State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, 2012 1 RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
WIOA Timeline and Action Plan for States
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
1 Illinois RTTT 3 Award: A Focused Plan for Dramatic Instructional Improvement.
> Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Title of Presentation > Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Title of.
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
Reading First Program Notes for Russ Sweet March 2 & 3, 2006 Eugene, Oregon © 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York September 15, 2010.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION High School End-of-Course Mathematics Exams in 2011 Deputy Superintendent Alan Burke ESD 113 Superintendents’
I Have Been Notified That A School in My District Needs an "ESCA"? What Does that Mean? Regional Workshop for Differentiated Accountability New York State.
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
DIVISION OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UPDATES.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Consolidated Application Schedule.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
School Improvement Planning and Reporting for Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 Schools June 8, 2015June 8, 2015.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Title I Equitable Services for Eligible Private School Students 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 27, 2015.
Contra Costa County Office of Education May 2015 Local Control Funding Formula: Supporting Continuous Improvement.
Local Control Accountability Plans (LCAP) Cambrian School District June 19, 2014.
Florida’s Charter Schools Program Grant Award Information Session August 2011.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Race to the Top Application State Board of Education Meeting January 6, 2010 January 6, 2010.
AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Overview of Proposed Educator Evaluation Regulations August 1, 2012.
Historical Context on Indiana’s School Turnaround Efforts Presentation to Committee on School Turnarounds August 21,
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) School Board Meeting, March 20,
Updates from the Office of Human Resources/Accountability September 13, 2011.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
Focus Schools Grant Monitoring and Support Consolidated Planning and Monitoring September 2015.
1 SEC State Collaborative Meeting San Diego February 10-12, 2008 Idaho’s PRINCIPAL ACADEMY of LEADERSHIP and the SEC Peter Kavouras Curt Rathburn.
Title I Directors’ Meeting Regions 5 and 7 Update on the Race to the Top September 8, 2011.
Reimagining Professional Learning Innovation Grant Deadline: March 23, 2016.
Every Student Succeeds Act January Christopher Woolard Senior Executive Director, Center for Accountability and Continuous Improvement Colleen D.
Fall 2012 The Glen Rock Elementary Report Card Committee.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Improving Instruction through Regional Data Initiatives FY2010 ARRA Title II, Part D Competitive Grant Program Applications due September 15, 2009.
West Central Regional Service Center Race To the Top funding, important dates, forms and decisions.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
1. 2 The Great Teaching and Leading Fund (GTLF) was created in the State General Fund during Nevada’s 78th Legislative Session (2015) via Senate Bill.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program (CTEIG)
USBE: Tracy Gooley and Tanya Semerad
Monitoring LEA Implementation of SIG Interventions:
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
Planning Process Strategic Plan Operational Priorities
New Jersey Department of Education
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Implementing Race to the Top
February 2007 Note: Source:.
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities District-Level Activities Key Milestones

Race to the Top 3 Overview 1. State awarded $37.8 million on December 22, $18.9 million is allocated to 322 participating LEAs, according to the Title I formula Grants range from $498 to $2,038,932 50% of funds (~$9.7M) distributed among 15 districts 3. $18.9 million is allocated to state-level activities to fund five of NJDOE’s state-wide initiatives Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Instructional Improvement (IIS) System Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Educator Evaluation Pilots Charter School Expansion 2

Project Area State Funding Distribution LEA # of LEAs Funding Common Core State Standards $5,667,67291$4,279,421 Instructional Improvement System $6,303,81923$1,156,587 STEMIncluded with CCSS25$1,769,556 Teacher Evaluation$3,850,752251$11,252,117 Charter School$2,003,6269$223,141 Current Allocation of Funds: 3

State Level Activities Project Areas 1 & 3: Common Core State Standards Create model curriculum, aligned assessments Scaffold model curriculum for special populations Award teachers for submitting model lessons Project Area 2: Instructional Improvement System Contract with vendor to create IIS Fund implementation for all priority schools Fund competitive sub-grants to districts Project Area 4: Educator Evaluation Systems Build NJDOE capacity to manage EE4NJ Implementation Fund teacher and principal evaluation pilots Project Area 5: Charter School Development Increase capacity to improve charter application and renewal review process 4

District Level Activities Project Areas 1 & 3: Common Core State Standards Support for teachers transitioning to CCSS Professional development for science and math instruction Implementation of PSI and/or PMI programs Project Area 2: Instructional Improvement System Technology improvements Fund setup, operating cost, professional development Project Area 4: Educator Evaluation Systems Contract for or develop observation instruments Internet-based performance data management system Technology required to perform observations Project Area 5: Charter School Development Improve or expand operations Implement research-proven best practices 5

Key Milestones December 2011 NJDOE received Grant Award Notification and access to12.5% of funds February 2012 Eligible districts submitted MOUs indicating intent to participate in RTTT3 March 2012 Districts submitted draft Scopes of Work to NJDOE April 2012 NJDOE submitted a draft State Scope of Work to USDOE May 2012 NJDOE reviews district Scopes of Work, revises State Scope of Work June 2012 NJDOE reviews district Scopes of Work, revises State Scope of Work July 2012 NJDOE received final approval of State Scope of Work and access to remaining 87.5% of funds Districts began to receive final approval on Scopes of Work and received access to allocations NJDOE had first monitoring call with USDOE program officers August 2012  NJDOE will establish an amendment process for LEAs  NJDOE will submit LEA monitoring plan to USDOE September 2012  NJDOE will submit Annual Performance Report to USDOE  USDOE will conduct a one day on-site review of implementation October 2012  Districts will submit first monitoring report 6