Company LOGO Grants and Funding Finding federal and state entitlement and competitive grants for your school.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Update and 2009 Grant Process. What is ITQ? Part of Federal No Child Left Behind $$ focused on increasing the number of “highly qualified” teachers in.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Consolidated Application Budget Detail and Fiscal Issues.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Title II-A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality ESEA Application Workshop April 21-22, 2015.
1 Welcome to Julius West MS Middle School Reform Phase II:
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting [NAME OF SCHOOL] [DATE][Principal]
Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
Company LOGO Grants and Funding Helping schools pursue federal and state entitlement and competitive grants.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Company LOGO What Can the Data Tell You? Adventures in Finding Funding.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
Scenic Hills Elementary School 2014 Annual Title I Parent Meeting Presented by: Herronda Harley, Professional Learning Coach September 25, 2014.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Kendale Lakes Elementary September 15, 2014 Martha T. Jaureguizar, Principal Nancy Cabrera-Nuñez, Assistant Principal.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
Sol C. Johnson High School Wednesday September 23, 2015 (11:00am and 5:30pm) Auditorium.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
Project Design Jennifer Coffey OSEP May 4,
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Welcome Family and Community
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Local Control Accountability Plan
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
No Child Left Behind.
What Parents Need to Know
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
What Parents Need to Know
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Schoolwide Programs.
What Parents Need to Know
Presentation transcript:

Company LOGO Grants and Funding Finding federal and state entitlement and competitive grants for your school

What Kinds of Grant Funds are Out There? Federal Entitlement Federal Competitive State Entitlement State Competitive National Foundations Local Foundations

10% -- Who CARES????  Why should you care so much about 10% if that’s “all” the federal government supplies?  Represents $65 billion dollars  Money used for “supplemental” programs  New programs  Pilot programs  Very concerned with teacher quality issues  Professional development  Money for Technology programs  25% for professional development

Federal Funding Review: NCLB Four “Pillars” of No Child Left Behind 1.Accountability (AYP) 2.Proven education methods:  Using scientifically-based research (SBR)  Providing high-quality staff in every classroom  Promoting high-quality professional development 3.Flexibility (spending) 4.Choices for parents (school choice, supplemental services)

Adequate Yearly Progress: (AYP)  NCLB report cards for districts and schools  Do you have Schools in Need of Improvement (INOP)  additional professional development requirements and funds  What % of your staff are highly-qualified staff in core areas?

Highly Qualified Staff  State certified  At least Bachelor’s degree  Demonstrate subject-matter competency  Advanced degree in appropriate major  Pass subject-matter competency test  Core academic subjects  State’s definition of HOUSSEHOUSSE

High Quality Professional Dev. Components of High Quality Professional Development Programs (NCLB definition) PBS TeacherLine Improve teachers' knowledge of academic subjects. More than 80 research-based courses for teachers at every grade level in reading, mathematics, science, technology integration, teaching strategies, and curriculum mapping. Developed in association with nationally recognized curriculum organizations Are integral to broad school- wide educational improvement plans. With an array of courses, teachers can select which course(s) best address their school’s needs for improvement

HQPD (cont.) Give teachers and principals the knowledge and skills to help all students meet challenging state academic standards. Standards-based, content-rich courses provide authentic tasks with real-class applications. Courses are “mapped” to identified needs Improve classroom management skills Proven, scientifically-based teaching strategies and methods to help raise student achievement. 24-hour access to resources and training. Interactive simulations, streaming video, animations and interactives Modeling of research-based practices by master practitioners in real classrooms. Practice and application of skills. Coaching, feedback and reflection. Free tutorials, tech tips, classroom management techniques, lesson plans

HQPD (cont.) Are sustained, intensive, classroom-focused, and are not one-day or short-term workshops. Most classes run for at least 6 weeks, providing ample opportunity for discussion, integration, and extended learning. Real class videos and examples embedded in each course. Advance teacher understanding of effective instructional strategies that are supported by scientifically based research. More than 80 research-based courses for teachers at every grade level in reading, mathematics, science, technology integration, teaching strategies, and curriculum mapping. Are developed with extensive participation of teachers, principals, parents, and administrators. Teachers select which course(s) to enroll in, based on their individual needs and school improvement plans. Schools and districts can customize courses to meet their goals.

HQPD (cont.) Provide guidance to enhance parental involvement PBS TeacherLine offers a course entitled Connecting Family, Community and Schools Provide training on how to use data and assessments to improve classroom practice and student learning. PBS TeacherLine reading, math, Capstone and some technology courses address this by asking teachers to work with students to try to identify skill levels and plan future instruction.

Title I - Entitlement  Schoolwide/Targeted Assistance  Mostly elementary schools  Reading, Math  Professional Development set aside $$$  Supplement vs. Supplant  Often considered “entrée” point for change

Title I - Competitive  Reading First  Provide scientifically based instructional methods to improve reading in K-3  Professional development  Comprehensive School Reform  School reform as an improvement strategy  Research based  Effective practices  Professional development

Title II - Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High-Quality Teachers  Part A – Improving Teacher Quality State Grants  Given to districts using a formula  Part B – Math and Science Partnerships  Districts partner with colleges and universities to strengthen content expertise  Part D -  Technology grants  50% formula  50% competitive

Title II - Competitive  Math and Science Partnerships  Increase achievement in math and science  Improve content knowledge  Improve pedagogical skills  Enhancing Education Through Technology  Integrate standards-aligned technology into the curriculum  Increase access to technology  Support distance learning

EETT – Enhancing Education Through Technology  25% must be used for professional development  Half of the funding is used for competitive and half for formula grants  Districts must be “high need”

Titles IV and V  Title IV – Competitive  21 st Century Community Learning Centers  Academic support in after school settings  Professional development  Title V - Entitlement  “Special” projects  Flexible program that can be used for a myriad of projects, including professional development.

Title IV Part B  Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP)  Formula-driven: Small and Rural Schools Achievement Program  Direct from US DOE to districts w/600 or fewer students  Competitive to states: Rural and Low Income Schools Program  Funds used for variety of purposes, including professional development

Perkins Vocational  Vocational-technical education programs  Formula and competitive grants used for:  vocational curriculum materials  materials for learning labs, curriculum development or modification  staff development  efforts for academic-vocational integration

Your Turn Think about your district:  Do you qualify for grants? Which one(s)?  Is there a culture of change? Are folks ready?  Do you have the resources to pursue and implement grant-funded programs?  Will you be looking for assistance?  Who is in charge? Who are “players” to involve?  Title One Director  Director of Professional Development  Assistant Superintendent  Director of Technology  Building Principal

Process Steps for Writing Proposals with School District Partners CUSTOMER PARTNERSHIP PROCESS Implement and evaluate success Complete a winning proposal Evaluate options Identify school needs Determine requirements GRANT WRITING TOOLS ProspectingQualifyingProposalDecision Deliver Probe and assess needs with school/district Create a presentation that maps product/service to school needs Deliver proof to school/district that needs can be met Initial school/district identified Partnership vision and access to administrators OUTCOMES/GOALS GRANT WRITING PROCESS STEPS PROPOSAL PROCESS ACTIVITIES AND MILESTONES Generate new prospects (via referrals, networking, conferences). Look at existing customer base for eligibility Identify willing administrator within target school/district Evaluation plan to demonstrate to administrators your ability to meet their school needs Assess potential (competitive and discretionary programs the school qualifies for) Draft a grant proposal with the school Negotiate terms and conditions Complete the grant proposal Complete the work (deliver the professional development) Follow-up with the customer Engage in ongoing evaluation Agreement reachedGrant proposal submitted Successful grant program High Needs LEAs list NCLB report cards Marketing Materials Grants Presentation SBR documents NCLB requirements Course syllabi Grant narrative (boilerplate and customized) Grants toolkit Sales and Marketing materials Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4Phase 5 Program evaluation materials Ongoing communication with the school/district and the teachers involved in the program

Budget Considerations  # teachers  # courses  Teacher stipends  Facilitator  On-site face-to-face component  Administrative costs  Equipment/internet access  Evaluation

Sample Enrollment Budget # teachers# PBS TL courses $$$ ($150/course) 72$2, (2/yr, 2 years)$4, $4,500 The average elementary school has app. 500 students and maybe 20 teachers

Sample Budget (based on 7 teachers, 2 courses each) Budget Line Item$ Enrollment$2,100 Stipends e.g. $20/hr x 30 hours per course $8,400 (7x60x$20) On-Site meetings (2 2-hr per course) Teacher stipends $1,120 On-site Facilitator (PBS or locally provided) $2,000 ($500/mtg.) Evaluation10% of total = app. $1300 Administration10% of total = app. $1450 TOTAL$16,370

Contact Info  Insert your contact info  Insert a bullet or 2 about what help/service you can provide audience in follow-up