Magnetic Shielding Issues Roy Preece STFC - RAL. Overview Issues Items in harms way – Step IV Step IV mitigation plan –Racks –Compressors Current / Future.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICO Meeting Magnetic Field Shielding Issues 11 th July 2012 Mike Courthold 1.
Advertisements

1 UK Project Alan Grant, STFC. Finance How savings are made Update on stepIV position Milestones Critical Path - stepIV Concerns 2.
Project Managers Update Roy Preece Particle Physics Department, STFC MICE Video Conference, 18 th September 2014.
MICE Superconducting Solenoids: Status and Update RAL: T W Bradshaw M Courthold J Rochford M Hills D Baynham Oxford: J Cobb W Lau S Yang MICE.
MICE: Hall Infrastructure Chris Nelson CEng CM16 8 th Oct 2006.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 MICE PM Report Installations to date Future installation work Preparations for Phase Two Target status MICE Video Conference, 22nd May, 2008.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Electrical Installation CM39 Andy Gallagher & Ian Mullacrane.
Electrical & Control CM40 Daresbury Laboratory. CM40 Electrical Infrastructure Update RRM2 Latest Latest on Installation Progress Rack Allocations Racks.
Major items from field affected component list MICE Magnetic shielding review C.Macwaters 23/9/13.
MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July
MICE Funding Agency Committee Alain Blondel 1 MICE Funding Agency Committee Spokesperson’s remarks.
Alan Grant OsC 30/4/ UK Project Finance & Schedule.
MICE - UK Project Progress Roy Preece 30 th April 2013.
MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July
MICE MICE Magnet Modelling - Presentation to the Daresbury Magnetics Group Daresbury Laboratory 31 st January 2013 P J Smith University of Sheffield.
1 MICE - INFRASTRUCTURE MICO meeting 7 th February 2008 Tim Hayler.
MICE: overview K. Long, 18 March, Contents ► Introduction ► Beam line ► Infrastructure ► MICE steps ► Phase II (comment) ► Conclusions.
MICE Magnetic Field Mitigation Review Potential impact on ISIS of MICE Stray Magnetic Fields 24 th September 2013 Martin Hughes.
1 UK PM Report Costs & Schedule Alan Grant, STFC.
Preparations in the MICE hall Video Conference 25 th June 09 Tim Hayler Andy Lintern Peter Lau Geoff Barber.
RSLR mtg 28/3/2014 RLSR mtg Alan Grant. 2 RLSR mtg 28/3/ MICE Finances - Forward Look.
The status of the construction of MICE Step IV K. Long, on behalf of the MICE collaboration.
MICE CM32 8 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman 1.
Magnetic Shielding Roy Preece. Issues Cooling channel initially designed without return yolks. Current North and South shielding walls designed to encapsulate.
Schedule and Work We are moving into a very intensive 4 months with a lot of work to be carried out Electrical services to the devices – after the South.
MICE Specification of the Stray Field Issue and the MICE Hall Model P J Smith 23 rd September 2013.
1 Layout and Installation MICE Collaboration Meeting, RAL, October 27-29, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Paul Drumm, Matthew Hills, Yury Ivanyushenkov,
Magnetic Mitigation - Contents l Magnetic Mitigation General l West Wall Compressors l Rack Room 2 l Magnetic Shielding Yoke Jason Tarrant – Integration.
MICE VC Alain Blondel 1 MICE NEWS MICE VC Spectrometer solenoid 2. Magnetic shielding 3. Next Collaboration meeting.
Andrew Moss ASTeC CM32 9t h February 2012 RAL MICE RF System.
Status of the MICE Project & Dashboard MICE Project Board 14 th November 2013 Roy Preece.
1 MICE Hall construction status Richard Apsimon MICE VC meeting 29th Nov 2007.
PRY Base - Contents l PRY Support/Base/Platform in the MICE Hall l History l Requirements l Environment l Design l Structural Integrity l Preparation l.
PRY Implementation - Contents l Fit with Experimental Devices (& services connections) l Fit with Tracker Cryo l Fit with Floor & Trench l Fit with Mezzanine.
1 MICE Hall and Infrastructure - Progress since CM18 Chris Nelson MICE CM19 Oct 2007.
MICE CM35 Status and Goals Alain Blondel 1 WELCOME TO MICE CM35! – Status and Goals - Many thanks to Chris Rogers, Debbie Loader and Rose Hayes for taking.
Project Managers Report CM40 Collaboration Board – Rome Roy Preece 28 th October 2014.
Spectrometer Solenoid Schedule MICE Schedule Review May 23 rd 2011 Roy Preece (STFC RAL, LBNL)
UK Update Package Managers Meeting 001 Roy Preece 13 th January 2014.
MICE Oversight Committee Meeting RAL, 24 April 2014 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration Status of MICE and Spectrometer Solenoids.
PRY Base - Contents l PRY Support/Base/Platform in the MICE Hall l Requirements l Environment l Design l Structural Integrity l Preparation l Installation.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Pre-CM33 schedule planning SuperMICO meeting, June 6th Motivation: For all of us to understand the main drivers behind the top-level MICE schedule So that.
OsC mtg 24/4/2014 OsC mtg Alan Grant. 2 OsC mtg 24/4/ MICE Finances - Forward Look.
1 Mice Collaboration Meeting CM33 Glasgow University 25 th – 29 th June 2012 STFC Daresbury Laboratory Electrical Infrastructure Report Authors : Ian Mullacrane.
Contents Jason Tarrant STFC Aim of Presentation to show: l Problem of compressors located at south shield wall l Description of compressor layout and services.
Status of the MICE Construction Project Resource Loaded Schedule Review 29 th April 2014 Roy Preece.
1 Project Infrastructure for steps I-III Tim Hayler, STFC – RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting, RAL, nd October 2008.
MICE CM32 25 th February 2012 Magnet Group Report Vicky Bayliss Victoria Blackmore John Cobb Mike Courthold Roy Preece Mike Zisman 1.
MICE Magnetic Modelling CM 35 RAL 14 th – 16 th February 2013 P. J. Smith.
OsC mtg 15/10/2014 MICE Step IV Alan Grant. Content Step IV – Construction Status – Finances – Schedule – Risks – Summary 2.
MICE – UK Plan Roy Preece STFC RAL DOE Review of MAP Brookhaven National Laboratory 13 th August 2014.
1 UK Project Roy Preece – STFC Alan Grant, STFC. Finance Staffing Update on stepIV position Milestones Critical Path – stepIV Magnetic field mitigation.
Magnetic Field Engineering Update CM36 IIT Craig Macwaters 17/6/13 1.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
Schedule and Milestones Roy Preece STFC RAL FAC 17 th April 2015.
1 UK Project Finance & Schedule. Overview Finance  Budget Setting 2013/14  June Finance  Forward look to complete stepVI Schedule  Overview 2.
MICE Magnetic Modelling CM 36 IIT 17 th – 19 th June 2013 P. J. Smith.
Schedule and Milestones Colin Whyte STFC RAL Resource Loaded Schedule Review 5 th April 2016.
S A Griffiths CM42 June 2015 Electrical & Control.
Project Managers Report CM38 – Napa Roy Preece 24th February 2014.
Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment Overview
Outcome of the Review and Response to Recommendations
CM 34 RAL 17th – 19th October 2012 P. J. Smith
Introduction Jason Tarrant – Integration Engineering Step IV Removal
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Shielding Issues Roy Preece STFC - RAL

Overview Issues Items in harms way – Step IV Step IV mitigation plan –Racks –Compressors Current / Future work –Hall Field Analysis –Partial return yolk concept Step VI Conclusions

Issues Cooling channel initially designed without return yolks. Current North and South shielding walls designed to encapsulate the field with regard to the safety requirements. Safe levels outside the walls but high field within In air field, the original analysis, is not applicable for placing items. The field will focus where there are ferrous items. Sensitive equipment inside the shielding walls needs to be moved to lower field locations.

Issues 5 Gauss 100 Gauss 50 Gauss Original Compressor position Original Control Rack position Step IV Solenoid mode 240 MeV/C Beta 42cm

Items in harms way Cryo cooler compressors. Power supplies, controls. PPS door interlocks Turbo pumps, primary pumps, Gate valves (limit switches) MCB’s, RCB’s, Relays ……..and the list goes on

Step IV - Racks Control and power supply racks for SS and FC to the RF area. –Behind shield wall and so out of large field. –Enough space for the 7 racks –Enough space to install the first of the four RF amplifiers –Power feed from the current RF boards –Cable routes under the false floor

Step IV - Racks

Step IV - Compressors Move to the West wall away from the South shield wall –19 compressors, 13 two stage Cryomech, 2 single stage Cryomech and 4 single stage Sumitomo. –Very low field in air ~ 5 gauss –Enough space for the 19 compressors. –Long Helium lines will be required ~40m –Stairs will need to be moved through 90 degrees and a removable section design in. –Water supplies / pumps for the compressors will need to be moved from the trench and the current South wall installation. –Power supply for the compressors will need to be moved from the current South wall installation.

Step IV - Compressors

Current / Future work Hall field analysis –Construction of a model containing as much ferrous equipment and structures as possible. Quad magnets and stands Decay Solenoid area shielding North mezzanine structure –Size of model is a problem when solving for mesh and field analysis Small objects cause the local mesh to be very fine extending solving time. Limit in size of object that can be modelled. –The model is close to being in a state where numerical results can be taken from it. Further geometric and sanity checks to be carried out. –Investigation of Sub-modelling has taken an encouraging step forward. Smaller model can be constructed with higher detail Boundary conditions imposed onto the smaller model Faster solving time Smaller items / more detail can be analysed

Current / Future work

Current / Future Work To get good shielding horizontally: need continuous steel in azimuthal direction Geometry –Tube of radius 1.2 m –wall thickness 10 cm –azimuthally ° –weight: 30t 1.5 m 2 m R1.2 (Note: not to scale) Slide from Holger Witte presentation at CM34

Shielding Efficiency r = 1.5 m B < 15 Gauss (1.5 mT) Step IV, 240 MeV/c, flip Shielding wall Slide from Holger Witte presentation at CM34 40 Gauss

Development of Fringe Field r = 3 m Slide from Holger Witte presentation at CM34 12 Gauss

Step VI Geometry 4 m 5.6 m t=0.1m t=0.3m r=1.8m r=1.2m 100° Weight: 130t (both halfs) Slide from Holger Witte presentation at CM34

Step VI Geometry CC Spectrometer Slide from Holger Witte presentation at CM34 FC

Conceptual design of local flux return –reduces stray field in hall significantly (factor 30) –shield: about 30t of iron (130t for Step VI) –force on shield manageable Effect on beam – To be determined Effect on other iron structures in hall – To be determined –Q9, floor, walls Extension to Step VI possible –includes solution for natural breaks in shield for wire feed- in/out Engineering Partial return yolk conclusion Slide from Holger Witte presentation at CM34

Power and control racks behind North wall will need to move to accommodate RF amplifiers. Discussion of possibility of using ISIS plant room as a rack room underway. Additional compressors installed to the West wall – structural aspects installed during Step IV mitigation. Partial return yolk concept applicable for next step. Step VI

Build of full analysis model to be completed and full checks carried out to ensure the model gives credible results. Further development of the sub-model analysis to give more detail in critical areas, eg, racks and compressors. Design / manufacture work for compressor location at the West end of the hall. –Routing of the He lines for cold heads Engineering investigation of the partial return yolk concept –Collaboration between RAL and BNL engineers Discussions for the ISIS plant room location for MICE rack room / extended control room. Testing of small equipment that cannot be realistically placed in the model. Conclusions