Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Números.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.
Elementary Principals Meeting Data Presentation August 6, 2010.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) An Overview. Resources Policy Guidance NCLB Brochures
Newark Kids Count 2011 A City Profile of Child Well-Being Advocates for Children of New Jersey 35 Halsey Street Newark, NJ
AYP Changes for 2007 K-20 Videoconference June 11, 2007 Presented by: JoLynn Berge OSPI Federal Policy Coordinator.
Student Performance Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 3 – State Assessment Performance, 7 – Early Childhood Outcomes.
1 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY IN DELAWARE July 31, 2009 For the School Year.
Illinois Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005 Fall 2005.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
A presentation to the Board of Education
1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress 2004 and Beyond.
1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress Changes 2005 and Beyond.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Federal Accountability AYP Update Accountability TETN April 23, 2009 Shannon Housson and Ester Regalado TEA, Performance Reporting Division.
Annual Progress Report Submitted to The Iowa Department of Education by the Cedar Rapids Community School District.
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
CELEBRATE OUR SUCCESS! School Year 1 st Year of Transformation.
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Accountability Reporting Webinar Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Determinations & Federal NCLB Accountability Status, State Accountability & Assistance.
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.
School Improvement Advisory Committee October 15, 2008 Welcome!
MT. PLEASANT A CLOSER LOOK AT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
AYP: Making Adequate Yearly Progress in Washington State Spring 2012.
STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board.
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Track Performance Division of Performance Accountability.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
School Grades Model and Historical Background
Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
Arkansas ESEA Flexibility Flexibility Amended in October, 2012 Louis Ferren, School Performance Public School Accountability.
Columbus Tustin Middle School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
Chapter 8: Dialysis Providers 2014 ANNUAL DATA REPORT VOLUME 2: E ND -S TAGE R ENAL D ISEASE.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Presentation transcript:

Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated

Adequate Yearly Progress What is AYP? How is AYP determined?

What is AYP? No Child Left Behind and AYP AYP is part of NCLB (PL ) signed into law on January 8, AYP is the accountability framework to ensure that states, districts, and schools make satisfactory progress on the implementation of a standards and assessments reform model. Must be designed to narrow achievement gaps. Assessments must be a primary factor in the measure. Includes all students and all schools! Goal is all students will be proficient by

What is AYP? ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS MEASURES: Participation of all 3 rd -10 th grade students in assessments, including alternate assessment. Performance for all students grades 3-10 (at the school level only those enrolled for the full academic year) in language arts (reading & writing) and mathematics. Graduation or attendance rate.

How is AYP determined? PARTICIPATION 95% student participation rate for school, OR if the school has 1-40 students and 2 or fewer miss, the school has satisfied AYP participation. 95% participation for each sub-group. Sub-group of 0-20 satisfies requirement. Sub-group of 21-40: if no more than two students do not participate, participation is satisfied. Participation rate may be averaged for two or three consecutive years to meet the 95% requirement.

How is AYP determined? SUBGROUPS Student Ethnicity (6 Groups) African American Alaska Native / American Indian Asian Caucasian Hispanic Multi-ethnic Economically Disadvantaged Student with Disabilities Limited English Proficient

How is AYP determined ? PERFORMANCE Meet or exceed the lower bound of the 99% confidence interval around the AMO in: Language Arts Mathematics *AMO: Annual Measurable Objective

How is AYP determined? Performance: School designation based on full academic year students (October 1 to 1 st day of testing). Minimum N of 25 students enrolled before a subgroup is included in the AYP determination. Confidence interval to determine if the performance score meets or exceeds the lower bound of the 99% confidence interval around the AMO.

How is AYP determined? CONFIDENCE INTERVAL By using a confidence interval we can conclude that a school or subgroup did not meet the AMO for that year if the school subgroups performance score lies outside the lower bound of the confidence interval of the AMO. Confidence interval is similar to a public poll on an issue or political campaign when they indicate that candidate A has 52% support versus candidate B with 48% support of likely voters, plus or minus a 5% margin of error.

How is AYP determined? AMO Starting Point A new statewide AMO starting point on school performance was computed using 2005 data based on the new assessment program. The 20 th percentile method was used to calculate the starting point Rank the school from lowest to highest performance by the percent proficient within the school. The AMO is percent proficient in the school wherein the 20 th percentile student is enrolled. For language arts the value is 71.48%. For mathematics the value is 57.61%. The AMO increases over time to the value of 100% by

How is AYP determined? School YearAMO for Language ArtsAMO for Mathematics %54.86% %54.86% %54.86% %57.61% %57.61% %57.61% %66.09% %66.09% %66.09% %74.57% %83.05% %91.53% %

How is AYP determined? OTHER ACADEMIC INDICATOR Schools must meet the other indicator threshold or show improvement from the previous year. All schools with 12 th grade must use graduation rate as the: The 2003 grad rate = # grads in 2003 divided by (# grads in # 12 th grade dropouts in # 11 th grade dropouts in # 10 th grade dropouts in # 9 th grade dropouts in # of th graders who did not graduate). Threshold value is 55.58%. For all other schools: Attendance rate is the other academic indicator for schools who do not graduate students. Threshold value is 85%.

How is AYP determined? IMPROVEMENT PROVISION If a school or s ubgroup does not meet the AMO, they can meet AYP through the improvement or Safe Harbor provision if the school meets participation in all categories, the other indicator, and: School or subgroup shows improvement by having a 10% reduction in the percent not proficient from the previous year performance data or falls within the lower bound of a 75% confidence interval of a 10% reduction in percent not proficient from the previous year. The subgroup meets the other academic indicator.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Clear Goals and Targets. Drives Learning Opportunities for ALL. A 12-Year Plan!