1. Robert S. Wright US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC wright.bob@epa.gov, 919-541-4502 EPA Protocol Gases Fall 2012 Update PurityPlus Specialty Gas Producers Meeting Aurora, Illinois October 17, 2012

2. 2012 Revision of EPA Traceability Protocol Publication in June 2012 with recent technical corrections Specialty gas producers have one year to implement the changes New website for protocol, Excel spreadsheets, Q&A compilation http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/appcd/mmd/ db-traceability-protocol.html

3. Recent Protocol Changes MixtureOld RangeNew RangeOld PeriodNew Period NH 3 /N 2 2 years1 year CO 2 /Air100 to 500 ppm360 to 420 ppm CO 2 /N 2 10 ppm to 20 %5 ppm to 20 % CO/Air1 ppm – 10 %40 to 500 ppb8 yearsTBD 500 ppb to 10 %8 years H 2 S/N 2 5 to 1000 ppm1 to 1000 ppm CH 4 /N 2 500 ppb to 10 %8 years NO/N 2 0.5 to 20 ppm0.5 to 50 ppm3 years 20 ppm to 1 %50 ppm to 1 %8 years N 2 O/AirTBD300 ppb to 5 %6 years8 years NO X /N210 ppm to 1 %3 ppm to 1 %6 years3 years C 3 H 8 /N 2 100 ppm to 2 %5 ppb to 2 %

4. Recent Protocol Changes A new procedure has been written and a new spreadsheet has been prepared for the assay and certification of dynamic gas dilution systems. EPA does require NIST-traceable calibrations of dynamic gas dilution systems that may be used under Appendices A and C of Part 50 to calibrate ambient air quality monitors for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) and carbon monoxide (CO). 40 CFR Part 75 only allows use of compressed gas calibration standards when calibrating continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) that are being used for purposes of Part 75 and when calibrating Test Methods 3A, 6C, and 7E when these methods are used for Part 75 testing.

5. Questions and Answers Q: What is the certification period for an EPA Protocol Gas that is currently in the field and that was certified under the 1997 revision of the protocol? What if the certification is expired? A: The certification periods for existing EPA Protocol Gases (both those in certification and those that are expired) have been extended with the beginning of the now-longer certification period remaining the date of the last assay.

6. Questions and Answers Q: If recertification of a 16 ppm SO 2 /N 2 EPA Protocol Gas passes the TOST 1% test for stability, does it get a recertification period of 6 months or 4 years? A: This mixture was classified in the 1997 protocol as a lower-concentration mixture with a 6-month certification period. Under the 2012 protocol, the recertified gas mixture falls into the 1 to 50 ppm SO2 range with a 4-year certification period.

7. Questions and Answers Q: Would it be permissible for a third party (e.g., another specialty gas producer) to recertify the expired, or about-to-expire, EPA Protocol Gas without an analysis, even though they were not the producer? A: The original producer can be the only one who can send out any new certificates for expired or expiring EPA Protocol Gases that are not reassayed. An end user can't shop around for another producer who is willing to send out another certificate.

8. Questions and Answers Q: Does the 2012 EPA Protocol Document allow a NO X EPA Protocol with the composition of nitric oxide, and total NOx certification? A: You can directly assay the NO and NO X concentrations of the nitric oxide in nitrogen candidate standard using the certified NO and NO X concentrations of the NIST nitric oxide in nitrogen reference standard and a chemiluminescent instrument. NIST has been certifying both the NO and NO X content in their SRMs for years.

9. Questions and Answers Q: We will use the 1997 protocol while we update the uncertainty calculations, but we want to implement the new shelf lives immediately. Is the following statement acceptable: “This certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards September 1997, using procedure G1 or G2. The certification expiration date is assigned using the May 2012 revision of the EPA Traceability Protocol.” A: The proposed statement is acceptable during the one-year interim period

10. Questions and Answers Q: How should producers handle shelf life for concentrations above the highest indicated concentration in the protocol, for example 1000 ppm propane in air? A: This question about the shelf life for high- concentration standards is moot because such standards cannot be assayed under the protocol. The heart of the matter is the lack of a high- concentration NIST-traceable reference standard with which to generate a calibration curve whose well-characterized region would bracket the high- concentration candidate standard.

11. Questions and Answers Q: How shall we handle SO 2 in air; H 2 S in air, N 2 O in nitrogen, and oxides of nitrogen in nitrogen? A: There are no available NIST reference standards for these gas mixtures and no corresponding EPA Protocol Gases can be prepared as a result. At such a time as NIST makes these reference standards available as SRMs, NTRMs, or RGMs, the protocol will be revised and producers will be notified of the new gas mixtures.

12. Protocol Gas Verification Program Producers must participate in PGVPs to sell EPA Protocol Gases Producers must register with EPA to participate Separate PGVPs for emission monitoring and ambient air monitoring programs PGVP ID number must be listed on certificates Producers’ names and results are published at www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/aapgvp.html and http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/emissions/pgvp- detail.html

13. Ambient Air Protocol Gas Verification Program EPA conducts independent analyses of binary cylinders with CO, SO 2 or NO Cylinders were obtained from air pollution control agencies or producers Assay in Kansas City, KS or Edison, NJ Assays were done using Procedure G2 (i.e., dilution of gas mixture) SRMs were used as reference standards Acceptance criterion 4 to 5 percent bias

14. 2011 AA-PGVP Results

16. Emission Protocol Gas Verification Program Tri-blend cylinders with CO 2, SO 2, and NO purchased from producers Assay at NIST in Gaithersburg, MD Assays were done using Procedure G1 (i.e., no dilution of gas mixture) Acceptance criterion 2.0 percent bias 2011 results have not been reported

17. 2010 Emission PGVP Results

18. The results of the 2010 audit are generally consistent with previous audits- a 10% failure rate over all components analyzed, with 40% of the production sites failing at least one gaseous component

19. EPA Contacts Emission PGVP - John Schakenbach EPA- Washington, DC schakenbach.john@epa.gov, 202-343-9158 Ambient Air PGVP - Mike Papp EPA-Research Triangle Park, NC papp.michael@epa.gov, 919-541-2408 EPA Traceability Protocol – Bob Wright EPA-Research Triangle Park, NC wright.bob@epa.gov, 919-541-4502