Farfield Exposure: Bringing the Environmental Elements into ComET™ – Estimating Emissions Dr. Michael Jayjock The LifeLine Group Slides and Materials Copyright.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stoichiometry The calculation of the quantities of chemical substances involved in chemical reactions.
Advertisements

DEPRECIATION AND ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS. CASH FLOW THROUGH A PROJECT BASED ON THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT PRIMARY COMPONENTS ARE CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS.
Chemical Exposure & Environmental Contamination Chapter 3 How are chemicals released into the environment? What are the impacts on the environment? –The.
Major Concepts Activity 40 The concentration of a solution is expressed in terms of parts of solute to parts of solution. Parts per million (ppm) are used.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
Protection of the public and the environment standards? Rodolfo Avila.
Discussion Sessions Facilitated by The LifeLine Group Slides and Materials Copyright Protected.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Chapter: Solutions, Acids, and Bases
Combined Heat and Power and Air Quality - Guidance for Local Authorities Ed Dearnley Policy Officer.
Dr. F. Iskanderani Spring 2003/2004 Example C : Component.
Using Resources Wisely
Math 3C Practice Word Problems Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB.
Credit Risk – Loan Portfolio and Concentration risk
1 1 Slide © 2000 South-Western College Publishing/ITP Slides Prepared by JOHN LOUCKS.
Copyright The Solution Foundry. All rights reserved. WELCOME TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS 101.
Making Waste Productive. Creating Energy from Waste.
15 Blue-ness Sequence Science By the Horns Summer 2006.
Lecture 14. More on Thermodynamic Potentials PotentialVariables U (S,V,N)S, V, N H (S,P,N)S, P, N F (T,V,N)V, T, N G (T,P,N)P, T, N.
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
Scheme of the equilibrium Environmental Compartments Model.
PRESENTATION 1 Whole Numbers. PLACE VALUE The value of any digit depends on its place value Place value is based on multiples of 10 as follows: UNITS.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
Surveillance monitoring Operational and investigative monitoring Chemical fate fugacity model QSAR Select substance Are physical data and toxicity information.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e by Render/Stair/Hanna 5-1 1© 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Module 5 Mathematical.
Welcome to Class! 9-16 and 9-17 Complete the following:
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
1 The MOLE. 2 Atoms and molecules are very, very small, but we still need to “count” them.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
1 Environment and health information Content Scott Brackett.
Malé Declaration 1 ST emissions inventory workshop AIT, Bangkok, 3rd – 5th July 2006 Part 6 – Compilation of emissions from Agriculture (Sector 8) Harry.
Copyright © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Chapter 5 Handy Circuit Analysis Techniques.
Common Fractions © Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved next #6 Taking the Fear out of Math 1 3 ×1 3 Multiplying.
ComET™ Farfield Modelling Dr. Don Mackay Mr. Jon Arnot Canadian Environmental Modelling Centre Trent University Peterborough, ON Slides.
CBE 150A – Transport Spring Semester 2014 Radiation.
Improve The Air We Breathe In. California’s Central Valley A large, flat valley that dominates the geographical center of California The Central Valley.
December 14 th, 2011 Lesson 4. Today’s Agenda Explanation of how to answer question # 2 of the lab Note Questions Reading We will complete the lab tomorrow.
Here are some “final” results for 2005, based on adding up just the time periods in 2005.
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Model Cap and Trade Rules: Unique Elements and Flexibilities Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
HC Screening State of the Science Reports Update to the ICG February 14th/05 Presented by: Bette Meek Existing Substances Division Health Canada.
Year 8 Equations with Fractions Dr J Frost Last modified: 23 rd March 2014.
Modelling noble gases Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Chemical Quantities. Chapter Overview Measuring Matter Mass ________ Counting ________ Volume _____________ Length ________.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
Rounding scheme if r * j  1 then r j := 1  When the number of processors assigned in the continuous solution is between 0 and 1 for each task, the speed.
1 Copyright © 2008 Cengage Learning South-Western. Heitger/Mowen/Hansen Process Costing Chapter Five Fundamental Cornerstones of Managerial Accounting.
Environmental Modeling Center TRIM Training, Day 1 MCNC TRIM Training Day 1 Introduction and Overview of Model February 18, 2002 Mark Lee MCNC/Environmental.
What does Going Green Mean!??
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Estimation and Computation By: Your Name (First, Last) Section: O-
Water Accounting Overview Core tables, hybrid tables and monetary accounts Michael Nagy Environment and Multi-Domain Statistics Section UNECE Statistical.
CHAPTER 15 CHEMICAL REACTIONS Lecture slides by Mehmet Kanoglu Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
Process Costing and Hybrid Product-Costing Systems
Process Costing and Hybrid Product- Costing Systems
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
2.1 Monitoring Water Quality
Unit Flow In the long run, the product flow through each operation must be proportional to the output flow of the process 8/24/04 Paul A. Jensen Operations.
ECETOC TRA tool Proposed application to estimate PEC/PNEC ratio for substances with risk score = 1 ECETOC has developed a tiered approach for calculating.
Summary Points from B Breakout
Principles of Cost Accounting 15th edition
SDTC Application For Funding
Item 4.5 – ENHANCEMENT OF ERA SERVICES
Agenda point 4 Water PSUTs – Open Issues
Presentation transcript:

Farfield Exposure: Bringing the Environmental Elements into ComET™ – Estimating Emissions Dr. Michael Jayjock The LifeLine Group Slides and Materials Copyright Protected

Recap -The Two Parts of ComET™ The Nearfield part of ComET™ estimates exposure from Sentinel Products from the personal use of Consumer Products. The Nearfield part of ComET™ estimates exposure from Sentinel Products from the personal use of Consumer Products. The Farfield ComET™ portion estimates exposure to man to the DSL substance from environmental sources. The Farfield ComET™ portion estimates exposure to man to the DSL substance from environmental sources. Total human exposure to the DSL substance is the sum of the two. Total human exposure to the DSL substance is the sum of the two.

s s s s Small Sources within the Microenvironment (Nearfield) Large but distant Environmental Sources (Farfield)

Glossary of Terms in this Talk De minimus – a small and relatively insignificant part or portion of the total human exposure estimated for the DSL substance. De minimus – a small and relatively insignificant part or portion of the total human exposure estimated for the DSL substance. NFComET™ – Portion of ComET™ that estimates human exposure to DSL substances from products used near the person (Nearfield). NFComET™ – Portion of ComET™ that estimates human exposure to DSL substances from products used near the person (Nearfield). FFComET™ – Part of ComET™ that estimates human exposure to the DSL substances from the environment (Farfield). FFComET™ – Part of ComET™ that estimates human exposure to the DSL substances from the environment (Farfield).

NFexposure – estimated human exposure from NFComET™. NFexposure – estimated human exposure from NFComET™. FFexposure – estimated human exposure from FFComET™. FFexposure – estimated human exposure from FFComET™. Actual emission rate – an estimate of the kg/hr that might realistically be expected to flow into the standard Canadian geographical area being modeled for FFComET™. Actual emission rate – an estimate of the kg/hr that might realistically be expected to flow into the standard Canadian geographical area being modeled for FFComET™. Glossary of Terms in this Talk (cont)

3-Step Sequential Elements of FFComET™ 1. ChemCAN estimation of “unit concentrations” in environmental media (air, water, soil), biota and food from “unit” release rates to the environment. (John Arnot- CEMC) – previous presentation 2. Estimation or assignment of actual DSL substance release rates and use of these rates to estimate actual or potential concentrations in the above media, biota and food. (MAJ – LLG) – this presentation 3. ComET™ conversion of these concentrations to potential human exposure to the DSL substance from the environment. (CFC – LLG) – next presentation

Step #1 CEMC – ChemCAN estimation of “Unit Concentrations” A standard emission rate is modeled separately in air, soil and water using a modified version of ChemCAN and a “standard” Canadian geological/geographical area determined and used by CEMC. A standard emission rate is modeled separately in air, soil and water using a modified version of ChemCAN and a “standard” Canadian geological/geographical area determined and used by CEMC. The resulting environmental concentrations are output by the model including concentrations in air, water, other environmental media (e.g., freshwater zooplankton) and 23 human food items (fish, game, and agricultural items). The resulting environmental concentrations are output by the model including concentrations in air, water, other environmental media (e.g., freshwater zooplankton) and 23 human food items (fish, game, and agricultural items).

Step #2 Estimation or Assignment of Actual or Potential DSL Substance Emissions Actual emission rates applied to the “standard” Canadian geographical/geological area used by ChemCAN can be estimated from actual, estimated or assigned annual production volumes for any DSL substance. Actual emission rates applied to the “standard” Canadian geographical/geological area used by ChemCAN can be estimated from actual, estimated or assigned annual production volumes for any DSL substance. All concentrations calculated from ”unit emissions” are directly scaleable to “actual” or potential concentrations in any environmental compartments and food items by multiplying them by the ratio of actual/unit emission rate. All concentrations calculated from ”unit emissions” are directly scaleable to “actual” or potential concentrations in any environmental compartments and food items by multiplying them by the ratio of actual/unit emission rate.

Step #3 Conversion of CEMC Environmental Concentrations Estimates to Human Exposure from the Environment Estimated exposure to man from the environment by any DSL substance comes from combining concentration estimates for the environmental media and food with estimates of human intake for these items. Estimated exposure to man from the environment by any DSL substance comes from combining concentration estimates for the environmental media and food with estimates of human intake for these items. This will be done by the LifeLine Group and the results will be integrated into a final output for Farfield ComET™ (FFexposure) which will, in turn, be added to the exposure estimate from near-field ComET™ (NFexposure) for an estimate of Total Human Exposure from the DSL substance. This will be done by the LifeLine Group and the results will be integrated into a final output for Farfield ComET™ (FFexposure) which will, in turn, be added to the exposure estimate from near-field ComET™ (NFexposure) for an estimate of Total Human Exposure from the DSL substance.

A possible approach is outlined here It includes a 3-tier treatment designed to first set-aside substances that will not be anticipated to present significant exposure to man from the environment, proceeding to a more realistic estimation of the emission and exposure potential for those substances that might present significant exposure from the environment. Final approach not decided at this time: Step #2 (estimate actual emissions/exposures)

1.Set FFexposure to a de minimus (x %) of NFexposure as calculated by NFComET™ (x to be determined in subsequent deliberations) 2.Determine the environmental emission rate that would give this FFexposure. 3.IF this emission rates is IMPOSSIBLY High then set FFexposure aside. OVERVIEW of Proposed Linear Process for Estimating Farfield Exposure

4.IF NOT THEN estimate FFexposure using emission rates derived from binned production levels for the GPE, IPE and LPE substances. 5.IF FFexposure calculated from #4 above is less than a de minimus (x %) of NFexposure determined by NFComET™ THEN set FFexposure aside. 6.IF NOT THEN modify the emissions using available factoring schemes (e.g., EUSES 2.0 Table for Chemical Industry Releases: BASIC CHEMICALS TABLE to estimate fraction of total production/emission that would be released to air, water and soil) and then calculate FFexposure. OVERVIEW of Proposed Linear Process for Estimating Farfield Exposure

7. de minimus (x %) of NFexposure determined by NFComET™ THEN set FFexposure aside. 8. IF NOT THEN report FFexposure as determined by the calculations derived in #6 as FFComET™ 9. Add FFComET™ to NFComET™ for TOTAL ComET™ exposure. OVERVIEW of Proposed Linear Process for Estimating Farfield Exposure

Step-by-Step Procedure (a possible approach) for estimating actual emission and Farfield Exposure to Man from the Environment (1 of 5) Step 1 – Get unit concentrations for the DSL substance from CEMC modeling of unit emissions. Step 1 – Get unit concentrations for the DSL substance from CEMC modeling of unit emissions. Step 2a – Run NFComET™ and SET the FFexposure to be a de minimus level (less than x%) of the NFexposure estimate from NFComET™. Step 2a – Run NFComET™ and SET the FFexposure to be a de minimus level (less than x%) of the NFexposure estimate from NFComET™. Note: de minimus % to be determined.

Step-by-Step Procedure (a potential approach) for estimating actual emission and Farfield Exposure to Man from the Environment (2 of 5): Run CEMC software* to answer the question: Could the actual emission rate that caused this FFexposure be realistically possible?** (i.e., Is it less than some impossibly high value of kg/hr emission). Run CEMC software* to answer the question: Could the actual emission rate that caused this FFexposure be realistically possible?** (i.e., Is it less than some impossibly high value of kg/hr emission). * CEMC software will be made available with ComET™ ** Note: Realistic maximum rate of emission to be determined.

Step-by-Step Procedure (a potential approach) for estimating actual emission and Farfield Exposure to Man from the Environment (3 of 5): IF the answer is NO then set aside FFexposure as de minimus (compared to NFexposure); that is, NFexposure = Total Exposure. IF the answer is NO then set aside FFexposure as de minimus (compared to NFexposure); that is, NFexposure = Total Exposure. IF the answers is YES go to Step 2b. IF the answers is YES go to Step 2b.

Step-by-Step Procedure (a possible approach) for estimating actual emission and Farfield Exposure to Man from the Environment (4 of 5): Estimate FFexposure using emissions calculated from GPE, IPE or LPE “binned” or substance-specific assigned levels for annual production. Estimate FFexposure using emissions calculated from GPE, IPE or LPE “binned” or substance-specific assigned levels for annual production. IF estimated FFexposure is still above the de minimus (x%) portion of NFexposure proceed to Step 2c, IF estimated FFexposure is still above the de minimus (x%) portion of NFexposure proceed to Step 2c, IF NOT THEN FFexposure is de minimus, can be set aside and Total Exposure = NFexposure IF NOT THEN FFexposure is de minimus, can be set aside and Total Exposure = NFexposure

Step 2c – Use a standard scheme to estimate the fraction of total emissions that would go to air, water and soil (e.g., the EUSES 2.0 Table for Chemical Industry Releases: BASIC CHEMICALS TABLE) Step 2c – Use a standard scheme to estimate the fraction of total emissions that would go to air, water and soil (e.g., the EUSES 2.0 Table for Chemical Industry Releases: BASIC CHEMICALS TABLE) Then run estimate FFexposure. IF estimated FFexposure is still above x% of NFexposure THEN include this value as the Farfield ComET™ exposure, ELSE Total Exposure = Nearfield exposure. Then run estimate FFexposure. IF estimated FFexposure is still above x% of NFexposure THEN include this value as the Farfield ComET™ exposure, ELSE Total Exposure = Nearfield exposure. Step-by-Step Procedure (a possible approach) for estimating actual emission and Farfield Exposure to Man from the Environment (5 of 5): Note: Specific scheme to estimate fraction remains open.

Example Release Factors from EUSES 2.0 – Basic Chemicals Solubility less than 100 mg/l Solubility less than 100 mg/l –VP less than 100 Pa  Proportion to air = 0.65  Proportion to waste water = 0.25  Proportion to soil = –VP greater than 1,000 Pa  Proportion to air = 0.95  Proportion to waste water = 0.05  Proportion to soil = 0.001