South Africa PRIMA Operating Rules. Model Trans-boundary Operating Process PRIMA,TPTC etc Trans-boundary Agreement Operational Committee Representatives.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STEPS A Stochastic Top-down Electricity Price Simulator Martin Peat.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mid-West Electric Consumers Association September 16, 2014 Corps of Engineers US Army Missouri River Mainstem.
Antamina Mine Water Management Model Alan Keizur Golder Associates Roberto Manrique Arce Compañia Minera Antamina User Conference 2006 Background The Antamina.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hydrological Information System Module 20 – Integrated Reservoir Monitoring System.
Defining the Status Quo. Definition of Status Quo The “Status Quo” describes existing or anticipated conditions of a water resources system if policies,
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney River Basin Modeling.
ESTIMATING THE 100-YEAR FLOOD FORDECORAH USING THE RAINFALL EVENTS OF THE RIVER'S CATCHMENT By Kai TsurutaFaculty Advisor: Richard Bernatz Abstract:This.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE – ACF Operations Bailey Crane Water Management USACE, Mobile District.
31 DECEMBER VARIABLE FLOOD CONTROL DRAFT FOR LIBBY RESERVOIR U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division, North Pacific Region.
The use and management of water in Goulburn Valley.
Green River Water Rights Distribution Model (MODSIM) Update By Division of Water Rights
Reclamation Mid-Term Operational Modeling Seasonal to Year-Two Colorado River Streamflow Prediction Workshop CBRFC March 21-22, 2011 Katrina Grantz, PhD.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney Simulating System Performance.
Eduardo Mondlane UniversityInstitute for Water Resource, Rhodes University PhD Proposal-Progress Agostinho Vilanculos Supervisors: - Prof. Denis Hughes.
Dr. David Ahlfeld Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering The Westfield River Basin Optimization Model Demonstration:
Water Harvesting and Groundwater Recharging in India: Potentials and Pitfalls M. Dinesh Kumar, B. R. Sharma, Ankit Patel and OP Singh IWMI-Tata Water Policy.
The Application of a Real-Time Operational Water Resources Decision Support System (DSS) for the Orange-Fish-Sundays Water Transfer Scheme 18 th October.
1 Sustainable Agricultural Economic benefits of reservoir scale expansion in Balkh Basin, Afghanistan Abdelaziz A. Gohar & Frank A. Ward New Mexico State.
Dr. R.P.Pandey Scientist F. NIH- Nodal Agency Misconception: A DSS takes decisions ---(No)
Municipal Water District of Orange County 2015 Water Supply Report February 10, 2015.
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
INKOMATI CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY Science & Management.
The Colorado Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) Performance Since 1981 Nolan Doesken Colorado State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State.
Deksyos Tarekegn National DSS Specialist - Ethiopia
Climate: Outlook and Operational Planning Jayantha Obeysekera (’Obey’), Ph.D.,P.E.,D.WRE Department Director Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling.
An assessment of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia water managers’ perceptions, needs, and capacity to integrate climate information into decision making December.
New Mexico Rio Grande Water Operations Modeling: Creating a synthetic flow sequence representative of regional paleo-hydrology for alternatives analysis.
Climate Outlook Jayantha Obeysekera (’Obey’), Ph.D.,P.E.,D.WRE Department Director Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
Salinity and Bulk Water Workshop 27 October 2010 Werribee Irrigation District.
Modeling Development CRFS—Technical Meeting November 14, 2012.
Overview of the Situation and Challenges for Water Quality Monitoring and Reporting in South Africa Wandile Nomquphu Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.
WISKI Open Water and Ice Bernard Trevor, M.Eng. P.Eng. River Forecast Section Environment and Sustainable Resource Development WISKI ESRD Users Conference.
Resource allocation and optimisation model RAOM October 2003.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Reservoir Simulation Software “Westfield Sub-basin” Presenter – John Hickey, HEC August 2010.
Intro to the Delaware River Basin Megan Wiley Rivera HydroLogics, Inc Sept 13, 2010.
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report Modeling Results Historical Record and Instream Claims Model Accuracy Jonathan La Marche KADR Hydrologist3/11/2000.
WISKI for Hydrologic Assessment Michael Seneka Water Policy Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development.
USACE Managing a Drought  Overview  Timeline  Depletion Scenario Current Status– 17 Oct 07.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT “Introduction to Operations and the Non Treaty Storage Scenarios” Presenter: Jim Gaspard.
Water Resources Planning and Management
1 Scenario formulation Scenario-based planning is a structured way of thinking about what might happen in the future Scenarios are descriptions of possible.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
CHALLENGES IN WATER RESOURCES SYSTEMS OPERATION 1 July 2004 B Mwaka Water Resources Planning Systems – User Forum No. 3.
Water Resources Planning and Management Daene C. McKinney System Performance Indicators.
Model Overview Application of CALSIM II to Friant System.
1. 2 Required under water right Establishes limit on LCRA firm water contract sales from lakes Industry standard for evaluating available water supply.
Mekong River Commission Information System/ “WUP-FIN Phase III” Concept The information system development is critical activity for maintaining the MRCS.
Note: This presentation contains only preliminary research results. If you have any questions, please contact Julie Vano at Thanks.
CRFS Technical Committee Fall Meeting LC Operations Update December 8, 2015.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update November 14, 2012.
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update March 27, 2014.
AQUASTAT FAO’s global information system on water and agriculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
A Jurisprudential Model for Sustainable Water Resources Governance By Professor D. E. Fisher.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Raw Water Availability in the Integrated Vaal River System Presented to:WSF Presented by:Kobie Mare Date:25 May
1 Hydrological Regime of the Mekong River Hydrological Regime of the Mekong basin depends on climatic conditions of the wet and dry seasons. High water.
Yuma Agriculture Water - Rights and Supply Terry Fulp Director, Lower Colorado Region Yuma Agriculture Water Conference January 13, 2016.
Hydrological Information System
Colorado River Commission of Nevada (CRCNV)
Effects of persistent drought on Lake Mead and the Las Vegas Valley
Hydrological Information System
Paimionjoki River Basin
Water Prof. Mike Young Research Chair, Water Economics and Management The University of Adelaide Some Like it Hot, Renmark, 6th November 2008.
Department of Water and Sanitation
Summary of COA and Addendum
Presentation transcript:

South Africa PRIMA Operating Rules

Model Trans-boundary Operating Process PRIMA,TPTC etc Trans-boundary Agreement Operational Committee Representatives for water management institutions (WUA, CMA etc) Operational Committee Representatives for water management institutions (WUA, CMA etc) Define integrated operating objectives Model Determine operating rule Current catchment conditions Determine operations for next season (Restrictions) Determine operations for next season (Restrictions) Local Water Management Authority Local Water Management Authority Compliance check PRIMA Operations Task Team/Data Unit PRIMA Operations Task Team/Data Unit

System interactions MIS DSS Operator Mike Basin Water use Dam Levels Operating Rules Super user -Access and change everything Super user -Access and change everything Operator -Access limited through GUI Operator -Access limited through GUI Viewer -Access limited cannot change system information Viewer -Access limited cannot change system information

Operating Rules Process Define operating objective -Per catchment resource -Integrated operating objective (international and ecological requirements) Define operating objective -Per catchment resource -Integrated operating objective (international and ecological requirements) Determine operating rule -Per catchment/dam -Integrated operating rule Determine operating rule -Per catchment/dam -Integrated operating rule Review operating rule -Determine critical period -Test medium term operations -Stochastic runs -Dam trajectories -Check assurance of supply Review operating rule -Determine critical period -Test medium term operations -Stochastic runs -Dam trajectories -Check assurance of supply Short term/Compliance -Compliance -Operating rule -Dam levels -Releases -Restrictions -Water use (Water balance) -Flows (Environmental requirement) Short term/Compliance -Compliance -Operating rule -Dam levels -Releases -Restrictions -Water use (Water balance) -Flows (Environmental requirement)

Example Developing and Operating Rule Define the operating objectives 1.Use water from run of river first then if this is not sufficient release water from Kwena Dam 2.Normal: 1.Dam level should be back above 90% the next May. An increase in dam level of more than 40% can be expected from November to May. 2.Dam level should preferably not go down below 60% but be kept above 50% as far as possible. 3.Restrictions should normally be implemented from May to October/November. Conservative approach in winter months 4.Wet season turning about November/December dam fills. Generally keep dam level to 60% at 15 December.

Example Developing and Operating Rule Define the operating objectives 1.Drought: 1.Dam level should at least be back at 70% if the previous year was a drought year. Increase in dam level of 30% to 35% could be expected if it is a dry year again. 2.Dam level should not go down below 35% but preferably be kept above 40% under these conditions. 3.If it is the third or fourth year of a drought and still a dry year ahead under these conditions it is possible to go down to below 20% but not lower than 15% depending on the time of the year and the forecast. 4.In a drought we assume the turning point to be much later and we work on the end of January.

Example Developing and Operating Rule Determine the operating rule Normal condition Choose representative hydrological sequence (50 th percentile) Choose a dam level and iteratively restrict users in so that we reach a level of 90% at May the next year Change the dam level and repeat the process Create a curve showing restriction level versus dam level for normal condition Drought condition Choose representative hydrological sequence (25 th percentile) Choose a dam level and iteratively restrict users in so that we reach a level of 70% at May the next year Change the dam level and repeat the process Create a curve showing restriction level versus dam level for normal condition Two curves generated for drought and normal condition

Development of operating rules Dam Level(%)Restriction LevelPercentage of allocation 9024%76% 8033%67% 7046%54% 6057%43% 5066%34% 4076%24% 3095%5% 20100%0% 10100%0%

Example Developing and Operating Rule Determine the operating rule

Example Developing and Operating Rule Review operating rules

Example Developing and Operating Rule Review operating rules

Verifying and checking

Integration Crocodile Mozambique Kaap Wit

Compliance Checking

System Overview Purpose: Give good general overview of system allowing manager to identify problems quickly Critical information presented on – Dams – Flows – Water Use – Missing information

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use System Overview (Double click on elements for more information) Flow: Meets IIMANot compliant Water use: 0-25% 25%-50% 50%-75% 75%-100% >100% Dam Level:

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Pongolapoort Dam Volume: m 3 Percentage full:70% Storage capacity: m 3 Inflow:120 m 3 s -1 Release:90 m 3 s -1 Time series graphs Curtailment levels AssuranceLevelRestriction H0None M180% L175% Release comparison Release Status Forecasted Dam Trajectories Comparative Dam Trajectories

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Pongolapoort Dam Volume: m 3 Percentage full:70% Storage capacity: m 3 Inflow:120 m 3 s -1 Release:90 m 3 s -1 Time series graphs Curtailment levels AssuranceLevelRestriction H0None M180% L175% Release comparison Release Status 1 Forecasted Dam Trajectories Comparative Dam Trajectories

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Pongolapoort Dam Volume: m 3 Percentage full:70% Storage capacity: m 3 Inflow:120 m 3 s -1 Release:90 m 3 s -1 Time series graphs Curtailment levels AssuranceLevelRestriction H0None M180% L175% Release comparison Release Status 2 Forecasted Dam Trajectories Comparative Dam Trajectories 3 month average 1 month average

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Pongolapoort Dam Volume: m 3 Percentage full:70% Storage capacity: m 3 Inflow:120 m 3 s -1 Release:90 m 3 s -1 Time series graphs Curtailment levels AssuranceLevelRestriction H0None M180% L175% Release comparison Release Status Forecasted Dam Trajectories Comparative Dam Trajectories

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Pongolapoort Dam Volume: m 3 Percentage full:70% Storage capacity: m 3 Inflow:120 m 3 s -1 Release:90 m 3 s -1 Time series graphs Curtailment levels AssuranceLevelRestriction H0None M180% L175% Release comparison Release Status Forecasted Dam Trajectories Comparative Dam Trajectories

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Pongolapoort Dam Volume: m 3 Percentage full:70% Storage capacity: m 3 Inflow:120 m 3 s -1 Release:90 m 3 s -1 Time series graphs Curtailment levels AssuranceLevelRestriction H0None M180% L175% Release comparison Release Status Forecasted Dam Trajectories Comparative Dam Trajectories

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Komatipoort Weir Flow rate YesterdayToday3 Day Average

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Water use information can be incorporated into the system However Existing water use data is not reliable and methodology for the collection of this information is not well established. Many areas no water meters are available and assessments based on remote sensing information tend to be inaccurate.

Prima Operations Home Dams Flows Water use Idea for identification of water use Run a water balance Loss/Gain = Upstream gauge + Tributaries (n) – Downstream gauge – estimated evaporation – Estimated seepage Loss/gain vs Allocation Idea for identification of water use Run a water balance Loss/Gain = Upstream gauge + Tributaries (n) – Downstream gauge – estimated evaporation – Estimated seepage Loss/gain vs Allocation

Thank you