Lille, 17th November 2010 Ernest GODWARD The Report on Vehicle Authorisation - Costs and Complexities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IRSC October Denver, USA 1 Europe: an open space for rolling stock?
Advertisements

Experience of a GIG - 17/11/2010 Experience of a GIG: Mutual recognition in practice.
Cross-Acceptance: UNIFE expectations Alice Polo Safety and Certification Manager.
17 November INTEROPERABILITY & Cross Acceptance Paul Maas Inspector.
Transport RAIL Isabelle Vandoorne Brussels, 29 November 2012 TEN-T 2012 calls info day.
Workshop on Inventories and Projections of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste under WG 1 and 2 of the Climate Change Committee Presentation of UNFCCC.
Railway Grade Separations Issues. Railway Grade Separations 1.Introduction Qualifications/experience to undertake bridge planning for railway grade separations:
OTM TASK FORCE EFRTC General Meeting Sofia, Markus Hofmann, EFRTC OTM Task Force Chairman Franz Messerli, UNIFE OTM Task Force Vice-Chairman.
European Rail Agency Workshop 29 th September 2011 (Lille) Dr Björn Paulsson (UIC) Dr Stephen Ingleton (Newcastle University) REDUCING THE OCCURRENCES.
Low Carbon Bus Procurement Proposed Work Plan LowCVP Jonathan Murray 15 November 2007 BWG-P
Vehicle-infrastructure integration: creating co-operative mobility systems and services Hearing EU Parliament, 22 January 2009 Hermann Meyer, CEO.
Reference Document Management 1 European Railway Agency (ERA) Cross-Acceptance Unit P. Mihm 17/11/2010.
Victoria State Emergency Service Unit Costing Review Mary Barry Chief Executive Officer Victoria State Emergency Service September 2008.
The Future – the “Roadmap” SIMPLIFICATION. The Road Map 2 TSI in Place Hi Speed Conv Loc & pass Off TENS TSI Conformity New Vehicles Networks Open pointsUpdates.
1 8 July 2010 Cross – Acceptance and Safety Ralf Schweinsberg Vice-President Eisenbahn-Bundesamt UNECE Group of Experts on Unified Railway Law Secon Session;
WELCOME EFRTC General Meeting, Paris, 11th June 2010 Franz Messerli.
OTM TASK FORCE Draft final report Markus Hofmann OTM Task Force Chairman EFRTC General Meeting Prague, 22 nd June 2012.
JUDGES MEETING 1. Judges Meeting The Judges Meeting –Each Team will be assigned a date and time. Each Senior Examiner will be expected to present their.
Results of the EC Task Force on national safety rules (NSR) Caroline Fischer Safety Unit 23 January th meeting of the RISCN° 1.
The European Railway Agency in development
National trends in passenger transport regarding the choice of transport mode Grant Agreement number: Project Acronym: USEmobility Project title:
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
10 November 2009 Masahiko NAITO MLIT, JAPAN Future direction for harmonization of vehicle regulations ~ Japanese contribution to WP29 ~ Informal Document.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 企業資源規劃期末報告 企業資源規劃期末報告 The Nature and Determinants of Customer Expectations of service The Nature and Determinants.
BEWAG (UIP) General assembly European Railway Agency Jean-Marie DECHAMPS, Head of Sector (Safety) Brussels, 27 April 2015.
Workshop on EU regulations concerning rights of passengers in bus and coach transport Belgrade, 20 September 2012.
N° 1 The European railway Agency: an engine for the integrated railway area EFRTC, Vilamoura on June 24 TH 2005 Olivier PIRON 24 June 2005.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Supporting European Rail Accident Investigation Inter national Rail Safety Conference Sweden 29th September 2009 Dr Jane Rajan Head of sector : safety.
Workshop BEWAG Entity in charge of Maintenance Brussels, 01 st of December /11/2010J-M DECHAMPS.
FSF Overview about European and International Railway Standardisation / Innovativon and Standardisation Rüdiger Wendt Secretary of ISO/TC 269 and CEN/TC.
Public hearing on the 4 th Package 1 The future role of the European Railway Agency Tuesday, 07 May 2013 Steer Davies Gleave Upper Ground London,
GIS Development in Romania Vlad Trusca Head of Climate Change Unit Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development “REC Workshop “Facilitating GIS:
UIC ERTMS World Conference Certification and Assessment of GSM-R Begoña DOMINGO, GSM-R Project Officer Istanbul, 3/04/2014.
The 4 th Railway Package: Impact for the keepers Clio Liégeois.
Mutual Recognition Arrangement under UN/ECE 1958 agreement under UN/ECE 1958 agreement 21 st APEC TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP Meeting Takao Onoda Ministry.
Ms. Tshilidzi Ramuedzisi Chief Director: Energy Planning Integrated Energy Plan: Introduction and Background 1.
RE-E / IRSC / 27/09/ /10/09 1 The necessary evolution of railway safety regulations in Europe A challenge – Risks to be controlled.
Transport Rail Safety & the Railway Safety Directive Frank Jost Single European Rail Area EU Commission 1.
General Meeting Florence Secretary General report on Items 5 of the agenda Imrich KORPANEC.
Evaluation of ITS applications on the Køge Bugt Motorway, Denmark Jens Toft Wendelboe Technical Consultant Traffic Management Department Danish Road Directorate.
Estimating workers remittances using household surveys: Experience and Lessons from Uganda Presented by Kenneth Alpha Egesa BANK OF UGANDA International.
Chances for quick wins in the railway sector How to reach economic growth through full interoperable corridors? Karel VINCK, European ERTMS Coordinator.
109 July 2009CER The Voice of European Railways Cross Acceptance CER Expectations ERA Seminar, Lille, Libor Lochman.
1 Joint UNECE/EUROSTAT/OECD METIS Work Session (Geneva, March 2010) The On-Going Review of the SDMX Technical Specifications Marco Pellegrino, Håkan.
Concerning regarding the future development of ECE R28 1 Informal document GRB (63 rd GRB, February 2016, agenda item 2) Transmitted by the.
Doc.: IEEE /1292r0 Submission November 2008 George Bumiller, Research In MotionSlide 1 3GPP use of the TGu Interworking with External Networks.
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
Workshop accreditation and recognition / conformity assessment Removing Technical Barriers - TSIs within New Approach and Safety Directive Dr.-Ing. Andreas.
Slide n° 1 Workshop to NABs & RBs on Reg. 402/2013 and Harmonised sectorial accreditation scheme for railway NOBOs - Valenciennes, April 2016 NAB/RB Training.
FM 54 GSM-R points ERA ERTMS Unit London, 22 February 2016.
Raising Awareness of Metrology (MEDEA APMP-APLMF Joint Project 2)
TRANSPORT SCIENCE: INNOVATIVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
Consultancy on International Trade in Services Statistics
Europe: an open space for rolling stock?
NAB/RB Training Workshop In Valenciennes, April 2016
EFRTC GENERAL MEETING Ny Tiana TOURNIER
ERA Seminar Cross Acceptance Ad hoc Summary
ERTMS Conference 4RP VA Authorisation
General MS procedure UNECE WP6 panel session Draft 2
Meeting of the WG on Rail Transport Statistics 2-3 April 2009
for sustainable urban mobility Contract Number: IEE/12/698/SI
ENabling SafE Multi-Brand Platooning for Europe
The information Content of IPO Prospectuses
Integrated Energy Plan: Introduction and Background
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects
Fourth Railway Package Technical Pillar Hearing at the European Parliament, Brussels 7 May 2013 José GORTAZAR Chief Technical Officer, CAF.
Railway Conference Pardubice
4RP – authorization of wagons
Presentation transcript:

Lille, 17th November 2010 Ernest GODWARD The Report on Vehicle Authorisation - Costs and Complexities

Report content Executive summary 1.References, terms & abbreviations 2.Railway vehicle authorisation background 3.Railway vehicle authorisation trends and methodology 4.Analysis of vehicles authorisation processes 5.Analysis of costs drivers related to vehicle authorisation 6.Obstacles to vehicle authorisation for placing in service 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future2

Sources of information 1.ERA questionnaire to MSs/NSAs on processes 2.ERA questionnaire to the sector (manufacturers, RUs) on costs & delays 3.ERA workshop with the sector on obstacles 4.Bi-lateral meetings with the NSAs/ Sector from 07/2009 to 07/2010 on the processes and business cases 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future3

Processes: key findings Different ways to place a vehicle in service amongst the 28 NSAs (25 EU+ NIE + NO + CH) Current processes are extremely complex, take time and cost a large amount Even with the current XA agreements, there are still improvements to be made related to APS 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future4

Processes: key findings Recall the findings from the NSA questionnaire: Mean number of vehicles authorised per type (2004 – Q2 2009) From the bi-lateral meetings, the Sector Workshop and other sources we were able to examine 83 observations of 62 cases of APS 17/11/20105Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future WagonsLocomotivesPass. VehiclesFixed formation NewExistingNewExistingNewExistingNewExisting Processes\Veh. Category WagonsLocomotivesPass. VehiclesFixed formationTotal New type Additional authorisation Additional authorisation under XA Modification of an existing type

Forecasts of future APS – UNIFE/BCG WM Study 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future6

Forecasts of future APS – ERA based on UNIFE/BCG WM Study 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future7

Time for APS Sample of 5 varied projects across Europe 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future8 Time for stages of the APS – Start to finishStatistical mean time in days Project (First contact to APS)745 Application (Technical File completed to APS)457 All Tests173 Assessment24 Assessment to final Authorisation (Internal handling by NSA) 8

Costs of authorisation for vehicles Costs to authorise vehicles to APS is split into three parts: To meet Contractual Requirements - Manufacturer and Contracting Entity/Railway Undertaking To meet Essential Requirements by being placed in “Design Operating State” – Manu/CE/RU and National Safety Authority (NSA) To meet Technical Compatibility Requirements – NSA in conjunction with Infrastructure Manager(s) All of the above costs overlap. To date, our case studies have only seen the total costs for these three items. The total figures have more of an impact than the split costs 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future9

Ranges of authorisation costs 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future10 Vehicle categoryCosts First authorisations Wagon1% of Contract price Multi-system Locomotive€ 5 to 7 Million Subsequent authorisations Multi-system Locomotive for a MS€ 1 to 4 Million Multi-system Locomotive for 5 MSs€ 16 to 20 Million

Cost Drivers for additional authorisation Open points or Specific Cases in CCS TSIs Equipment of Locos with additional Class B systems Different requirement leading to exchange of pantograph Testing to proof running (dynamic) behavior Aerodynamic effects Different brake performance requirements Different requirements to design and equip Driver’s cab Different national requirements on Push Pull controls 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future11

Relative Cost Impact of Cost Drivers 17/11/201012Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future Parameter Averaged Relative Cost Impact (100%: complete costs of an additional authorisation) Open points or Specific Cases in CCS TSIs15 Equipment of Locos with additional Class B systems15 Different requirement leading to exchange of pantograph10 Testing to proof running behaviour10 Aerodynamic effects5 Different requirements to design and equip Driver’s cab5 Different brake performance requirements5 Different national requirements on Push Pull controls1 Others34

Impact of XA on additional authorisations Current situation  MoU in place: Significant reduction in the authorisation costs  Differences in Infrastructure (between first & subsequent MS) The greater these are, the higher the authorisation costs will be  Worst case: No existing MoU and significant difference of infrastructure Additional authorisation vary between €0,9 - €2 M per locomotive type Future expectations  APS cost decreases: if more MoUs are established, or if MS implement APS in line with the Directives and DV29  Additional APS costs may be lowered to be in the range of €0,4 – 0,5 Million 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future13

Next Steps First draft submission to XA Core Group – 26/10/2010 XA Core Group comments by 15/11/2010 Submission to the XA WP - 01/12/2010 Dissemination 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future14

Thank you for your attention Any questions? 17/11/2010Cross Acceptance Workshop - The Bridge to the Future15