The new educational model Lars Peter Jensen. The New Aalborg Model 2 50% courses 50% project Course 5 ECTS Project 15 ECTS In groups up to 8 persons Individual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-entry qualifications – staff perceptions versus reality Sarah Maguire Derry Corey.
Advertisements

ECTS grade system in the curricula of Ruse University Principal Assist. Dr Desislava Atanasova.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
1 Problem based Learning in Engineering and Science – Development of Supervisor A PhD Course given by: Anette Kolmos Department of development and planning.
 National 3 is not graded and does not have an examination. It is pass/fail and is based on Units.  National 4 is not graded and does not have an examination.
Learning and Teaching Conference 2012 Skill integration for students through in-class feedback and continuous assessment. Konstantinos Dimopoulos City.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Quality Assurance and ECTS at HEI in Serbia Prof. dr Vojin Rakić (BK University, Belgrade)
All About the Master’s Thesis Michael I. Schwartzbach University of Aarhus Department of Computer Science.
All About the Master’s Thesis Michael I. Schwartzbach Gudmund S. Frandsen University of Aarhus Department of Computer Science.
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
PBL and accreditation Anette Kolmos. Research on engineering education and PBL 18 PhD studerende – Creativity and mega projects (satellit) – Organisational.
ON ORAL EXAMS Susana Tosca (7/12/12). Today´s menu Introduction round Presentation “On Oral Exams” Questions & Answers Video: an examination Discussion.
Intro Module11 Project-related course (PE): Problem Based and Project Based Learning Xiangyun Du Department of Development and Planning Aalborg University.
1 Evaluation is a Partnership Dr. Darla M. Cooper Associate Director Center for Student Success Basic Skills Coordinators Workshop September 17, 2009.
1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way A Course given by: Xiangyun Du Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 13, DK
The new educational model Assesment of project groups Lars Peter Jensen.
1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way To day given by: Søren Hansen Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK
School of Asian Studies University College Cork Induction Meeting Wednesday 9 th September 2pm MA Teaching Chinese to Speakers of Other Languages [MATCSOL]
CPLA Video Case Studies Making Media Nursing. Making Media - Background First year, semester long 20 credit core module Involved 200 students with 4 staff.
WHAT IS THE WPE? Writing Assessment Office Office of Undergraduate Studies Campus Center 1st Floor, Room
How to give a PowerPoint Presentation Staff Development Group and Central Computing Services.
1 Ideas of Problem-based Learning As a learner-centred process, problem- based learning meets the learners' interests and as such gives room for developing.
Expectations Widening my knowledge of general pedagogic methods and learning teaching structure at Aalborg University. I hope that I learn the teaching.
Curriculum Innovations in the Department of Informatics of TEI-A Prof. K. Georgouli Nis, 24 March 2006 SCM Tempus project CO15A05.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
1 PBL course program day 3 : 9.00 Presentation and discussion by group CS1. Reviewed by: Gilberto Berardinelli, Mohammad Komareji, Anders Nickelsen
1 PBL course program day 3 : 9.00 Presentation and discussion of group excercise by group ES. This experiment is reviewed by: Yesenia Lacouture, Mikael.
10/06/04Model, PBL-skills and supervision1 Thursday the 10 th of June: training of PBL 09.00:Coherence between projects and courses (LPJ) 09.30: Co-operation.
WS1 Introduction to Problem Based Learning: The AAU Way. Assessment/Examination of projects, why and how The Faculty of Engineering and Science The New.
1 Problem based Learning in Engineering and Science – Development of Facilitator A Course given by: Xiangyun Du Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy.
1 Problem based Learning – The AAU Way A Work Shop given by: Mona Dahms Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK Aalborg East.
PBL for the 21 st century. Getting Started Planning & Preparing Managing Reflect Perfect & Planning and Preparing Entry event Culminating products/rubrics.
Tuesday December 15 th 2015: Results from experiments with facilitation situations + Examination Until the last day of the course the participants are.
35th International IGIP Symposium, 2006, Tallinn, Estonia Lars Peter Jensen Associated Professor at Automation and Control Department of Electronic Systems.
Developing Common Course Syllabi November 20, 2010 Heather Sass, Education Consultant Preview.
1 Problem based Learning – The AAU Way A Work Shop given by: Mona Dahms Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK Aalborg East.
Feedback in University Teaching Prof. Arif Khurshed Division of Accounting and Finance.
1 Assessment - the hidden curriculum The aim of the study goals objectives Forms of the exams and criteria Teaching and learning methods: PBL and project.
11/06/04Supervision and Assessment1 Friday the 11 th of June: Supervision and Assessment 09.00:Cases on supervision (LK + LPJ) 11.00:Supervision - strategies.
The Faculty of Engineering and Science The New Project Examination Hans Hüttel Anette Kolmos Kathrin Otrel-Cass Egon Moesby Jette Holgaard Picture:
Mr C Johnston ICT Teacher G041: How Organisations Use ICT Introduction To The Unit.
AP Capstone: Seminar A Brave New YWCPA. Class Overview The AP Capstone is an inquiry-based course that aims to engage students in cross-curricular.
REAP Projects in CBS An overview of what we’re doing and why its interesting….
Asssessment of projects Lars Peter Jensen. 2 Alingment.
Tips for Academic Quality Assurance Hugh Starkey Tempus DO IT 2 nd Consortium Meeting Landau 13 March 2013.
The survey of assessment practices Oana Radu April 17, 2012.
Student Learning Time (SLT).  Effective learning time or student effort of learning in order to achieve the specified learning outcomes.  Inclusive.
Devising Assessment Tasks PGCE CS IT. Objectives To consider how to plan for assessment To consider progression To think about collaborative learning.
L9: Courses and project work
‘How flipping difficult can it be?’ - an update
Problem Based Learning The Aalborg case
Project Organized Learning - a course from the Master Programs Introduction Semester for foreign student in Electronics and Information Technology Lars.
Welcome to Workshop 3 Today’s Agenda 17:20 Course Evaluation 
The New Project Examination
TALLINN UNIVERSITY ORIENTATION DAY
Introduction – Process View on Management
Recommendations Regarding the Organisation of the educations at INS
The Aalborg model - one way of dealing with PBL
The new educational model Assesment of project groups
Asssessment of projects
The new educational model Assesment of project groups
The New Project Examination
The new educational model Assesment of project groups
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Institute of Electronic Systems
The Hungarian Education System
Assessment - the hidden curriculum
The New Project Examination
Presentation transcript:

The new educational model Lars Peter Jensen

The New Aalborg Model 2 50% courses 50% project Course 5 ECTS Project 15 ECTS In groups up to 8 persons Individual assessment Self-selected groups Appointed supervisor(s) One semester 1 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) = 30 working hours Course 5 ECTS Course 5 ECTS

How to organize projects More focus on Peer-learning Facilitation of group Communication/information/lecture for all groups on the semster (e.g. Introduction) Status seminar Workshops Visits to companies

How to organize courses Lectures Study cirkle Student Symposia (lectures by students) Exercises Workshops Excursions Mini Projects Longer individuel exercises (e.g. one week) Cases Question time sessions

Assessment of courses Written examination (traditional) Multiple-choise test Written exam. using computer Written answers to assignments (exercises, mini project, articel, essay etc.) Written reflexsive portfolio Oral examination Oral exam. based on written answers by stu. Continued assessment (presence, written assignments etc.)

”Economy”/payment Facilitation of project: 1 hour pr. student pr. ECTS. Max. 100 hour, typicalle (5-6 stu.). ALL included !!! Censorship 2 hours pr. stu. Min. 8 hours Courses (5 ECTS): 150 hours hour pr. students Total: 180 h. (20 st), 240 h. (60 st), 300 h. (100 st) Exam 0.33 h. pr. st. Both for teacher and censor

Asssessment of projects Lars Peter Jensen

8 Alignment

Assessment - the hidden curriculum The aim of the study goals objectives Forms of the exams and criteria Teaching and learning methods: PBL and project work

Basic assumptions Examination is dominating the students learning approach Criteria for evaluation are crucial for the learning process Evaluation is a basic part for the learning process (reflection)

The ”Old” Aalborg Model 11 50% courses 50% project Project courses 7,5 ECTS Project 15 ECTS Study courses 7,5 ECTS Group examination Individual examination Model from The Aalborg PBL model - Progress, Diversity and Challenges Anette Kolmos, Flemming K. Fink & Lone Krogh One semester 1 ECTS (European Credit Transfer System) = 30 working hours

12 Supervisors examinors Team to be assessed (Audience) OH screen Black board Team based examination

13 Presentation of project (students) Comments to presentation (examiners) Votation (examiners) Giving marks and final comments Detailed questions to Team/individual team members break Team based examination 1 hour 3 – 4 hours

14 Presentation of project (students) (Comments to presentation (examiners)) Votation (examiners) Giving the individual grade Detailed questions to Individuals – one by one break Individual examination 1 hour 30 – 40 minu tes

Guidelines for Project Evaluation E study board: 1.Project conclusion (Presentation): At the project conclusion the group will present the whole project - all group members equally. There will be no discussion or evaluation of the quality of the project. The conclusion should normally take 10 minutes per student but normally not more than 1 hour per group.

2.Examination (individual): The examination may be based on questions prepared in advance on the basis of the project report including all central subjects within the project unit goal. Each group member is given minutes for examination and voting. Concerning B.Sc.-, M.Sc.-, and Master-thesis projects each group member may be given 15 minutes more. The evaluation is based on both the written report and the oral presentation. The report is indirectly part of the evaluation and will not be graded separately. The members of the project group are not allowed to be present in the examination room before they are to be examined or have been examined.

3.Discussion of the report When all group members have been examined and all grades are given the group will be offered feedback to the project report. Note: From fall 2007 grades are given according to the 7-step scale. The students are entitled to receive the grade immediately after the examination. However, the students and the supervisor may decide that grades are given when all group members have been examined. The students are entitled to receive the grade in private. During the voting the examiner and the supervisor must take notes about the presentation and the assessment of grades to be used in case of possible complaints. The notes must be kept for at least 1 year further until a possible complaint is finished.

Old 13-point scaleNew 7-point scaleECTS 1312A B 97C 8 74D 602E 500Fx F

20 Study of Assessment for projects Methods Empirically drawing on surveys 2006 and 2007: –students of which 14% were international students and 15% was assessed individually –Academic staff –external examiners

21

22 Skills

23 Skills

24 Skills

25 Skills