What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
Index 4 Description: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 is : the Post-secondary Readiness index, which is used to show the readiness of students on campus.
2014 Accountability Commissioner’s Decisions – April 4, 2014.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Accountability Development What do we know? What do we want to know? March 4, 2014.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3 rd Grade Parent Information Night.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
1 August 8, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of 2014 Accountability.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Accountability: Current Issues Friday, April Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
Overview of 2015 Accountability SUMMER 2015 MICKI WESLEY, DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY & COMPLIANCE CINDY TEICHMAN, COORDINATOR OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Accountability Update Ty
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
Charter School Summit| June 16, 2014 Diane J. Hernandez | Texas Education Agency Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Charter School Summit| June 30, 2015 Christopher Lucas| Texas Education Agency Department of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
TETN Videoconference #36664| April 21, 2016 Texas Education Agency | Assessment and Accountability Performance Reporting Overview of 2016 Accountability.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
Accountability 2016 Shauna Lane, Educational Specialist
Accountability Overview 2016
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Update
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Texas State Accountability
State and Federal Accountability Overview
Presentation transcript:

What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

For 2013 and beyond a framework of FOUR Performance Indexes Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Performance Index 1: Student Achievement Provides a snapshot of performance across subjects at Level II – Satisfactory Academic Performance Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Performance Index 1: Student Achievement Measures: % Met Level II Standard All Students – Reading All Students – Writing All Students – Math All Students – Science All students – Social Studies Participation by race/ethnicity Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Performance Index 1: Student Achievement Includes: STAAR STAAR-Modified, STAAR Alternate STAAR-L Grades 3-8 and EOC English and Spanish Grade 11 TAKS performance (2013 only) Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Performance Index 1: Student Achievement Minimum Size: None Small Group analysis is applied if there are fewer than 10 tests Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Performance Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 3-8 Districts and Campuses Spring results – Snapshot Date Grades 5 and 8 Highest score 1 st & 2 nd administration EOC Districts and Campuses Students enrolled on Fall Snapshot Summer 2012 results…. Fall 2012 results… Spring 2013 results… Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Performance Index 1: Student Achievement ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER RESULTS: Students in US schools 1- 3 years excluded Students in US schools 4 years and beyond included at phase-in Level II Asylees/refugees in US school 1-5 years excluded Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Performance Index 1: Student Achievement District/Campus Index 1 Met Standard Rating Index Target: 50 ReadingMathematicsWritingScience Social Studies Total % Met Level II Students Met Level II =136 45%45 Students Tested =305 Index Score45 Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 STUDENT PROGRESS Measures student progress by subject and student group Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Subjects: Reading Math Writing Student Groups: All Students SPED ELL Seven Racial/Ethnic Groups PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 STUDENT PROGRESS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index Targets: District 21 High School 17 Middle School 29 Elementary 30 PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 STUDENT PROGRESS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

ELL Results: English Test Version:  STAAR ELL Progress Measure NOT available for 2013 on STAAR English.  Asylee/refugees excluded Spanish Test Version:  STAAR Growth Measure calculated  Students in US schools 1-3 years excluded  Students in US schools 4 years and beyond included in growth measure  Asylees/refugees year 1-5 excluded PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 STUDENT PROGRESS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Minimum Size: All Students – at least 10 test results Student Groups – 25 test results for the group Small Group Analysis – cannot be calculated for 2013 PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 STUDENT PROGRESS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

STAAR Percent Met Growth Standard Students are assigned to one of three growth categories based on change in scale score in relation to growth expectations: Did Not Meet Expectation, Met Expectation, Exceeded Expectation PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 STUDENT PROGRESS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Important Points about Index 2  Gain Score = Current-year scale score – Prior-year scale score  Grounded in STAAR performance standards & goal of having all students achieve at or above Level II  All students scoring at the 3 highest raw scores, in the current year will be classified as having Exceeded the progress target.  Students who maintained Level III performance from the prior year to the current year will be classified as having Met or Exceeded the progress target.  A student can move to a higher performance level without having Met progress. PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 STUDENT PROGRESS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 Student Progress Index Target will be set at about fifth percentile by campus type One Point for percentage of students who Met Expectation or Exceeded Expectation in each race/ethnicity for  Reading grades 4-8; English I & II Reading; English II Writing  Math grades 4-8 and Algebra I  (2014) Writing Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

PERFORMANCE INDEX 2 Student Progress Index Target will be set at about fifth percentile One Point for percentage of students who Met Expectation or Exceeded Expectation in each race/ethnicity for  Reading grades 4-8; English I & II Reading; English II Writing  Math grades 4-8 and Algebra I  (2014) Writing Another Point for Percentage of all students who Exceeded Expectations  Reading grades 4-8; English I & II Reading; English II Writing  Math grades 3-8 and Algebra I  (2014) Writing Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index construction for Index 2: Student Progress Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index construction for Index 2: Student Progress Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index construction for Index 2: Student Progress Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index construction for Index 2: Student Progress Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index construction for Index 2: Student Progress Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

PERFORMANCE INDEX 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS Emphasize advanced academic achievement of the ECD and lowest race/ethnicity preforming groups Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

PERFORMANCE INDEX 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved. Subjects: Reading Math Writing Social Studies Science Student Groups: ECD Two lowest Preforming Race/Ethic Groups (page 26)

Index Target 55 One Point Each % of students: ECD or one of two lowest race/ethnic groups meeting Level II PERFORMANCE INDEX 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

STAAR Weighted Performance Rate for Reading ECD Lowest Performing Racial/Ethnic Group1 Lowest Performing Racial/Ethnic Group2 Total Points Maximum Points # of Tests Performance Results Phase in 1: Level II or above Number Percent % % % Reading WPR

Indicator Economically Disadvantaged Lowest Performing Race/Ethnic Group 1 Lowest Performing Race/Ethnic Group 2 Total Points Maximum Points STAAR Reading WPR STAAR Mathematics WPR STAAR Writing WPR STAAR Science WPR STAAR Social Studies WPR TOTAL 5341,500 Index Score (total points divided by maximum points) 36

Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Importance of high school diploma and CCRS Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness STAAR Percent Met final Level II on One or More Tests  2014 and beyond (Final Level II performance is not included in accountability in 2013)  Assessment results include all assessments evaluated in Index I  Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Writing, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index Target 75 Graduation Score: Grade 9-12 Four-Year 2012 Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups OR Grade 9-12 Five-Year 2011 Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups, and RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness IndicatorAllAAHispanicWhiteAsian Pacific Island Amer. Indian Two or More ELL Sp. Ed. Total Points Max. Points 4-year graduation rate %74.5% 70.2% 75.4% 82.4% RHSP/DAP75%66.1% 51.4% 67.6% Year Graduation Total TOTAL INDEX POINTS72

Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Some Distinction Designations Top 25% Distinction Campus Academic Achievement Distinction Grade 3-9 and Algebra – Level III AP/IB Performance ELA and Math SAT/ACT Participation SAT Performance in ELA or Math ACT Performances in ELA or Math