Ocean - Proshutinsky/Haidvogel (CG Left Bay) What science questions exist for the arctic that are best answered with coupled regional models? o process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) in the International Polar Year
Advertisements

World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO Global Integrated Polar Prediction System (GIPPS) Peter Lemke (on.
WCRP polar climate predictability initiative Vladimir Ryabinin
Global Change Research in Belgium Guy P. Brasseur Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Chair, International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP)
The Ocean and Climate Change Institute The Ocean and Climate Change Institute Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
CliC (NEG) Climate and Cryosphere Recent, current and planned activities Aike Beckmann
1 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Monitoring polar climate change from space Thorsten Markus Cryospheric Sciences Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD.
ICEMON Presentation at IICWG-IV by Helge Tangen. Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Contents of presentation The ICEMON Consortium Objectives and.
Ron Kwok Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Critically Needed: Continued 3-day RADARSAT coverage of the Western Arctic Ocean.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.
IPY Satellite Data Legacy Vision: Use the full international constellation of remote sensing satellites to acquire spaceborne ‘snapshots’ of processes.
Climate Change in Earth’s Polar Regions
The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Director, Climate Change Science Program.
Global Inter-agency IPY Polar Snapshot Year (GIIPSY): Goals and Accomplishments Katy Farness & Ken Jezek, The Ohio State University Mark Drinkwater, European.
International Arctic Buoy Programme (IABP)  Established by PSC in 1979  20 Participants from 9 countries.  33 buoys currently reporting  Data are available.
How can regional coupled arctic modeling efforts best interact with the global climate modeling community? Marika Holland, NCAR Cecilia Bitz, U. Washington.
Towards Advanced Understanding and Predictive Capability of Climate Change in the Arctic using a High-Resolution Regional Arctic Climate System Model (RAMC)
Washington, DC - Sunday, 7 February 2010 SAON Board Meeting :: January 2012 :: Tromsø, Norway United States Report to the SAON Board Martin Jeffries.
IPY: Collaborative Research: Ocean-Ice Sheet Interaction in the Amundsen Sea: The Keystone of West Antarctic Stability A joint proposal to NSF and NASA.
US CLIVAR Themes. Guided by a set of questions that will be addressed/assessed as a concluding theme action by US CLIVAR Concern a broad topical area.
How does it all work? Synthesis of Arctic System Science Discover, clarify, and improve our understanding of linkages, interactions, and feedbacks among.
Numerical International Polar Year Andrey Proshutinsky and AOMIP group, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution NOAA Arctic Science Priorities Workshop, February.
Organized by Committee on Earth and Planetary Sciences (National Committee for IASC), Science Council of Japan, Committee on Environmental Sciences/Earth.
Brief report from some institutes on the status of ice shelf – ocean modeling.
Report on Ice Sheet Modelling Activities David Holland Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University, NY USA Jonathan Gregory Walker Institute,
Arctic Sea Ice Predictability & the Sea Ice Prediction Network (SIPN) Decline in the extent and thickness of Arctic sea ice is an active area of scientific.
Dr. Frank Herr Ocean Battlespace Sensing S&T Department Head Dr. Scott L. Harper Program Officer Team Lead, 322AGP Dr. Martin O. Jeffries Program Officer.
The GEOSS Portfolio for Science and Technology Produced by ST Featuring: Climate: Capacity Building of Operational Oceanography and Climate Adaptation.
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
Meteorologisk Institutt met.no Operational ocean forecasting in the Arctic (met.no) Øyvind Saetra Norwegian Meteorological Institute Presented at the ArcticGOOS.
Mark Cresswell Impacts: Sea-level Change 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
● Institution Contacts ● Institution Contacts Prof. Minghua Zhang, ITPA Prof. Minghua Zhang, ITPA Stony Brook University Stony Brook University
Using Global Ocean Models to Project Sea Level Rise Robert Hallberg NOAA / GFDL.
Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project: Key outcomes. Boundary condition considerations, readiness of regional models for coupling. Arctic System Model.
Geosciences - Observations (Bob Wilhelmson) The geosciences in NSF’s world consists of atmospheric science, ocean science, and earth science Many of the.
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
The Pacific Gateway to the Arctic – Quantifying and Understanding Bering Strait Oceanic Fluxes R. Woodgate 1, T. Weingartner 2, T. Whitledge 2, Ron Lindsay.
How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002 Dr. Daniela Jacob Regional climate modelling Daniela Jacob.
Nov.8, 2005CORE III protocol, Hobart Reaction of the oceanic circulation to increased melt water flux from Greenland - a test case for ocean general circulation.
IPY International Polar Year Progress report to STG 2.
Ocean processes affecting ice-cover in the Arctic, and their impact on hydrocarbon exploration William Crawford Eddy Carmack Josef Cherniawsky Institute.
AOMIP status Experiments 1. Season Cycle 2. Coordinated - Spinup Coordinated - Analysis Coordinated 100-Year Run.
SWOT: A HIGH-RESOLUTION WIDE-SWATH ALTIMETRY MISSION
The Polar Prediction Workshop, Oslo, Norway, 6-8 October 2010.
Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.
Breakout sessions 13:15-14:45Five Breakout sessions 1.Atmosphere – Walsh/Elliot 2.Sea Ice/Ocean – Proshutinsky/Flato/Gerdes 3.Terrestrial/Permafrost –
New Technology Developments for Increased Maritime Domain Awareness In the Chukchi Sea USCG Debrief Juneau, AK July 27, 2012 Presented by Hank Statscewich.
1 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Global Ice Coverage Claire L. Parkinson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Presentation to the Earth Ambassador program, meeting at NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Do we / why do we want to develop an ASM? Climate working group for WRF – workshop on model developments for climate studies with WRF (summary of.
Texas A&M University The College of Geosciences Atmospheric Sciences Atmospheric Sciences Geography Geography Geology and Geophysics Geology and Geophysics.
The Mohn-Sverdrup Center’s planned scientific program by Ola M. Johannessen, Laurent Bertino and Geir Evensen Opening 20th of October 2004.
Dmitry Dukhovskoy, Andrey Proshutinsky and Mary-Louise Timmermans Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies Florida State University Acknowledgement:
Evaluation of AOMIP Modeled Arctic Sea Ice Thickness (Using Observational ULS data) Mark Johnson 1, Andrey Proshutinsky 2, Yevgeny Aksenov 4, Igor Ashik.
Seasonal-to-Decadal Predictions of Arctic Sea Ice: Challenges and Strategies Sponsors: NASA, ONR, Intelligence Community Report available: October 30,
Reference: Ji, R., M. Jin, Ø. Varpe, Sea ice phenology and timing of primary production pulses in the Arctic Ocean. Global Change Biology. 19:
Michael Steele Polar Science Center / APL University of Washington Jan 14, 2009 AOMIP WHOI Mechanisms of Upper Ocean Warming in the Arctic and the Effect.
Intercomparison of ocean circulation in regional Arctic Ocean models at increasing spatial resolution – Preliminary Results Robert Osinski, Wieslaw Maslowski.
Craig Nicolson, UMass-Amherst
Ice sheets and their relation to sea level
ICE AND OCEAN ACTIVITIES
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
Evaluation of sea ice thickness reproduction in AOMIP models
The ACCIMA Project - Coupled Modeling of the High Southern Latitudes
How will the earth’s temperature change?
Xuezhu Wang, Qiang Wang, Sergey Danilov, Thomas Jung,
Presentation transcript:

Ocean - Proshutinsky/Haidvogel (CG Left Bay) What science questions exist for the arctic that are best answered with coupled regional models? o process studies (see next slide; also polyna studies) o reconstruction studies based upon control scenarios (e.g., ensemble of runs with a range of AO forcing, …) o sensitivity studies (e.g., ecosystem response to melting ice, …) o coupled response studies (e.g., coastal erosion, …) o observational design studies (AON) o model improvement studies

Process studies: ocean/ice

Atmosphere Process studies: atmosphere

Model improvements AOMIP/OCEAN/ICE

Model improvements Atmosphere

Concerns  There are not enough observational data for model initialization, forcing, validation and assimilation.  A comprehensive AON is urgently needed to satisfy needs of both observational and modeling communities o ice coverage / thickness (satellites) o monitor strategic locations o profilers o bathymetry (IBCAO)

Ocean What are the existing modeling and model validation efforts aimed towards answering these questions? 1.MIPs: SIMIP,ARCMIP, AOMIP (proposed), CARCMIP (status?), Southern Ocean MIP (?) 2.Global and regional models (independent validation efforts)

Challenges The major challenge of the MIPs is to improve existing regional Arctic atmosphere, ice, ocean and terrestrial models and, respectively, global climate models:  This work is expensive and requires significant financial and labor resources.  In order to develop a comprehensive arctic model it is necessary to involve the entire community of arctic researches including modelers and observers, scientists and engineers from different disciplines.

What model and model validation projects are on the horizon aimed towards answering these questions? Ocean o AOMIP proposal was submitted in November 2007 o OCMIP 3 o EcoMIP (US GLOBEC interested) o DARWIN (self-organizing approach vs IBMs)

Table 1 AOMIP Project participants. Institute, PI(s) CountryAbbreviatio n Support type Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, A. MakshtasRussiaAARIB Alfred Wegener Institute, R. Gerdes and C. KoeberleGermanyAWIB Florida State University, E. Chassignet and D. DukhovskoyUSAFSUA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, S. Griffies, M. WintonUSAGFDLB Goddard Space Flight Center, S. HakkinenUSAGSFCB International Arctic Research Center, B. Hibler, G. PanteleevUSAIARCB Institute of Marine Sciences, UAF, M. JohnsonUSAIMSA Institute of Ocean Sciences, G. HollowayCanadaIOSB Jet Propulsion Laboratory, R. Kwok, A. NguyenUSAJPLB Los Alamos National Laboratory, E. HunkeUSALANLB Massachusetts Institute of Technology, C. HillUSAMITA Naval Postgraduate School, W. MaslowskiUSANPSA National Center for Atmospheric Research, M. HollandUSANCARB New York University, D. HollandUSANYUA Norwegian Polar Institute, Ole Anders NøstNorwayNPIB Ocean and Atmosphere Systems, M. Karcher and F. KaukerGermanyOASYSB Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, M. MaquedaUKPOLB Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, N. YakovlevRussiaRASMB Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, E. GolubevaRussiaRASNB Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, M. MeirSwedenSMHIB University College London, S. LaxonUKUCLB University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, C. ChenUSAUMASA University of Washington, M. Steele, J. ZhangUSAUWA Woods Hole Oceanogr. Ins, A. Proshutinsky, P. Winsor, A. Condron USAWHOIA

What arctic science questions cannot be answered with limited area regional coupled arctic models? Ocean o any question where dynamic coupling between the global and regional models is strong

What science questions are missing from existing efforts? Ocean o mass balance questions (e.g., what are land ice sheets doing? How is mass being rearranged in the ocean?) o fate of fresh water inputs from (e.g.) Greenland. o sea ice at high resolution (interactions with – e.g. – tides, mesoscale eddies, submesoscale, …) o transmission/fate of eddy signals across non-uniform grids

What human systems are relevant to the physical systems being addressed? Are there existing models for these human systems? What are human systems? Ocean o ecosystems/fisheries o navigation o energy exploration o coastal erosion o national security

What are reasonable boundaries on the ‘Arctic System’ for your area of research? Ocean o down to 58N, including: Bering Sea, Norwegian Sea, Barents Sea, Baffin Bay, etc. Sea of Okhotsk (?)