Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, 2008 7:00 p.m. Redwood City School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Title I Information Meeting. Overview of Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs The purpose of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB),
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Imagine Clay Avenue Community School Title I Parent Meeting October 23, 2013.
Imagine Madison Avenue Community School Title I Parent Meeting May 28, :00PM.
Assessment & Accountability TEP 128A March 7, 2006.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
CESA 10 February,  Overview of the the legal requirements  Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) formerly known as No Child Left Behind.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
1. 2 Title I, Part A Purpose of Power Point Purpose of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Purpose of Title I Definition of supplemental funds Definition.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
WELCOME Title I School-wide Open House EWING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Major Cheney Elementary  As a Title I School, our students now have many additional educational opportunities!  These opportunities will.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Sandpiper Elementary School Mrs. Camille LaChance.
Taft Elementary Title Meeting. AGENDA What is Title 1? Action Plan: What does it look like at Taft Elementary? Assessment Title Policy Parent Conferences:
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
No Child Left Behind Title I Newport News Public Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Brentwood Elementary Title One Annual Parent Meeting September 20, :00 PM.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
 According to the U.S. Department of Education the purpose of Title 1 funding, “is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
WELCOME.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
BCCHS Annual Title I Meeting A Single-School District LEA September 10, 2015 December 3, 2015.
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District

Educating every child for success.

Agenda I.Introductions II.RCSD Achievement III.Title I Information IV.Program Improvement Information V.Parent Involvement VI.Next Steps

RCSD Student Achievement and AYP Information

AYP Description Adequate yearly progress (AYP) and program improvement (PI) are part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of Schools and school districts that do not make AYP for two consecutive years, as measured by the California assessment system (standardized testing and reporting or STAR), go into PI status. A school or district is eligible to exit PI if it makes AYP for two consecutive years.

AYP Requirements There are four sets of requirements to make AYP: 1) Student participation on statewide tests 2) Annual Measurable Objective (AMO): percentage of students scoring proficient or above (in ELA and Math) 3) API growth 4) Graduation rate (if high school students are enrolled) These criteria are also applied to numerically significant subgroups. If a school or district misses any one criterion of AYP, the school or district does not make AYP. Potentially, a school or district may have up to 46 different criteria to meet in order to make AYP.

AYP Requirements NCLB mandates that all students perform at the proficient or above level on state assessments in ELA and mathematics by California’s Annual Measurable Objectives are the minimum percentages of students who are required to meet or exceed the proficient level on the state assessments used for AYP. The AMOs will continue to rise every year so that by 2014, 100 percent of students in all schools and districts, and numerically significant subgroups must score at the proficient or above level.

AYP AMO Targets - ELA

AYP AMO Targets - Math

AYP Redwood City School District did not make AYP RCSD met 29 of 35 AYP criteria

2008 AYP Percent Proficient - RCSD

AYP AMO Charts AMO is displayed in these charts. A) District AYP AMO compared to state AYP – ELA B) District AYP AMO compared to state AYP – Math C) District Subgroup AYP AMO – ELA D) District Subgroup AYP AMO – Math To be considered numerically significant for the AYP, a subgroup must either: (1) have at least 50 students enrolled or with valid test scores who make up at least 15 percent of the school’s enrollment or total valid test scores, or (2) have at least 100 students enrolled or with valid test scores.

Title I Title I is part of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act. It provides funding to school districts that helps to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic achievement standards and state academic assessments.

Title I The goals of Title I are accomplished through: instruction and assessment aligned to State standards meeting education needs of children who are low achieving in our high poverty schools closing the achievement gap between children who are disadvantaged and their more advantaged peers holding schools and district accountable for improving the academic achievement of all students insuring children access to sound, effective, scientifically-based instructional strategies providing staff the opportunities for professional development providing parents meaningful opportunities to participate in their children’s education

Program Improvement

Program Improvement Timeline Notify Parents (September) Hold Information Meeting (October) Convene district level team to analyze, assess and revise district academic plan (Oct/Nov) Present revised plan to school board (Dec)

Parent Involvement Update 2 Title I Parent Involvement meetings held last spring where we: -wrote proposed Parent Involvement Policy -brainstormed ideas to increase parent involvement

Proposed Parent Involvement Policy Draft policy is available for your review, it will go to school board later this year.

Proposed Parent Involvement Ideas and Actions Taken IDEA: More parent information meetings  Program Improvement information meeting  Parcel tax information meetings SUGGESTION: Don’t rely on backpack information  We are using “Connect ED” calls to follow up letters that have been sent home  We are using “Connect ED” calls to inform parents about meetings (tonight is an example)

Proposed Parent Involvement Ideas and Actions Taken IDEA: Make written information available to parents who can’t attend meetings  Program Improvement letters sent home IDEA: Get feedback from parents on key issues  Communications survey in “first day” packets  Survey at parent/teacher conferences

How you can stay involved at the district level? Participate in District Program Improvement Committee Sign Up sheets available tonight!

Educating every child for success.