Participatory Land Use Planning and SLM Impact Assessment For PALM Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Advertisements

CBP Socio-Economic Component Drivers-Impacts-Responses Analysis.
Addressing Large-scale Drivers of Deforestation in the Mekong Region Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) NICFI Grantees’ meeting, Oslo, 28 Oct Thematic.
INTRODUCTION Organogram of DoF My role In the Department of Forestry
1/ INTEREST meeting Rothamsted,October 2004 Towards a sustainability assessment procedure Concerns of local people and researchers.
Green Recovery And Reconstruction: Training Toolkit For Humanitarian Aid Project Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Session 2: Environmental Monitoring.
Cross-cutting M&E functions in MENARID MENARID Knowledge Exchange workshop 24th to 28th of March, Hammamet, Tunisia 1.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE FRAME OF RURAL CHANGES Regional contexts linked up with the common approach CASEE-Kick-off Meeting at BOKU Vienna
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
Communication on "Land as a Resource" Jacques DELSALLE Head of sector Land & Soil European Commission, DG Environment FoEE Conference "Putting resource.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA-Energy Implementation United Nations Statistics Division Oslo Group Meeting September 2013 Baku,
1 Modalities for addressing socio- economic and environmental impacts, including impacts on biodiversity and natural ecosystems Heikki Granholm Programme.
Land as a Resource State of play 5 March Land as a Resource: at the crossroad of objectives 1 and 2 of 7 th Environmental Action Programme (EAP)
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE Ecosystem Based Adaptation – Measuring Effectiveness Ali Raza Rizvi Global Programme Manager EbA IUCN -
Environment and Energy Community of Practice meeting, Bratislava, 24 – 26 September, 2007 LAND DEGRADATION.
Research European Commission FP6-ERA.ppt15/10/01 1 Requests in the fields of Sustainable development: multifunctionality, agriculture, forestry Pierre.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Understanding Territorial Impacts: Tool for Territorial Impact Assessment Bernd Schuh (ÖIR) Karkow, Nov
Results Based Management at the GEF Omid Parhizkar, PhD Interim Results Management Coordinator May, 2015.
Mali Work Packages. Crop Fields Gardens Livestock People Trees Farm 1 Farm 2 Farm 3 Fallow Pasture/forest Market Water sources Policy Landscape/Watershed.
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 19 – 21, 2011 Monrovia, Liberia.
1. Framework project Title of the framework project + claim Background: emblematic picture (this picture is very important: it is the one should illustrate.
GEF-6 Programming Directions in Natural Resources Management
1 Expert workshop on components of EEA Ecosystem Capital Accounts (ECA) Focus on biomass carbon and biodiversity data 24/03/2015.
Conservation Agriculture as a Potential Pathway to Better Resource Management, Higher Productivity, and Improved Socio-Economic Conditions in the Andean.
United Nations Environment Programme Regional Cooperation and Coordination Experiences Marieta Sakalian Programme Management/Liaison Officer Biodiversity.
Omid Parhizkar, PhD Interim Results Management Coordinator Results Based Management at the GEF.
OUR LAND – OUR WEALTH, OUR FUTURE, IN OUR HANDS THE STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM (SIP) Monitoring and Evaluation Plan July 2006 Midrand, South Africa.
Myanmar Healthy Rivers Initiative (MHRI) Rivers for life and livelihoods: classification of river health in the Ayeyarwady and Thanlwin River.
Potential and Pitfalls of Experimental Impact Evaluation: Reflections on the design and implementation of an experimental Payments for Environmental Services.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
[ISO Water footprint – potential standard]
1 Integrated Water Resources Management Training Course Overview p.p. 0.1.
Mohamed Bakarr Senior Environmental Specialist GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 GEF Strategies, Activities and Accomplishment:
Andrew Dougill & Mark Reed School of the Environment, University of Leeds Framework for Community-Based Degradation Assessment for the Kalahari, Botswana.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
St. John’s, Antigua May What is STAP? In 1994, the GEF Instrument sets up STAP – “UNEP shall establish, in consultation with UNDP and the World.
1 FOREST MONITORING IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE Don Wijewardana United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat.
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
Where and how can REDD+ deliver most benefits? Lera Miles, UNEP-WCMC 7 December 2015.
LADA Assistance to the CACILM CMPF Support Project Sustainable Land Management Information System LADA Project Steering Committee Meeting and Technical.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 6 – 9, 2011 Dakar, Senegal.
Roadmap & Actions Expert Consultation Health in All Policies.
1. Framework project Title of the framework project + claim Background: emblematic picture (this picture is very important: it is the one should illustrate.
Developing (simplified) ecosystem capital accounts Current status of work at EEA MAES meeting, 26 April 2013.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands Riccardo Biancalani FAO LADA Team Mendoza, 26 January 2009.
THE MCPFE AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE „LIVING FOREST SUMMIT“ Stefanie Linser FAO/ECE/ILO Seminar on Close to Nature Forestry Zvolen, Slovakia, October.
General discussion on local assessment process suggestions by countries Lehman Lindeque.
DESIRE – Desertification Mitigation and Remediation of Land DESIRE Work Block 3: Gudrun Schwilch / CDE 1 October 2007 / WB3 Training Workshop Murcia, Spain.
 Project for the Management and Restoration of Degraded Lands in the Groundnut Basin Republic of Senegal Ministry of Environment, Protection of Nature,
Guyana LDN Implementation
Local Land Degradation Assessment meeting Mendoza, Argentina
PHILCAT initiative 1. Introduction 2. Challenges
Environmental Intelligence Platform – Monitoring Nutrients Pollution with Earth Observation Data for Sustainable Agriculture and Clean Waters Blue.
Presented by YOUSSOU LO PROJECT NATIONAL COORDINATOR
CRP DS M&E Framework Enrico Bonaiuti Research Program Coordinator
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Geospatial Impact Evaluation and Valuation of Land Degradation Projects Juha Uitto1,Geeta Batra1, Anupam Anand1, Dan Runfola2, Ariel BenYishay2 and Jyothy.
EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Global Meeting of the DS-SLM Project
Monitoring and Evaluation
Environmental aspects
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation
Presentation transcript:

Participatory Land Use Planning and SLM Impact Assessment For PALM Project

Training purpose  Create awareness about participatory land-use planning and that it can be used as a tool to address land degradation and promote sustainable land management (SLM)  Clarify the steps in the land-use planning process  Test Indicator Framework for SLM Impact Assessment (i.e. impact of micro-projects)  Identify context specific indicators to populate the indicator framework and their measurement methodologies.  Initiate the M&E of the impacts of microprojects and identify projects and SLM practices that can be upscaled using the village land-use plans and the regional strategy

Steps in participatory land-use planning 1.Produce a map of land-use and vegetation types 2.Identify land degradation problems in different land-use and vegetation types using the PALM LADA Manual 3.Synthesize the information and identify possible response measures based on best practices identified by e.g. WOCAT, Micro-projects, etc.

Why is impact assessment needed?  Effective monitoring is an important part of the project cycle. It allows planners and communities to assess progress with respect to project implementation and in terms of project impacts (eg. environmental, social, and economic outcomes).  Impact monitoring methods need to be cost effective and simple.  The measurements at project level are primarily based on field assessments, participatory methods and interviews and group discussions and/or expert knowledge.

SLM Impact Assessment for PALM  Need to develop a monitoring framework that links the monitoring of Global Environmental Benefits (GEBs) and socio-economic benefits of SLM in different land-use types, taking into consideration local National, and regional level.  Need to identify: indicators and measurement methodologies that can be used for the different micro-projects. (See Guidelines)

Examples of indicators  Pastures: Soil erosion Land cover Land use (area under improved grazing practices) Land productivity Biodiversity Soil carbon

Assignment  Divide into 3 groups: Pasture group with pasture management experts Agriculture group with agricultural experts Forest group with forest management experts  Each group to go through proposed indicators for the land-use system they have been assigned (see Table) and identify what can be measured and how it will be measured in the micro-projects.  Identify the minimum set of indicators needed for each land-use type (at least two)  Each group to give brief presentation before lunch and provide written comments to me and Nevelina before leaving.  Visit to micro-projects in the afternoon to discuss indicators in the field.