Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of the Environment All State Agencies Recycle (All StAR) Recycling Coordinator Training January 17, 2012.
Advertisements

Rangeland Health United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Regulatory Program.
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment.
Session 4 Outline Overview of regulations needed. What should regulations address? What to look for in model regulations? Participation discussion on current.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
KANE COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION STEARNS ROAD WETLAND MITIGATION SITE SECTION NO BR PRE-BID MEETING.
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Post-construction rates and volume of stormwater runoff on-site will be equal to or less than that of pre-development rates and volume of stormwater runoff?
Department of the Environment Water Use and Appropriation of Maryland’s Waters.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
 WELCOME  Welcome to the home page for the Louisiana Mapping Project (LaMP). The LaMP effort is being undertaken by Department of Homeland Security’s.
LENTIC CHECKLIST. NATURAL RIPARIAN RESOURCES LENTIC CHECKLIST HYDROLOGIC.
CHAPTER 102 Plain English Guide to the Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Regulations Fulton County Conservation District 216 N. Second Street, Suite 15.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
April 14, Indicate every resource type proposed for impact on the Application: Tidal Wetland (short form for some projects) Nontidal Wetland Waterway.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRIT) Eastgate Shopping Center Chapel Hill, NC September 9, 2008.
Chesapeake Bay Program Habitat Goals Implementation Team June 26, 2013.
Breewood Stream Restoration Montgomery County Capital Improvement Project to Stabilize the Breewood Tributary November 14, 2012 Sligo Middle School.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Connecticut Department of Transportation: Office of Environmental Planning (OEP) Statewide Drainage Maintenance Activities State owned Rail Facilities.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Chanhassen’s 2006 Surface Water Management Plan Carver County WENR Meeting March 27, 2007 Lori Haak Water Resources Coordinator
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Large and Small Construction.
Introduction to PA Act 167 Stormwater Management Planning Little Juniata River Watershed April 21, 2005.
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
SMALL CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMITTING. STORMWATER GENERAL PERMIT FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Construction activities regulated under this permit.
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project Tanya Lamb Urban Geography, GEOG 481 Description 15-mile stretch Hyak (MP 55.1) to Easton (MP 70.3) 2010 scheduled to.
Selecting the Best Regional Sequestration Options Dick Rhudy EPRI WESTCARB Annual Meeting October 27-28, 2004 Portland Oregon.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
IMLA New England Regional Land Use Seminar June 21, 2012 Work Session 2. Storm Water Management James N. Katsiaficas, Esq. P.O. BOX 426 PORTLAND, MAINE.
Lake County Watershed Management Board Funding Program Mike Prusila, CFM, Watershed Planner.
An exercise in stream restoration and redesign
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
Watersheds What is a watershed? 93 watersheds in Ohio.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Document Preparation WETLANDS BEST PRACTICES 33 rd Annual Airports Conference Marie.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Bureau of Watershed Management Preliminary Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management December 19, 2007.
General Water Obstruction and Encroachment Permits Presented by NCRO Watershed Management Program.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
Item W16a February 8, 2012 CCC Hearing A-6-OCN (Altman) 1823 South Pacific Street City of Oceanside.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Mn Buffers Program: Overview of 2016 Statute Clarifications
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
THE CORPS REGULATORY AUTHORITY
36 CAs across Ontario (mainly in the south)
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
Economic Study for Watts Branch Stream Restoration N. E
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Restoration and Regulation Discussion
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Shaver Creek Permitting
Presentation transcript:

Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment Coordination Meeting March 12, 2013

Need for Timely Completion of Restoration Projects Need for Complete and Accurate Permit Applications and Compliance with Requirements to Issue Authorizations Issues

Practitioners Have Expressed Frustration with Need for Permits, Information Requirements, and Delays Regulatory Agencies Have Expressed Frustration at Poor Coordination, Incomplete Applications, and Projects that Fail to Comply with Requirements

Purpose and Need

Project Purpose – Reason for doing a project Goals- Overall desired outcome of a project Objectives-Specific actions to accomplish the goal

Purpose and Need Request Pre-application meeting, JE presentation and site visit In coordination, determine suitability of site and need for restoration In coordination, reach consensus on project purpose, goals, and objectives Most effective approach for reducing review times and information requirements

Purpose and Need cont. Process is more lengthy and demanding of applicants and regulators when application submitted without coordination Many questions may be raised and additional information requested

Questions Related to Purpose and Need Why the applicant is proposing the project? What is the need for this project? Is there actually a problem? Briefly mention how the project purpose supports existing and current larger-scale (Statewide, regional, watershed) plans or policies, if applicable.

Broadly defined, purpose, goals and objectives in a project purpose will result in analysis of alternatives at other locations with fewer impacts. Detailed and specific purpose, goals and objectives will limit alternatives that may have fewer adverse impacts on regulated resources.

Questions Related to Goals, Objectives What are the project goals, and how will this particular project accomplish the goals? Is the site degraded and a good candidate for meeting project goals? What are the resource impacts resulting from this project? What is the desired outcome of the completed project?

Project Purpose Example Very broad project purpose may result in analysis of alternatives at other locations with fewer impacts Example: Improve water quality in X watershed.

Is there a water quality problem in the watershed? What is nature and extent of water quality problem? Why is restoration proposed at this particular proposed project site? Is there a problem at the proposed site?

How was the water quality problem determined? Where is the source of the problem that degrades the proposed site? Are there alternative locations (e.g. upland) elsewhere in the X watershed with less adverse impact and greater need for restoration?

Example: Improve water quality in X watershed by reducing sediment in XY Branch. How was sediment determined to be a problem in XY Branch? What is the source of the sediment problem? Are there alternatives (e.g. upland) elsewhere in the watershed of XY Branch with less adverse impact?

Example: Improve water quality of XY Branch by stabilizing eroding banks to reduce erosion and sediment entering impaired X watershed. What method was used to determine that banks are eroding? Are the eroding banks causing a problem of excess sediment, or is the sediment part of the normal bedload?

Example:Stabilize 500 feet of eroding banks of XY Branch using regenerative stormwater conveyance and riparian plantings to reduce sediment in impaired X watershed. Project named in MS-4 watershed plan for County. Temporary disturbance for access is 5000 square feet of forested wetland and floodplain. Combines project purpose, need, technique, and amount of impact. All of the information in this statement is necessary for application review, but not all of it is the project purpose.

Example: Stabilize 500 feet of eroding banks of XY Branch to reduce sediment, raise IBI score from fair to good and increase trout populations using regenerative stormwater conveyance and riparian plantings using backhoe and 50 foot wide temporary road for construction access through forested wetland and floodplain in impaired X watershed. Project named in MS-4 watershed plan for ___County. Combines project purpose, description of techniques, amount of impact but adds performance standards that may not be achievable and result in project being considered failure.

Regulatory agencies may make independent determination of project purpose and structure review based on the determination.

1800 Washington Boulevard | Baltimore, MD | TTY Users: Maryland Department of the Environment Wetlands and Waterways Program