1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress 2004 and Beyond.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program Gateway and End of Course 2007.
Advertisements

Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.
1 North Carolina National Assessment of Education (NAEP) 2009 LEA Training--Session A December 2008 Iris L. Garner, Ph.D. NAEP.
Title I Data Presentation All served Title I students School-wide and Targeted Combined.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) An Overview. Resources Policy Guidance NCLB Brochures
Federal NCLB Regulations
Student Performance Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 3 – State Assessment Performance, 7 – Early Childhood Outcomes.
Presenter Name(s) Issue date National Student.
Title III Update Planning for Success In
May 3, 2006WV Department of Education Annual Measurable Objectives for Improving the Achievement of LEP Students Title III AMAOs.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Gretchen Everhart School School Improvement Plan Public Hearing September 10, 2007.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 R-2 Report: Graduation A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional Services Staff Research and Assessment.
1 What are the new changes to the School Performance Grading Rules (Revisions made by the the State Board of Education on November 18, 2003)
1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress Changes 2005 and Beyond.
Federal Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress. TEA-USDE Flexibility Agreement
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Graduation, Completion, and Dropout Data Accountability Policy Advisory Committee and Accountability Technical Advisory Committee Joint Meeting March 5,
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Accountability Data Reports for Presented to the Buncombe County Board of Education September 15, 2011.
Accountability Reporting Webinar Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Determinations & Federal NCLB Accountability Status, State Accountability & Assistance.
MA Department of Education Calculating Graduation Rates Massachusetts Department of Education November 2006 Bob Bickerton, Senior Associate Commissioner:
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Changes in Student Assessment and School Accountability A-1.
No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.
Opioid-Related Deaths and Mortality Rates by County, Wisconsin Residents Office of Health Informatics and AIDS/HIV and Hepatitis C Program Bureau.
MT. PLEASANT A CLOSER LOOK AT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
East Zone Cohort Graduation Rate Progress Monitoring Data March 16, 2012.
AYP: Making Adequate Yearly Progress in Washington State Spring 2012.
11 P 2 : Proficiency & Progress 2011 Using Data to Think & Do Things Differently Dr. Ron Costello Superintendent of Catholic Schools Archdiocese of Indianapolis.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
Successful completion of the following requirements:  Language Arts– 3 middle school level or higher courses  Mathematics – 3 distinct middle school.
Name ____________________ Date ___________ Period ____.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Track Performance Division of Performance Accountability.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
School Grades Model and Historical Background
Arkansas ESEA Flexibility Flexibility Amended in October, 2012 Louis Ferren, School Performance Public School Accountability.
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
AYP Prediction By Diagnostics in the Educational Data Warehouse.
Understanding Your Child’s FSA Score
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Presentation transcript:

1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress 2004 and Beyond

2 Beginning in School Year (Revisions made by the State Board of Education on November 18, 2003) All students, regardless of disability or limited English proficiency classification, with valid FCAT scores in Reading in both the current and previous year will be included in School Grading. This will apply ONLY to: - Percent tested calculation, and - Learning gains calculation

3 From School Year to School Year (Revisions made by the State Board of Education on November 18, 2003) The expected student performance for FCAT Writing will be 3.5 points. Schools will earn one point for each percent of students who score at or above 3.5 points.

4 Beginning in School Year (Revisions made by the State Board of Education on November 18, 2003) The expected student performance for FCAT Writing will be 4.0 points. Schools will earn one point for each percent of students who score at or above 4.0 points.

5 Beginning in School Year (Revisions made by the State Board of Education on November 18, 2003) Science will be added to the school performance grading system as the 4 th achieving high standards category. Schools will earn one point for each percent of students who score at or above Achievement Level 3. NOTE: The grading scale will be adjusted accordingly.

6 No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (Revisions made by the State Board of Education on May 16, 2005)

7 Beginning in School Year The criteria for AYP apply to subgroups whose population is greater than or equal to 30 and at least 15% of total school population, or at least 100 students in the subgroup count Note: Schools will still be evaluated for AYP if total enrollment is greater than 10. (Revisions made by the State Board of Education on May 16, 2005)

8 Schools receiving a school grade of A or B will receive a Provisional AYP designation Beginning in School Year Note: Information regarding Provisional AYP designation is forthcoming from the Florida Department of Education.

9 School Year The proficiency target in Reading is at least 44% and Mathematics is at least 50%. (Revisions made by the State Board of Education on May 16, 2005)

Year ReadingMath %Prof Prior %Prof Revised Increase %Prof Prior %Prof Revised Increase Base38 Base Revised Reading and Math Proficiency Targets for School Year and Beyond

11 Department of Research, Evaluation, and Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief of Performance Accountability Nancy Brito, Instructional Specialist