CORS. CORS Network > 1,865 Stations 226 federal, state, local and academic partners Growth > 231 new stations in 2012 Updated Guidelines.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Geoscience Australia’s Online GPS Processing Service (AUSPOS)
Advertisements

Aeronautical Survey Training Workshop Corbin Training Facility AC Geodetic Control November 14-18, 2011.
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar July 31, pm ET RTK/RTN Precision vs. Accuracy & Occupation Time Mark L. Armstrong,
The OPUS-DB Experience User and NGS perspectives.
NGS Updates MARTI IKEHARA, Geodetic Advisor CLSA Monterey Chapter June 2011.
Alabama Height Modernization Project, NAD 83(2011), and GEOID 12 in Alabama Overview of Height Modernization Project Overview of Height Modernization.
GNSS DERIVED HEIGHTS- PART 2 NOS/NGS - 59
REAL TIME POSITIONING “ IT DEPENDS” REAL TIME POSITIONING PDOP MULTIPATH SATELLITES BASE ACCURACY BASE SECURITY REDUNDANCY, REDUNDANCY, REDUNDANCY PPM.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Down to Earth, part II NGS Tools and Software Demo Marti Ikehara: California Geodetic Advisor Sacramento, CA
Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.
1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.
OPUS Projects (beta) status and plans Improved solutions for simultaneous or repeated observations harvest data from multiple observers share upload &
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
The RSGPS program and OPUS - RS Getting There Faster –
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey Continuously Operating.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
≥107 RTN USA ≥35 DOT ACADEMIC/SCIENTIFIC SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTERS VARIOUS DOTS + MACHINE GUIDANCE COUNTY CITY GEODETICSURVEYS(NC,SC) MANUFACTURERS VENDOR.
LINK TO SLIDES: ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/dist/whenning/FWS2011/
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
Common Marks. Datasheet Basics The NGS Data Sheet See file dsdata.txt for more information about the datasheet. DATABASE = Sybase,PROGRAM = datasheet,
VECTOR Vermont Enhanced CORS and Transmission Of Real-time Corrections Network Status and Current Applications Daniel J. Martin, National Geodetic Survey.
Using the Vermont CORS to Access the National Spatial Reference System Webinar hosted by the Vermont Center for Geographic Information Wednesday January.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
GPS and Geodetic News You Can Use David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State of Ohio National Geodetic Survey, NOAA 2008 Ohio GIS Conference September.
Giovanni Sella CORS Program Manager NOAA-National Geodetic Survey CORS Program Updates FY Especially New Revised Coordinates CGSIC - Portland,
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar March 20, pm ET Key Considerations and Concerns When Using OPUS Projects to Position.
Part Va Centimeter-Level Instantaneous Long-Range RTK: Methodology, Algorithms and Application GS894G.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
National Geodetic Survey Programs & Geodetic Tools William Stone Southwest Region Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
Coastal Zone 2011 Conference “Cool Geodetic Resources For Your Project” A National Ocean Service, NOAA, Presentation 1)TOOLS TO OBTAIN GEODETIC CONTROL.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
Tools to help complete “Height Mod” Surveys OPUS & OPUS Projects Joe Evjen, Geodesist, NGS Height Modernization Eastern States Regional Tuesday, March.
What is OPUS Projects? Introduction PSLS Webinar May 20, 2015 Dan Martin Northeast Regional Geodetic Advisor.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey GPS Products & Services.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
New Coordinates for CORS Sites & Oregon Case Study The NGS Multi-Year CORS Solution and the evolution from NAD 83(CORS96)Epoch 2002 to NAD 83(2011)Epoch.
Kansas Land Surveyors Conference OPUS, OPUS-RS, and OPUS-DB Dave Zenk NGS Advisor October 29, 2010 Wichita, KS.
CDOT CORS/OPUS Team P. Fromhertz Colorado State Geodetic Advisor National Geodetic Survey (NGS) January 13, 2011.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
OPUS Projects Manager Training Step 2 : Uploading Data.
Height Modernization Western States Regional Webinar Tuesday, November 19, :00am PT - 2:00pm PT (1:00 – 5:00 pm ET) OPUS-DB Publishing with OPUS.
Why do Millimeters Matter? NOAA Models and Tools Support High Accuracy Positioning for Ecosystem Restoration and Ecological Research Surface too low: too.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Guidelines for Positioning the Oregon Real-time GPS Network Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT 31 July 2013 NGS Real-time GPS Network Webinar.
Towards optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS APRIL 14, 2015 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S. and Michael Eddy, Ph.D. student.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Towards Optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS OCTOBER 9, 2014 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S.
NGS Activities in Colorado Federal Surveyors Workshop February 28, 2012 P.
RTN Field Procedures and Best Practices New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors January 20, 2016 Dan Martin Northeast Regional Geodetic.
CORS Network > 1,865 Stations 226 federal, state, local and academic partners Growth > 231 new stations in 2012 Updated Guidelines.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
National Height Modernization Eastern Regional Meeting March 4, 2014 Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) Neil D. Weston National Geodetic.
1 CORS and OPUS for GIS Applications Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey ESRI International User Conference San Diego, California August 5, 2008.
GPS Site Calibration Objectives  Explain the Co-ordinate systems used in GPS Surveying.  Explain what a calibration is.  Explain the 5 main process.
1700+ Active sites 200+ Contributors CORS Network continued growth RTN AND NGS “FOUNDATION CORS” WILL BE THE PRIMARY ACCESS TO THE NSRS.
National Height Modernization Partner Meeting Neil D. Weston National Geodetic Survey, NOS, NOAA Frankfort, Kentucky April 30 – May 1, 2013.
Guidelines for Real Time GNSS Networks (RTN) Administration.
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Online Positioning User Service Review and new developments
Presentation transcript:

CORS

CORS Network > 1,865 Stations 226 federal, state, local and academic partners Growth > 231 new stations in 2012 Updated Guidelines

Obtain Static Data Files for CORS Here CORS “Data Products” Page

Provide Information about your Project

Enter your custom requests

CDOT CORS/OPUS Team Incorporate CORS and OPUS into the CDOT Survey Manual Test Data Assessed Written Report Provided to CDOT Presented to SAC on Feb 15, 2012 Addendum – use of CORS added Recommendations also made

CDOT CORS/OPUS Team Addendum

CDOT Comparison Between HARN, CORS and OPUS Region 3 Data

CDOT Comparison Between HARN, CORS and OPUS Region 2 Data

Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) Users submit GPS data to NGS Data is processed using NGS computers and software Resulting precise positions ed back to the user Solutions up to 1-2 cms in accuracy provided by OPUS Rapid Static - 15 minutes of data vs. 2-4 hours

OPUS OPUS – S (2 hrs) OPUS – RS (15 minutes) OPUS – DB (Publish) OPUS – Projects (Network)

recent OPUS improvements - – best 3 of 5 CORS – NAD_83 & IGS new frames, epochs – GEOID12A orthometric heights, HTDP velocities – publishing OPUS solutions -beta.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/beta.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/ – OPUS-projects - dev.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/ dev.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/ – OPUS-NET, -mapper – bulk reprocessing of published solutions – composite solutions – defaults from RINEX

OPUS Submission Webpage Your address Location of your data file Your antenna type Antenna height Customize your solution - details on next slide

New Look And Feel. The Options button “accordions” to a streamlined set of menus and entry fields. No more jumping to a new page.

OPTIONS in/ Exclude CORS extended solution SPC zone geoid model project profile publish OPUS-RS or OPUS-Static (15 min-2 hr) (2-48 hr)

OPUS Solution Report check your OPUS reports (March – August, 2010) for incorrect accuracy estimate for Orthometric Height

>15 min of L1/L2 GPS data >>> geodesy.noaa.gov/OPUS/ Processed automatically on NGS computers, tied to CORS Solution via - in minutes Fast, easy, consistent access to NSRS Online Positioning User Service (OPUS)

CORS solution #1 solution 3 solution 2 Static: OPUS determines your position with a differential GPS static solution, using hours of data. This process is repeated 4x from other CORS. solution 4 solution 5

How Good Can I Do With OPUS-S? More generally, Eckl et al. (NGS) preformed a similar but more extensive test using the same software but outside OPUS. Eckl et al., 2001, “Accuracy of GPS-derived relative positions as a function of interstation distance and observing-session duration”, J. of Geod. 75, ). Their results provide a good “rule of thumb” for accuracy versus session duration when using OPUS-S and in many other applications.

Rapid-static: OPUS first creates an atmospheric delay model from surrounding CORS data. Your position is then quickly determined by differential GPS static solution.

How Does OPUS-RS Work? OPUS-RS selects three to nine “best” CORS based upon: Having common satellite visibility with the user data. Having distances from the user’s site <250 km. This is shown here graphically. The star represents the user’s site. The triangles are CORS. No CORS farther than 250 km from the user’s site will be included. The three CORS minimum is shown. No more than nine are used. s 250km >250km Choi, 2010, personal communication.

How Does OPUS-RS Work? In addition, user’s site must be no more than 50 km from the (convex) polygon created by the selected CORS. Again in this figure, the star represents the user’s site; the triangles are CORS. Five CORS and their resulting polygon are shown in this example. If the user’s site, the star, is more than 50 km outside this polygon, alternate CORS will be considered. If none can be found, the processing will abort. Schwarz et al., “Accuracy assessment of the National Geodetic Survey's OPUS-RS utility”, 2009, GPS Solutions, 13(2),

OPUS-RS Coverage in Colorado

 your position: averaged from the “best” 3 of 5 CORS solutions h your peak-to-peaks: scaled from the spread of the 3 CORS solutions solution 2 = solution 3 = solution 5 = solution 4 = CORS solution #1 =

OPUS Static vs. Rapid Static StaticRapid Static Input (dual-frequency GPS) 2-48 hours15 minutes-2 hours Output normal, extended, XML datasheet, project normal, extended, XML Accuracy (95%confidence) 1-2 cm horizontal 3-6 cm ellipsoidal height 1-2 cm horizontal 4-8 cm ellipsoidal height Network geometry 3 CORS, preferably within 1000 km of rover 3-9 CORS, surrounding & within 250 km of rover Availability global90% of CONUS (subject to CORS configuration)

How is the Antenna Height Measured? ARP MARK The height is measured vertically (NOT the slant height) from the mark to the ARP of the antenna. The height is measured in meters. The ARP is almost always the center of the bottom-most, permanently attached, surface of the antenna. See GPS Antenna Calibration for photo’s and diagrams that show where the ARP is on most antennas: If the default height of is entered, OPUS will return the position of the ARP.

Why Do I Need the Antenna Type? The antenna phase centers are located somewhere around here. The Antenna Reference Point (ARP) is almost always located in the center of the bottom surface of the antenna. The antenna offsets are the distance between the phase centers and the ARP You do not need to know these offsets. They are passed to the processing software through the antenna type Incorrect or missing antenna type  big vertical errors ARP phase ctr.

NGS Antenna Calibration – Relative vs. Absolute GNSS Antenna Calibration relative absolute 2 hours GPS tracking

5,000++ OPUS-Published Solutions April 2013

OPUS-DB Published Solutions

NGS Data Sheets Traditional blue booking New OPUS-DB

OPUS DB Requirements Field Procedures GPS data file ≥ 4 hour durationdata file quality mark settingmark setting experienced observer fixed height tripod recommended brace tripod legs with sandbags or chain verify antenna height and plumbantenna height

OPUS DB Requirements High-Quality OPUS Solution ≥ 70% observations used ≥ 70% ambiguities fixed ≤ 3 cm RMS ≤ 4 cm peak-to-peaks, lat. & lon. ≤ 8 cm peak-to-peak, el. hgt. properly identify antenna typeantenna type precise or rapid orbits (avail. next day)

OPUS DB Requirements Mark Attributes photos of mark & equipment details (name, type, stability, etc.) description to aid mark recovery preview mark description form & help filemark description formhelp file

Why OPUS-DB A new easier way to capture data and have it in an NGS database Help populate Ellipsoidal Heights on Bench Marks, help with Geoid models and future vertical datums To the extent (?) they've bluebooked in the past, they can continue into the future more easily. If they are running RTK, this would help determine base station position and document where it was used, assuming they left a permanent mark. Changeover to new datums; either we maintain the data or user does for highest accuracy, but models will be available for bringing old coordinates forward.

Marks Published. OPUS is showing steady growth in registered users and published marks.

OPUS-DB Requirements

Issues to Consider Site – instability, multi-path – mark ID (search database, check stamping) Weather – wild, local troposphere issues? – space weather: ionospheric issues? “Truth” (orbits, CORS, etc.) – Rapid (next-day) orbits required for publishing

2010 May 11Federal Geospatial Summit42

Interface The user is taken to a new page where they designate the mark associated with their data as “new” or “recovered”. 43

Interface - “Existing” mark designation After making that selection, the user is offered the appropriate form for entering the meta-data.

Interface - “New” mark designation 2012 SurvCon Atlantic City NJ

Review If the meta-data is complete, the quality control restrictions are met and the user gives the “OK”, the submission is entered into the data base after review by NGS.

OPUS-DB Solutions 47

Interface This is part of a published data sheet. Note the “See Also” highlight. Note the “See Also” highlight. This provides access to other data base and IDB entries for this mark.

OPUS – Datasheet Publishing Publishing Criteria: NGS-calibrated GPS antenna > 4 hour data span > 70% observations used > 70% fixed ambiguities < 0.04m H peak-to-peak < 0.08m V peak-to-peak Uses: GPS on BMs PLSS / GCDB Data archive Data sharing

Orthometric Height Comparison m Published NAVD m OPUS GEOID m (0.18 ft) Difference

OPUS-projects : first, run OPUS to harvest all project data OPUS automatically forms sessions from simultaneously observed marks, allowing multi-baseline processing and adjustment of multiple sessions.

OPUS Projects Session Manage Create

OPUS-NET : first, run OPUS to solve for CORS from IGS CORS then run OPUS-Static using improved CORS positions and tropospheric corrections, along with ocean-tide loading & absolute antenna calibration models

What’s happening now? PAGES suite (software behind OPUS) to integrate GLONASS and other GNSS. Updated algorithm for OPUS-RS GNSS

Heights Geoid New Datums GRAV- D