Texas Projection Measure. What is TPM? TPM is a method for… – projecting future student scores -OR- – determining whether a student is likely to pass.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TETN Accountability Update Session June 18, 2009.
Advertisements

Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Texas Assessment Conference December 1-3, 2010 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
State Accountability System Update Special Education TETN January 6, 2010 Shannon Housson TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
Federal Accountability AYP Update Accountability TETN April 23, 2009 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN November 18, 2010 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
OGISD Board of Trustees September 19, 2011 Orange Grove Elementary Accountability Report.
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
Components of the 2014 Texas Assessment Program State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) –STAAR Spanish –STAAR L –STAAR Modified –STAAR.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
STAAR State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Coming soon to a Theatre Near You! Wiethorn 8/1/
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.
Vertical Scale Scores.
Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.
State Accountability and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress.
RECOGNIZED 2009 Accountability Rating. Basic Indicators EXEMPLARY: for every subject, at least 90% of the tested students pass the test RECOGNIZED**:
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Longview Independent School District Summary Report
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE State and Federal Systems TSNAP Not-So-New Coordinator’s Academy September 24, 2008 Sandra Poth, Northside ISD.
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
State & AYP Accountability Ratings Highlights District Ratings by Rating Category (including Charter Operators) ACCOUNTABILITY RATING 2009 CountPercent.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Ysleta Independent School District 2004 Accountability State and AYP.
Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2009 MILLSAP ISD Prepared by Lois Johnson in compliance with Texas Education Code
Sample ISD District Overview Name Position. What makes Sample ISD unique? Mission Statement Vision Statement Unique Programs.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
10/19/2015 Academic Excellence Indicator System Woden ISD.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report January 20, 2009 Dr. Joan Bowman Assistant Superintendent Sheldon ISD.
Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2004 Office of Research, Evaluation,
The Basics of Federal Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress AYP.
Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
AEIS Orenda Charter Schools. Changes to the AEIS 2  Assessment results include TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), and TAKS-M for grades
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
2008 State and AYP Accountability Systems Data Analysis, Reporting, and Research September 21, 2007.
Annual Report and Public Hearing January 19, 2010.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Draft...proposals may change1 Proposed Changes to the Texas Accountability System Adapted from “Accountability System for 2006 and Beyond- Standard Procedures”
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation,
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update Accountability TETN April 19, 2011 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
PROCEDURES FOR GRADE 10 TAKS LAT ADMINISTRATIONS  Spring 2012 February 9, 2012 TETN Event #11747 Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT DIVISION TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY Assessment Provisions for Qualifying ELL Asylees and Refugees Spring 2011 Administrations © 2010, Texas.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
State Accountability Update
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update
Changes Ahead: Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Section II Accountability
Accountability Update
AEIS [Our School District]
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Section II Accountability
2013 Texas Accountability System
Presented by Special Education Secondary Programs Fall 2008
Presentation transcript:

Texas Projection Measure

What is TPM? TPM is a method for… – projecting future student scores -OR- – determining whether a student is likely to pass TAKS assessments, in the next high-stakes grade using students’ current year scale scores

What is TPM? TPM is a method for… – projecting future student scores -OR- – determining whether a student is likely to pass TAKS assessments, in the next high-stakes grade using students’ current year scale scores Grades 5, 8, or 11 with the exception of writing, which is projected from grade 4 to grade 7 vertical or horizontal depending on the grade and subject TPM provides an indication of how student performance at the end of a school year positions a student to meet the standard in future grades.

Where is TPM in this picture?

2009 TPM TPM will provide projections for all TAKS English- and Spanish-version tests (except 8th grade science) TPM projections are made separately for each subject area: reading/ELA, mathematics, writing, science, and social studies. The TPM will be used in 2009 for students taking the TAKS, TAKS (Accommodated), and linguistically accommodated testing (LAT) versions of TAKS.

2010 TPM TEA proposes to: expand the TPM for use with students taking the TAKS–M assessments; and implement a transition table approach to growth for students participating in TAKS–Alt.

Projections from and to… From page 9

TPM Process TPM Equations are developed by TEA/Pearson using TAKS results from prior years. A student’s current scale scores are used for individual subject calculations. Campus mean score for that TPM subject is used. TPM is calculated for students who have current year scale scores in the subjects and language versions needed.

TPM Calculations What is included? From page 9

TPM Requirements A student must test all subjects needed for the calculation in the same language. A student must test all subjects in TAKS (the “regular” form, Accommodated form, or linguistically accommodated test form) When projections for students in grades 3–8 are calculated, the student’s reading and mathematics scale scores used must be the vertical scale scores.

TPM Requirements TPM requires that a student (1) have a valid scale score in the current-year predictor subjects, (2) have a current-year scale score in the projection subject, and (3) have a valid scale score in the same language (English or Spanish) for all scores used as predictors to receive a projection.

No TPM available for students who… take TAKS in two language versions, such as taking TAKS reading in Spanish and TAKS mathematics in English, do not take all tests that are needed for a projection, take TAKS for one subject and TAKS–M for another subject, and are in grades 5 and 8 with student ID information that does not allow their results on the primary reading administration to be matched with records in the TAKS history file.

TPM Calculations Page 12 and 13

TPM Constants and Coefficients Page 14

TPM Student Identified Groups

TPM for TAKS-M

TPM for TAKS-Alt

Student - Specific Scenario

State Accountability Standards

State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required Improvement Recalculate Using TPM Use Exceptions Note: Can use any combination of the three provisions, but can only use one provisions for a single indicator. # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Calculate Performance Improvement/Safe Harbor – Compare Met Standard Rate for 2009 and 2010 (without TPM) – A 10% Reduction of Failures and Meeting the Other Measure for the Group or showing any improvement. Recalculate Using TPM Accountability Calculations

Texas Projection Measure Can be used to move from Unacceptable to Acceptable or Acceptable to Recognized. The gain from 2008 must allow the cell to reach the standard if the gain were repeated the next year. There is no floor when moving to Acceptable. The rating must be within 5 points to move to Recognized. Required Improvement is always reviewed first. If it cannot increase the cell rating, TPM is applied. Required Improvement State Accountability: Provisions that May Increase Rating by One Level Identifies if student is projected to pass next high stakes test at 5 th, 8 th or 11 th grade. Only available for students in grades 3-10 who:  Test on TAKS, TAKS-Acc, TAKS-LAT  Have scored results this year for both Reading and Math  Test in the same language TPM will not be available for:  7 th Grade Writing  8 th Grade Science  All 11 th Grade Subjects TPM can increase the campus rating to Acceptable, Recognized or Exemplary. If applying TPM does not raise the cell rating, Exceptions are reviewed. Exceptions Exceptions are the last choice. Exceptions cannot be used for the same cell two years in a row. Exceptions are limited depending on the number of cells measured. The initial cell result must be within 5 points of the standard. Acceptable/RecognizedExemplary 5-8 Cells1 ExceptionWith 10+ Cells evaluation, can use 1Exception 9-11 Cells2 Exceptions Cells3 Exceptions 16+ Cells4 Exceptions SAISD: Research & Evaluation

State Accountability Federal Accountability Test Versions:  TAKS – All Subjects/Grades  TAKS-Accommodated – Science, Social Studies and all 11 th Grade subjects Also includes  Dropout Rate: 7-8 (2%)  Completion Rate (75%)  On-time Graduates and Continuers/Class of 2008 Test Versions (Reading/Math only):  TAKS  TAKS-Accommodated  TAKS-M  TAKS-Alt  TAKS-LAT (2+ years in US) Also includes  Participation (95%) and  Attendance Rate (90%) or  Graduation Rate (70%)  On-time Graduates/Class of Accountability Standards SubjectAcceptableRecognizedExemplary Reading/ELA, Social Studies, and Writing 70%75%90% Math 55%75%90% Science 50%75%90% SubjectMeets AYP Reading/ELA 67% Math 58% SAISD: Research & Evaluation

Calculating a State Campus Rating SubjectAll StudentsAfrican AmericanHispanicEconomically Disadvantaged Reading/ELA Math Science Social Studies Initial Campus Rating = Acceptable Scores: 2009 Met Std/ 2008 Met Std/ 2009 TPM SubjectAll StudentsAfrican AmericanHispanicEconomically Disadvantaged Reading/ELA Math Science Social Studies Final Campus Rating = Recognized Scores: 2009 Met Std/ 2008 Met Std/ 2009 TPM SAISD: Research & Evaluation

Calculating a State Campus Rating SubjectAll StudentsAfrican AmericanHispanicEconomically Disadvantaged Reading/ELA Math Science Social Studies Campus A Initial______ Final______ Scores: 2009 Met Std/ 2008 Met Std/ 2009 TPM 24 Campus B Initial______ Final______ Scores: 2009 Met Std/ 2008 Met Std/ 2009 TPM SubjectAll StudentsAfrican AmericanHispanicEconomically Disadvantaged Reading/ELA Math Science Social Studies SAISD: Research & Evaluation

Calculating a State Campus Rating Campus C Initial______ Final______ Scores: 2009 Met Std/ 2008 Met Std/ 2009 TPM SubjectAll StudentsAfrican AmericanHispanicEconomically Disadvantaged Reading/ELA Math Science Writing SAISD: Research & Evaluation

TPM Summary Statements Table Activity: Create a ‘T’ chart which outlines the key points and cautions related to TPM. Key Points Cautions