Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
Advertisements

2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Common Core Circles: Part I How to Choose a Task Developed by the CMC-S CaCCSSM Committee.
Re-viewing the CMI Framework (Re-view: Take another look, see anew)
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
Standards Scaling– Teacher Leaders LMS Team
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Strategies to Promote Motivation in the Mathematics Classroom
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
The 5 E Instructional Model
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
The Four Strands of Scientific Proficiency Students who understand science:  Know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world  Generate.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Basics of Research and Development and Design STEM Education HON4013 ENGR1020 Learning and Action Cycles.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
ASLI Plenary Session Rigor. Welcome to ASLI What does Rigor mean? Rigor is more than what you teach and what standards you cover; it's how you teach.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
Patty Stephens, M.Ed, NBCT 7-12 Math Instructional Specialist, Northshore School District Jeanne Flahiff, M.A., NBCT 7-9 ELA teacher & instructional coach,
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
The Constructed Response Assessment The Journey Continues.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Palmyra Area School District Summer Goals  Develop an understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the area of Math, including the.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Enrichment…It is not just for gifted anymore.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Inquiry Science and the 5-E Model
STEM Learning Module PISA- Summer 2007
What is it with these two?
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
Preplanning Presentation
Wayne Curriculum Conversations
Mathematical Tasks, Cognitive Demand and Higher Level Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions

Types of Science Tasks Investigations: Experimental & Observational Data representation, analysis and interpretation Modeling Explanation

Experimentation Students are designing, critiquing, and/or carrying out an experimental protocol or research design. Can be either experiment or observation

What Level?

Experimentation Low level- students following a prescribed procedure and data collection method. High level- students are given a purpose or problem to solve, but are tasked with using their background knowledge to design a procedure and data collection method.

Data Representation, Analysis and Interpretation Students are representing, analyzing, and/or interpreting data

What Level?

Modeling Students are constructing or using models to explain a phenomenon.

What level? Over the next 30 days, take or draw a picture of the moon from the same point at home. At the end of the 30 days, use the pictures to create a model of the phases of the moon.

What level? Students use hydrogeology models to determine how much water runs off various surfaces when 1000 mL of water is poured over the model.

Explanation Students are providing explanations for patterns or phenomena.

Cognitive Demand …students who performed best on a project assessment designed to measure thinking and reasoning processes were more often in classrooms in which tasks were enacted at high levels of cognitive demand (Stein and Lane 1996), that is, classrooms characterized by sustained engagement of students in active inquiry and sense making (Stein, Grover, and Henningsen 1996). For students in these classrooms, having the opportunity to work on challenging mathematical tasks in a supportive classroom environment translated into substantial learning gains. ---Stein & Smith, 2010

What types of thinking must children be able to do to be proficient on the new standards? VDOE ExamplesExamples

Old

New

Old

New

Cognitive Demand Why do we focus on the cognitive demand of the task? Tools: Task Analysis Guide (TAG) Bloom’s Taxonomy Webb’s Depth of Knowledge

Recall Concepts & Skills Strategic Thinking Extended Thinking

Same Verb, Different DOK DOK 1- Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. (Requires simple recall) DOK 2- Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types) DOK 3- Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (Requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it)

Depth of Knowledge Level 1- Identify the utensils Level 2- Explain the functions of the fork Level 3- Identify two examples of when a fork would not be the best utensil for a type of food and why Level 4- Design an investigation to determine the optimal number and length of tines for a salad fork.

Determining cognitive level Curriculum Framework!

Planning Task Analysis 1. Do the task 2. Predict solution methods 3. Predict misconceptions/interventions 4. Plan essential questions

6.17 Curriculum Framework

Recall Concepts & Skills Strategic Thinking Extended Thinking

Cognitive Demand

Task Implementation Focus: Student Reasoning through Classroom Discourse Formative Feedback Which questions to ask? How to keep the cognitive demand up?

How are you preparing them for the new challenges our global economy creates? How can we leverage technology as a formative assessment tool to open discussions and learn from everyone’s point of view?

How can we make student voices audible and student thinking visible?

Feedback: Use Evidence of Student Thinking Set Purpose Give feedback on student work (self, peer and teacher) Use holistic and task specific rubrics What does the student understand? Misconceptions? What is the next step for that student? What is the next question?

SELF ASSESS

Things to remember... To effectively use discourse to deepen student learning: The task must be of high cognitive demand Students must have multiple ways to engage and complete the task Students must produce artifacts the make their learning visible (written texts, drawings, data representations, etc)