Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume IX Monitoring Systems for Quality Curriculum and Instruction.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Evaluating principal effectiveness Focal Point 2012.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Differentiated Supervision
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
O As professionals within the teaching profession, we recognize our responsibilities to continually analyze our practices in the pursuit of excellence.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
The Ugly Truth… Most school principals think they are “effective instructional leaders” but few really are.
Rationale for the Evaluation Frameworks Project Previous Paradigm in Our State A Compliance Exercise, Often Based Solely on Positional Authority.
Adopting the Iowa Core CSL Working Group Nov. 10, 2009.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 CHANGES IN LICENSED STAFF EVALUATION WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Keys to being an effective principal Mike Miles July 2009.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
R 0 G125 B 177 R 78 G 47 B 145 R 185 G 50 B 147 R 245 G132 B 107 R 255 G234 B 83 R 123 G193 B 67 R149 G169 B 202 Introduction to Performance Management.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report.
TBAISD Superintendents Association Leadership Academy 2010.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Teacher Evaluation MEASURING EDUCATOR IMPACT / / / CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
Teacher Evaluation Systems 2.0: What Have We Learned? EdWeek Webinar March 14, 2013 Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Principal Evaluation Update
REPORTING.
Presentation transcript:

Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009

In general, when you observe a teacher, what are the two most important things you look for?

Objectives Discuss goals/ rationale of providing instructional feedback Review criteria of providing effective instructional feedback Review spot observation form Use instructional feedback rubric

Why provide feedback?

The Main Thing Focus on High Quality Instruction

High Quality Instruction

... our greatest opportunity for better schools: a simple, unswerving focus on those actions and arrangements that ensure effective, ever-improving instruction. Instruction itself has the largest influence on achievement. Mike Schmoker, Results Now (2006)

“The top-performing school systems recognize that the only way to improve outcomes is to improve instruction.” How the World’s Best-Performing School Systems Come Out on Top, McKinsey and Company, Sep. 2007

Processes ImplementationPhilosophy L

Quick Survey Administrators and teachers in the organization know what the organization values most with regard to instruction. Administrators provide instructional feedback in multiple ways purposefully and regularly. Administrators use a spot observation or walk-through form.

Quick Survey Administrators respect the difference between formative and summative evaluations. Teachers in the organization believe the instructional feedback they receive is helpful. Instructional behavior changes as a result of the feedback teachers are given.

Quick Survey Administrators know how to provide effective instructional feedback in a way that is appreciated by the staff. The quality of instruction in the organization is very high.

Think and work systemically.

Systemic Leverage Points – Spot observation SPOT OBSERVATIONS Building Philosophy: beliefs, priorities, goals Classroom Instructional Priorities Staff Devel. School Achievement Goals Teacher Eval. Other System Connections  Data use plan  Alignment  Feedback  Accreditation

Principal’s evaluation rubric

Build a culture of instructional feedback.

Building a culture of feedback 1) Philosophy first  Establish rationale and goals for instructional feedback

Philosophy first Replace “what gets measured gets done” with “what gets feedback gets done better.” Guide beliefs about instructional feedback.

Goal of instructional feedback Provide information to teachers in order to improve instruction Stimulate conversations about professional growth Monitor the progress of the implementation of instructional practices and initiatives Provide focus Validate what is working well Help to hold ourselves accountable

Instructional feedback is only as important as the professional dialogues it stimulates and the changes to instructional behavior that result from it.

Building a culture of feedback 2) Set expectations  Open doors  Set expectations for written and verbal feedback

District expectations Administrators regularly conduct observations of classroom instruction Administrators provide feedback to teachers on a form developed by the school

District expectations Administrators hold conversations with all employees about the feedback and about instruction

Building a culture of feedback 3) Determine what you are providing feedback on  Solicit input regarding the type of feedback that is needed to improve instruction.  Give feedback on the instructional behaviors the organization values most and that will make the most difference for the organization’s goals.  Ensure alignment with instructional priorities, key actions, and evaluations.

Building a culture of feedback 4) Develop instructional feedback form  Building level  Input from staff

Building a culture of feedback 5) Train administrators and teacher leaders to provide effective instructional feedback  Develop instructional leaders  Focus on improving instruction Formative and summative assessments of instruction  Use rubric for providing feedback  Calibrate

Building a culture of feedback 6) Provide staff training and professional development  Before providing feedback  Aligned with feedback instrument

Building a culture of feedback 7) Follow through  Analyze data received  Provide additional support where needed  Insist on improvement; hold teachers and administrators accountable  Review and revise feedback processes as necessary

Building a culture of feedback 8) Model asking for and receiving feedback

Instructional feedback rubric

Spot observation forms

Contact information Mike Miles