Compliance Training Overview Principal’s Meeting February 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

REM Shelby County Schools School Year. Current Federal/State Law No Child Left Behind (NCLB) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Reauthorization of.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
EC Referrals Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Individual Education Program (IEP) Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Special Education Compliance
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Discipline Under the IDEA Tulsa Public Schools Special Education and Student Services Presenter: Cheryl Henry August, 2011.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Understanding the IEP Process
IEP Slide #1 I.E.P. Your host today: DIANE JOSLIN hi.
T IPS FOR IEP M EETINGS Presented By: Marsha Holleman Jenny Kurzer Nancy Simmons Lauren Whitson.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
IEP DEVELOPMENT Administrative Rubric Presented by: Jamillah Silver & Denise Simmons.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
Surrogate Parent Training
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
New York State Education Department (NYSED) Prior Written Notice (Notice of Recommendation) This presentation is presented using Power Point with an.
At least one month before the annual review date contact your coordinator to schedule the date of the meeting. Let’s get started!
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Planning Interview Process March 2011
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
Transition Assess Interests, Preferences, Strengths and Needs by age 14*** Add Post Secondary Goals and Transition Activities by age 16 At age 16 advise.
Planning together for service
Orientation to Special Education From Referral to Eligibility.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
CHAPTER 16 Regulations Covering the Education of Gifted Students August 25,2009.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.
NEW Oregon IEP: Identifying Changes and Useful Tools Laura Petschauer November 13, 2015.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
The New IDEA in Special Education
Manifestation Determinations Review of Suspension Meetings And Review of Placement Meetings.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
Prior Written Notice of Action & Notice of Conference March 2014 ADE-SEU.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
The Evaluation and Re-evaluation Process Guidelines for Parents Karen Finigan, Director of Special Education & Michelle Giovanola, Lead School Psychologist.
PSRC EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Compliance issues and suggestions that will help with case management.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Staten Island Integrated Service Center 1 VERIFY - NEVER LEAVE BLANK VERIFY Prior to writing on this line, contact your school’s Special Education Liaison.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Notice under IDEA.
Week 3 The IEP Process.
Compliance Monitoring
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Compliance Training Overview Principal’s Meeting February 2012

February 10, 2012 Arlington High School 1:00-3:30 pm We will NOT be pulling paraprofessionals. SPED Teachers PreSchool AFS/Functional Skills STEP Resource/CoTeachers APEX Homebound Hearing & Vision Related Services OT/PT/Speech School Psychologists

District Corrective Action Summary IEP Process IEP Revised Annually  Parent Received Copy of Written Report Used in This Eligibility Invitation to Meeting  Parental Concerns Present Levels of Performance Annual Goal & Short Term Objectives: Address all on Present Levels Annual Goals & Objectives: Measurable Program Participation  IEP Composition- Interpreter of Results  Informed Parental Consent- Proposed Program in IEP  Parent Notification: Transfer of Student Rights  Student Notification: Transfer of Rights  Date IEP Provided to Parent  LEA Person Responsible for Providing IEP, if Parent did not attend  IEP Review by Teachers Not in Attendance

IEP Process 1a: IEP Revised Annually Accepted 1/27/12 Signatures of IEP Team Required “DRAFT” must be crossed through on the 1 st page and ALL following pages once the IEP team has accepted the document. The team must DATE and SIGN the first page. The remaining pages should be DATED and INITIALED with “DRAFT” crossed out.

IEP Process 23: Parental Concerns During the IEP meeting, ask the parent or student (if age 18) what their main concerns are relating to his/her education. Document their concerns on the IEP. If the parent and/or student does not attend the meeting, gather this information prior to the meeting by phone, conference, or notes from home. Do NOT leave this section incomplete, blank, or use NA.

IEP Process 60: IEP Review by Teachers Not in Attendance When the review is completed each of the student’s teachers not in attendance at the meeting MUST sign and date the last page of the IEP. If all teachers responsible for implementing the IEP are present at the meeting, indicate “all teachers were present.”

District Corrective Action Summary CM Initial Prior Written Notice for Initial Evaluation Prior Written Notice for Initial Placement

Prior Written Notice

Please do not leave anything blank. -There are ALWAYS options to consider prior to proposal. -An explanation must be given for any action rejected. -Be very detailed with listing sources of information used in making proposal. -If parental concerns are rejected, the IEP team must use the prior written notice + minutes to document response.

District Corrective Action Summary CM ReEvaluation ReEvaluation Review Process Parent Input for ReEvaluation Procedural Safeguard for Triennial ReEvaluation Parental Consent for Comprehensive Evaluation Prior Written Notice for ReEvaluation

District Corrective Action Summary TCAP-Alt PA: Participation Requirements The student’s TCAP-Alt Participation Requirements are completed and documented in the IEP. The Principal’s signature is required and agreement MUST be indicated by a “yes” check mark.

District Corrective Action Summary Secondary Transition Transition: Student Invitation to Meeting

Summary of the Summary Many citations were a result of empty blanks on the IEP Citations suggest that IEP’s and ReEvaluation packets are done at the last minute

Required Action: Online Testing Training Plan Clericals: January 30 th All SPED Personnel: February 10 th and 20 th Assistant Principals: February 14 th and 16th Additional Technical Support Summer HELP Sessions: Voluntary Option for Site-Based Support Who Must Test: Principal, Assistant Principal (SPED), and all SPED Teachers When Will Testing Occur: Module will be open starting in April All must be completed by July 1, 2012

February 20th Southwind HS Morning Session

Training Topics State Mandated Testing & Accommodations Manifestation Determinations IEP Placements to Alternative Settings Criteria for Extended School Year Continuum of SPED Services Standards-Based IEPs Present Levels of Performance: Informal Assessments Subject to revision based on feedback from teachers on 2/10

Specialized Training According to Assignment Preschool FS/AFS OT/PT/Speech Resource/CoTeachers SPED Homebound STEP APEX

State Mandated Assessment & Accommodations TCAP MAAS TCAP-Alt Accommodations Must be consistently used for all testing to justify need on state mandated assessment. Prompting Upon Request and Read Aloud cannot both be selected for a student. Communicated to Building Testing Coordinator.

Manifestation Determinations Attendance & Long-Term Suspension Roles of ALL Participants: – To determine if conduct in question has a substantial relationship to conduct in question – To establish whether or not the district failed to implement the student’s IEP SPED Teacher – Will have the SPED file and “Adverse Effects” from the last psychoeducational report to read to the team to assist in determination Administrator – States the conduct in question and disciplinary action taken –or- Provides a summary of attendance history in question – Brings to the meeting paperwork for alternative school unless obtained from parent at the time of the suspension

IEP Placements to Alternative Settings RAL/RAN – Alternative Learning Specialist must be invited – DEC Specialist for school must be invited STEP/EIP – DEC Specialist for STEP must be invited – Transportation Specialist invited IEP Placements require the agreement of the IEP team members Require evidence of interventions attempted, implementation/revision s to the behavior plan, extensive efforts with progressive discipline and Least Restrictive Environments

Criteria for Extended School Year Student clearly needs services IEP team decision Teachers will be provided detailed criteria for use as a guide to recommendations. ESY meetings held after 2/20 and prior to March 30 th in order to ensure teacher training in process. ESY Projections due 3/5/12 ESY Paperwork due 4/2/12

Continuum of SPED Services Elementary Schools – Preschool – CoTeaching (4 th -5 th ) Language Arts Math – Resource (Tier III) – FS/AFS Middle School – CoTeaching Language Arts Math – Functional Skills – Resource Learning Lab (Tier III) “Academic Exploration” used as Direct SPED Service on IEP Taught by SPED teacher

Continuum of SPED Services High School – CoTeaching English I, II, III, IV Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, Bridge Math – Resource Learning Lab Algebra IA/IB Geometry A/B Biology A/B – FS/AFS

IEP Development Standards-Based IEPs Present Levels of Performance Emphasis Preschool-12 th Grade: Graduation with a REGULAR HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA Programming MUST provide student instruction in the content CoTeaching is ESSENTIAL Resource should be considered very carefully after 3 rd grade as the RTI Tier III Intervention.

SI-Teams Should be fully functioning