HUD Consolidated Plan Cuyahoga County Planning Commission Cuyahoga Urban County September 16, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Albuquerque Department of Family and Community Services 2014 HUD Action Plan Public Meeting Tuesday, September 9, 2014 “Be there or be Square”
Advertisements

Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center February North Dakota Statewide Housing Needs Assessment Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director.
Targeting NSP Funds Todd Richardson HUD Office of Policy Development and Research.
City of Tampa Consolidated Plan Federal Programs.
Agenda I.General Overview II.Special Needs Housing III.Housing Trust Fund IV.Balance of State Continuum of Care V.Emergency Solutions Grant VI.GCEH role.
Arizona Department of Housing DIRECTOR MICHAEL TRAILOR.
THE FORECLOSURE CRISIS BAY AREA CASE STUDY. Research Focus  Focus: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Neighborhood Stabilization.
1 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM Title III, Section 2301 of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HR3221)
Washtenaw County Office of Community Development Urban County Needs Assessment Public Hearing December 18th, 2007 Library Learning Resource Center.
Cause for Concern? “Vacancies create a downward spiral for neighborhood housing markets that is difficult to correct, even with large infusions of public.
Floyd County Comprehensive Plan - Demographic Data Report FLOYD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE.
Pinal County Housing Needs Assessment & Strategy Unincorporated County & Countywide March 2008.
Building a Stronger North Carolina: A Legislative Briefing and Call to Action 2014.
THE FORECLOSURE CRISIS BAY AREA CASE STUDY. Overview 2  Research Focus  Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP)  Bay Area Demographics  Foreclosures.
James Pappas, Housing Policy and Preservation Associate California Housing Partnership SCANPH Webinar 03/17/2014.
Chapter 15 Federal Subsidies and Grants for Housing.
The Washington DC Housing Market: Trends and Outlook Housing Association of Non-Profit Developers December 11, 2014 Lisa A. Sturtevant, PhD Vice President.
The Need for Affordable Housing An Overview Hillsborough County, Florida Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction.
The Need for Affordable Housing An Overview Charlotte County, Florida Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing M.E. Rinker, Sr. School of Building Construction.
Emily Cooper Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc. Key Features of HUD’s Low Income Programs.
Demographic Trends “Where we go from here” Presented by: Robert M. Lefenfeld Principal, Real Property Research Group, Inc.
1 CIL-NET, a project of ILRU – Independent Living Research Utilization 1 CIL-NET Presents… Assisting Individuals to Find Affordable, Accessible, Integrated.
Housing & Career Services Department Five-Year Consolidation Plan ( ) & Annual Action Plan Randy Mabson, Program Coordinator July 13, 2015.
CDBG Entitlement Program Consolidated Action Plan May 29, 2012 City Council Workshop.
CDBG Entitlement Program Consolidated Action Plan and Annual Action Plan July 10, 2012 City Council Workshop.
Housing Need & Gaps: Some of the Data Presentation by AHS 9/30/2014 Using Slides prepared by And from the County’s 9/22/2014 Presentation ARLINGTON AFFORDABLE.
May 6, rd Public Hearing Staff Recommendations Based on Council Priorities & Objectives 1.
CITY OF WENATCHEE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Three-Year Housing and Community Development Consolidated.
Office of Strategic Planning ANNUAL ACTION PLAN: ONE YEAR USE OF FUNDS PROGRAM YEAR November 19, 2007 Northwest Community Center 155 Lawn Ave.
1 Coconino County Trends April 5, 2012 The Arizona Rural Policy Institute Thomas Combrink, Senior Research Specialist Wayne Fox, Director Jeff Peterson,
Affordable Housing Initiatives: Building Your Own Local Toolbox Mara S. Register Community Development Director City of Valdosta, Georgia.
CDBG Projects July 13, CDBG Primary Objectives  The development of viable urban communities, principally for households earning low- and moderate-incomes.
Old Louisville by the Numbers A Statistical Profile by Michael Price Urban Studies Institute University of Louisville Spring 2006.
Weaving a story of poverty in Multnomah County. Per capita income, Portland MSA, US Metro, Multnomah County, Source: Regional Economic Information.
Presentation Outline Background NSP Plan Requirements Orange County NSP Plan NSP Implementation Strategies Timeline Action Requested.
1 January 25, Nebraska Profile 2011 NEBRASKA PROFILE Ninth Edition  State, 8 Regions, 93 Counties, plus 18 Cities – Three Volumes  Demographic.
1 Public Input: 9/23/04Nebraska Consolidated Plan Support Nebraska This Research is in Support of Nebraska Consolidated Plan For Housing and Community.
Office of Strategic Planning ANNUAL ACTION PLAN: ONE YEAR USE OF FUNDS PROGRAM YEAR 2006 Making Communities Livable Growing Our Economic Base Supporting.
Connecting People and Place: Improving Communities through Integrated Data Systems Chronic School Absenteeism in Pittsburgh PA Sabina Deitrick, PhD University.
Affordable Housing Strategy, Understanding, Solutions.
Division of Community Development FY2016 CAC Presentation Low Interest Loan Program$100,000 Repair, Accessibility, Maintenance Program (RAMP)$100,000 Weatherization$70,000.
Housing Element Update 2009 Update of the 2001 Berkeley Housing Element for the: – Planning Period – Regional Housing Needs Assessment.
Cuyahoga County Foreclosure Prevention Program, 2012 Evaluation Molly S. Schnoke Center for Community Planning & Development Levin College of Urban Affairs.
Indicator Development and Use in the LISC Sustainable Communities Assessment Research National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership Minneapolis, MN May.
Department of Planning & Development It’s Time for the Consolidated Planning Process The following presentation is designed to provide you with answers.
© PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
Community Planning and Development Programs. CPD Terms Office of Community Planning and Development – We provide funding to local governments and States.
OneMECK Affordable Housing Overview January 5, 2016.
1 Consolidated Plan: PY Focus Group - Housing Needs Tuesday, May 19, :00 to 11:00 AM Oakland County Executive Office Building Conference.
Yarmouth Housing Production Plan PLANNING BOARD MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING – FEBRUARY 3, 2016.
The Housing Market ‘Reset’ and its Implications for Housing Policy Alan Mallach Non-resident Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution.
Financing Small Multifamily Rental Housing Presentation to the Government Accountability Office June 8, 2015.
We change the way people use energy™ OPALCO Low Income Assessment and Market Profile.
City of Burlingame Housing Element Update Community Workshop # 1 | March 18, 2014.
COMMUNITY NEED MEETING HOUSING AND COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
Jo Carroll DeStefano Community Development & Training Network Public Works Department June-August 2011 City of Rowlett Public Works Department Proposed.
Portland Housing Bureau Budget Worksession Presentation Slide 1.
HOUSING TRUST FUND Housing Trust Fund (HTF) provides funds to create and preserve affordable housing for low- income and persons with special needs. HTF.
Public Hearing: Final Adoption of the Consolidated Plan for ; One-Year Action Plan ; and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice.
Landlord Liaison. History of Sacramento Landscape Population, Rental Increases & Inventory County Housing Needs 2016 Forecast, New Supply, Projected Supply.
Housing Master Plan: Housing For All Planning Commission October 19,
Tuesday, November 18, 2008 Robert Pulster, Executive Director of the Governor’s Interagency Council on Housing and Homelessness & Matthew D. Simmonds,
Orange County Consolidated Plan One-Year Action Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice August 2, 2016 BCC.
Housing Affordability in Cincinnati and Hamilton County
City of Roanoke 2017 HUD Annual Action Plan
Housing Production Plan: Meeting Local Needs
Cuyahoga County Housing Study and Plan
The Consolidated Plan Nicole Engels City of Omaha Planning Housing and Community Development.
“There’s More to the Story ”
Planning for the next 5 years Consolidated Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Required by HUD for Federal Programs: CDBG, HOME, ESG.
Presentation transcript:

HUD Consolidated Plan Cuyahoga County Planning Commission Cuyahoga Urban County September 16, 2009

’s Housing Assistance Plan Planning Documents HUD Housing Programs and Planning Documents Establishment of Programs Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Five-Year Consolidated Plan Emergency Shelter Grant Program HOME Investment Partnerships Program Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Cuyahoga Housing Consortium created Neighborhood Stabilization Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

HUD Consolidated Plan FY 2010 – FY 2014 Five-Year Plan (prepared once every five years) – A planning document to: Describe the housing needs of low- and moderate-income residents; Outline strategies to meet the needs; and Discuss resources available to implement the strategies. One-Year Plan (prepared every year) Description of how the available HUD funds, plus non- federal funds, will be used during the next twelve-month period for programs identified in the Five-Year Plan.

HUD Consolidated Plan FY 2010 – FY 2014 Components – Five-Year Plan – Examine existing and emerging demographic and housing trends; – Develop local priority needs and objectives for housing-related programs based on the trends; – Develop a plan for assessing yearly performance; and – Consult with private, nonprofit, and public agencies/organizations to better understand the needs of specific populations and the programs currently being provided.

HUD Consolidated Plan FY 2010 – FY 2014 Content – Five-Year Plan – Community Profile Characteristics of the general population; Characteristics of the housing stock and housing market; Affordable housing needs of low- and moderate- income persons and families; Needs of homeless persons; and Needs of non-homeless persons with special needs who require supportive services.

Cuyahoga Housing Consortium

Demographics

1990 – 2000 By Community 1990 – 2000 By Census Tract Percent Population Change, 1990 – 2000 Source: U.S. Census

Urban County4.2%-6.2% Cleveland-5.4%-9.3% Cuyahoga County-1.3%-7.9% Urban County Population (based on 2009 community roster) , , (estimate)586, – 2007 American Community Survey (approximation) 651,044 Source: U.S. Census Percent Population Change

Source: U.S. Census, 2005 – 2007 ACS Age Composition 17 Years or Under18 to 39 Years40 to 64 Years65 years and over NumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercent Urban County*150, %152, %237, %110, % Cleveland105, %118, %131, %49, % Cuyahoga County314, %344, %453, %198, % *approximation

Percent Minority Composition by Census Tract Source: U.S. Census

American Community Survey Urban County 11.4%16.7%14.5%* Cleveland 52.2% 61.2% 64.2% Cuyahoga County 28.4% 34.1% 36.2% Percent Minority Composition *approximation

Median Household Income by Census Tract * Source: U.S. Census *Adjusted to 1999 dollars

Source: U.S. Census American Community Survey Urban County*$38,856$51,636Not available Cleveland$17,821$25,928$27,007 Cuyahoga County$28,595$39,168$43,162 Not adjusted to current dollars. Median Household Income *approximation

“120% of Area Median Income” in 2008 = $67,050 for a family of three persons.

Percent Persons Below Poverty Level by Census Tract Source: U.S. Census One adult under age 65 = $8,867 One adult under age 65 = $6,451

Source: U.S. Census American Community Survey Urban County3.8%4.6%7.6%* Cleveland28.7%26.3%29.7% Cuyahoga County13.8%13.1%15.7% Percent Persons Below Poverty Level *approximation

Source: Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Ohio Labor Market Information October 2008 June 2009 July 2009 Percent Increase Oct – July 2009 Urban County*5.7%9.2%8.6%50.9% Cuyahoga County6.5%10.2%9.5%46.2% Ohio6.6%11.2%11.1%68.2% Unemployment Rate *approximation

Housing

1939 or Earlier 1940 – 1969 Percent Residential Housing Unit Period of Construction by Census Tract Source: U.S. Census

Percent Renter-Occupied Housing Units by Census Tract Source: U.S. Census

Source: U.S. Census, 2005 – 2007 ACS Tenure by Units in Structure Total Occupied Housing Units 1 Unit in Structure (Detached and Attached) 2 Units in Structure 3 to 9 Units in Structure Units in Structure 50 or more Units in Structure Total Percent Owner- OccupiedTotal Percent Owner- Occupied Total Percent Owner- Occupied Total Percent Owner- Occupied Total Percent Owner- Occupied Urban County*264,074201, %5, %13, %21, %20, % Cleveland168,55793, %33, %17,2997.1%11,1292.8%12,9134.7% Cuyahoga County542,856363, %47, %39, %42,7689.1%46,3998.8% *approximation

Source: NEOCANDO Change AmountPercent Urban County* $147,500$152,250$159,900$166,500$168,000$175,000$172,000$151,000$3,5002.4% Cleveland $62,000$66,500$70,000$74,900$76,000$72,500$62,046$40,000-$22, % Cuyahoga County $105,000$109,900$114,000$120,750$121,000$118,500$114,000$90,000-$15, % Median Sales Price of Single-Family Homes *approximation

“High-Cost” defined as an interest rate 3% or more above prime rate. Prime rate in = 4.0% %.

Source: NEOCANDO

(through Sept 4) Number Percent of Total Number Percent of Total Number Percent of Total Number Percent of Total Urban County3, %4, %4, %3, % Cleveland 7, %7, %7, %4, % Cuyahoga County13, %14, %14, %9, % Foreclosure Filings Source: NEOCANDO Foreclosure Filings

(Through Sept 4) Number Percent of Total Number Percent of Total Number Percent of Total Number Percent of Total Urban County3, %4, %4, %3, % Cleveland 7, %7, %7, %4, % Cuyahoga County13, %14, %14, %9, % Foreclosure Filings Source: NEOCANDO Foreclosure Filings Number As % of Foreclosure Filings Number As % of Foreclosure Filings Number As % of Foreclosure Filings Urban County1, %2, %2, % Cleveland 3, %5, %4, % Cuyahoga County 5, %10, %8, % Sheriff Deeds

Total Foreclosure Filings Residential Foreclosure Filings Residential Foreclosure Filings with 2.5% Tax Reduction Residential Foreclosure Filings with Homestead Tax Reduction Number Percent of Total Number Percent of Total Number Percent of Total Urban County3,1953, %2, %2226.9% Cleveland4,0513, %2, %1754.3% Cuyahoga County9,3538, %6, %5005.3% Source: NEOCANDO Foreclosure Filings 2009 (through Sept 4) For elderly or disabled homeowners, exempts $25,000 of the market value of a home from property taxes. Available only to owner-occupants.

HUD Consolidated Plan Cuyahoga County Planning Commission Cuyahoga Urban County September 16, 2009