Aggregated Core Indicator Data TOPs Code 12 – 1998-2006 Performance Of All Voc Ed & Special Populations Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Review Best Practices
Advertisements

COLLEGE WOMEN’S PROGRAMS COUNCIL OUR STORY GOALS RANGE OF SERVICES SURVEY STATS LONGTERM IMPACT.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
ACCJC’s Annual Report Institution-Set Standards REVISED March 19, 2014 PaRC Presentation E. Kuo Foothill IR&P.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Faculty Take on Student Learning by Doug Lederman, Inside Higher Ed, 4/4/2011 "[T]oo many policy discussions of student.
CTE Accountability and Planning Perkins Planning Meeting March 2013 MSDE/DCCR Accountability Team Pat Mikos, Program Manager George Comegys, CTE Specialist.
Slide 1 Perkins IV Changes and Additions to Perkins Data, Tables and Reports August, 2009 Michele Dorschner, System Developer, Office of the Chancellor,
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
CTE Outcomes Survey KC Greaney, Santa Rosa Junior College VERATAC September CAIR Conference, Nov. 20, 2013.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
Institutional Effectiveness 2010/2011 Core Indicators Institutional Research Wendy Dove – October 2011 COMMON GROUND “Progress towards a decade of student.
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Webinar September 27, 2012.
Scorecard Update Salary Surfer/Wage Tracker Alice van Ommeren Ryan Fuller Research, Analysis and Accountability.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
FLEX DAY RECAP OF FALL 2014 AND NEXT STEPS EDUCATION MASTER PLAN.
Completers and Wage Progression: Joining Wage Data and Student Records Patrick Perry, Vice Chancellor California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office.
Fall/Spring Enrollment GROSSMONT COLLEGE Number of Students* (Based on End-of-Term Data) Fall and Spring Semesters: * Excludes students taking.
Finding the Data 1 AN OVERVIEW OF WEB SOURCES FOR INSTITUTIONAL DATA Fall 2012.
Fall/Spring Enrollment CUYAMACA COLLEGE Number of Students* (Based on End-of-Term Data) Fall and Spring Semesters: * Excludes students taking.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
Click to edit Master title style 1 What Data? California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dr. W. Charles Wiseley, “Chuck” Career Technical Education.
New methods for exploring labor market outcomes: Examining wages for award completers at California Community Colleges Patrick Perry Ryan Fuller.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Perkins IV: The Special Populations Perspective Mimi Lufkin, CEO CCCAOE Conference October 22, 2008 San Diego, CA National Alliance for Partnerships in.
Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
Fact Book Fall 2010 Outcomes *Unless otherwise specified, charts exclude students taking only non-credit courses.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Foundations for Perkins Accountability: Core Indicators, Annual Reports, Targets, and Gap Evaluation Carl D Perkins.
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Webinar September 9, 2015.
Dale Gruis Ag Ed Consultant Iowa Dept. of Education
End Statement Metrics Based on Board of Trustees’ Retreat held on September 30, 2006 Presented December 13, 2006 Reviewed and Reaffirmed October 3, 2008.
Health Care MIS Data Jim Comins, Initiative Director & Education Co-Chair SWHOAC Click Page Down to Advance.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Merritt College’s plan based on the principles Improve student access to college programs and services. Increase and balance student equity and diversity.
End Statement Metrics Based on Board of Trustees’ Retreat held on September 30, 2006 Presented December 13, 2006 Reviewed and Reaffirmed October 3, 2008.
Informing Program Improvements in the Classroom at: Cosumnes River College Dr. Norv Wellsfry Professor, CIS and Accounting.
Columbia Basin College Plenary I: Mission and Mission Fulfillment Rich Cummins Melissa McBurney 1.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
Perkins A discussion of Program Improvement from Perkins to Perkins III Presented by: Tom Grimm, Iowa Dept. of Education NACTEI Conference, Palm.
2010 ARCC Overview Michael Orkin, Ph.D. Associate Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs Peralta Community College District.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN CAMPUS-BASED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Core Indicator Cohort Selection Carl D Perkins (Perkins IV) Career and Technical Education Act Dr. W. Charles Wiseley.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning January 24, 2008.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
ENGINEERING Academic Advising. OBJECTIVES  General transfer issues  Transfer for engineering students  ASSIST  Applications  Job Outlook 2007.
Mimi Lufkin Chief Executive Officer National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity Education Foundation The Five Step Program Improvement Process Step One:
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability
A Brief Look at Career and Technical Education NCCCS - Perkins Update
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Contra Costa Community College District
Pairing LaunchBoard and CTE Outcomes Survey Data to Support Economic Mobility Presentation will be live but sample Powerpoint for future reference can.
Guiding Questions What are your general reactions to the data?
LaunchBoard in Action Presentation will be live but sample Powerpoint for future reference can be found at: Presenters:
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
IPRE Retreat Transfer & Employment Natalia Córdoba- Velasquez
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
Student Success Metrics
Guided Pathways: through the Lens of Special Populations
Disproportionate Impact Study
Perkins Core Indicators of Performance Report
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting April 2019.
Workforce Preparation and Employment Outcomes
2010 ARCC Report Findings May 3, 2010
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting Advisory Council▪ April 19, 2019.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN CAMPUS-BASED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Presentation transcript:

Aggregated Core Indicator Data TOPs Code 12 – Performance Of All Voc Ed & Special Populations Students

CORE Indicator 1 - Percent of TOPS 12 students successfully completing Vocational courses with a grade of “C” or better State Negotiated Level = 79.76% All groups have consistently performed above the State Negotiated Level over the period of record. Students with Disabilities have had the lowest rate of success amongst the six groups. Graphs reflect data reported for the most recent year available. For example, outcomes for Indicator 1 (Skill Attainment) are from the previous academic year while outcomes for Indicators 2 – 4 (Completions, Placement, Retention and Equity) are from the previous year for students who were last enrolled two years prior. For a complete explanation, see

CORE Indicator 2 - Percent of TOPS 12 vocational education students who receive a degree or certificate, transfer to UC or CSU, or join the military All groups have performed significantly above the State Negotiated Level and gains have remained constant over time. Nontraditional students have the lowest rate of completion amongst the six groups. Graphs reflect data reported for the most recent year available. For example, outcomes for Indicator 1 (Skill Attainment) are from the previous academic year while outcomes for Indicators 2 – 4 (Completions, Placement, Retention and Equity) are from the previous year for students who were last enrolled two years prior. For a complete explanation, see State Negotiated Level = 60.82%

Nontraditional students have been most successful in obtaining employment or continuing their education at a four-year college. Students with Disabilities have been less successful in obtaining employment or continuing their education at a four-year college. Graphs reflect data reported for the most recent year available. For example, outcomes for Indicator 1 (Skill Attainment) are from the previous academic year while outcomes for Indicators 2 – 4 (Completions, Placement, Retention and Equity) are from the previous year for students who were last enrolled two years prior. For a complete explanation, see State Negotiated Level = 83.19% Core Indicator 3a – Percent of TOPS 12 vocational education students who were found in California UI covered employment or a four-year public educational institution one year following data collection

Nontraditional students are the most likely special population subgroups to be working after leaving community college. Students with Disabilities and Displaced Homemaker students have the lowest level of employment success amongst the six groups. Graphs reflect data reported for the most recent year available. For example, outcomes for Indicator 1 (Skill Attainment) are from the previous academic year while outcomes for Indicators 2 – 4 (Completions, Placement, Retention and Equity) are from the previous year for students who were last enrolled two years prior. For a complete explanation, see State Negotiated Level = 82.85% Core Indicator 3b – Percent of California UI covered TOPs 12 cohort students who were found employed for at least three quarters

Over the last two planning years, all subgroups of Nontraditional students have made significant progress in meeting the State Negotiated Level for participation in courses deemed nontraditional. Economically Disadvantaged students have had the highest increase in participation and are the only group meeting the State Negotiated Level Graphs reflect data reported for the most recent year available. For example, outcomes for Indicator 1 (Skill Attainment) are from the previous academic year while outcomes for Indicators 2 – 4 (Completions, Placement, Retention and Equity) are from the previous year for students who were last enrolled two years prior. For a complete explanation, see State Negotiated Level = 29.98% Core Indicator 4a – Percent of TOPs Code 12 Nontraditional students enrolled in SAM A-D courses identified as leading to jobs that had less than a 25/75% gender ratio

LEP and Economically Disadvantaged students have become the most likely to complete courses of all nontraditional special population subgroups. Graphs reflect data reported for the most recent year available. For example, outcomes for Indicator 1 (Skill Attainment) are from the previous academic year while outcomes for Indicators 2 – 4 (Completions, Placement, Retention and Equity) are from the previous year for students who were last enrolled two years prior. For a complete explanation, see State Negotiated Level = 25.25% Core Indicator 4b – Percent of TOPs Code 12 Nontraditional students who complete SAM A-D courses identified as leading to jobs that had less than a 25/75% gender ratio and receive a degree or certificate, transfer to UC, or join the military

Statewide, 9% of TOPs Code 12 Nontraditional students moved from participant to completer compared to 14% of TOPs Code 12 Traditional students Nontraditional students in TOPs Code 12 programs are moving from participant to completer at about 2/3 the rate of traditional gender students.* * Planning Year