Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SB Sub-Area (AQ CoP) K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, J. Husar, R. Poirot, M. Schulz., K. Torsett,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Quality and Health Scenario Stefan Falke, Rudy Husar, Frank Lindsay, David McCabe.
Advertisements

AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
User Interface Mechanism GEO GEO-I Meeting Ad Hoc User Interface Workgroup May 2005 Geneva.
1 GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot (AIP) Phase 2 Air Quality and Health Working Group Stefan Falke, Rudy Husar, Frank Lindsay, David McCabe, Erin.
WELCOME TO THE USER INTERFACE COMMITTEE MEETING 15 November 2009 Gary J. Foley, PhD Earth Observation Systems Executive Senior Advisor to the EPA Chief.
ID-06 Building a User-Driven GEOSS Essential Components of User Management for GEO Tasks.
ID-04 Building Communities and Increasing Awareness & ID-06 (proposed) Building a user-driven GEOSS.
Remote Sensing at the service of Natural Disasters Warning: the Contribution of the Supersites Concept Professor Stuart Marsh Co-Chair GEO Institutions.
GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
From “Usability Testing 2009” to the “Sprint to Plenary 2011” GEO Portal and Clearinghouse: reaching out to users with user-friendly interfaces. Gary J.
What does the air quality scenario envision? We produced a very broad, ambitious scenario, structured around 4 societal needs: -Real-time event analysis.
GEOSS Architecture Describes how components fit together for providing data and information that will be better …than the individual components or systems.
A Roadmap for the GHCP The GeoHazards Community of Practice (GHCP) Presentation developed during the First GHCP Workshop, Paris, January 18-21, 2010.
ESIP Air Quality Workgroup and the GEO Air Quality Community of Practice collaboratively building an air quality community network for finding, accessing,
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew,
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Architecture Implementation Pilot (AIP) Air Quality and Health Working Group Stefan Falke, Rudy Husar,
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
1 GEO Task US-09-01a Health SBA SBA: Health – Air Quality Analyst: Rudolf Husar, Washington University/Lantern Co-Analyst: Stefan Falke, Wash. U./Northrop.
The Communities of Practice: Implementation & Users Engaging Users? Meeting User Expectations? Gary J. Foley, PhD Co-chair, User interface Committee 10.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing By John Lyon and Co-Chairs, UIC Introduction to the UIC: A User Requirements Approach Gary J. Foley,
Task ID-05 IDIB report ID-05 Catalyzing Resources for GEOSS Implementation C1 - Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building C2 - Resource Mobilization.
Water & Health Community of Practice (CP) Taking a Watershed Approach (a draft for review) GEO User Interface Workgroup Geneva, Switzerland December 16,
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
Air Quality Management: Workflow, Value-Adding Activities, Participants and Earth Observation Needs R. Poirot, W. White, S. Falke, M. Schulz., K Hoijarvi,
EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP; Environmental Health Decisionmaking January 10, 2008 George Gray, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator EPA Office of Research.
Air & Health Community of Practice (CP) (a draft for review) GEO User Interface Workgroup Geneva, Switzerland December 16, 2005 Gary Foley, USA.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Plenary Discussion of Framework for Engagement GEO XI Plenary Geneva, November, 2014.
Earth Science Environmental Decision-Making Pai-Yei Whung, PhD Chief Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency January 5, ESIP Federation.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-03: Science and Technology in GEOSS ID-03-C1: Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation.
EPA’s Role in the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)
The Use of the Targets by the Institutions & Development Implementation Board in Monitoring the Work Plan Implementation 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignotelli,
Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.
1 GEO Task US-09-01a Health SBA SBA: Health – Air Quality Analyst: Rudolf Husar, Washington University/Lantern Co-Analyst: Stefan Falke, Wash. U./Northrop.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
1 Using the GEOSS Common Infrastructure in the Air Quality & Health SBA: Wildfire & Smoke Assessment Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working.
Introducing the Science and Technology Roadmap 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SB Sub-Area (AQ CoP) K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, J. Husar, R. Poirot, M. Schulz., K. Torsett,
International Collaboration, Interoperable Data Flows, Architecture of GEOSS R.B. Husar, E. M. Robinson, J. D. Husar and M. Kieffer, Wash. Univ. G. Percivall,
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation EU research activities supporting AfriGEOSS AfriGEOSS Side Event, Tuesday 10 November Jose Miguel RUBIO.
Capacity Building & the European Community Research Framework Programme: (FP7) Alan Edwards European Commission.
The GEOSS Architecture Users and Scientific Communities Served By GEOSS Common Approaches Systems within their Mandates UIC Goal Organize this side of.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
GEOSS A single dataset will serve many communities Any single problem requires many datasets Register Discover.
1 Using the GEOSS Common Infrastructure in the Air Quality & Health SBA: Wildfire & Smoke Assessment Prepared by the GEOSS AIP-2 Air Quality & Health Working.
A Workflow-Accounting Methodology to Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality A Contribution from the GEO Air Quality Community of Practice.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
The Federated Data System DataFed R. Husar, K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, DaFed Community EPA Data Summit, Feb. 12, 2008, RTP Non-intrusive data integration infrastructure.
User Requirements for Air Quality and Encoding for the GEO URR R. Poirot, S. Falke, M. Schulz., K Hoijarvi, K. Torsett, E. Robinson, J Husar, A, Surijavong,
GEO 2016 Work Programme Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ESDS Reuse Working Group Earth Science Data Systems Reuse Working Group Case Study: SHAirED Services for.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
Data needs and priorities of EPA How the EPA and Federation can work together to reach our common objectives? Gary J. Foley, EPA 2005 ESIP Federation Winter.
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits
The GEO Air Quality Community of Practice AQ CoP
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
DRAFT Air Quality SBA Air Quality Management: Workflow, Value-Adding Activities, Participants and Earth Observation Needs R. Husar Oct. 3, 2010.
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
GEO AQ CoP Contact: R. Husar,
Building a User Driven GEOSS Masami Onoda, GEO Secretariat Workshop at 34th ISRSE, Sydney, Australia 10 April, 2011.
Air Quality Data Systems and the GEOSS Architecture
Presentation transcript:

Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SB Sub-Area (AQ CoP) K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, J. Husar, R. Poirot, M. Schulz., K. Torsett, E. Robinson, A, Surijavong, S. Vlasic, W. White GEO AQ CoP Contact: R. Husar, DRAFT Phase II. Encode and Enter the AQ Requirements into the GEO User Requirement Registry (SCG)

Forum to Develop AQ Requirements: GEO AQ Community of Practice Methodology for Gathering User Requirements: 1.State the SB Sub-Area: e.g. Manage Air Quality 2.Define Major Workflow Steps of the SBA 3.Name the Value-Adding Activities 4.Identify Participants for Each Activity (i.e. the ‘Users’) 5.Determine the Participant’s EO Needs Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SBA

1. Select SBA: AQ Management 2. Define Workflow Bachmann, 2008

3. Define Value Adding Activities: Workflow Step 1: Setting AQ Standard Emission Analyst Transport Meteor. Activity Drivers Emission Modeler Chem. Tr. Modeler Receptor Modeler Air Qual. Analyst Health Analyst PM Comp. Gas Comp. Policy Analyst Popul. Density Policy Maker Knowledge: Decisions Information: Processed Data Data: Observations Spreadsheet of activities, participants, requirements Other Data

Phase I. Determining Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SBA Clearinghouse AQ Community Catalog User Requirement Registry GEO Task US 0901a: Priority Earth Observations for Air Quality

The URR is a facility for collection, sharing and describing: User types among the nine SBAs; Applications that use Earth observations; Requirements for Earth observations and derived products; Links among user types, applications, and requirements. Phase II: Encode and Enter the AQ Requirements into the GEO User Requirement Registry (SCG)

Encoding into URR: Activities – User Types - Requirements Characterize Current AQ Develop AQ Standard Determine Compliance Eval. Control Effectiveness Det. Background AQ Assess Health Risk Assess Visibility Risk Assess Terrestr. Risk Assess Aquatic Risk Set AQ Standard ActivitiesWorkflowUser Types AQ Analyst Receptor Mod. Transport Mod. AQ Analyst Health Analyst AQ Analyst Aquatic Analyst AQ Analyst Terrestr. Analyst AQ Analyst Visibility Analyst Policy Analyst Requirements

Workflow Step 2: Evaluate Current Air Quality Evaluate Current AQ Develop AQ Standard Determine Compliance Eval. Control Effectiveness Det. Ambient AQ Attribute Sources Determ. Exceedance ActivitiesWorkflowUser Types AQ Analyst Receptor Mod. Transport Mod. Policy Analyst Det. Emissions Emiss. Analyst Emiss. Modeler Requirements

Workflow Step 3: Develop and Enforce Compliance Characterize Current AQ Develop AQ Standard Develop Compliance Eval. Control Effectiveness Attribute Sources Emiss. Reduct. Plan ActivitiesWorkflowUser Types AQ Analyst Receptor Mod. Transport Mod. Policy Analyst Det. Emissions Emiss. Analyst Emiss. Modeler Requirements

Workflow Step 4: Evaluate Control Effectiveness Characterize Current AQ Develop AQ Standard Determine Compliance Eval. Control Effectiveness Det. Ambient AQ Attribute Sources Assess Health Risk Assess Visibility Risk Assess Terrestr. Risk Assess Aquatic Risk Eval. Control Effect ActivitiesWorkflowUser Types AQ Analyst Receptor Mod. Transport Mod. AQ Analyst Health Analyst AQ Analyst Aquatic Analyst AQ Analyst Terrestr. Analyst AQ Analyst Visibility Analyst Policy Analyst Det. Emissions Emiss. Analyst Emiss. Modeler Requirements

Activity – Participant - Requirements Browser for AQ Management

Provider - Instrument - Observation Browser for AQ Data in GEOSS Clearinghouse

It is possible to Approach: Make AQ Contribution Consistent with: Clearinghouse AQ Community Catalog User Requirement Registry GEO Task US 0901a: Priority Earth Observations for Air Quality

General Requirements by User Type AQ Analyst Receptor Modeler Transport Modeler Health Analyst Aquatic Analyst Terrestrial Analyst Visibility Analyst Policy Analyst Emission Analyst Emission Modeler User Types EO Requirements: Where, What Type; Pollutant Surface| MassConc. | PM25, PM10, O3, SO2, NO2, VOC; Surface | MassConc. |PM25, PM10, PMComp, WindField 4Dim| Emiss. /4DWea| PM25, PM10, SO2, NO2, VOC Surface/Col| Emission Obs/| PM25, PM10, SO2, NO2, VOC; Surface| Activity Drivers| PM25, PM10, SO2, NO2, VOC; Surface| Expos., HealthMeas| PM25, PM10, O3, SO2, NO2 Surface| Depos., AquaMeas| PM25, PM10, O3, SO2, NO2, VOC; Surface| Depos., TerrMeas. | PM25, PM10, O3, SO2, NO2 Surface | Light Ext., Vistas | PM25, PM10, PMComp Surface | Analysts Outout |PM25, PM10, O3, SO2, NO2 Any AQM activity may require multiple user types Any user type can contribute to multiple AQM activities The specific user requirements depend on the activity

Browser of AQM Activities, Participants, and EO Needs

Value Chain for Informing the Public Emission Analyst Transport Meteor. Activity Drivers Emission Modeler Forecast Modeler Air Qual. Analyst Public Media Gas Comp. Public Dec. Maker Observation-Data Processed Data Actionable Knowledge

AQ Management: Science View Processes and Earth Observations for AQ: Emissions, Transport and ambient Concentrations/Depositions User Types: Emission Analysts, Emission Modeler, AQ Data Analyst, AQ Transport Modeler, AQ Receptor Modeler, Health Analyst, Aquatic Analyst, Terrestrial Analyst, Visibility Analyst

AQ Management: Science View Emissions, Transport and ambient Concentrations/Depositions causing Effects on Health and Welfare Emission Analysts Emission Modeler Transport Modeler Receptor Modeler AQ Data Analyst Health Analyst Aquatic Analyst Terrestrial Analyst Visibility Analyst

GEOSS Information Flow Framework Policy Maker Policy Analyst AQ Domain Analyst AQ Analyst Modeler AQ Management: Information Flow View GEOSS Core The AQ Information system processes Earth and other observations into actionable knowledge for policy/decision makers. User Types: AQ data analysts and modelers; health, aquatic and other domain analysts, policy analysts and policy/decision makers

UIC Objectives Enable GEO to address in a systematic, targeted, focused and comprehensive way the needs and concerns of a broad range of user communities in developing and developed countries, across issues and trans-disciplinary needs, with a particular focus on fostering new or less organized communities. Enable GEO, in the implementation of GEOSS, to engage a continuum of users, from producers to the final beneficiaries of the data and information Facilitate linkages and partnerships between established CPs and new user groups or organizations interested in collaborating.

THE SPECTRUM OF USERS 08.ppt&rct=j&q=Foley%20Spectrum%20of%20Users&ei=Jyu7TPXBBI3Lngejvvy-DQ&usg=AFQjCNHwFre7zIWG_68GQLe9on3A7k-2mA&sig2=SA5reCriEOLJY0a18XM7JA Earth observations & earth system models Data-to-Information archiving & services Decision support tool development Decision making Assessment of benefits Earth system scientists and modelers Earth system service providers Environmental process modelers & researchers Policy Makers & Environmental managers Public officials, advocacy groups and the Public From observations To societal benefits Requirements well known Not aware that observational Requirements are even needed

How to Approach Users in the Lower Half of the Spectrum What do they do in their occupation and what does their organization do? Is there a web-site? How would they describe their more important activities? What are those of their organization? What decision-making are they involved in, either directly or indirectly by providing research or decision support tool development? What impact/benefits result or might potentially result from this decision- making, including the expected timeframe of the impact/benefits? Does the organization measure the impacts/benefits?

How to Approach Users in the Lower Half of the Spectrum Does your organization operate a system or systems that collect observational data, either in-situ or remotely sensed? Describe these systems. Are they part of a larger system? What observational data, geographical data, socio-economic data and/or models/forecasts, if any, are used in the decision-making or the indirect support to the decision-making What are the needs for additional information that could improve the decision-making or the indirect support to the decision-making? What regional or international working groups are you a member of or on the mailing list of?

A user-led community of stakeholders, from providers to the final beneficiaries of Earth observation data and information, with a common interest in specific aspects of societal benefits to be realized by GEOSS implementation. The Communities of Practice will be self organized and will include stakeholders required to achieve benefits. Communities of Practice

An Example Community of Practice Air Quality & Health The Public

Registering User Types Air & Health CP Examples The Air Quality Managers Air Quality Index operations Air Quality monitoring and regulatory officials Regulated industrial groups Traffic planning & highway management groups Forest & agricultural fire management officials AQ researchers AQ management decision support tool developers The Public Health Officials Public Health outcome officials Hospital & Emergency Room management groups Epidemiologists Medical Practitioners treating sensitive sub-populations Asthma, birth defect and cardiovascular disease researchers

Registering User Applications Air & Health CP Examples Global NO2 monitoring by SCIAMACHY and ROSE model Air Quality Indices PREV'AIR air quality forecasts PROMOTE applications SMOG alerts for AQ episodes, EnviroFlash and APNEE TU Fusion of AOD with ground- based data to provide better PM2.5 information to AQ and health researchers The Public Health Air Surveillance Evaluation (PHASE) Project A Health-based AQ index Long-range Smoke alerts

The GEOSS Architecture Users and Scientific Communities Served By GEOSS Common Approaches Systems within their Mandates UIC Goal Organize this side of the GEOSS Architecture

The GEOSS Architecture Users and Scientific Communities Served By GEOSS Common Approaches Systems within their Mandates Success begins and ends on this side of the architecture User Requirements

Resources