HOM Studies at the FLASH(TTF2) Linac Nathan Eddy, Ron Rechenmacher, Luciano Piccoli, Marc Ross FNAL Josef Frisch, Stephen Molloy SLAC Nicoleta Baboi, Olaf.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Testing and Development of Feed-Forward System for ATF2 A. Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre, Daresbury Laboratory, UK Fifth ATF2 Project.
Test of LLRF at SPARC Marco Bellaveglia INFN – LNF Reporting for:
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
Preliminary Results from HOM Measurements at the Tesla Test Facility (SLAC) Josef Frisch, Kirsten Hacker, Linda Hendrickson, Justin May, Douglas McCormick,
OPTIMISATION OF BEAM INJECTION INTO THE FIRST ACCELERATING MODULE AT TTF2 WITH CAVITY DIPOLE MODE SIGNALS N. Baboi, H. Schlarb, M. Wendt, G. Kreps, DESY,
Ron Johnson Beam Position October 29-31, Beam Position Monitors FAC Review October 29-31, 2007 Stripline BPM.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
RF Synchronisation Issues
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 28-Jan
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
Status of ATF2 Cavity BPM Project Sep 29, 2005 Project Scope: Instrument both couplers ATF2 cavity BPM’s (35) Produce prototype for December cavity test.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
The Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) Massimo Dal Forno Paolo Craievich, Raffaele De Monte, Thomas Borden, Andrea Borga, Mauro Predonzani, Mario Ferianis,
Task 12.4: SRF HOM Beam Diagnostics R.M. Jones, U. van Rienen, T. Flisgen, N. Baboi (UMAN, UROS, DESY)
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.
K.Honkavaara, LCLS ICW06 LCLS Injector Commissioning Workshop, SLAC, October 9-11, 2006 Linac Experience at FLASH Katja Honkavaara University of Hamburg.
Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Shilun Pei with Chris Adolphsen, Zenghai Li, Karl L. Bane, et al. SLAC, Dec. 12, 2007 TTF.
Cavity Alignment Using Beam Induced Higher Order Mode Signals in the TTF LINAC Olivier Napoly, Rita Paparella CEA/DSM/DAPNIA, Gif-sur-Yvette Marc Ross,
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
… Work in progress at CTF3 … Davide Gamba 01 July 2013 Study and Implementation of L INEAR F EEDBACK T OOLS for machine study and operation.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update – Preparing for MEBT 1.1 Beam Vic Scarpine Feb. 9, 2016.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 18/06/2015 High Gradient work shop 2015.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
LEReC BPM Status P. Cernigla, R. Hulsart, R. Michnoff, Z. Sorrell June 2, 2016.
R. M. Jones (ESGARD OMIA/SRF-AS FP7, CERN, ) 11 1 High Precision SC Cavity Alignment/Diagnostics/BPM with HOM Measurements Nicoleta Baboi, Olivier.
Sub-Task HOM-BPM HOM based Beam Position Monitors – Planned and Extant Measurements N. Baboi, DESY, Hamburg EuCARD WP 10: SRF, Annual Review Meeting.
HOM-BPM study in STF for cavity miss-alignment detection
LLRF Research and Development at STF-KEK
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
LLRF'15 Workshop, Shanghai, Nov. 4, 2015
CLIC Workshop 2016: Main Beam Cavity BPM
12.4: SRF HOM Diagnostics: Experimental Results and Future Plans
Controls CBETA controls will extend existing EPICS control system
ATF nanoBPM system - nanoGrid ATF2 Movers TTF HOM – dipole / monopole
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
Beam Position Measurements in TTF Cavities
Low Level RF Status Outline LLRF controls system overview
HOM Based Beam Diagnostics in TESLA Superconducting Cavities at FLASH
High Precision SC Cavity Alignment Diagnostics with HOM Measurements
Status of TTF HOM Project Aug 9, 2005
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

HOM Studies at the FLASH(TTF2) Linac Nathan Eddy, Ron Rechenmacher, Luciano Piccoli, Marc Ross FNAL Josef Frisch, Stephen Molloy SLAC Nicoleta Baboi, Olaf Hensler DESY

FLASH Facility (formerly TTF2) 1.3 GHz superconducting linac –5 current accelerating modules, with a further two planned for installation. –Typical energy of 400 – 750 MeV. Bunch compressors create a ~10 fs spike in the charge profile. –This generates intense VUV light when passed through the undulator section (SASE). Used for ILC and XFEL studies, as well as VUV-FEL generation for users. dump bunch compressors collimator section bypass line 5 accelerating modules gun undulators FEL beam

Higher Order Modes in Cavities In addition to the fundamental accelerating mode, cavities can support a spectrum of higher order modes. Traditionally they are seen as “bad”. –Beam breakup (BBU), HOM heating, … Here we investigate their usefulness, –Beam diagnostics –Cavity alignment –Cavity diagnostics

TESLA Cavities Nine cell superconducting cavities. 1.3 GHz standing wave used for acceleration. Gradient of up to 25 MV/m. –Addition of piezo-tuners and improvement of manufacturing technique intended to increase this to ~35 MV/m. HOM couplers with a tunable notch filter to reject fundamental. –One upstream and one downstream, separated by 115degrees azimuthally. –Couple electrically and magnetically to the cavity fields.

Response of HOM modes to beam

Sample HOM Spectrum

Beam Position Monitoring –Dipole mode amplitude is a function of the bunch charge and transverse offset. –Exist in two polarisations corresponding to two transverse orthogonal directions. Not necessarily coincident with horizontal and vertical directions due to perturbations from cavity imperfections and the couplers. Problem – polarisations not necessarily degenerate in frequency. –Frequency splitting <1 MHz (of same size as the resonance width). Beam Phase Monitoring –Power leakage of the 1.3 GHz accelerating mode through the HOM coupler is approximately the same amplitude as the HOM signals. i.e. Accelerating RF and beam induced monopole modes exist on same cables. –Compare phase of 1.3 GHz and a HOM monopole mode. HOMs as a Beam Diagnostic

Narrow-band Measurements ~1.7 GHz tone added for calibration purposes. Cal tone, LO, and digitiser clock all locked to accelerator reference. Dipole modes exist in two polarisations corresponding to orthogonal transverse directions. The polarisations may be degenerate in frequency, or may be split by the perturbing affect of the couplers, cavity imperfections, etc. May be difficult to determine their frequencies.

Method Steer beam using two correctors upstream of the accelerating module. –Try to choose a large range of values in (x,x’) and (y,y’) phase space. Record the response of the mixed-down dipole mode at each steerer setting. BPMs accelerating module 18 HOM electronics steering magnets electron bunch

Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to Find Modes Collect HOM data for series of machine pulses with varying beam orbits Use SVD to find an orthonormal basis set. –Select 6 largest amplitude modes –Calculate mode amplitudes Linear regression to find matricies to correlate beam orbit (X,X’,Y,Y’), and mode amplitudes Use SVD modes and amplitudes to measure position on subsequent pulses

Singular Value Decomposition SVD decomposes a matrix, X, into the product of three matrices, U, S, and V. –U and V are unitary. –S is diagonal. It finds the “normal eigenvectors” of the dataset. –i.e. “modes” whose amplitude changes independently of each other. –These may be linear combinations of the expected modes. Use a large number of pulses for each cavity. –Make sure the beam was moved a significant amount in x, x’, y, and y’. Does not need a priori knowledge of resonance frequency, Q, etc. –Similar to a Model Independent Analysis.

Predict position at one cavity from positions at adjacent cavities X resolution ~ 6.1µmY resolution ~ 3.3 µm

Cavity Alignment ACC5 X: 240 micron misalignment, 9 micron reproducibility Y: 200 micron misalignment, 5 micron reproducibility

Multi-Bunch Processing

Multi-Bunch Initial Results

HOM as BPM in DOOCs VME HOM Front-End DOOCs Matlab Vectors Calibration Constants DataBase Display X, X’ Y, Y’

HOM BPM Details Mode Vectors Raw Data Amplitudes Calibration Matrix 4D Position k ~ 6, j ~ 100 to 4k

DESY System Need to read out raw data for mod*cav*coupler channels at 4k to 10k data points per for multibunch then perform dot products to determine mode amplitudes This requires a lot of I/O in the front-end (slow) and then a bunch multiply accumulates which must be done sequentially on the front- end processor The current system is unable to report a position for every pulse at 5Hz for single bunch even with only a few cavities per module enabled

Custom FPGA Based Board Extreme flexibility inherent in FPGA –Algorithms and functionality can be changed and updated as needed –Code base which can be used for multiple projects –Intellectual Property (IP) cores provide off the shelf solutions for many interfaces and DSP applications The speed of parallel processing –Can perform up to 512 multiplies using dedicated blocks The Pipeline nature of FPGA logic is able to satisfy rigorous and well defined timing requirements

Dot Product FPGA Implementation Store mode vectors in FPGA RAM Perform dot product (multiply accumulate) in FPGA for digitized data as it arrives from ADC Simply read out mode amplitudes which are available as soon as data has arrived Can perform calculation on all channels in parallel Also able to store raw data in internal RAM ADC FPGA  x n *v n,j Coupler Data

Dedicated HOM BPM Digitizer Dedicated HOM Digitizer –Provide amplitudes in real time –Reduce front-end processor I/O and load by orders 3- 4 orders of magnitude Maximum rate still limited by front-end I/O –Provide bunch by bunch data for every pulse Design dedicated 8 channel digitizer –Modify existing design ~ 6 months –Commissioning time (have prototype already) –Conservative estimate of $200 per channel

Broadband System Broadband (scope-based) system –Monitor HOM modes up to 2.5GHz –Several simultaneous channels (4 or 8) –Limited dynamic range (8 bit scope) –Use for Phase measurement

Monopole Spectrum Data taken with fast scope. Both couplers for 1 cavity shown Note that different lines have different couplings to the 2 couplers: More on this later Monopole lines due to beam, and phase is related to beam time of arrival Fundamental 1.3GHz line also couples out – provides RF phase

Analysis of Monopole Data Lines are singlets – frequencies are easy to find Find real and imaginary amplitudes of the waveform at the line frequency Find phase angle for each HOM mode Convert phases to times Weight the times by the average power in each line Correct the scope trigger time using this weighted average of the times Calculate the phase of the 1.3GHz fundimental relative to this new time

Beam Phase vs. RF Measurement During 5 Degree Phase Shift Measure 5 degree phase shift commanded by control system See about 0.1 degrees of rms

Summary HOMs are useful for diagnostic purposes. –Beamline hardware already exists. –Large proportion of linac occupied with structures. Beam diagnostics. –Accelerating RF and beam induced monopole HOM exist on same cable. No effect from thermal expansion of cables. Can find beam phase with respect to machine RF. –Dipole modes respond strongly to beam position. Can use these to measure transverse beam position. Cavity/Structure diagnostics. –Alignment of cavities within supercooled structure. –Possibility of exploring inner cavity geometry by examining HOM output and comparing to simulation.

Backup Slides

Intuitive modes? This calibration matrix, M, shows how much of each SVD mode contributes to the modes corresponding to x, y, (x’, y’). Therefore, can sum the SVD modes to find the intuitive modes. –Lack of calibration tone in the reconstructed modes, as expected. –Beating indicates presence of two frequencies, i.e. actual cavity modes are rotated with respect to x and y. –Could rotate these modes to find orientation of polarisation vectors in the cavity…

Using SVD on the (n x j) cavity output matrix, X, produces three matrices. –U (n x j), S (j x j, diagonal), and V (j x j) V contains j modes. –These are the orthonormal eigenvectors. –“Intuitive” modes will be linear combinations of these. The diagonal elements of S are the eigenvalues of the eigenvectors. –i.e. the amount with which the associated eigenvector contributes to the average coupler output. –It can be shown that the largest k eigenvalues found by SVD are the largest possible eigenvalues. U gives the amplitude of each eigenvector for each beam pulse. Using SVD

Theoretical Resolution Corresponds to a limit of ~65 nm –Included 10 dB cable losses, 6.5 dB noise figure, and 10 dB attenuator in electronics. Need good charge measurement to perform normalisation. –0.1% stability of toroids, to achieve 1 um at 1 mm offset. –Not the case with the FLASH toroids. LO has a measured phase noise of ~1 degree RMS. –This will mix angle and position, and will degrade resolution. –LO and calibration tone have a similar circuit, and cal. tone has much better phase noise. Therefore, should be simple to improve. Energy in mode –Thermal noise –

HOM Calibration Overview DOOCs VME HOM Front-End Matlab Control Code Matlab Analysis Code TTF2 Correctors BPMs, Etc Display Matlab Data Structure Matlab Vectors

Steering Plots

Apply calibration to a different dataset

Practical system Can use 2 LO frequencies to mix both the 1.3GHz, and the 2.4GHz Homs to a convienent IF (~25MHz). Digitize with same system used for dipole HOM measurements. Filters will greatly improve signal to noise –Dual bandpass for 1.3GHz, and 2.4GHz –Risk introducing phase shifts from filters System low cost – couplers already exist, electronics is inexpensive.

HOM Downmix Board Input and sample out Bandpass filters Pre-amplifier Mixer IF output amplifier