© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of Education Career and Technical Education Section Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Reviewing National High School Improvement Strategies, Models, Characteristics and Potential Monica Martinez KnowledgeWorks Foundation (formerly of the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
What Everyone Should Know About the Successful K–12 STEM Education Report.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 A Framework for Mapping the System Joseph R. Harris Director, National High School Center National High School Center 2008 Summer Institute Washington,
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Technology Leadership
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Stakeholder Forum D300 Strategic Plan Overview Fred Heid, Superintendent.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Business, Technology, and Design (BTD). Unifying Vision/Identity BTD will provide a personalized, supportive, and collaborative academic environment.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Los Angeles Virtual Academy A learning portal to the future.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Smaller Learning Communities Grant Program 2008 Cohort Nicki Brisson, Director School Choice and Parental Options.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
GWDC Education Policy Workgroup Draft Policy Recommendations Mo Amundson, Chair GWDC Quarterly Meeting May 13, 2010.
SAISD Professional Learning Advisory Board Meeting Thursday, January 20, 2005.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 FOR ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY Anson Green Director Adult Education and Literacy Texas Workforce Commission.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Rosa Aronson Director, Office of Advocacy Archived Information.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
 A MODEL SCHOOL. The children are the of North Aiken supported by reflective and responsive teachers and staff, devoted parents, a supportive district.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Comprehensive Planning
The CCPS Strategic Plan
World’s Best Workforce Update:
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny Scala, TA Liaison February

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Overview Welcome & Introduction Current High School Initiatives National High School Center’s Eight Elements of High School Improvement Customizing the Eight Elements Incorporating District Feedback Wrap Up 2

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Current High School Initiatives

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® National High School Center’s Eight Elements of High School Improvement: A Mapping Framework

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Picturing the High School Improvement Landscape 5

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Picturing the High School Improvement Landscape Dropout Prevention Transitions In Tiered Intervention Dual Enrollment Small Schools Career Academies Transitions Out HS Literacy Model High Schools Freshman Academies Advisories HS Equity & Access HS Restructuring SLCs Post- secondary Pathways HS STEM HS Assessment Credit Recovery Virtual Learning Positive Behavior Rigorous Content CTE 6

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Dropout Prevention Transitions In Tiered Intervention Dual Enrollment Small Schools Career Academies Transitions Out HS Literacy Model High Schools Freshman Academies Advisories HS Equity & Access SLCs Post- secondary Pathways HS STEM HS Assessment Credit Recovery Virtual Learning Rigorous Content CTE HS Restructuring Picturing the High School Improvement Landscape 7

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® 8 Picturing the High School Improvement Landscape

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Alignment Alignment Coherence Coherence Connectedness Connectedness 9 Picturing the High School Improvement Landscape

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Eight Elements of High School Improvement: A Mapping Framework Rigorous Curriculum and Instruction –Align with rigorous state and local standards and vertically interfaced with local school curriculum –Incorporate multiple research-based instructional strategies, technologies and learning modalities –Adapt to a variety of school and classroom settings Assessment and Accountability –Include variety of classroom, school-based, and district, and state level assessments –Collect and report longitudinal data to measure short- and long-term student growth for instructional planning and accountability 10

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Teacher Quality and Professional Development –Promote knowledge of content and academic literacy skills, varied and effective pedagogy, and effective classroom management –Embed at the school and classroom levels throughout the school year with increased opportunities for teachers to work together Leadership and Governance –Distribute decision-making authority at all levels with alternative structures that support change –Provide principals and other instructional leaders with adequate knowledge, time, and interpersonal skills to work collaboratively 11 Eight Elements of High School Improvement: A Mapping Framework

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Eight Elements of High School Improvement: A Mapping Framework Student and Family Supports –Support students as they transition into/through/out of high school –Provide family-focused services and outreach that respect and honor the student’s family and community Stakeholder Engagement –Foster relationships among P-16 schools, the workforce, families, and communities –Ensure that all appropriate stakeholders are at the table from the start 12

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Eight Elements of High School Improvement: A Mapping Framework Organization and Structure –Support effective teaching and learning and personalization through physical/operational changes and alternative time/schedule approaches –Include students with special needs in the general curriculum Resources for Sustainability –Adequately staff the initiatives and provide appropriate time and necessary fiscal support to take hold and scale-up –Grow both the physical and human capital within the system and continuously develop teacher knowledge and skills 13

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Rigorous Curriculum and Instruction Assessment and Accountability Teacher Quality and Professional Development Leadership and Governance Student and Family Supports Stakeholder Engagement Organization and Structure Resources for Sustainability 14 Eight Elements of High School Improvement: A Mapping Framework

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Customizing the Eight Elements: Minnesota Systemic High School Redesign: Building a Minnesota Model FrameworkSystemic High School Redesign: Building a Minnesota Model Framework Minnesota model core components: 1.Rigorous and relevant course-taking for all students, especially at transition points. 2.Personalized learning environment for each student, with the support of parents and other adult mentors. 3.Multiple pathways to postsecondary training or college to achieve a minimum K-14 education. 4.High-quality teacher and principal leadership. 5.Student assessment and program evaluation data used to continuously improve school climate, organization, management, curricula and instruction. 15

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® 16

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Customizing the Eight Elements: Tennessee High School Redesign Project Embedded Eight Elements Framework –Funding priority in proposals –Proposals used the Eight Elements to help determine strategies and activities –Scoring rubric 17

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Linking State Systems of Support with High School Redesign Efforts

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Incorporating District Feedback Invite LEA leaders and key stakeholders to provide feedback Leverage implementation of research, innovation and best practices for high schools Build culture of two-way communication and shared accountability 19

© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® Questions & Answers