Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADDRESSING FOREST GOVERNANCE THROUGH REDD+
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Progress with Due Diligence Activities in Panama Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC5) La Lopé National Park, Gabon.
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland June 16-18, 2009 Evolution of FCPF Readiness Plan Concept:
REDD PLUS -- What is that?. 1. REDD PLUS – in brief Background: Deforestation has become a problem that the world cannot ignore.  Deforestation results.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Session 12: Overview of road map - proposed actions Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Agriculture Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
READINESS TO IMPLEMENTATION Lessons and Experiences from Zambia Presented by: Deuteronomy Kasaro National REDD+ Coordinator 7th November,
KEY ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN REDD+ AND FCPF Joan Carling, AIPP.
Participatory Governance Assessment for REDD+: The pilot process in Nigeria Oslo Governance Forum 3-5 October, 2011 By Salisu Dahiru National Coordinator.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
Regional highlights of R-PINs Asia Region FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008 By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel Forest Carbon Partnership.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool and Suggested Structure for Assessment United Nations Statistics.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Presentation by Alfred N. Gichu Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland, New Zealand, September 2008.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.
Introducing the REDD+ Roadmap Process Bangladesh REDD+ Roadmap Launching Workshop Dhaka, 26 th October 2011.
Global Forest Observations Initiative Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland June 16-18, 2009 Financing Sources for Readiness outside.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland, June 16-18, 2009 Panama’s REDD Readiness-Plan Technical.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Carbon Fund Indigenous Peoples Global Dialogue with the FCPF Doha, Qatar December 9-11, 2012.
1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.
World Bank - Forest Carbon Partnership Facility: REDD+ Readiness and Country Needs Alexander Lotsch Forest Carbon Partnership Facility The World Bank
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility 2a. Review of R-PP Template and Presentation of ad hoc Technical Advisory Panels for PC11 R-PPs Eleventh Meeting of.
Update on REDD+ Readiness in Nigeria Presented at the GCF Annual Meeting,20-22 Sept Palangka Raya,Centrall Kalimantan Indonesia Odigha Odigha I.
UN-REDD – QUICK OVERVIEW. The UN-REDD Programme. What it is? Since part of you may not have heard about the UN-REDD Programme, I have thought it could.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Developing Incentives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) The Readiness Mechanism Some ideas for your consideration next steps.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Readiness Procedures July 9, 2008.
Proposed structure and Process for R-package preparation in Nepal
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Overview of the R-Package Kenn Rapp, Facility Management Team Asia-Pacific Indigenous Peoples Dialogue of the FCPF Chiang.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland June 16-18, 2009 Application of World Bank Safeguard.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland, June 16-18, 2009 Guyana’s REDD Readiness-Plan Technical.
REDD after Copenhagen – The way forward. EARLY LESSONS FROM THE UN-REDD PROGRAMME Mar
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC 2) Gamboa, Panama,
Designing Effective REDD+ Safeguards Information Systems Jessica Boyle IISD With support from the Norwegian Development Agency.
Global Forest Observations Initiative Simon Eggleston GFOI SDCG 5, Rome, Italy, 25 Feb 2014,
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
4.3 Developing a Safeguard Information System as part of a country-led approach to REDD+ safeguards Tom Blomley.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
Monitoring and MRV context of the Country National Forest Inventory (NFI): the previous NFI has not covered some forest type (the sampling strategy did.
Support to National REDD+ Action: Global Programme Framework (SNA) Work Plan and Budget 2015 Information and Knowledge Sharing Sessions Twelfth.
Bosque Patagónico Bosque Chaqueño YungasYungas REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA Selva Misionera Bosque Patagónico.
Global Programme Framework Document Tiina Vähänen, UN-REDD Programme Secretariat.
UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries FAO-UNDP-UNEP April 2008.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
REDD+ Methodology: Issues Coming Out from Country Presentations
Project Cycle Management
Introduction to Malawi REDD+ Process and Outlook
Country needs assessment Madagascar: Progress and next steps
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
Lessons and Experiences from Zambia National REDD+ Coordinator
5. Fiji REDD Policy and Strategy Framework
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility
Cambodia National REDD+ Strategy Development: Progress and Challenges
Indonesia’s Readiness-Plan Technical Advisory Panel Review
Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Planning Instruments
Consultation & Participation
A brief history of REDD Early 1990s: Deforestation 1/5 of GHG emissions COP7: Avoided deforestation was too difficult to include in CDM (+ no additionality).
SNA Work Plan and Budget Revision 2015 (additional activities)
Safeguards and Co-benefits in a REDD+ Mechanism Garanties et co-bénéfices liés au mécanisme REDD+ With support from the Norwegian Development Agency.
‘From REDD+ readiness to implementation’
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points
Peru Draft R-PP: Initial comments by the TAP
Presentation transcript:

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review and Assessment Criteria for R-PP

From Readiness Plan (R-Plan) to Readiness Preparation Proposal (R-PP)

1.Countries desire simpler template. 2.Harmonize with UN-REDD. 3.Shift to planning document that identifies funding priorities and timing – to enable donor funding decisions review criteria difficult to operationalize. 5.Charter’s “R-Plan approval” too evaluative for this stage. Early Lessons on R-Plan

The structure and ordering of the components All components of the original R-Plan remain The ‘capacity building and investment’ component of the R-Plan is now embedded within each of the other components Funding budget for activities in each component Rationale and guidelines now included in the template What has changed from R-Plan to R-PP?

R-PP-Purpose R-PP provides a framework for taking stock of national situation with respect to deforestation and forest degradation and addressing the situation through analytical work in a range of areas and funded from a variety of sources. The readiness preparation proposal is the Formulation Phase in which country lays out a roadmap of preparation activities needed to be undertaken in the four core components.

R-PP Purpose The four core components are as follows: Assessment of deforestation and forest degradation REDD strategy options i.e actions to reduce deforestation and/or forest degradation Reference scenario (a scenario of forest cover change and emissions) for GHG emissions from REDD A monitoring system to measure, report and verify the effect of REDD strategy on GHG emissions

Moving Ahead: R-PP on to R-Package R- Preparation Proposal Readiness Package: Results of Readiness process Focus on key building blocks & what is known and knowable now. Includes request for funding of activities: “R-Preparation Proposal” Full “Readiness Package” details come later, when known. Allows time & funding for consultations & progress on most topics. Harmonizes with UN REDD as feasible

R-PP Table of Contents General Information and Executive Summary Component 1: Organize and Consult 1a National Readiness Management Arrangements 1b: Stakeholder Consultation and Participation Component 2: Prepare the REDD Strategy 2a Assessment of Land Use, Forest Policy and Governance 2b: REDD Strategy Options 2c: REDD Implementation Framework 2d: Social and Environmental Impacts Component 3: Develop a Reference Scenario Component 4: Design a Monitoring System Component 5: Schedule and Budget Component 6: Design a Program Monitoring and Evaluation Framework

Comparison of R-Plan and R-PP R - PlanR-Preparation Proposal (R-PP) 9 components ToR required Single budget for R-Plan 4 core components + Schedule and budget + program monitoring and evaluation ToR recommended Funding budget in each component Consultation Plan required Degree of prior consultation not stated. Consultation Plan required -Start with framework for consultation and representative groups -Consultation Plan + process that broadens and deepens over time including consultations for assessment of social and environmental impacts Quick assessment to inform REDD Strategy REDD strategy not well defined Assessment of Land use, Forest Policy and Governance+ deeper studies later REDD Strategy emerges as work progresses

Process and criteria for assessment of R-PPs

R-Plan Review Process Generic Schedule W 1W 2W 3W 4W 5W 6W 9 R-Plan draft received by FMT FMT & Bank informal comments provided to Country TAP review completed and sent to Country Revised R-Plan posted on website; Bank no-objection PC Meeting TIME TASK MILESTONE W 7W 8 Time, in Weeks FMT & Bank provide comments & assistance + no-objection TAP reviews R-Plan Country incorporates feedback PC reviews R-Plan

Key Assessment Criteria for R-PP Crosscutting nature of readiness management arrangements Ownership, transparency, and dissemination of the R-PP by the government and relevant stakeholders Identifies drivers of deforestation, recognizes past successes and failures, identifies gaps and designs strategies that align with identified drivers Includes work plans for MRV, reference scenario and implementation that identify institutional and technical capacity needs Includes a program of work for due diligence for strategic environmental and social impact assessment in compliance with the Bank’s safeguard policies Includes full suite of activities, and identifies capacity building and financial resources needed to accomplish these activities

Cross-Cutting Criteria and Standards to Be Met (1)  Organize and Consult-  Standard 1a: National Readiness Management Arrangements The cross-cutting nature of the design and workings of the national readiness management arrangements on REDD, in terms of including major stakeholders and key government agencies beyond the forestry department, commitment of other sectors in planning and implementation of REDD readiness  Standard 1b: Consultation and Participation Ownership, transparency, and dissemination of the R-PP by the government and relevant stakeholders: Inclusiveness of effective and informed consultation and participation by major stakeholders Standards to be met by R-PP Components

Cross-Cutting Criteria and Standards to Be Met (1) REDD Strategy  Standard 2.a: Assessment of Land Use, Forest Policy, and Governance: Identifies major land use trends, direct and indirect deforestation and degradation drivers in the most relevant sectors in the context of REDD, and major land tenure and natural resource rights and issues? Document past successes and failures policies or measures for addressing drivers of deforestation, identifies significant gaps, challenges, and opportunities to address REDD.  Standard 2.b: REDD strategy Options: Aligns proposed REDD strategy with the identified drivers, and with existing national and sectoral strategies: the R- PP includes a summary of the emerging REDD strategy to the extent known presently, and of proposed analytic work (and, optionally, ToR) for assessment of the various REDD strategy option Standards to be met by R-PP Components

Cross-Cutting Criteria and Standards to Be Met (1)  Standard 2.c: REDD implementation framework: Describes activities to further elaborate institutional arrangements and issues relevant to REDD in the country setting that identifies key issues, explores potential arrangements to address them, and offers a work plan that seems likely to allow their full evaluation and adequate incorporation into the eventual Readiness Package. Standard 2.d: Assessment of social and environmental impacts: The proposal includes a program of work for due diligence for strategic environmental and social impact assessment in compliance with the Bank’s safeguard policies, including methods to evaluate how to address those impacts via studies, consultations, and specific mitigation measures aimed at preventing or minimizing adverse effects. Standards to be met by R-PP Components

Cross-Cutting Criteria and Standards to Be Met (1)  Standard 3 Reference scenario: Present work plan for how the reference scenario for deforestation, and for forest degradation (if desired), will be developed, including early ideas on feasibility of which methods to use (e.g., scenario of forest cover change and emissions based on historical trends in emissions and/or based on projections into the future of historical trend data), major data requirements and capacity needs, and linkages to the monitoring system design. Standards to be met by R-PP Components

Standard 4: Design a monitoring system: Initial design of an integrated monitoring system of measurement, reporting and verification of changes in deforestation and/or forest degradation The system design should include early ideas on including capability (either within an integrated system, or in coordinated activities) to monitor rural livelihoods, conservation of biodiversity, key governance factors directly pertinent to REDD implementation in the country, and to assess the impacts of the REDD strategy in the forest sector. Describes major data requirements, capacity requirements, how transparency of the monitoring system and data will be addressed, early ideas on which methods to use, and how the system would engage participatory approaches to monitoring by forest– dependent indigenous peoples and other forest dwellers. Standards to be met by R-PP Components

Standard 5: Completeness of information and resource requirements Proposes a full suite of activities to achieve REDD readiness, and identifies capacity building and financial resources needed to accomplish these activities. A budget and schedule for funding and technical support requested from the FCPF, as well as from other international sources (e.g., UN-REDD or bilateral assistance) are summarized by year and by potential donor. The information presented reflects the priorities in the R-PP, and is sufficient to meet the costs associated with REDD readiness activities identified in the R-PP, or gaps in funding are clearly noted. Standards to be met by R-PP Components

Design a Program Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Standard 6: Adequately describes the indicators that will be used to monitor program performance of the R-PP activities, and to identify in a timely manner any shortfalls in performance timing or quality. The R-PP demonstrates that the framework will assist in transparent management of financial and other resources, to meet the activity schedule. Standards to be met by R-PP Components