Conspiracy Theory Did the Americans really land on the moon?

9 Reasons why the Americans never landed on the moon!

The American flag is waving even though there is no wind on the moon.

The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the Astronauts’ feet made deeper impressions into the moon’s surface.

There are no stars in any of the photos.

The astronauts’ cameras had cross wires on the lenses. Why are some objects located in front of the wires?

Some photos on the moon show the letter “C” on a rock. This is common on Hollywood sets and the “C” stands for center stage.

Identical backgrounds in photos are listed as taken miles apart.

The lack of a more than two-second delay in two-way communications at a distance of 250,000 miles.

No blast crater appeared from the landing.

Moon rocks were identical to rocks found in Antartica.

Who believes that we actually landed on the moon now?

Reasons why the Americans did land on the moon!

The Flag was not blowing in the wind. The astronauts were moving the flag into position, causing motion. The fabric's rippled appearance was due to its having been folded during flight and gave it an appearance which could be mistaken for motion in a still photograph. The astronauts were moving the flag into position, causing motion. The fabric's rippled appearance was due to its having been folded during flight and gave it an appearance which could be mistaken for motion in a still photograph.

Indentions in the moon The Lander weighed less than three tons on the Moon. The astronauts were much lighter than the Lander, but the area of their boots was also much smaller than that of the Lander's pads. Pressure, or force per unit area, rather than force, determines the depth of compression of the soil. The Lander weighed less than three tons on the Moon. The astronauts were much lighter than the Lander, but the area of their boots was also much smaller than that of the Lander's pads. Pressure, or force per unit area, rather than force, determines the depth of compression of the soil.

No Stars The surface of the moon was very bright and the cameras were set at a low exposure time to prevent over exposure and a ruined picture. Take a picture with your camera at night with the same settings and you won’t see stars in your pictures either. The surface of the moon was very bright and the cameras were set at a low exposure time to prevent over exposure and a ruined picture. Take a picture with your camera at night with the same settings and you won’t see stars in your pictures either.

Irradiation effect of glaring objects See picture for example. See picture for example.

Not on the original Something on the film when reproducing caused this to look like it had a C on it. Not found on the original film. Something on the film when reproducing caused this to look like it had a C on it. Not found on the original film.

Identical backgrounds were not really identical. Shots were not identical, just similar. Background objects were mountains many miles away. Without an atmosphere to obscure distant objects, it can be difficult to tell the relative distance and scale of terrain features. Shots were not identical, just similar. Background objects were mountains many miles away. Without an atmosphere to obscure distant objects, it can be difficult to tell the relative distance and scale of terrain features.

Edited Out There may also be some documentary films where the delay has been edited out. Principal motivations for editing the audio would likely come in response to time constraints or in the interest of clarity There may also be some documentary films where the delay has been edited out. Principal motivations for editing the audio would likely come in response to time constraints or in the interest of clarity

Shouldn’t be a blast crater. No crater should be expected. The exhaust would not be focused on any one surface spot for very long, and the compactness of the lunar soil below a thin surface layer of dust also make it virtually impossible for the descent engine to blast out a "crater”. No crater should be expected. The exhaust would not be focused on any one surface spot for very long, and the compactness of the lunar soil below a thin surface layer of dust also make it virtually impossible for the descent engine to blast out a "crater”.

Rocks are not alike Chemical analysis of the rocks confirms a different oxygen isotopic composition and a surprising lack of volatile elements. Also the Apollo lunar soil samples chemically matched the Russian Luna space probe’s lunar soil samples. Chemical analysis of the rocks confirms a different oxygen isotopic composition and a surprising lack of volatile elements. Also the Apollo lunar soil samples chemically matched the Russian Luna space probe’s lunar soil samples.

Do you think we landed on the moon or not?