar 30 October 2018 NMU Port Elizabeth Wynand van der Walt Head Librarian: Technical.
Presentation transcript:

Laura Waugh University of North Texas 16 th International Symposium on ETDs September 25, 2013 Creating Order Out of Chaos: Introducing Name Authority into a Large ETD Collection

Overview  Name Authority  UNT Libraries Approach  UNT Name App  Narrow the scope  Develop a workflow  Lessons Learned  Q & A

Name Authority

Search and Retrieval  Citation analysis  Embargos  Copyright management  Linking researchers with their research

Name Authority Common Issues  Changing a name  Abbreviations/initials  Entry errors  Similar or same names  Pseudonyms

Name Authority One Example  Samuel Clemens  Clemens, Sameul Langhorne  Clemmens, Samuel  Clemens, S. L.  Twain, Mark

Name Authority More Complex Example  Ellery Queen  Dannay, Frederic  Lee, Manfred Bennington  Two names = 1 pseudonym

Name Authority Many Interested Groups  Virtual International Authority File (VIAF)  Library of Congress (LOC)  Wikipedia  OCLC

Name Authority Unique Author Identifiers  ORCID  ResearcherID  International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI)

Name Authority Random Sampling of 200 Names in our ETDs UNT ETD Collection200 (random sampling) VIAF28% LOC27% Wikipedia1% WorldCat Identifier57%

Name Authority Random Sampling of 200 Names in our ETDs UNT ETD Collection200 (random sampling) ORCID6% ResearcherID4% ISNI36%

Name Authority Random Sampling of 200 Names in our ETDs UNT ETD Collection200 (random sampling) Local bibliographic record61% UNT Name App22%

Name Authority Additional Challenges  Entering names verbatim  Over 7,000 ETDs  Retroactive digitization  Communication with metadata creators

UNT Libraries Approach

1.Create a tool – UNT Name App 2.Narrow the scope 3.Develop a workflow

UNT Name App A Tool for Consistency  Reference  Disambiguation  Storage  Access

UNT Name App Five Stars of Open Linked Data  Make it available on the web  Make it available as structured data  Use non-proprietary formats  Use URIs to identify things  Link to other data for context

UNT Name App Going a Step Further  Storing unique identifiers  Vocabularies available to metadata creators  Meaningful data for users

Narrow the Scope Decisions  Born-digital ETDs (since 1999)  Most relevant names  chairs  committee members

Develop a Workflow Staged Approach  Populate the UNT Name App  Clean-up/ add authorized versions  Include details and information  Edit records in the ETD collection

Populate the UNT Name App

Clean-up variations: Merging records

Include details and information  Affiliations  Dates  Location  Subject Areas

Include identifiers and links  VIAF, LOC, WorldCat, etc.  Faculty profiles  LinkedIn  ORCID, ISNI, etc.

Edit records in the ETD collection

What have we learned?

Lessons Learned  Name authority is very important!  Pulling lists helps a lot  Divide up the work  Simultaneously work on the project  Focus on names you use, not names you could use

Questions? Additional Information  Implementing Name Authority Control into Institutional Repositories: A Staged Approach  Laura Waugh