Collaborative Teaching Initiative January 25, 2007 Welcome Please complete teacher survey and return to boxes by each door.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rich Formative Assessment: Critical Component of Instruction
Advertisements

Co-Teaching Whittney Smith Adelphi University.
Creating Collaborative Standards-Based IEPs: A Training for IEP Team Members Session Three.
Making the Grade Grading Practices for Students with Disabilities By Cathy Sartain Industries
A Guide for IEP Teams Including Students with Disabilities in State and District- wide Assessment.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Skills & Ladders (with more variations) Welcome! 1.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Assessing Student Learning
Student-Centered Coaching Instructional Design and Assessment Presented by Diane Sweeney Author of: Student-Centered Coaching (Corwin, 2010), Student-
TELL Ohio Survey School Improvement Guide Insert date here.
Using Your TELL Data: A Guide for School Leaders Insert date here.
Using Your TELL Data: A Guide for School Leaders Insert date here.
Learning Strategies.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
Welcome First Grade!. Dubuque Community School District Grade 1 In-Service Day 12:30 – 3:30 February 18, :30 – 1:00 pm Lexile and Text Level Video.
TELL Mass Survey School Improvement Guide Insert date here.
Science Fair Project Survival Guide For Parents!.
Creating Meaningful Learning Experiences Powerful Conversations Secondary Network February 28, 2013.
 Based upon your teaching experience, write a one sentence definition for each of the following letter grades. What does the letter signify?  A=  B=
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
TELL Delaware Survey School Improvement Guide Insert date here 1.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
SPU Institute- Day 2 July 21, Session Overview Team Project Essential Conditions Thinking about implementation – Structures – Norms Formative Assessment.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Math-It’s Elementary February 2013 Investigating strategies that promote highly effective teaching and learning for meeting the Kentucky Core Academic.
Welcome Parents! As you come in: Sign up for a conference time (located on by door). Feel free to sign up and volunteer(located on by door). Find your.
Maria LeFort 1 M. LeFort - Teaching Reading Across the Curriculum - Part 2.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
STAR Information Meeting. Agenda Changes Security Before testing During testing After testing Testing Calendar.
TELL ACPS 2014 Survey School Improvement Guide Insert date here.
Welcome to Transitional Algebra. As you enter the classroom...  Pick up a puzzle piece.  Find the other students that have a piece that goes with your.
Grading Special Education Students Elementary, Middle School, and High School Ages “Research suggests that grading practices vary considerably among.
The Quality of Mentoring Matters February 22 and 23, 2012 INTC Conference Rosalie Gardner Facilitator.
Making the Grade Grading Practices for Students with Disabilities By Cathy Sartain Industries
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Response to Intervention RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem- Solving Model Jim Wright
Susan Colvin 2011 SMCPS Susan Colvin 11/2011.  How comfortable are you with making modifications for students having difficulties?  What difficulties.
Using Your TELL Data: A Guide for School Leaders Insert date here.
Mary Culpepper and Molly Oexle  Based on Stetson and Associates.
Foundations of Inclusion Training Workshop
North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey School Improvement Guide Insert date here.
Developing Questions That Matter
Co-Teaching Whittney Smith, Ed.D. Adelphi University 2013.
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
WestEd.org Framing the Curriculum: Families, Interactions, Environments, and Materials PITC Partners for Quality Advanced Training 2014.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement December 1, 2010.
2016 TELL MNPS Survey School Improvement Guide Insert date here.
Syllabus for SPE 523 Dr. Karin Dyke January 13, 2010.
Working Systemically To Increase Student Achievement Collecting, Interpreting, and Using Data.
TfR Seminar: Session 4 Mathematics in Science. Do Now! Do Now! (3 min) Take out all session 4 Handouts, please! Select Handouts 3.17 and 3.18: Strategy.
Gayla Reid K-2 Content Specialist K-2 Reading Academy Day 3.
Back To School Night Welcome to Second Grade! September 24, 2009.
Balanced Literacy Guiding Our Students Toward a Lifelong Love of Reading.
JULIE LUCAS ~ SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND THEORY.
SPE 300 Entire Course (UOP) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT SPE 300 Week 1 Individual Assignment Reflection Paper SPE 300 Week 1 DQ 1 SPE.
March (February) ISLN March 17, 2016
Welcome Protocols in Math Study Group-Session -6 Facilitator; Alaka Das June 19, 2015.
Please get Out your 7 learning Styles paper and look over your answers on the back. Please do not talk at this time.August 25 HW: CIS Quiz on Wed/Thursday.
Academic Conversations
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Session 4, Grading Practices
Welcome to the Washtenaw Writing Collaborative
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Individually page 3 handout
Presentation transcript:

Collaborative Teaching Initiative January 25, 2007 Welcome Please complete teacher survey and return to boxes by each door.

Agenda Snowball fight Collaborative Teaching Rubric Solution Focused conversation School Team Planning Strategy Survey Give one, get one LunchCoaches lunch meeting Expectations Grading Future Evaluation

Snowball Fight Write down on a white piece of paper at your table one great experience you have shared with one of your partners this year. Be specific. Include: 1.Exactly what it was 2. How you both felt about it 3. What you have done to replicate or expand that experience

New Groups Look at your name tag and locate the alphabet letter under your name Please move to the table matching the alphabet letter on your name tag. Okay go ahead and move!

Collaborative Teaching Rubric Mark each section for: √ - Best pair experience Χ – Most challenging pair experience Ο – Where building is

Solution Focus Discussion As a table group come to consensus on one challenge from the rubric Choose a recorder Choose a facilitator Choose a time keeper

Solution Focused Conversation Directions Mixed Team Discussion

Solution Focus Conversation Large group sharing Summarize in 3 minutes or less your table issue and plan you choose to address it.

Back to building teams

Building Discussion In building teams determine a day and a time when you can meet with content teachers, strategist, and administrator to discuss the rubric. Your challenge is to develop a plan to move your building level practices from where your rubric said you were performing to the next higher level. Use the form in your packet called “School Team Planning”.

Break Return in 16 minutes

Strategy Use Survey

I have used the course organizer a.0 b.1 c.2 d.3 e.More than 3 times

I have used unit organizer a.0 b.1 c.2-3 d.4-5 e.More than 5 times

I have used the framing routine a.0 b.1 c.2-3 d.4-5 e.More than 5 times

I have used the text preview organizer a.0 b.1 c.2 d.3 e.More than 3 times

I have used the Frayer model a.0 b.1-2 c.3-4 d.4-5 e.More than 5 times

I have used the semantic feature analysis a.0 b.1-2 c.3-4 d.4-5 e.More than 5 times

I have used KWL, KWHL, KWLR, KNWS or KWL Plus a.0 b.1-2 c.2-3 d.4-5 e.More than 5 times

I have used the anticipation guide a.0 b.1-2 c.2-3 d.4-5 e.More than 5 times

I have used the prediction guide a.0 b.1-2 c.2-3 d.4-5 e.More than 5 times

Processing

Return in 1 hour

Give One, Get One Write one new idea you learned this semester from the sessions or from one of your teaching partners on the 3x5 index card on your table. Write one new idea you learned this semester from the sessions or from one of your teaching partners on the 3x5 index card on your table.

Expectation Write questions on note cards –Include name for individual response –Group responses check the blog –Place in basket located in the back of the room

New Groups Look at your name tag and locate the number under your name Please move to the table matching the number on your name tag. Okay go ahead and move!

Issues in Grading Perceptions of purpose of grades Inclusion of factors other than learning or achievement in an inconsistent manner Parent/ student unawareness of the grading system Weighting single factors heavily or differently for different assignments

Frequently Heard Grading Comments “Students with IEP’s cannot fail.” “Modifying grading scales is not fair.” “Teachers feel pressure to inflate grades for students with IEP’s” “You just tell me what grade you think they should have.” “Students with IEP’s getting high grades creates difficulty for the really good students in class rank” “We’ll just grade on effort.” “Grades have little meaning anyway”

Survey of Grading Purposes Part 2 Directions: Transfer your rankings form Part 1 to the interpretive chart below. Sum the rankings for the items in each Focus Area. The lower the score the more important the Focus Area. Focus Area: Academic Performance Item: 1.Rank ________ 9.Rank ________ 10. Rank ________ 8. Rank ________ Focus Area: Affective and Behavioral Control 5.Rank ________ 3. Rank ________ 12.Rank ________ 4. Rank ________ Focus Area: Transition/Post Secondary Planning 2Rank ________ 11. Rank ________ 7. Rank ________ 6. Rank ________ Adapted from Dennis Munk “Solving the Grading Puzzle for Students With Disabilities”

Grading – Group Sharing At your table discuss : What is your building policy on grading? Who is responsible for grading? Whose name goes on the report card? What changes to your grading have you made for kids? How do you designate co-taught classes in your course of study? What successes have you had in working out grading challenges? What grading modifications are spelled out in IEP’s? What will be different next year about grading in your building? How are student IEP goals addressed in your classes? Other discussion…..

Large Group Sharing Share one future need that you discussed at your table. Leave white sheets on table, we will collect them.

Please leave completed evaluations on the center of your table