Traffic noise and motorway pavements W. Alberts, CEDR Road Noise, Geneva, 28.01.2015 Transmitted by the Conference of European Directors of Roads Informal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Holistic approach for rolling noise mitigation GRB 56 th Sep 3 – 5,
Advertisements

Vehicle-infrastructure integration: creating co-operative mobility systems and services Hearing EU Parliament, 22 January 2009 Hermann Meyer, CEO.
Stone Mastic Asphalt Molly Nause-McCord. What is it? A type of road surfacing mix Mix made up of 70% coarse aggregate Nominal size of 10 mm or 14 mm –10mm.
Portorož, Slovenia Statistical Properties of Road Traffic Noise Emission Measurements Marco ConterMarco Conter arsenal researcharsenal research ResearcherResearcher.
R&D in Norwegian Public Roads Administration Director Helen Riddervold.
ESTONIAN ROAD ADMINISTRATION Pärnu mnt. 463a Tallinn, Estonia Tel (0) Fax (0)
Asphalt Rubber Asphalt Concrete Friction Course Overlay as a Pavement Preservation Strategy K. Kaloush, K. Biligiri, M. Rodezno, M. Belshe Arizona State.
The SILVIA Guidance Manual on the implementation of low-noise road surfaces Workshop: locationand date Information Network on QUiet European road Surface.
CEDR Project Group Noise Value for Money in Noise Abatement Ingunn Milford Environmental Section Norwegian Public Roads Administration CEDR = Conference.
Noise classification for tendering quiet asphalt wearing courses Hans Bendtsen, Danish Road Directorate International Partnership MeetingWashington January.
A Urban Highway Infrastructure: Design For Long, Long Life Michael I. Darter, Ph.D, PE Principle Engineer, ARA, Inc. Director, Pavement Research Institute,
Alternate Bidding in Missouri Transportation Estimators Association Annual Conference November 2-4, 2005 – Daytona Beach, FL Interstate 44 … South-Central.
Application of Low Noise Road surfaces in the Netherlands: Excellent results but not enough to meet the legal targets Prepared by the Netherlands.
ROAD PAVEMENT FORUM MAY 2007 ASPHALT RECYCLING. Recycling Energy consumption of recycled asphalt layers can be as little as 25% of that needed for new.
The Use of Hot Mix Asphalt for Colorado Trails and Paths Tom Clayton, SET Director of Training And Member Services.
CARS 21 A strategic vision towards increased internationalisation in the automotive sector What does it entail for the World Forum for Harmonisation of.
Rail Freight Noise Abatement in Europe A consensus building workshop for all relevant stakeholders Conclusions and next steps Luc Aliadière, UIC UIC, Paris.
World of Asphalt Pavements Feedback Sydney Stephen Emery.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
Wet Grip for C3 tyres Minimum Type Approval Level
Sustainability at Rijkswaterstaat (RWS) Road Pavements (and contracts) Jan van der Zwan.
Estonian Road Administration. Estonian Main, Basic and Secondary Roads 2 The total length of national roads as of is km i.e. 28.1% of.
EB Workshop on eSafety Objective: Come to a shared vision/interest w.r.t. common position in the eSafety process.
Dutch Campaign ‘Choose the Best Tyre’ Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1 (62nd GRB, 1-3 September 2015, agenda.
International Collaboration between Road Agencies Gregers Hildebrand, Danish Road Directorate.
Global emulsions markets Jean Claude Roffé Etienne le Bouteiller.
ROADS AND BRIDGES (RESEARCH-DEVELOPMENT) Dr. László Gáspár research professor ERTRAC National Platforms Workshop 5 September 2008, Budapest ERTRAC National.
1 New Innovations in Road Seal Treatments 19 th South Australian Local Government Road & Works Conference BAROSSA – 25 th & 26 th August 2011 Warren Carter.
The use of texture in the Swedish road management Thomas Lundberg Leif Sjögren Mika Gustafsson.
Traffic Noise U.K. Perspective on Surfaces Presented by Mike Ainge 4 th – 6 th September 2006 Informal document No. GRB-44-6 (44th GRB, 4-6 September 2006.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
1 Automotive industry Reducing Noise Emissions from Motor Vehicles: New EU Commission legislative proposal World Forum on Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) 156.
High Modulus Asphalt (EME)
LOA 5 D — Thin Noise-Reducing Asphalt Technology and Performance DAV, Bergisch Gladbach, 18 June 2012 Dipl.-Ing. Miomir Miljković The Faculty of Civil.
Regulatory Impact Assessment of New Vehicle Noise Test Colin Treleven Senior Consultant Environmental Assessment Group TRL Limited 6 th September 2005.
Influence of road surface on tyre rolling sound emission Report from the NordTyre project, part 2: Passenger car tyres. Truls Berge, SINTEF ICT, Norway.
Quiet road surfaces Eurocities - working group noise Chair: Henk Wolfert Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1.
Geneva, 09 December Commission Proposal on the General Safety of Motor Vehicles Automotive Unit- F1 Geneva, 09 December Informal document No.
Outcome of Meeting on “Environmentally Friendly Vehicle” on Noise Date : 15 th February th Informal Group Meeting on Environmentally Friendly Vehicle.
THIN ASPHALT MIXTURES A new top layer should ; be flat and rough
VTT BUILDING AND TRANSPORT March 2006 O2 Task Group 1 O2: To take advantage of intelligent vehicles and infrastructure technologies to improve road.
VTT BUILDING AND TRANSPORT January 2006 Risto Kulmala VTT 1 O2: To take advantage of intelligent vehicles and infrastructure technologies to improve.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
CEDR-Noise – 1st meeting Conference of European Directors of Roads At the Danish Road Directorate on April 2006.
Surface Treatments #2.
GUIDED BY PRESENTED BY LIJA.M.PAUL SHYAM.S.THAMPY LECTURER C7-51 DEPT.CIVIL.
Noise Mitigation Possibilities for Quieter Cities in Europe CAETS 2012 Zürich Tor Kihlman, Chair CAETS Noise Control Technology Committee Chalmers.
TD MANAGEMENT PG PLANNING THE NETWORK Future Needs for Performance Indicators & Road Data.
Proposal Netherlands Tyre Noise Limits Original GRB Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal document GRB Add.1 (62nd GRB, 1-3.
Results of the DISTANCE project Luc Goubert Belgian Road Research Centre LEO seminar, Oslo 2 June 2016.
Johan Sliggers Ministry of Environment The Netherlands
COMBINED TRANSPORT A brief view on the UIRR scrl
Transmitted by the expert from the Netherlands Informal Document No
Introduction to Pavement Design
Effective noise control for European roads
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
APNIC 21- IX SIG Perth Australia by Serge Radovcic of Euro-IX
Midland Service Improvement Group
CEDR = Conference of European Directors of Roads
ETRTO proposal for UN R30 & 64 amendments Extended Mobility Tyres
Strengthening Tyre limits ! New developments (2)
Main subjects: priority 1, 2, 3
European Noise Barrier Federation
Aim of the session What smart transport solutions can be implemented in the near future? Identify general obstacles? As concrete suggestions as possible!
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects
Comments on tyre choosing of UN Regulation No
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
Infrastructure investments – source of future well-being
(ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2019/2 by the Netherlands)
Presentation transcript:

Traffic noise and motorway pavements W. Alberts, CEDR Road Noise, Geneva, Transmitted by the Conference of European Directors of Roads Informal document GRB (61st GRB, January 2015, agenda item 10)

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements2 Question

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements3 Overview objectives CEDR road noise pavements figures on use, noise, lifetime and costs conclusions and final remarks

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements4 Objectives To inform about: CEDR pavements used on motorways in Europe and their noise reduction, lifetime and costs

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements5 CEDR: profile What is CEDR: –the Conference of European Directors of Roads (CEDR) is a forum for the discussion and promotion of improvements to the road system and its infrastructure –members represent their national road authorities (NRAs) in Europe Now there are 27 CEDR member states (MS)

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements6 CEDR: mission to analyze future developments of the road system to promote international networks of personal contacts to provide a platform for responding to common problems to develop a strong involvement in EU developments to use existing representations in international groups to make use of the results of common understandings

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements7 CEDR: structure

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements8 CEDR: Road Noise The two main goals of CEDR Road Noise are: improve noise quality in close proximity to road infrastructure reduce costs in planning, building, maintaining and researching road infrastructure

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements9 Road traffic noise

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements10 Road traffic noise

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements11 Road: layers a road has several layers (courses) for road noise the surface layer (pavement) is important surface layer consists of aggregates (stones) bound together with bitumen (asphalt)

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements12 Pavements wide range of motorway pavements available: these pavements differ for functional aspects like lifetime, costs, noise reduction and driver comfort (splash and spray) these pavements meet MS standards for skid resistance

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements13 Pavements: use pavements on motorways in CEDR MS (in %) DAC and SMA are preferred pavements in most CEDR MS

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements14 Pavements: use pavements on motorways in CEDR MS (in %) DAC and SMA are preferred pavements in most CEDR MS noise reducing pavements like PA, TL and TLPA are used in some CEDR MS

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements15 Pavements: noise initial noise reduction (in dB, MS standard pavement is zero)

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements16 Pavements: noise initial noise reduction (in dB)

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements17 Pavements: noise initial noise reduction (in dB) transition from much used pavements (DAC/SMA) to noise reducing pavements (PA/TL) reduces noise with 2 to 3 dB average lifetime noise reduction is less than initial reduction acoustic properties of pavements are covered in regulation and noise calculation model in CEDR MS harmonization at EU level (END and CNOSSOS-EU)

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements18 Pavements: lifetime lifetime (average in years) lifetime of noise reducing pavements is less than lifetime of non-noise reducing pavements MAIN PAVEMENTS:ATBE-FDEDKEEESFRGRIEITLVNLSErangeaverage Dense Asphalt Concrete15 12/1815/17 206/10>122020/22> Stone Mastic Asphalt10/151516/2215/ / / Cement Concrete30/404026/30 15/ Porous Asphalt8/10 8 6/10 8/1015/1610/ Thin Layers Two Layer Porous Asphalt 135/

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements19 Pavements: costs#1 all-in investment costs (EUR/m2) little information and wide range of all-in investment costs investment costs of noise reducing pavements is higher than costs of non-noise reducing pavements

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements20 Pavements: costs#2 all-in maintenance costs (EUR/m2/year) very little information average maintenance costs of noise reducing pavements is more or less comparable with costs of most non-noise reducing pavements

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements21 Conclusions In general: there is no standard pavement on motorways in Europe the use of pavements is based on NRA policy and CEDR MS regulation main reason for using a pavement: costs and lifetime constraints like winter circumstances limit the choice of pavements

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements22 Conclusions Regarding the use of noise reducing pavements: some CEDR MS use noise reducing pavements in acoustic hot spots to lower noise levels noise reducing pavements are more cost-effective than noise barriers noise reducing pavements lower noise levels with 2 to 3 dB (max. 6 dB) do not overestimate the possibilities of using noise reducing pavements

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements23 Final remarks the best way to lower traffic noise levels is by reducing noise production three domains in traffic noise production: vehicles, tyres and pavements reducing traffic noise production is a shared responsibility CEDR, its NRAs and the paving industry are doing a lot of research to improve noise reducing pavements at EU level CEDR is working on cooperation with the other domains

W. Alberts Traffic noise and motorway pavements24 End THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST