1 Prepared by Les Knapp, Associate Director, MACo and Amanda Stakem Conn, Principal Counsel to MDP* for the Maryland State Bar Association, 2012-05-11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Issues for Council Discussion April 24, Critical Habitat Changes made to Chapter II, IV and V in response to comments received, and experience gained.
Advertisements

Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
Smart Growth Update VCARD May 23, Growth Management & Schools during 2005 Volusia County Council adopts new school impact fee. School Board of Volusia.
Implementation of SB236 – Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012 MACo Planning Directors Meeting July 13, 2012.
Proposed Land Use & Development Regulations Public Hearing Month Day, 2012.
TA Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Current Features: 1.Floodways, 100 yr 2.Floodplain, outside floodway, 100 yr 3.Jurisdictional Wetlands 4.Stream.
Meeting the Letter and Spirit of the Law: Legal Components of Comprehensive Plans.
Policy Subdivisions Recently Adopted Amendments June 23, 2009 Miccosukee Community Center Open House.
Article 41 Wastewater Planning Capacity Study To determine whether the Town will vote to adopt a resolution supporting the Town Manager’s allocation of.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
County Home Rule in Iowa New County Officers School January 19, 2005 David Vestal General Counsel ISAC (515)
Town of Lyndon Zoning Bylaw Changes Town Planning Commission Public Informational Meeting 09December09.
Volusia Smart Growth Implementation Committee Final Report August 2005.
Citrus County Planning Division Evaluation and Appraisal Report Citrus County Comprehensive Plan.
Planning & Community Development Department Municipal Code Amendments: Adoption/Certification Authority of California Environmental Quality Act Reviews,
Planning Legislation – Prof. H. Alshuwaikhat ZONING Zoning is the division of a municipality, city or town into districts for the purpose of regulating.
8/29/20151 Docket Z (Easter Mountain, LLC) A Request to Rezone 556 Acres From RU-4 to SR-2 Cochise County Board of Supervisors October 25, 2011.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 19, 2008.
From Mandate to Smart Growth: The Evolution of Growth Management in the United States Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Evaluation and Appraisal Comprehensive Plan Amendments City Council Workshop December 9, 2014.
California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions LAFCo 101 An Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions Bill Chiat, Executive Director.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Board of County Commissioners School Concurrency June 10, 2008 Adoption Public Hearing.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
A 1,240 Acre Master Development Plan Proposal, West of Willcox, AZ. Cochise County Board of Supervisors August 23, 2011 Docket MDP / Z
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Planning.Maryland.gov The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012 Arnold Preservation Council March 9, 2015.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
1 Prepared by Les Knapp, Associate Director, MACo* for the Homebuilders Association of Maryland, *Supplemented with certain information provided.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
Presentation by Jon Laria, Chair to the Maryland Association of Counties Winter Conference January 6, 2011.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public Hearing May 19, 2009 Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
San Antonio Unified Development Code Group 17. Numbering and Referencing The numbering system is consistent with the system used throughout the City's.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
1 Planning 4A7 Design & the Built Environment Dept. of Civil, Structural, & Environmental John O’Connor.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
The Crash Course for Municipal Planning Commission Members in Cumberland County 1.
G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Location Map. G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Aerial.
OFFICIAL PLAN 5-YEAR REVIEW & TAKE ACTION FOR SUSTAINABLE HURON.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
July 8, 2008 Board of County Commissioners Capital Improvements Element Annual Update Adoption Hearing.
Chapter 15, Amended Article X Wetland Conservation Areas Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection Division February 5, 2008 Presented by.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Marriott-Slaterville, Utah March 2018
Article 41 Wastewater Planning Capacity Study
Towards An Institute for Sustainable Maryland September 16, 2013
Bay Restoration Fund (SB 240/HB446)
Planning and Zoning Essentials
Board of County Commissioners
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

1 Prepared by Les Knapp, Associate Director, MACo and Amanda Stakem Conn, Principal Counsel to MDP* for the Maryland State Bar Association, *This is prepared for educational purposes and is not advice of the Attorney General’s Office

 Major/Minor Subdivision Definitions  Definition of Tiers  Tier Development and Adoption  Tier Check by Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)  Exemption Provisions  Grandfathering  Reporting Requirements 2

 Local Jurisdictions may adopt a definition of major and minor residential subdivisions for the purposes of the bill by Dec. 31,  New definitions of minor subdivisions may not exceed 7 new lots 3

4 Adoption of Growth Tiers by a local jurisdiction is optional After December 31, 2012, a local jurisdiction that has not adopted Tiers cannot authorize major residential subdivisions served by septic systems, community sewerage systems, or shared systems. May only authorize residential minor subdivisions served by septic systems or a major or minor subdivision served by public sewer. Tier adoption process and statutory criteria for the Tiers is located in Article 66B (and after Oct. 1, Title 1, Subtitle 5 of the Land Use Article). Tier development prohibitions and limits is located in § of the Environment Article. Four classes of Tiers (I-IV) that dictate whether residential development may occur on a public sewerage system or a septic system

5 A local jurisdiction does not have to adopt all 4 Tiers. Counties must adopt Tiers I, III, and IV and may adopt Tier II. Municipalities must adopt Tier I and may adopt Tier II. If a local jurisdiction does not adopt all of the authorized Tiers, the local jurisdiction must document the reasons for not adopting a particular Tier. Local jurisdictions may use their existing comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance to create the Tiers [Uncodified Section 4 of SB 236] Before adopting the Tiers, a local jurisdiction may submit proposed Tiers to Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) for technical assistance, review, and comment After adoption of the Tiers, a local jurisdiction shall provide a map and information to MDP demonstrating the location of the Tiers and existing or planned water and sewer services

6 MDP may comment on the Tiers adopted by a local jurisdiction. If MDP comments, then the local legislative body or planning board/commission must hold a public hearing and review the tiers based on the comments. If the planning board/commission holds the hearing, it must recommend to the local legislative body whether the Tiers should be changed or remain as adopted. The local jurisdiction is not bound to the recommendations of MDP

7 A local jurisdiction that adopts the Tiers must incorporate the Tiers into its local comprehensive plan or an element of the plan when the local jurisdiction conducts its 6-year review of the plan. A local jurisdiction may adopt the Tiers as an amendment to its comprehensive plan and may include the Tiers as an appendix that delineates the Tiers and the comprehensive plan land use categories and zoning ordinance districts that are included in each Tier. [Uncodified Section 4 of SB 236]

9 A Tier I area must: (1) be a mapped locally designated growth area served by public sewerage OR (2) a municipal corporation that is a priority funding area (PFA) and served by public sewerage

10 Tier I allows: (1) major and minor subdivisions on public sewerage

11 A Tier II area must: (1) be planned to be served by a public sewerage in a municipal growth element or a mapped locally designated growth area AND (2) be needed to satisfy the demand for development at densities consistent with the jurisdiction’s long-term development policy after considering the capacity of land areas available for development, including in-fill and redevelopment

12 Tier II allows: (1) major or minor subdivisions on public sewerage systems (2) minor subdivisions on septic systems

13 A Tier III area must: (1) not be planned for sewerage service (2) not be dominated by agricultural or forest land (3) not be planned or zoned by a local government for land, agricultural, or resource protection AND (4) fall in one of the following categories a municipal corporation not served by public sewerage a rural village as defined by statute (§ 5-7B-03(f) of the State Finance and Procurement Article) an area planned or zoned for large lot development a mapped locally designated growth area NOTE: A local jurisdiction must strive to avoid creating a Tier III area that is bounded on all sides by land in a Tier IV area.

14 Tier III allows: (1) minor subdivisions on septic systems (2) major subdivisions on septic systems, community systems, or shared facilities if the local planning board has reviewed and recommended the approval of the major subdivision NOTE: Before approving a Tier III major subdivision the planning board must hold at least one public hearing and include as part of its review: (1) the cost of providing local government services to the subdivision (unless such review is already required); and (2) the potential environmental issues or a natural resources inventory related to the proposed subdivision)

15 A Tier IV areas cannot be planned for sewerage service and are: (1) areas planned or zoned by a local jurisdiction for land, agricultural, or resource protection, preservation, or conservation (2) areas dominated by agricultural lands, forest lands, or other natural areas OR (3) Rural Legacy areas, priority preservation areas, or areas subject to a State or local covenant, restriction, condition, or conservation easement for the purposes of natural resources or agricultural land preservation

16 Tier IV allows: (1) minor subdivisions on septic systems (2) IF the jurisdiction’s Tier IV area has been verified by MDP as having an actual overall yield of not more than one dwelling unit per 20 acres, major subdivisions on septic systems, community systems, or shared facilities at the local jurisdiction’s discretion

17 For exception to apply, a local jurisdiction may request that MDP verify that the jurisdiction’s subdivision and zoning requirements in the jurisdiction’s cumulative Tier IV area result in an actual overall yield of not more than one dwelling unit per 20 acres If requested by a local jurisdiction to verify, MDP shall: (1) review the local zoning code and any relevant subdivision or development regulations or rules to help determine the overall development yield; (2) request, if appropriate, information from the local jurisdiction to help determine the overall development yield in Tier IV; (3) examine any additional information that the local jurisdiction provides supporting the qualification of the jurisdiction’s zoning districts; (4) consult with the Maryland Sustainable Growth Commission; and (5) discuss any discrepancies or questions with the local jurisdiction before making a final determination [§ 9-206(h) of the Environment Article and Uncodified Section 5 of SB 236]

18 If two or more local jurisdictions adopt conflicting Tier designations for the same area, the Department of the Environment (MDE) and MDP shall confer with the local jurisdictions to seek resolution. If the conflict is not resolved, MDE shall determine which Tier designation prevails MDP shall recommend to MDE a preferred Tier designation based on: (1) The local jurisdictions’ comprehensive plans, including applicable municipal growth elements, water resource elements, land use elements, and priority preservation elements; (2) Growth projections and development capacity; AND (3) Availability of infrastructure MDE may accept MDP’s recommendation or substitute its own decision when making a decision on which Tier designation prevails

 Bill contains provisions that prevent land from being subdivided into minor subdivisions on septics overtime if the land is located in a Tier that is restricted to minor subdivisions on septic  Exceptions to the resubdivision restriction:  Subdividing into one subdivision over time is allowed; and  When land becomes a PFA that is to be served by public sewer 19

July 1, 2012 effective date Final plat approval by December 31, 2012 – Limitations on wastewater disposal systems do not apply No final plat approval by December 31, 2012: (1) Do grandfather provisions apply; or (2) If not, limitations on wastewater disposal systems apply

On or before February 1 st, 2013 MDP, in consultation with MDE, shall report on:  adoption of the tiers by each local jurisdiction  adoption or alteration of local ordinances or regs to implement the Act  list of comments that MDP provided to each jurisdiction 21

MDP Planning Directors Meeting 5/24/127/1/12 10/1/12 12/31/ Feb 2013 Effective Date of Bill Recommended date for Tier Adoption If no tiers adopted, restrictions on major subdivisions in place; - adopt new definition of subdivision Public hearings on MDP comments MDP report due to General Assembly

23 Impact will vary based on local jurisdiction Little impact for municipalities and Baltimore City Moderate impact on urban counties and counties close to their build-out capacity Significant impact on some rural counties

24 Local government responsibility Flexibility in Tier designation Growth in rural areas SB 236 does not exist in a vacuum

New water resources element, municipal growth element, and priority preservation element [HB 1141 and HB 2] 2007 New stormwater management requirements [HB 786/SB 784] 2008 New critical area requirements [HB 1253] 2009 New planning visions, Smart Growth measures and indicators, and plan consistency requirements [HB 294/SB 273, HB 295/SB 276, and HB 297/SB 280] 2010 New transportation planning requirements [HB 1155] 2011 PlanMaryland [Executive Order ] 2012 New Growth Tiers and septic system restrictions [SB 236] The Present – Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load requirements The Future – Greenhouse gas reduction initiatives

26 SB 236 has “teeth” and will limit future development on septic systems Local governments are expected to designate Tiers responsibly but also should be afforded a level of flexibility when designating the Tiers.* Effect of SB 236 is further magnified when considered as part of cumulative package of recent land use and environmental initiatives As land use and environmental laws and regulations become increasingly complex, Maryland land use attorneys will not suffer a shortage of work * Amanda Conn notes that the Tiers must meet the requirements of Article 66B.

QUESTIONS???