1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop 22.05.2007 European Standards Requirements of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 10 & 20 Corrections to May 15, 2006 Final Rule That Updated the Methods That Updated the Methods Foston Curtis US EPA.
Advertisements

Issues with low concentration gas detection in ambient air: Sub-ppm and ppb detection are not just business as usual.
PART 75 SPAN & RANGE Manuel J Oliva Clean Air Markets Division
QUALITY OF AIR PROTECTION 2008 Workshop –for West Balkan contries Importance of National References Laboratories for Air Quality role on the AQ/AC chain.
Ljupcho Grozdanovski Division for air quality monitoring Ministry of environment and physical planning Prizren, July 2013 Air Quality support meeting,
Monitoring the Product Production, Import, Wholesale and Retail Level Monitoring.
Update on Mercury Calibration Gas Standards and Traceability Scott Hedges US EPA, Clean Air Markets Division 2009 EPRI CEM User Group Conference St. Louis,
OSHA’s Respiratory Protection Standard 29 CFR
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN/09 1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
World Health Organization
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
Calibration (Qualification) of Centrifuge
OPTIMISING CHEMICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE WFD BY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES & ACCREDITATION An Overview OPTIMISING CHEMICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE WFD BY QUALITY.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Kevin A Cavender EPA-Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards Precursor Gas Monitoring NO y Monitoring Training.
WELCOME The Fixed Fire Suppression Systems. We carry out the supply installation & Annual required maintenance in regard to the fixed.
Project co- financed by Asean European Committee for Standardization Implementing Agency Project co-financed by European Union Module 7 GMP Workshop Kuala.
1 AQS Ambient Monitoring Topics AQS Conference August 20, 2008 David Lutz.
1 Guest Speaker: Bill Frietsche US EPA.  April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control.
Quality Assessment 2 Quality Control.
Approach of a UK auditor Paul Mudway Mudway Health, Safety & Environment.
Debra Waller NJDEP-Office of Quality Assurance
What to compare against the validation templates (see templates in course webpage: Resources/Validation%20Templates%20from%20Red.
Ensuring of Traceability
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHM’s commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION STANDARD FEDERAL REGISTER 1/8/98 29 CFR Revised Other OSHA Standards That Incorporated By Reference.
Gaseous Pollutants mini-course TAMS Center February 2009 Creating a Test Atmosphere.
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
Quality Assurance/ Quality Control
1 Dec. 8, 1997 LEADS Quality Assurance Summary Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang Garche Bukarest EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
B. Neidhart, W. Wegscheider (Eds.): Quality in Chemical Measurements © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000 J. Green Why do we need Good results? 1 Chemical.
Quality Control – Part II Tim Hanley EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Field Methods of Monitoring Atmospheric Systems Measurement of Air Pollution Copyright © 2009 by DBS.
Appendix A: Calculations for Data Quality Assessment QC check statistics Precision calcs Bias calcs PM stats Reporting: quarterly and annual.
EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Bucharest, Saxony-Anhalt Wolfgang Garche State Environmental Protection Agency 1 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
1 Dec. 11, 1997 LEADS Quality Control Systems Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest National Reference Laboratory for Air.
Hardware Analyser vs Software Analyser
Virtual Analyser What is it Have you ever faced an analyser failure that requires a plant shut down to repair & wished that there.
The Theory of Near Light Scatter
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
New Product Developments World Leaders in Combustion Management Solutions C.E.M.S., MCERTs & E.P.A. Exhaust Gas Analysers C.E.M.S., MCERTs.
QC/QA.
New Product Developments World Leaders in Combustion Management Solutions C.E.M.S., MCERTs & E.P.A. Exhaust Gas Analysers C.E.M.S., MCERTs.
Emission source sampling and monitoring Topic 6 Ms Sherina Kamal May
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Quality Management & Operations Support Branch Quality Assurance Section Presented By: Webster Tasat.
 Routine viral diagnostics: indirect and direct detection of viruses. ◦ Indirect detection: serological tests; ◦ Direct detection:  Viral antigens;
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
Laboratory equipment Dr. W. Huisman Cairo, November 21th 2012.
1 Ambient Monitoring Program PM 2.5 Data Lean 6 Sigma Air Director’s Meeting May 2015.
Robert S. Wright US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC EPA Protocol Gases Fall 2012 Update PurityPlus Specialty Gas Producers.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Quality Assurance.
Total Coliform Rule (TCR)
Monitoring aspects of permits and inspections (1)
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
The route to accreditation at Lithuanian Air Monitoring Network
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
Calibration in the Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network
Training Module Presented by Steve Wright
Quality Control Lecture 3
Presentation transcript:

1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements of European Standards on Quality Assurance and Quality Control 1. Gaseous Pollutants Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt Environmental Protection Agency Department Air Quality Monitoring, Information, Assessment

2 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards European standards – Ambient air quality – Standard methods for the  EN measurement of NO 2 and NO by chemiluminescence  EN 14212measurement of SO 2 by UV fluorescence  EN 14625measurement of O 3 by UV photometry  EN 14626measurement of CO by NDIR spectroscopy  EN 14662measurement of benzene

3 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards  descriptions of the measuring principles  demands on specific compounds of the analysers and the sampling system  the minimum performance criteria for analysers  descriptions of the type approval test procedures  requirements and recommendations for QA and QC  guidance for determining the accuracy of measurements European standards – Contents

4 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Quality control is necessary in order to ensure that the uncertainties of the measured values are kept within the stated limits during continuous monitoring periods in the field. This requires that maintenance, test and calibration procedures shall be followed which are essential for obtaining accurate and traceable air quality data. In the EN-standards, procedures for maintenance, checks and calibration are given. The following procedures are regarded as a minimum necessary for maintaining the required quality level. Statement - Quality control

5 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Compound Uncertainty of individual measurements (on a 95% confidence interval) Minimum data capture SO 2 15 %90 % NO 2 / NO x 15 %90 % O3O3 15 % 90 % (Sommer) 75 % (Winter) CO15 %90 % C6H6C6H6 25 %90 % PM 10 + Pb 25 %90 % Data quality objectives

6 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements on Ongoing Quality Control MeasuresFrequencyAction criteria Calibration of the analyserAt least every three months and after repair Certification of test gasesAt least every six months Zero: ≥ detection limit Span: ≥ 5,0 % from last certified value Zero and span checkAt least every two weeks (Recommended every 23 h or 25 h.) Zero: ≥ 5 nmol/mol Span: ≥ 5,0 % of initial span value Lack of fit checkWithin 1 year after installation and after repair; further frequency depending on the result of test lack of fit > 6,0 % of the measured value Testing sample manifold -influence of pressure drop induced by the manifold pump - sample collection efficiency At least every three years influence > 1 % of measured value influence > 2 % of the measured value Test of the sampling linesAt least every six months ≥ 2 % sample loss Regular maintenance of the components of the analyser As required by manufacturer As required Changing of (if applicable) drying material and other consumables: At least every six months As required Change of particulate filtersAt least every three months Response to span gas passing the filter is ≤ 97 %

7 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards  every three months  at a recommended concentration of 70 % to 80 % of the certification range  used calibration gases shall be traceable to national standards (maximum permitted uncertainty is ± 5 % with a level of confidence of 95 %)  zero gas shall give no instrument reading higher than the detection limit  calibration gases shall be introduced over the filter to check and if necessary to correct for contamination of the filter Calibration of the analysers

8 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Zero and span checks  Zero and span gas can be supplied by gas cylinder, or generated by an external calibrator unit or internally in the analyser.  The zero and span gas shall pass through the particulate filter. Frequency of test: At least every two weeks. Recommended every 23 h or 25 h. Action criteria: Zero ≥ 5 ppb (CO ≥ 0,2 ppm, Benzene ≥ 0,5µg/m³) of the initial zero span; Span ≥ 5 % of initial span value. Appropriate action: The site should be visited and the correct function of the analyser determined by calibration.

9 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Certification of test gases  Gases for span and zero checks shall be verified at least every six months with use of reference gases traceable to national standards. Action criteria: Zero ≥ detection limit; Span ≥ 5 % of previous verification. Appropriate action: Replace the cylinder.

10 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Lack of fit check  The lack of fit of the analyser shall be tested using the following concentrations: 0 %, 20 %, 60 % and 95 % of the maximum of the certification range. At each concentration (including zero) at least two individual readings shall be performed.  Lack of fit may be checked either in the laboratory or on site. Frequency of test: After installation and after repair the analyser shall be tested within 1 year; if the result of this test is ≤ 2,0 % of the measured value the next test shall be carried out within 3 years; if the result is > 2,0 % but ≤ 6,0 % the analyser shall be retested within 1 year; if the result is > 6,0 % appropriate action shall be taken; Action criteria: > 6,0 % of the measured value. Appropriate action: Remove analyser from site for further testing and repair if necessary.

11 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Zero gas NO CO / mln / min CO SO 2 Mixing chamber Ozone generator to analysers PC controlled gas mixing system

12 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Test of sampling lines Testing comprises two measurements of the test gas, direct sampling of test gas and the sampling of test gas through the sampling line. Frequency: At least every six month Action criteria: Sample loss > 2 %. Appropriate action: Clean or replace the sampling lines and retest.

13 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Testing of the sample manifold  Measurement of the pressure drop in the sample manifold.  Calculation of the induced effect on the analyser’s respond. Action criteria: Influence of the pressure drop induced by the manifold sampling pump on the measured concentration < 1 %. Appropriate action: Reduce flow through manifold to reduce the induced pressure drop. Influence of pressure drop: Sample collection efficiency of the sampling system:  Testing comprises two measurements of the test gas, direct sampling of test gas and the sampling of test gas from the complete sampling system. Action criteria: Sample loss > 2 %. Appropriate action: Clean/replace/repair manifold as necessary and retest.

14 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards pSpS pApA  R - is the change in the analyser’s response due to the influence of the pressure drop b gp - is the sensitivity coefficient of the analyser to sample gas pressure change (should be known from the type approval test) p A - is the ambient pressure p S - is the pressure in the sampling manifold Influence of pressure drop

15 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Test of converter efficiency (only for NO/NO2-analysers)  measurements with calculated amounts of NO 2. This can be achieved by means of gas-phase titration.  two concentration levels: at about 50 % and about 95 % of the maximum of the certification range of NO 2 Frequency: At least every year Action criteria: converter efficiency < 95 %. Appropriate action: replace the converter

16 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Many Thanks for your Attention!