Spatial mapping as a tool for mainstreaming biodiversity values Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER FOR THE 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT Santa Ana River Watershed Conference April 11, 2013.
Advertisements

Payment for Environmental Services Extracted from work by Ffemke Griffoen FAO-APO TZ.
Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International Waters Sustainable Forest Management Sustainable Cities Food Security Fisheries Forests.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Towards More Sustainable and Market-based Payment for Ecosystem Services A Pilot Project in Lijiang, China Lu Zhi.
1 Water Funds © Ami Vitale Andrew Deutz, Ph.D. Director, International Government Relations The Nature Conservancy.
Heejun Chang, Madeline Steele, Terrance Anthony Department of Geography, Portland State University Driss Ennaanay, Manu Sharma Natural Capital Project,
Project for Ecosystem Services (ProEcoServ) San Pedro de Atacama -Chile Belko Caqueo, Roberto Villablanca,
Why economic valuation of Hima can be useful
LECTURE XIII FORESTRY ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. Introduction  If forestry is to contribute its full share to a more abundant life for the world’s increasing.
The Ecosystem approach: from theory to application in England Tom Tew Natural England Delivering Nature’s Services.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Ecosystem Services Studies in Minnesota Jan. 9, 2013 ES 281.
Using Payments for Ecosystem Services to Achieve Conservation and Development Objectives Sara Scherr Forest Trends Ecoagriculture Partners September 2005.
Ecosystem Services & Emerging Markets and Payments
MINISTRY OF TOURISM, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Forest Monitoring For REDD “A Case of The Integrated Land-use Assessment (ILUA) - Zambia” Presented.
Landuse change impact on the carbon balance at highly modified floodplains a systematic approach for combined emission reduction and landuse optimalization.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
 Timber, wood fiber, fuel wood  Gas regulation and climate control  Carbon sequestration  Watershed services (water supply and quality)  Clean air.
Ecosystem Services Analysis Tues, Jan ES 281.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
FOREST ECOSYSTEM SERVICES E mail:
Valuation Discussion: Motivation, Concepts and Methods Emily McKenzie and Shan Ma.
9/10/2015A GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE AND PROSPEROUS KENYA Challenges on Climate Change Adaptation in Kenya.
Results: Test-run in the Willamette Basin Some areas provide higher levels of services than others. The agriculture and timber maps show dollar values—high.
WLI REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE WORKSHOP ON DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS AND MODELS SEPTEMBER, 2013, JERBA, TUNISIA Economic analysis of improved water.
Funded by the Government of Alberta Ecosystem Services and Conservation Offsets April 24 th, 2012.
Eftec Economics for the Environment Consultancy Using ecosystem services for cost benefit analysis of forestry decisions Roundtable on Cost / Benefit of.
InVEST Nirmal Bhagabati Emily McKenzie. Outline What is InVEST? – History of development – Scope, objectives, users – Conceptual approach and applications.
Amy’s slides for Lafarge road- tester presentation CEV launch at WRI May 3, 2011.
It’s Our Nature to Know Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute A Geographically- Broad Assessment of Rangeland Ecosystem Services Shannon White,
The Natural Capital Project  Help people understand what we get from nature  Use that understanding to inform decisions.
Sediment Retention model
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
Natural Capital Concepts in Practice: Experience in the US (and farther South) Brian C. Murray Director for Economic Analysis, Nicholas Institute for Environmental.
How can InVEST inform Bioeconomic Modeling?
InVEST Tier 1 Carbon Model. In the Tier 1 model we estimate carbon stock as a function of land use / land cover. Storage indicates the mass of carbon.
6. Values and externalities Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Valuation of ecosystem services of Makira and Masoala Protected areas Michel Masozera.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
GEF-6 Programming Directions in Natural Resources Management
Our Nation’s Forestlands On the Edge Susan Stein USDA Forest Service FREMO Workshop, Annapolis FREMO Workshop, Annapolis September 18, 2007.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: Managing Hydropower, Mining and Infrastructure Development Impacts on Natural Capital Iain Watson Senior Environmental.
 The SNC’s mission is to initiate, encourage and support efforts that improve the environmental, economic and social well- being of the Sierra Nevada.
CIAT’s current research in water- related ecosystem services and benefit-sharing mechanisms Contribution to the CRP5’s Basins SRP Marcela Quintero Addis.
Corporate Ecosystem Valuation (CEV) Road Test Case Study: Lafarge May 3, 2011.
WWF Greater Mekong Programme InVEST Seminar – April 2012 Ecosystem Services in the Greater Mekong Subregion.
Integrating Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation Dick Cameron Senior Conservation Planner The Nature Conservancy, California Program 1.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
Ecosystem functions: The capacity of natural processes and components to provide goods and services that satisfy human needs. (de Groot, 1992) Ecosystem.
Carbon InVEST case studies & policy Emily McKenzie 3 April, InVEST Training, Bangkok.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 6 – 9, 2011 Dakar, Senegal.
Observations and Ideas for Payment for Ecosystem Services in Central Asia.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
Land, Public and Private. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change  Paving –
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
Linking Stewardship to Ecosystem Services Presentation to Camrose County Miquelon Growth Management Study Review Committee March 22, 2011 Candace Vanin,
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
RUPES Workshop, Cagayan de Oro , September 2012
Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future
Carly Cipolla ATOC 4800 Final Project
Climate and Green Plan Town Hall Toolkit
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT
Joint Nature Conservation Committee
Good riparian management Financial benefits for the public
A three steps assessment
Presented By Samuel Muriithi HEAD OF ECONOMICS AND PLANNING:
Power and Decision Making In INRM
Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES)
Presentation transcript:

Spatial mapping as a tool for mainstreaming biodiversity values Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, 16 May 2012 Luis Germán Naranjo, Ph.D. Conservation Director WWF Northern Amazon/ Chocó-Darien

Sibundoy Valley Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012

The cloud forests of Colombia’s Upper Putumayo region are threatened by advancing agriculture, ranching, and infrastructure development. These activities can have adverse effects on the benefits nature provides, including water supply and quality, prevention of soil erosion, carbon capture and sequestration, and biodiversity. The impacts of climate change intensify these effects, which is likely to have serious consequences for future development. Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Seeking solutions to prevent further biodiversity loss in the upper Putumayo basin

WWF, Corpoamazonía (the regional environmental regulatory agency), and CIPAV (Foundation Center for Sustainable Agricultural Systems), joined efforts to identify areas in the Upper Putumayo basin with especially high ecosystem service value, for incorporation into a compensation and rewards for ecosystem services (CRES) scheme. A CRES scheme involves creating contracts for compensation or providing incentives for ecosystem stewards to protect and enhance ecosystem services, or reduce their degradation, for the benefit of users. CRES schemes differ from payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes in that no market is set up to facilitate the payment transfers. Ecosystem service providers may pay compensation to beneficiaries to offset a decline in ecosystem services. Alternatively, ecosystem service beneficiaries may pay compensation to providers to reduce economic activities that degrade ecosystem services. Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Developoing a schem of compensation and rewards for ecosystem services

Establishing a CRES scheme for alternative livestock production systems required assessing how cattle ranching would affect :  agricultural revenues  drinking water quality to local aqueducts  erosion control  carbon sequestration, and  biodiversity Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Assessing Ecosystem Services in the Upper Putumayo Basin

InVEST: Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs Where do ecosystem services originate and where are they consumed? How does a proposed forestry management plan affect timber yields, biodiversity, water quality and recreation? Which parts of a watershed provide the greatest carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and tourism values? Where would reforestation achieve the greatest downstream water quality benefits while maintaining or minimizing losses in water flows? How will climate change and population growth impact ecosystem services and biodiversity? Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012

InVEST is embedded in a decision-making process: Stakeholder engagement Choices Change in management, climate, population Biophysical models Economic models Maps Tradeoffs Balance sheets Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012

Using InVEST for decision making Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 InVEST can estimate the amount and value of ecosystem services that are provided on the current landscape or under future scenarios. InVEST models are spatially-explicit, using maps as information sources and producing maps as outputs. InVEST returns results in either biophysical terms (e.g., tons of carbon sequestered) or economic terms (e.g., net present value of that sequestered carbon). The spatial resolution of analyses is also flexible, allowing users to address questions at the local, regional or global scale. Using InVEST in an iterative process: the stakeholders may choose to create new scenarios based on the information revealed by the models until suitable solutions for management action are identified.

InVEST has a tiered design Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012

Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services in the Upper Putumayo Water: where are the most important areas to maintain the current water cycle? Carbon: which parts of a watershed maintain the largest carbon stocks? Biodiversity: which parts of a watershed provide the best quality habitat? Sediment retention: where will most of the potential soil losses occur under current land use and land cover patterns? Erosion: which parts of the landscape are more important to prevent soil loss? Nutrient retention: Which parts of the landscape are more important in keeping pollutants out of waterways?

Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Annual Average Water Yield

Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Contributions by type of land cover Component PutumayoHidraúlica Vol m 3 % % Primary forest17,947, ,804, Secondary forest9,161, , Wetlands--00 Agricultural systems4,659, ,050, Paramo grasslands--2,325, Urban areas--335, Natural pastures2,000, ,742,

Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Biodiversity –habitat quality Modifiers (Threats): Land use conflicts Road distance Town distance Current land use

Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Sediment Retention Current soil loss calculation Potential soil loss calculation

Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Ecosystem services and climate change

Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 Concluding remarks The results identified the areas most important in terms of carbon sequestration capacity, water yield, nutrient retention, and erosion control. The most biodiverse areas were located at higher elevations, which were farther away from roads and infrastructure development. Locations with the highest concentrations of services, the greatest risk of loss from incompatible activities, or potential to increase services provide the greatest amount of benefits to ecosystem stewards and beneficiaries, making the sites good candidates for compensation schemes. WWF Colombia and its partners have selected pilot locations for silvopastoral systems, using InVEST to identify where there is potential for enhancing ecosystem services in degraded areas and for conservation in areas with high concentration of services.

Subregional Workshop for South America on Valuation and Incentive Measures Santiago de Chile, May 2012 ©WWF/ CF Suarez