Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Advertisements

Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Teaching and Learning at All Levels
Common Core Standards mathematics
Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Depth of Knowledge. Why Depth of Knowledge? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Common Core Elementary Symposium Transitioning to the Common Core
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Why does it matter to us?.  You have a question in front of you.  Read the question.  Decide (in your head) if it is DOK 1,2,3. Don’t tell anyone.
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Teaching with Depth… using Questions Partially Adapted from Polk County, Florida Professional Development Presentation.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Depth of Knowledge Teaching and Learning at All Levels.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) An Overview. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE By Beth Scarboro. WHAT IS DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE ?  Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards.
Page 1 Teaching with Depth: An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge by Karen Taylor
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Tuesday 08/12 Grab DOK handouts and put them in your “Units” tab. Warm-up: Look over the Academic Integrity Policy that you researched for homework. Respond.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge as it Relates to Unpacking the WV CSOs Adapted from the Office of Instruction’s Presentations posted on Teach st.
1. 10:00 – 10:05AmWelcome 10:05 -10: 10Starter 10: :30DOK and Blooms 10: :30DOK activity 11 :30AM Prayer Break 12: :15Pm Broad.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
Agenda 10:00 – 10:05Am Welcome 10:05 -10: 10 Starter 10: :30
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Preplanning Presentation
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Presentation transcript:

Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge

“He who learns but does not think, is lost. He who thinks, but does not learn is in great danger.” Confucious

Factors that Correlate to Student Achievement Rates National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Parent Education Economics (poverty - affluence) Language Acquisition Ethnicity

Efforts to Improve Student Learning ✴ Class Size Reduction ✴ Whole School Reform ✴ Re-vamp Class time (varied bell schedules, year-round schools, block schedules) ✴ Innovative Curriculum ✴ Traditional Curriculum (Back to Basics) ✴ Remediation Programs (Tracking, two-year algebra, etc.) ✴ Standards Based Education (Pacing Guides, Benchmark Test, Data Driven, etc.) ✴ High-Stakes Accountability (Rewards, Sanctions, Differentiated Accountability) ✴ Professional Learning Communities

So...what is the most significant factor in student learning?...the teacher

Teachers are the Key “Teachers must be the primary driving force behind change. They are best positioned to understand the problems that students face and to generate possible solutions.” James Stigler and James Hiebert, The Teaching Gap

Quality Instruction Makes A Difference “Good teaching can make a significant difference in student achievement, equal to one effect size (a standard deviation), which is also equivalent to the affect that demographic classifications can have on achievement.” Paraphrase - Dr. Heather Hill, University of Michigan

Differences in Instruction “Our research indicates that there is a 15% variability difference in student achievement between teachers within the same schools.” Deborah Loewenberg Ball, Dean of Education, University of Michigan

“What Matters Very Much is Which Classroom?” “If a student is in one of the most effective classrooms he or she will learn in 6 months what those in an average classroom will take a year to learn. And if a student is in one of the least effective classrooms in that school, the same amount of learning take 2 years.”

Research has indicated that... “teacher quality trumps virtually all other influences on student achievement.” (e.g., Darling-Hammond, 1999; Hamre and Pianta, 2005; Hanushek, Kain, O'Brien and Rivken, 2005; Wright, Horn and Sanders, 1997)

Making Sense & Worthwhile Tasks “What are our Kids really being asked to do?” “How are we keeping up with Cognitive Demand?”

Cognitive Demand The kind and level of thinking required of students to successfully engage with and solve a task Ways in which students interact with content

Depth of Knowledge (DOK) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires assessments to “measure the depth and breadth of the state academic content standards for a given grade level”. (U.S. Department of Education, 2003, p. 12)

Why Depth of Knowledge? Focuses on complexity of content standards in order to successfully complete an assessment or task. The outcome (product) is the focus of the depth of understanding.

Why Use a Depth of Knowledge? Used to determine the level of the expected outcomes of the Nebraska State Standards Determines the complexity of NeSA items (success level with items is factor in determining AYP)

Why Depth of Knowledge (DOK)? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that standard matches the assessment items (required under NCLB) To ensure that teachers are teaching to a level that will promote student achievement

DOK is NOT... a taxonomy (Bloom’s) the same as difficulty about using “verbs”

It’s NOT about the verb... The Depth of Knowledge is NOT determined by the verb (Bloom’s Taxonomy), but by the context in which the verb is used and the depth of thinking required.

Verbs are not always used appropriately... Words like explain or analyze have to be considered in context. “Explain to me where you live.” Simple rote responses… does not raise the DOK Even if the student has to use addresses or landmarks, the student is doing nothing more than recalling and reciting.

DOK is about what follows the verb... What comes after the verb is more important than the verb itself. Directions: Analyze this sentence to decide if the commas have been used correctly. Does not meet the criteria for high cognitive processing. The student who has been taught the rule for using commas is merely using the rule.

Same Verb—Three Different DOK Levels DOK 1 - Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. (Requires simple recall) DOK 2 - Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types) DOK 3 - Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (Requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it)

DOK is about intended outcome, not difficulty. DOK is a reference to the complexity of mental processing which must occur to answer a question, perform a task, or generate a product. For instance: Adding is a mental process. Knowing the rule for adding is the intended outcome that influences the DOK. Once someone learns the “rule” of how to add, is DOK 1 and is also easy. Adding 4,678, ,578,885 is still a DOK 1, but may be more “difficult.”

DOK is not about difficulty... Difficulty is a reference to how many students answer a question correctly. 1. How many of you know the definition of exaggerate? DOK 1 – recall If all of you know the definition, this question is an easy question. 2. How many of you know the definition of prescient? DOK 1 – recall If most of you do not know the definition, this question is a difficult question.

DOK is about complexity The intended student learning outcome determines the DOK level. The Nebraska Standards, (Reading/Language Arts, Mathematics and Science) which are assessed using the NeSA, have been assigned a DOK level. Instruction and classroom assessments must reflect the DOK level of the objective or intended learning outcome. (Standards and Curriculum alignment)

Quick Quiz 1) Give an example of a statement that uses a verb that “sounds” like a high DOK but is used inappropriately. 2) Fill in the blanks: What _____ the verb is more _____ than the verb itself when deciding the DOK level. 3) What is the difference between difficulty and complexity? 4) What really determines the DOK level?

Quick Quiz Answers 1) Give an example of a statement that uses a verb that “sounds” like a high DOK but is used inappropriately. answers vary 2) Fill in the blanks: What follows the verb is more important than the verb itself when deciding the DOK level. 3) What is the difference between difficulty and complexity? answers vary, but do not rely on the verb 4) What really determines the DOK level? the intended learning outcomes

What is Depth of Knowledge (DOK)? A scale of cognitive demand (thinking) to align standards with assessments Based on the research of Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin Center for Education Research and the National Institute for Science Education Defines the “ceiling” or highest DOK level for each Core Content standard for the state assessment Guides item development for state assessments

Level 1: Recall and Reproduction Level 2: Skills & Concepts Level 3: Strategic Thinking Level 4: Extended Thinking Webb’s Four Levels of Cognitive Complexity

Requires recall of information Such as a fact, definition, term, or performance of a simple process or procedure Answering a Level 1 item can involve following a simple, well-known procedure or formula DOK Level 1: Recall and Reproduction

Recall and Reproduction DOK Level 1 Examples: List animals that survive by eating other animals Locate or recall facts found in text Describe physical features of places Determine the perimeter or area of rectangles given a drawing or labels Identify elements of music using music terminology Identify basic rules for participating in simple games and activities

Skills/Concepts: DOK Level 2 Includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem Actions imply more than one mental or cognitive process/step

Skills/Concepts: DOK 2 Examples Compare desert and tropical environments Identify and summarize the major events, problems, solutions, conflicts in literary text Explain the cause-effect of historical events Predict a logical outcome based on information in a reading selection Explain how good work habits are important at home, school, and on the job Classify plane and three dimensional figures Describe various styles of music

Strategic Thinking: Level 3 Requires deep understanding exhibited through planning, using evidence, and more demanding cognitive reasoning The cognitive demands are complex and abstract An assessment item that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response would most likely be a Level 3

DOK Level 3: Strategic Thinking Examples: Compare consumer actions and analyze how these actions impact the environment Analyze or evaluate the effectiveness of literary elements (e.g., characterization, setting, point of view, conflict and resolution, plot structures) Solve a multiple-step problem and provide support with a mathematical explanation which justifies the answer

DOK Level 3 Examples Develop a scientific model for a complex idea Propose and evaluate solutions for an economic problem Explain, generalize or connect ideas, using supporting evidence from a text or source Create a dance that represents the characteristics of a culture

Extended Thinking: Level 4 Requires high cognitive demand and is very complex Students are expected to 1. make connections, 2. relate ideas within the content or among content areas, and 3. select or devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4 often requires an extended period of time

Extended Thinking: DOK 4 Examples Gather, analyze, organize, and interpret information from multiple (print and non print) sources to draft a reasoned report Analyzing author’s craft (e.g., style, bias, literary techniques, point of view) Create an exercise plan applying the “FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type) Principle”

“Extending the length of an activity alone does not necessarily create rigor!”

DOK Activity

Key Points DOK 1 + DOK 1 + DOK 1 = 1 Depths of knowledge classification is based on the task, not the student DOK is different from task/item difficulty DOK ratings aid in alignment of standards and assessment, and therefore instruction

The alignment between tasks, standards, and assessments allows for cognitive complexity with a deeper understanding. “A mile wide and an inch deep”

Remember DOK is... …descriptive …focuses on how deeply a student has to know the content in order to respond …NOT the same as difficulty. …NOT the same as Bloom’s Taxonomy

The Heart of the Matter is the Depth of Knowledge