Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Realities. Registration Provisional Registration (PRT) Valid for 5 years Subject to Confirmation (STC) Valid for 3 years Full Registration Valid for 5.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Walkthroughs One Vehicle to Promote Student Learning Developed by: Otto Graf & Joseph Werlinich University of Pittsburgh.
Observation Process and Teacher Feedback
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
What Is Evidence? PRESENTED BY SCHAUNA FINDLAY, PH.D.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Differentiated Supervision
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process

Components Observations Classroom walks Professional time Personal time

Professional Responsibilities (Often Listed in a Teacher Handbook) Has a valid teacher’s license Has completed Safe Environment requirements Practices and develops personal faith Supports and communicates Church teaching and doctrine Works to fulfill the mission of the school Supports student faith development Involved in school and student’s extra curricular programs Participates in catechist certification program Respects students, colleagues, administration, pastors, parents and others Engages in professional learning Demonstrates professionalism in dress and actions Reflects on teaching Maintains accurate records Communicates with students, parents, families, colleagues, administration, pastor, and all in a professional and confidential manner Uses feedback from stakeholders to improve instruction

Planning and Assessment Demonstrates knowledge of content Demonstrates knowledge of students Demonstrates knowledge of church teaching Establishes appropriate instructional objectives Provides challenging lessons and assignments Utilizes student performance data to plan instruction

Classroom Environment Fosters an atmosphere true to the mission of catholic education Creates an environment that supports prayer Manages student behavior using appropriate classroom procedures Creates an environment of respect and rapport Creates a physical environment that supports learning

Pedagogical Practices (Including Descriptors from an Approved Instructional Rubric) Uses researched and evidenced based methods that engage all learners Analyzes and confirms student performance through assessment Differentiates instructional practices and assessments Uses appropriate educational technolog y Incorporates Catholic values and teachings into instructional practice and curriculum when possible

Student Performance Data What will be used to determine that students are learning? What evidence will be accepted?

Pre-Conference – for announced visits (5 – 10 minutes) Objective – What do you want to accomplish? Content – What are you going to teach? Special needs of students – What should I look for?

Observation Script what is said by the teacher and the students. Compare script to the rubric while highlighting descriptors observed. Determine ratio of observed descriptors to total descriptors for each indicator. (example – 4 out of 7) Determine commendations and recommendations. Write a narrative of lesson within 48 hours. Ask teacher to do a self-evaluation using report form. Schedule post-conference – try to complete within 48 hours

Post Conference Teacher should bring self-evaluation. Discussion of what went well, and examine how teacher thinks the lesson went. Discuss lesson in detail including what might make the lesson better. Discuss commendations and recommendations.

Principal’s Responsibilities Keep clear and accurate records. Develop observation schedule for the year, varying the schedule in subsequent years. Conduct both announced and unannounced visits. Provide some coaching personnel if at all possible for teachers to go to. Develop common planning time for teachers to discuss instruction and learning. – Professional Learning Communities/Clusters

Teacher writes personal goals based on School Improvement Plan’s goals and previous evaluations, if available. Teacher goals must support the school’s improvement plan. Principal and teacher meet to discuss goals and role of teacher in the school’s success. Principal schedules a preconference, an observation, and a post conference with the teacher utilizing the observation protocol.