PacifiCorp RTO project team Presentation to SSG-WI Planning WG PDX Business Center, 7/31/02 Economic Assessment of Generation & Transmission Expansion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparent, Repeatable, Defendable, and Published Generation, Transmission & Nat Gas Network Co-Optimizations
Advertisements

Software Analysis Tools
SSG-WI System Model Data Requirements [PART 1] September 5, 2002 Las Vegas, NV.
Aidan Tuohy Sr. Project Engineer NWPCC Flexibility Metric Roundtable April 2013 Metrics and Methods to Assess Power System Flexibility.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
Improving Transmission Asset Utilization through Advanced Mathematics and Computing 1 Henry Huang, Ruisheng Diao, Shuangshuang Jin, Yuri Makarov Pacific.
EStorage First Annual Workshop Arnhem, NL 30, Oct Olivier Teller.
Presentation to WECC Market Interface Committee March 24, 2015
IEOR 180 Senior Project Toni Geralde Mona Gohil Nicolas Gomez Lily Surya Patrick Tam Optimizing Electricity Procurement for the City of Palo Alto.
I/O Curve The IO curve plots fuel input (in MBtu/hr) versus net MW output.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Lecture 16 Economic Dispatch Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Announcements Be reading Chapter 7
All content in this presentation is protected – © 2008 American Power Conversion Corporation Rael Haiboullin System Engineer Capacity Manager.
Hybrid System Performance Evaluation Henrik Bindner, Tom Cronin, Per Lundsager, Oliver Gehrke Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.
Cutting the Electric Bill for Internet-Scale Systems Andreas Andreou Cambridge University, R02
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
Introduction to Optimization (Part 1)
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
1 Least Cost System Operation: Economic Dispatch 2 Smith College, EGR 325 March 10, 2006.
Least Cost System Operation: Economic Dispatch 1
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013.
APPA Business & Financial Conference 2006 September 18, 2015 Business Intelligence Solutions for the Workplace Enhancing Analytical Reporting Presented.
Production Cost Model Fundamentals
Base Case Draft – For Comment Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Black Sea Regional Transmission Planning Project By Predrag Mikša EKC - Electricity Coordinating Center Istanbul, March 2011.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
K E M A T & D C O N S U L T I N G Power System Conference, Clemson, South Carolina, March 8-11, 2005 Principles and Issues Relating to the Interconnection.
© 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Matthew Rylander EPRI April 20, 2015 Streamlined Method for Determining Distribution.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Proposed Generation Expansion Process For Review and Discussion March 1, 2011.
Advanced Controls and Sensors David G. Hansen. Advanced Controls and Sensors Planning Process.
“DRAFT” RMATS 2008 Base Case (To be presented at the RMATS Stakeholders Meeting) March 17, 2004.
1 Pacific Northwest Hydro-Thermal System and RTO West Market Design FERC Market Design Workshop January 23, 2002.
PS ERC 1 Reactive Power Considerations in Linear Load Flow with Applications to Available Transfer Capability Pete Sauer (With a lot of help from Santiago.
© ABB Group August 23,2010 | Slide 1 MBPC Study – 1 st Load Pocket Preliminary Results for Discussion only Entergy Regional State Committee (ERSC) Southwest.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
Lecture 16 Economic Dispatch Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Announcements Homework 8 is 11.19, 11.21, 11.26, 11.27, due now
American Wind Energy Association Wind in The Portfolio Mike Jacobs American Wind Energy Association Managing Your Energy Portfolio in a Greener World January.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
January 14, 2016 PacifiCorp-CAISO-NVE EIM Initiative Overview.
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education (Asia). All rights reserved. 13 Aggregate Planning.
A new Nomogram Development POM- based tool - Application results in the Idaho Power System. Orlando Ciniglio, IPC Marianna Vaiman, V&R Energy WECC TSS.
December 14, 2007 RPG - CREZ Meeting CREZ Transmission Optimization Study: Update Warren Lasher ERCOT System Assessment.
Smart Grid Vision: Vision for a Holistic Power Supply and Delivery Chain Stephen Lee Senior Technical Executive Power Delivery & Utilization November 2008.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission
Market Architectures Integrating Ancillary Services from Distributed Energy Resources Olivier Devolder Head of Energy Group N-SIDE.
ME 312 PPE POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Fundamental Supply Factors Driving Current Market Prices
Economic Operation of Power Systems
ISO New England System R&D Needs
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Lecture 15 Economic Dispatch Tom Overbye and Ross Baldick 1.
Security of supply - deriving a winter energy standard using the DOASA model EPOC Winter Workshop September 2018.
MIT tour of the California ISO Control Center March 31, 2015
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
GENESYS Current Functionality
Software Analysis Tools
Presentation transcript:

PacifiCorp RTO project team Presentation to SSG-WI Planning WG PDX Business Center, 7/31/02 Economic Assessment of Generation & Transmission Expansion Scenarios in WECC

Models used in Power Market analysis Econometric models - stochastic models that correlate trades and prices to time of year, weather or hydro conditions, fuel price & supply, etc. Used for predicting forward price curves, spark spreads, price spikes, etc. For M&A analysis, project assessment, for assessing credit risk, risk management, trade analytics and support, etc, etc Game theory models - KBS-based models that simulate traders’ behavior (always within the rules!). Used for developing/testing trading strategies; for stress testing of market designs, detecting/monitoring unusual trades, etc. Power market models - that optimize centrally-dispatched markets; or minimize traders’ production costs in meeting their load service obligations within transmission rights; or price transmission rights/congestion rents, etc. System planning tools - for generator interconnection design and impact studies; for network expansion planning, for computing flowpath ratings, etc A wide range - some old, some new...

Single Area OK for small control areas No congestion Ignores transmission ‘Bubble’ view Major flowpaths only Transportation model Better, but… Power doesn’t flow like that! Complete network Very complex All network constraints Only way to track line flows Still an approximation... CG&E KUEN LG&EE EKPC OVEC WVPA PSI NOLOAD 217 NUKE-A 218 NUKE-B 221 HYDRO 222 MIDCOAL 216 ADDON 225 VIKING 219 MIDCOALP 215 CONDENS 214 CARIOCA 220 BIGCOAL 223 BIGCOIL 213 WESTIE WESTIE MIDTIE MIDTIE EASTIE EASTIE REACTOR 106 MARYLOAD 104 ANNELOAD 105 ERIKLOAD 108 COAL-A 101 COAL-B 102 MIDOIL 107 Complexity Simple High Good Low Accuracy Network models in Power Market analysis

Trade-off in Market vs Network modeling Simple Network model Complex Sophistication of Market model High Low Trading models System planning models Production simulation models Power market models CG&E KUEN LG&EE EKPC OVEC WVPA PSI MIDOIL 107 Ideal combination (doesn’t yet exist)

Power Market simulation overview Market Modeling Market Simulation Scenario Analysis User specified scenarios Additional Scenarios Goal:To economicphysical Goal:To predict the economic and physical performance of large power networks Generation size, capability costs (fuel, O&M) availability outages Transmission network data constraints outages operation rules Load distribution hourly variation max MWh, MW annual growth Capacity factors Revenues/rents Flows/Congestion Clearing Prices

The heart of ABB-MS Why Linearize? Speed: Enables fast Linear Program (LP) solution Convergence: LP always a convex problem Accuracy: Flows on HV circuits modeled well Acceptability: Generally recognised by Industry DC Optimal Power Flow Transmission Constrained Economic Dispatch with linearized power flow model

Transmission Network Constraints Thermal Line Limits –Maximum MW on any line –Percentage of MVA rating HVDC –Fixed or controllable –Maximum flow: different for each direction –Limits on MW changes per hour Phase Shifter –MW Capacity –Angular limits –Limits on angle changes per hour Interface Constraints –Limit on net flows on selected lines –Models a variety of operating constraints: â Reliability, Angular/Voltage stability, Area Interchange Limits

Transmission Network Constraints Combined Generation & Transmission Nomograms Interface limits can be a function of generation variables –Online capacity –Reserve capability, etc Example: Southern California import nomogram Total Flow From East Total Flow From North Limit for online G1 Limit for online G2 > G1

Output Summary

Where we’re at with ABB-MS Hand over to Kurt various plots of Y2004 flowpath flows, generator nodal price differences, load factors,etc on-line demo of selected results

Keys to successful use of COUGER Easy to change data Large Base Case data set + Small, modular, incremental changes Similar data stored/displayed together Describe changes from Base Case to User Easily interpreted results Summary file: Physical and Financial Performance, with or without time element Summary file: highlight important constraints Graphical representation of results Case comparison: Summary and Graphical

Keys to successful use of COUGER Flexibility : User selects which hours to run –entire year, one hour, sampled weeks, etc constraints to model (accuracy vs. time) –Monitored Lines –Interface constraints –Individually, or as Groups via database filters results to view –Clearing Price for selected buses –Flows, Shadow Prices for selected lines and flowpaths –Total generation, load and average clearing price for selected areas Total Flexibility via User-controlled proprietary database

Tasks to complete Planning WG’s analysis... Given the necessary data, the steps would be: Set up a complete data set for Y2008: generators (capacity, costs, availability); loads by control area (annual energy, monthly maximum demand and hourly demand profile); and transmission network (a complete WSCC system or other as specified by WG) Run economic analyses using ABB-MS for a set of scenarios (fuel prices, new generator type and location, wet/dry hydro production) as specified by the WG Report to the Planning WG, on a timetable to be mutually agreed, the prospective resource utilization, system flows, congestion incidence and cost, and other agreed economic indicators Repeat the above analysis for Y2018, incorporating a specified set of transmission expansion options, taking account of agreed load growth and generator expansion/ fuel price options

What the Planning WG would need to do... Provide a complete transmission network data (e.g. in the form of a WSCC loadflow case in PSS/E format), circuit thermal ratings and interface/flowpath ratings, phase-shifter and HVDC link data. Provide load data (monthly energy and max demand, hourly load profile by control area/utility, annual growth rates). Dispatchable load data. Provide generator data (type, capacity, heat rates, ramp rates, outage rates, O&M, and fuel costs, hydro production MW/hr in wet and dry conditions). Specify the new generators (type, location, commissioning date, economic data and expected performance data) to be added Specify the transmission expansions to be studied (terminations, circuit data, ratings and commissioning date), and the combination/sequence of generation/ transmission projects selected to be studied. Also, the Planning WG would have to compute the effect on interface/ flowpath ratings of the specified combination of generation/transmission expansion projects that are selected to be studied. We are content to leave the interpretation of analysis results and the compilation of all reports to the Planning WG