1 Preparation of the hydrogen test system Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones CCLRC Technology.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 AFSWG Mtg 15 Aug 2003 Elwyn Baynham RAL Safety Overview Work done by RAL Group Contributors Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov.

Advertisements

Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP

Project Managers Update Roy Preece Particle Physics Department, STFC MICE Video Conference, 18 th September 2014.

MICE OsC – 22 nd June 2010 Liquid-hydrogen system and absorber M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold S Ishimoto W Lau I Mullacrane P Warburton.

1 MICE Hydrogen System Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL MICE / RAL Safety RAL, 30 October 2003.

Status of the AFC at RAL Tom Bradshaw John Cobb Wing Lau Matt Hills Elwyn Baynham Mike Courthold Victoria Bayliss MICE Project Board 28 th June 2011.

AFC Schedules and Status Tom Bradshaw John Cobb Wing Lau Matt Hills MICE MICO Meeting 12 th October 2011 Elwyn Baynham Mike Courthold Victoria Bayliss.

AFC Status Tom Bradshaw John Cobb Wing Lau Matt Hills MICE MICO Meeting 11 th January 2012 Elwyn Baynham Mike Courthold Victoria Bayliss 1.

1 Status of Hydrogen System Development MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tom Bradshaw, Elwyn Baynham, Mike Courthold,

MICE Safety Review Process and Schedule Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Columbia Meeting June 2003.

Paul drumm; 1 st December 2004; PM&TB Report 1 Project Management & Technical Board Reports.

CM26 – 26 th March 2010 Step IV: Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.

paul drumm; 3rd December 2004; AFC MM 1 Cost & Schedule Review I Terms of reference: –To review the Cost and schedule of the MICE Muon beam –To review.

1 RAL Integration Issues MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Paul Drumm, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tony Jones RAL.

1 MICE Absorber working group Columbia, 13 June 2003 MICE Hydrogen System. Preliminary HAZOP. Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw and Iouri Ivaniouchenkov,

1 Hydrogen Safety System Summary MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,

Report from meeting Hydrogen system operation from cryocooler and level control Cryocoolers for MICE Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Yury Ivanyushenkov Rutherford.

1 14. Project closure n An information system project must be administratively closed once its product is successfully delivered to the customer. n A failed.

MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.

Paul drumm; 3rd December 2004; AFC MM 1 Why? Goal: Ultimate (CCLRC defined) Safety & Design Review –How do we get there? We need a Process –What is needed?

1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.

H2 Safety Review - response paul drumm MICE VC, March 29 th,2006.

Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.

MICE Collaboration meeting RAL 21 – 24 Oct 2005 Summary of Design & Safety review progress By Wing Lau – Oxford University.

Hydrogen Delivery System – R&D Activities T W Bradshaw M Courthold M Hills J Rochford Daresbury Controls Group etc…

Hydrogen system status Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.

Hazard and Operability Studies - HAZOP ChE 258 Chemical Process Safety University of Missouri - Rolla Fike Corporation.

1 MICE Hall Layout MICE Collaboration Meeting, LBNL, February 12, 2005 Paul Drumm for Yury & the RAL team.

1 TB/Safety Summary Andy Nichols, STFC – RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting, Harbin, 13-17th January 2009.

MICE Hydrogen System MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN, 29 March-2 April 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,

Mechanical Safety Systems and DSEAR Compliance

MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Meeting October 2004 – Coseners House.

MICE VIDEO Conference 17 th December 2003 Report on AFCSWG Safety Review -- Future Plan By Wing Lau -- Oxford.

The MICE Hydrogen System Summary Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.

MICE CM30 7 th July 2011 Liquid Hydrogen Delivery System M Hills (STFC, RAL) T Bradshaw (STFC, RAL) M Courthold (STFC, RAL) S Ishimoto (KEK) A Muir (STFC,

1 MICE PM Report Phase One installations to date Phase One remaining items Progress with Phase Two Phase Two planning sequence Worries Don’t have time.

Main progress on Design & Safety Review: EmCAL -- Received the revised TRD write up from Ludovico Design & Safety Audit sheets need to be revised to correspond.

WHAT IS SYSTEM SAFETY? The field of safety analysis in which systems are evaluated using a number of different techniques to improve safety. There are.

MICE Hydrogen Safety Functions IEC61508 Compliance & Emergency Procedures MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.

Project manager report paul drumm CM16 October 2006.

Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.

1 Layout and Installation MICE Collaboration Meeting, RAL, October 27-29, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Paul Drumm, Matthew Hills, Yury Ivanyushenkov,

MICE Collaboration meeting (CM20) At RAL 10 – 13 Feb 2008 AFC Magnet – Status and Progress W. Lau, Oxford University.

1 MICE Mtg Oct 2002 Elwyn Baynham RAL Implementation of MICE at RAL Work done in Engineering and ISIS Departments Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Contributors.

The MICE Hydrogen System Safety Review Introduction Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford.

Hydrogen Delivery System Schedule MICE Schedule Review 23 rd -25 th May 2011 M Hills STFC.

1 MICE Collaboration meeting at Berkeley 9 – 12 February 2005 Integrated Design & Safety Review Presented by Wing Lau & Paul Drumm.

International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) Revision Status and next steps.

1 MICE Hall and Infrastructure - Progress since CM18 Chris Nelson MICE CM19 Oct 2007.

MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.

1 MICE Radiation Shielding MICE Phone Conference, 28 January 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Engineering Department, RAL.

CM 28 – 6 th October 2010 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.

Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 The Hydrogen Delivery System – An Introduction M Hills.

CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.

Progress on Hydrogen R&D System

Status of the MICE Construction Project Resource Loaded Schedule Review 29 th April 2014 Roy Preece.

Hydrogen System Update Video Conference 19 th January 2012 S Watson.

1 Status of infrastructure MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation.

Progress on Hydrogen R&D System Yury Ivanyushenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold Matthew Hills, Tony Jones MICE Collaboration.

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

1 MICE absorbers work package MPB – 27/10/15 Mike Courthold Mark Tucker Phil Warburton Steve Watson.

1 MICE PM Report Phase One installations to date Phase One remaining items Progress with Phase Two Worries Don’t have time for a detailed status report,

1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.

Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.

Hydrogen System Update

Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure Update

Integration Group Summary

East Hall under construction

MICE Safety Review Meeting 4th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab

Status of Hydrogen System Development

Presentation transcript:

1 Preparation of the hydrogen test system Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones CCLRC Technology RAL MICE Video Conference, 13 September 2006

2 Scope - Safety analysis status. -Test facility site. - Design status. -Hardware procurement. -Next steps. MICE Video Conference, 13 September 2006

3 Safety analysis status MICE Video Conference, 13 September 2006 R&D Hydrogen delivery system HAZOPs: 1) Preliminary HAZOP at the internal review – November 2005 Review panel recommended that “A full HAZOP study carried out with the aid of an external specialist, should be completed as a priority”. 2) R&D system HAZOP study at RAL by SERCO experts – May 2006: -26 recommendations to be analysed ( in progress, to be finished by CM16) Hydrogen zones classification in MICE hall: - Area classification procedure is defined in BS EN ; - The procedure calculates the volume and time of persistence of hydrogen cloud for a given hydrogen release rate and then assigns the zone type (0,1,2 or non-hazardous); -Knowledge of possible hydrogen release rate is essential ( it is where we have a difficulty at the moment). -> analysis of possible hydrogen accidents is being started. Note: Hydrogen area classification in MICE hall needs to be completed ASAP as it effects the civil works in the hall.

4 Test facility site MICE Video Conference, 13 September 2006 Hydrogen R&D facility was and is still sited in the MICE hall Pros: -The R&D system later becomes the first (out of 3) MICE hydrogen system Cons: -The work on hydrogen R&D interferes with civil work in the MICE hall; - Time schedule is defined by the Phase I preparation time table and puts the hydrogen R&D programme into the background mode (  risk of failure). That is why it has been suggested to search for a dedicated site for hydrogen R&D facility outside MICE hall. Pros: - Eliminates the Cons above, i.e. decouples Phase I programme from the hydrogen programme Cons: - Will require extra work on new facility layout and new safety case preparation, hence extra cost; - Will later require re-location of hydrogen test system into MICE hall, hence extra cost. Finally, hydrogen R&D system could possibly be locates in the Cryogenics Group laboratory- this is being investigated.

5 Design status MICE Video Conference, 13 September 2006 PID: -HAZOP recommendations are being implemented, to be completed by CM16. Cryostat design: - Is being revised to be released to a manufacturer. Test area layout: - Should be re-designed if the facility is moved into a new site.

6 Hardware procurement MICE Video Conference, 13 September 2006 Metal hydride tank: - Is now at RAL; - Has been tested by the manufacturer before shipping to RAL, Yury visited the company to see their facility and to discuss their recommendations on the tank implementation into MICE system. Heater/chiller unit for metal hydride tank: - A candidate model has been identified; - Procurement is being started

7 Next steps MICE Video Conference, 13 September Define hydrogen zones in MICE hall (ASAP) requires possible hydrogen accidents list. - Decide on the site for the test facility. - Analyse and implement HAZOP recommendations into the PID and into the system design (by CM16). - Complete formal response to the Internal Safety Review (by CM16). - Revise and complete cryostat design, send it to a manufacturer. - Procure heater/chiller unit. - Revise and complete facility layout, will require a new layout (as well as a new safety case) if the facility is moved into a new site.