WP5 Synthesis, recommendations and defining of the SRA Karel Charvat, Sarka Horakova, Ota Cerba WirelessInfo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The White Paper – a policy paper to contribute to the integration process of the WBC in the ERA Dr. Erika Rost, Dr. Andreas Kahle Federal Ministry of Education.
Advertisements

SCADM Report Working Paper 10. Overview SCAR Data and Information Management Strategy (DIMS) – endorsed Oct Introduction to the draft SCAR Data.
DELIVERING SHAREPOINT AS A SERVICE
ICT 2010: "Global Information Structures for Science & Cultural heritage: The Interoperability Challenge" Networking Session Coordination Action on Digital.
1 st Review Meeting, Brussels 5/12/12 – Technical progress (P. Paganelli, Bluegreen) iCargo 1st Review Meeting Brussels 5/12/12 Technical.
Review meeting 05th December
Architecture and Data Management Strategy (Action Plan) Ivan 1 DeLoatch, USGS, ADC Co-chair Alessandro Annoni, EC, ADC Co-chair Jay Pearlman, IEEE, ADC.
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,
Applying the ISO RM-ODP Standard in e-Government B. Meneklis 1, A. Kaliontzoglou 2,3, D. Polemi 1, C. Douligeris 1 1 University of Piraeus, Department.
1 ECCF Training 2.0 Introduction ECCF Training Working Group January 2011.
Training on INSPIRE: a real challenge VESTA-GIS / NatureSDI+ 6 November 2008, Genova Danny Vandenbroucke K.U.Leuven (SADL) co-funded by the European Community.
Networks ∙ Services ∙ People John DYER TF-MSP Video Conference Community Procurement Support Building on the SPOT-ON Proposal Smart Procurement,
GOVERNANCE ELECTRONIC. ” “ E-Governance is the application of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for delivering government services, exchange.
International Telecommunication Union ITU-T Study Group 17, Moscow, 30 March – 8 April 2005 New Recommendations on ODP Arve Meisingset Rapporteur Q15.
Previous activities Karel Charvat WirelessInfo. Previous projects and activities Aforo Rural Wins Valencia Declaration eRural Brussels conference conclusions.
WP5 Digital Business Ecosystem Alessandra Benvenuti, INSIEL SpA (Friuli Venezia Giulia Region) ADC Final Conference Venice, March 13 th 2012.
Training of master Trainers Workshop 10 – 15 November 2012 e-Services Design and Delivery Module VI Emilio Bugli Innocenti.
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
Page 1 LAITS Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology and Standards 9/6/04 Briefing on Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)’s Web Services (OWS) Initiative.
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Regional ICT R&D priorities, Jelena Pantelic,
The European Umbrella Organisation for GI On-going Metadata Initiatives in Europe Christian Chenez Gael Kermarrec.
Geospatial Systems Architecture Todd Bacastow. GIS Evolution
About How to Organise User Collection Workshop Karel Charvat, HSRS, CCSS.
WP7 - Architecture and implementation plan Objectives o Integrating the legal, governance and financial plans with technological implementation through.
2010/12/10 First Skills Council Meeting Brussels, April 14 th 2014 Federico Brugnoli.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web services Interoperability for Geospatial decision.
OOI CI LCA REVIEW August 2010 Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger Life Cycle Architecture Review.
Slide # 1 GEO Task AR Architecture Implementation Pilot George Percivall GEO ADC Meeting, 14 & 15 May 2007.
Grid Workload Management Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
WGISS-39, Tsukuba, Japan, May 11-15, 2015 GEO Community Portals Ken McDonald/NOAA CWIC Session, WGISS–39 May 13, 2015.
EVA Workshop, 26 March 2003, Florence, Italy1 COINE Cultural Objects In Networked Environments Anthi Baliou University of Macedonia,Library Thessaloniki,
NMI End-to-End Diagnostic Advisory Group BoF Fall 2003 Internet2 Member Meeting.
FDT Foil no 1 On Methodology from Domain to System Descriptions by Rolv Bræk NTNU Workshop on Philosophy and Applicablitiy of Formal Languages Geneve 15.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
1 ECCF Training 2.0 Introduction ECCF Training Working Group January 2011.
Enterprise Architecture HOW COMPANIES ARE EXPLOITING INFORMATION TO THROUGH IT.
ESS-VIP ICT Project Work Package III Task Force Meeting, Luxembourg, 5 March 2013.
E. Kaldoudi – DUTH Deliverable 1.2: Study Report on Content Sharing Functional Requirements 3 rd Project Meeting Plovdiv, Bulgaria, January 2010.
IEEE IT (Information Technology) Strategy – 2005 Unapproved.
TCS-ICS interactions Kuvvet Atakan 1 and the WP6 and WP7 Teams 1 University of Bergen / Department of Earth Science.
Mariano Navarro ICT Unit – I+D+i TRAGSA Social Validation of INSPIRE Annex III Data Structures in EU Habitats (27th of June 16:00 room Fintry)
Geospatial Systems Architecture
1 Class exercise II: Use Case Implementation Deborah McGuinness and Peter Fox CSCI Week 8, October 20, 2008.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
NeOn Components for Ontology Sharing and Reuse Mathieu d’Aquin (and the NeOn Consortium) KMi, the Open Univeristy, UK
Data Services Task Team WGISS-22 meeting Annapolis, the US, September 12th 2006 Shinobu Kawahito, JAXA/RESTEC.
19-20 October 2010 IT Directors’ Group meeting 1 Item 6 of the agenda ISA programme Pascal JACQUES Unit B2 - Methodology/Research Local Informatics Security.
WG2 Roadmap Discussion Denise Warzel May 25, 2010 WG2 Convenor SC32 WG2N1424SC32 WG2N1424.
The Federated Data System DataFed R. Husar, K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, DaFed Community EPA Data Summit, Feb. 12, 2008, RTP Non-intrusive data integration infrastructure.
Presented by the GMU Win-Win Team March 17, 2004 Status Report.
GEOSS Model Based System Engineering Challenge team report for GEOSS AIP-6 By Lawrence E. McGovern, DSC INCOSE/WYLE Aerospace/Timothy Woodard, Tellus /Kenneth.
LEuroCRIS 31st October 2001 A list of CERIF 2000 problems Walter Niedermayer
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
INTRODUCTION: This report contains the results of the International Council of System Engineer (INCOSE) UML/SySML Team efforts to produce UML/SySML Architecture.
7/2/2016 1:52 AM HL7 SOA-Aware Enterprise Architecture Executive Summary HITSP October 28, 2008 Executive Summary HITSP October 28, 2008.
WP6 – Inter-operability with e-Infrastructures Sergio Andreozzi - WP6 Task Leader Strategy and Policy Manager, EGI.eu Helix Nebula - 1st Year Review 1.
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
OGC’s role in GEO: Results from the Architectural Implementation Pilot (AIP) George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task IN-05 Coordinator
GEOSS Model Based System Engineering Session Plan By Lawrence E. McGovern, DSC International Council on System Engineering/Blue Heron Services.
Workplan for Updating the As-built Architecture of the 2007 GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Session 7B, 6 June 2007 GEOSS Architecture Implementation.
EOSC Governance Development Forum
Towards an ESS architecture ITDG Item 3.4
Geospatial Service Architecture Viewpoints
FDA-08 FDA Whitepaper Update
LOSD Publication Deirdre Lee
CEF e-Invoicing Readiness Checker
eGovernment - The technological potential
My name is VL, I work at the EEA, on EA, and particularly on developing a platform of exchange which aims at facilitating the planning and development.
Presentation transcript:

WP5 Synthesis, recommendations and defining of the SRA Karel Charvat, Sarka Horakova, Ota Cerba WirelessInfo

What are AgriXchange objectives establishing a platform on data exchange in agriculture in the EU; developing a reference framework for interoperability of data exchange; identifying the main challenges for harmonizing data exchange.

Establishing a platform on data exchange What is platform: –Common space –Community More complicated task is second point – to build community Common space is only some form of support for community building

Establishing a platform on data exchange Establishing a platform is some way of marketing –We need attractive content –We need find community –We need define methods, how to support pull and push of information –We need attractive design

Attractive content Presented clear vision of project (here is my doubt with white paper and Cologne declaration – I waited on contribution from Future farm, it seems, that we have finalize it without support from FF) To prepare nice presentation from WP2 analysis – probably better to present some parts and some comparison in form of Web presentation, then only downloadable documents

Attractive content Prepare in attractive form some first documents about reference framework

Existing communities Efita Newsletter Users User groups on different social networks (mainly professional networks), I personally could recommend LinkedIn – example of groups Agriculture, AGRO 2.0, CAPIG, EFITA, Farming in the Cloud, IT Infrastructure for Agriculture 2.0, Precision Agriculture, WCCA/EFITA 2011

Pull and push of information Pull methods – users use for example our RSS. It require, that our platform is already well developed. In current status we need use push methods, where we will try to distribute information into the direction to different network We can use EFITA newsletter and different social networks

Usage Social Networks Establish own groups for example on LinkedIn –Use tools of group to invite friends –Use such tools like RSS to distribute information directly from platform to social network Distribute information from platform to groups managed by others

How to distribute information to groups Inserting information into pages Implement tools on platform for automatisation

Inserting information into pages

Tools supporting push of informtion

Metadata in searchable form In form of plugin for search and discovery of metadata

Metadata in searchable form

Attractive design Classical like OGC or W3C Social Networks Based – ICT Ensure, Habitats Social Network

OGC

W3C

ICT ensure

Habitats Social Network

Reference framework for interoperability of data exchange What is reference framework – methodology and example how to define standards It is good to look on some best practicies –For example project Orchestra promote Reference Model for Open Distributed Processes (RM-ODP described in ISO/IEC ), which is now used as standard in OGC but in most EC projects in SDI

RM-ODP Design is divided into five parts so called viewpoints The enterprise viewpoint, which focuses on the purpose, scope and policies for the system. It describes the business requirements and how to meet them. It is based on user scenarios and user cases The information viewpoint, focuses on the semantics of the information and the information processing performed. It describes the information managed by the system and the structure and content type of the supporting data. This viewpoint is related to WP3, where data and metadata models are defined. Information viewpoint extended these models and analyse also necessary operation

RM ODP

RM-ODP The computational provide functional decomposition on the system into objects which interact at interfaces. It describes the functionality provided by the system and its functional decomposition. The engineering viewpoint focuses on the mechanisms and functions required to support distributed interactions between objects in the system. It describes the distribution of processing performed by the system to manage the information and provide the functionality. The technology viewpoint focuses on the choice of technology of the system. It describes the technologies chosen to provide the processing, functionality and presentation of information. In principle only this viewpoint is platform dependent. In our architecture design in this first document we will analyse potential components for implementation. In second version of document delivered in Month 15 concrete tools for single pilots will be defined.

Identifying the main challenges for harmonizing data exchange. Work was done, we need now prepare attractive short presentation and put this presentation on platform

What we need prepare for Praha ASAP finalize Cologne declaration and White Paper and start publish discussion about them using Social Networks (me) On the base of this prepare some strategic document for Praha (me)

What we need prepare for Praha To realy start platform before Praha with existing community. Platform has to be presented in Praha

What we need prepare for Praha To have reference framework, which could be discussed in Praha