Southern San Andreas Earthquake Scenario Faulting and Shaking Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Earthquake Country Alliance Southern California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting USGS Research to Use: User Perspectives on Research Evolution, Accomplishments, and Challenges USGS Earthquake Hazards Program (EHP) Lloyd S. Cluff.
Advertisements

Existing & Future Earthquake Information Systems Ken Hudnut USGS, Pasadena LA Financial Services Sector Regional Recovery Coalition Meeting 17 November.
CyberShake Project and ShakeMaps. CyberShake Project CyberShake is a SCEC research project that is a physics-based high performance computational approach.
The Transverse Ranges LA in the Squeeze. The coastline from Ventura to Point Conception beyond Santa Barbara is unusual in that it faces south, not west,
10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
Seismic and Tsunami Threats to Southern California Nancy King, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Pasadena Field Office Northridge earthquake 1994 Northridge.
Future Earthquake Shaking in the Los Angeles Region Thomas Heaton (Caltech) Anna Olsen (Univ. of Colorado) Masumi Yamada (Kyoto Univ.)
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
USC Civil & Environmental Engineering St. Andreas Fault Right-Lateral Strike-Slip Faults Location: Carrizo Plain area, San Luis Obispo County, California.
Panel Discussion: PBEE Practice and Needs Paul Somerville, URS Joe Maffei, R&C Ron Hamburger, SGH Lloyd Cluff, PG&E Tom Shantz, Caltrans Jim Malley, Degenkolb.
Will Performance-Based Engineering Break the Power Law? Tom Heaton John Hall Anna Olsen Masumi Yamada Georgia Cua.
PBEE Practice and Needs Panel Discussion Lloyd Cluff, PG&E Paul Somerville, URS Joe Maffei, R&C Ron Hamburger, SGH Tom Shantz, Caltrans Jim Malley, Degenkolb.
Earthquake Predictibility, Forcasting and Early Warning Bill Menke October 18, 2005.
Earthquakes Chapter 16. What is an earthquake? An earthquake is the vibration of Earth produced by the rapid release of energy Energy radiates in all.
Locating the source of earthquakes Focus - the place within Earth where earthquake waves originate Epicenter on an earthquake– location on the surface.
What Will a Large Earthquake be Like? Tom Heaton Caltech.
Modeling Decision Variables: Dollars, Deaths, and Downtime Judith Mitrani-Reiser (JHU) James L. Beck (Caltech) PEER Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA January.
1 Yahya C. Kurama, Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences University of Notre Dame Introduction to Engineering Program University.
1 Yahya Gino Kurama, Associate Professor Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences University of Notre Dame Introduction to Engineering Program University.
UseIT Tutorial # 3 Earthquakes in the Southern California Fault System Tom Jordan June 16, 2011.
EARTHQUAKES Week 2. EARTHQUAKES What to explore this week:  Predictablity  Linkages  Disastrous consequences  Impact of human activity  Minimizing.
CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE EXERCISE OCTOBER 21, 2010 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA.
The ShakeOut Scenario What will a big San Andreas earthquake really be like? The impact of a major earthquake on critical infrastructure Ken Hudnut & Team.
Earthquakes occur on faults Active Fault. Earthquakes Create Seismic Waves.
Dam Failure Dams are generally an expensive structure that directly affect the economy of the area through power generation, flood control and water supply.
Future Bay Area Earthquakes – Water & Sewer Issues JEANNE PERKINS ABAG Earthquake and Hazards Program Consultant.
Earthquakes. Describing Earthquakes Intensity vs. Magnitude.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
M. Demirdjian, B. Mckenzie, D. Perera, J. Reschke, D. Rodriguez, C. Sandoval, A. Siripaisan, K. Vargas, J. Ying “ShakeOut Scenario”
Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.
ShakeOut! Simulated Consequences of a M 7.8 San Andreas Earthquake Ken Hudnut; United States Geological Survey November 13, Summit on Creating.
Lecture 4: Earthquakes Our Hazardous Environment GEOG 1110 Dr. Thieme.
Ken Hudnut U.S. Geological Survey 22 November 2013
Earthquakes Most destructive forces on Earth. But it is buildings and other human structures that cause injury and death, not the earthquake itself 1988.
Comparison of February 2010 Chile, January 2010 Haiti, and December 2004 Sumatra Earthquakes. EarthquakeMagnitude*Focal DepthTsunamiDeaths Chile8.835 km“minor”~900.
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Measuring Earthquakes. (1) How are earthquakes studied? – or, seismograph, an instrument that measures ground vibrations seismometer – or, seismograph,
General Science. What is an Earthquake?  Earthquakes are one of the most powerful natural forces  Shaking and vibration at the surface of the earth.
ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario Ground Motions Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Earthquake Research Affiliates Pasadena, California 9 May 2008 U.S.
California Earthquakes Through an historical perspective.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
Zack Bick Erin Riggs Alicia Helton Cara Dickerson Presentation by:
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101.
Fault displacement from Landsat 8 pre- and post-earthquake image differencing and initial field observations of the surface rupture of the M W 7.7 Awaran.
On which faults have major earthquakes have occurred since the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake? The Great California ShakeOut.
Bringing Science to the Art of Underwriting™ TM Welcome to Earthquake Country: Impact of future quakes Mary Lou Zoback, Ph.D. Vice President, Earthquake.
#18 Measuring Earthquakes. How are earthquakes studied? Seismologists use seismometers, or seismographs, an instrument that measure vibrations in the.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
WHY DO WE LOOK FOR FAULTS?? Geologists of the end of the 19th century (at that time geologists were more like adventurers rather than scientists!) realized.
Caltech CE Seminar - Jan. 25, 2007 The November 13, 2008 ShakeOut Exercise (GG’08) Threat to Roadway Lifelines: M w 7.8 on the Southern San Andreas Fault.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
San Andreas MW 7.9 Earthquake: Slip at Critical Lifeline Crossings ShakeOut scenario for southern California Dr. Ken Hudnut U.S. Geological Survey,
The Great Southern California ShakeOut November 12-16, 2008 A week of special events to inspire southern Californians to get ready for big earthquakes.
Infrastructure Damage in ShakeOut (&ARkStorm) RESIN seminar, UC Berkeley, 30 Sep 2009 Keith Porter, Associate Research Professor Civil, Environmental,
Earthquake Hazards Owain Thomas Credit: U.S. Geological Survey.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
Caltech CE Seminar - Jan. 25, 2007 SoSAFE and ShakeOut Earthquake Scenario for GG08 M w 7.8 on the Southern San Andreas Fault Kenneth W. Hudnut, Ph.D.
ShakeOut M 7.8 Earthquake on the San Andreas Fault: Initial Damage Assessment & Impacts on Critical Lifeline Infrastructure Ken Hudnut (USGS) November.
Understanding Earth Sixth Edition Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES © 2011 by W. H. Freeman and Company Grotzinger Jordan.
1906 San Francisco EQ ~7.8M 1811 New Madrid EQ ~7.7M V VIII II - III VI IX 200 km Modern shaking hazard map Magnitude is not the whole story… Intensity,
TOWARDS PRE-EARTHQUAKE PLANNING FOR POST-EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY (PEPPER) EXAMPLES: TOKAI, JAPAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
Earthquakes USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquake Basics
TOWARDS A NEW NORTHRIDGE AFTER THE JANUARY 17, 1994 EARTHQUAKE
Understanding Earth Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES Grotzinger • Jordan
Presentation transcript:

Southern San Andreas Earthquake Scenario Faulting and Shaking Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Earthquake Country Alliance Southern California Association of Governments Los Angeles, California 18 April 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Economic Activity Time Projected activity For one specific natural hazard event: ‘Disaster’ (a few yrs.) ‘Catastrophe’ (decades) event

A San Andreas “Big One” is far bigger than Northridge 1994 What is meant by “Big One” exactly…? - fault length is 300 km (15 x) - rupture duration is 90 sec (10 x) - shaking duration is 180 sec (15 x) M 7.8 “great” >> M 6.7 amplitude (15 x) & energy (~30 x)

ShakeOut Scenario Earthquake Not a prediction - a plausible event First step: define the rupture length ? ?

Possible early/pre-historic earthquake rupture correlations: - Conservative correlations result in 6 events in 1200 years - Recurrence Interval ~150 years without latest ‘open’ interval - Currently, elapsed time of ~ 300 years appears longer than any previous recurrence interval A call for the most reliable data: Hard data versus soft data Examples: SoSAFE Project, B4 LiDAR project on San Andreas, multi-investigator trench studies Courtesy of Gordon Seitz, Pat Williams, Ray Weldon & Belle Philobosian Digging deep into the San Andreas fault, because the past may be the key to the future

M w 7.8 ‘ShakeOut’ Scenario (GG’08 Nov. 13, 2008) San Andreas ‘Really Big One’ simulated earthquake Initiation near Bombay Beach (unilateral rupture to the NW) Disruption of critical lifeline infrastructure (freeway, internet, power and gas lines) along surface rupture; Slip of 3-4 meters at Cajon Pass (I-15) Strong shaking throughout the region, including urban areas Surface Slip and Modified Mercalli Intensities for ShakeOut scenario earthquake Credit: Rob Graves (SCEC-CME; URS / USC) Brad Aagaard (USGS); ShakeMap Integration thanks to Vince Quitoriano (USGS) and Wan Lin (USGS)

Caltrans freeways and critical lifeline infrastructure fault crossings STOP GO Lifelines: white is power, yellow is gas and fuel, light blue is fiber optic, black is rail, orange is freeway and highway system I-5 is OK; I-15 and I-10 badly damaged & require repairs YOU ARE HERE

Elizabeth Lake Tunnel (LADWP) W = 9.5’ Slip: 3.5 m = 11.5’

Cajon Pass Lifelines

Rupture unzips SE to NW, taking 90 seconds; Shaking lasts >3 min.’s in LA & Ventura Southern California Earthquake Center

Tall Buildings Carefully modeled ground motions and had expert structural engineers assess potential damage: Pre-1994 welded steel moment frame Non-ductile reinforced concrete moment frame And, of course… Un-Reinforced Masonry, e.g., San Bernardino Mexico City, 1985 Kobe, 1995

Structural Engineering tall building panelists’ expert* opinion: Given the ShakeOut earthquake scenario ground motions: The fact that there were no collapses in previous US earthquakes cannot be taken as evidence that there would not be collapses in this scenario. In fact, the possibility of some collapses is quite credible. Ron Hamburger (Simpson Gumpertz and Heger, San Francisco) Jim Malley (Degenkolb Engineers, San Francisco) Greg Deierlein (Stanford University) Swaminathan Krishnan (Caltech) Organizer: Keith Porter (Univ. of Colorado and SPA, Boulder) *

Onset and Duration of Shaking

Drinking Water: 1 gal. per person, per day x 7 days Family of 5: 35 gallons Need plenty at work, in the car and at home