1 Results for Students with Disabilities 2008-09 and 2009-10 School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Data Reporting April LEAP Changes LEAP software will be released shortly. Final LEAP software will not be available before mid-July. We.
Advertisements

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Office of the Independent Monitor Update on Progress of MCD Outcomes
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Presentation by Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Statewide Briefing,
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department August 21, 2012.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens, Assessment and Accountability Greg Houser, Student Learning and Partnerships Oregon Department.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department November 12, 2014.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department November 12, 2014.
1 Graduation and Other Results: Students Who Began 9 th Grade in 2000 and 2001.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
Alternative Middle School Alternative High School GED High School Alternative Education.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Students with Disabilities in the P-16 Framework : Outcomes and Improvement Strategies Dr. Rebecca Cort Deputy Commissioner: VESID NY State Education Department.
Graduation Requirements College and Career Readiness Working Group.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
Students with Disabilities in the P-16 Framework Outcomes and Improvement Strategies SCDN, 12/07/07, DVJ.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
1 Office of Bilingual Education & Foreign Language Studies Dr. Pedro J. Ruiz, Coordinator S/CDN Meeting.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Students with Disabilities in the P-16 Framework: Outcomes and Improvement Strategies Rebecca H. Cort VESID October 2007 Statewide Meeting.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Special Education 6:+1 Reclaim 8:1+1 Adolescent Day Treatment 8:1+1 Crossroads 8:1+1 Oak Tree Regents Bound 8:1+1 Spectrum/Transitions 12:1+1 Futures 8:1+1.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
New York State’s Special Education Technical Assistance Resources Higher Education Task Force Meeting September 2009.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
1 School Report Cards 2002–2003 An Overview. 2 School Report Card: Overall Trends Elementary school achievement is up in English and math over Middle.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Data for the 2000 and 2001 Cohorts February 2006.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
HS Accountability Reports
What is “Annual Determination?”
2012 Accountability Determinations
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
AYP and Report Card.
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Presentation transcript:

1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010

2 *Revised methodology ** was the first year classification rates were calculated based on students with disability counts collected through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) Statewide Results - March 2010 The special education classification rate increased compared to the previous year.

3 *Revised methodology ** was the first year classification rates were calculated based on students with disability counts collected through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) Statewide Results - March 2010 Although the special education classification has increased compared to the previous years, the actual number of students with disabilities peaked in

4 Statewide Results - March 2010 Special Education Disability Population by Year

5 March 2010 Statewide Classification Rates of Students with Disabilities by Race/Ethnicity (December 1, 2005) – (October 7, 2009) **Includes Students with Disabilities reported as Multi-racial (none in , 103 in , 218 in , 584 in , 1099 in ) The special education classification rate is highest for Black and American Indian students.

6 ELA Results

7 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and ELA SWD BY NRC

English Language Arts (ELA) Students with Disabilities English Language Learners The performance of students with disabilities in grades 3-8 who are also English Language Learners is very low, however, there were slight improvements in each grade. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number Tested Grade 3: 1,512 Grade 4: 1,858 Grade 5: 2,477 Grade 6: 2,246 Grade 7: 2,195 Grade 8: 2,194 Grades 3-8 Combined: 12,482 Number Tested Grade 3: 3,816 Grade 4: 3,783 Grade 5: 3,451 Grade 6: 2,935 Grade 7: 2,534 Grade 8: 2,433 Grades 3-8 Combined: 18,952 Number Tested Grade 3: 3,474 Grade 4: 3,606 Grade 5: 3,295 Grade 6: 2,841 Grade 7: 2,351 Grade 8: 1,933 Grades 3-8 Combined: 17,500 Number Tested Grade 3: 3,642 Grade 4: 3,712 Grade 5: 3,619 Grade 6: 3,160 Grade 7: 2,740 Grade 8: 2,410 Grades 3-8 Combined: 19,283

by Ethnicity 2006 to 2009 Students with Disabilities Grades 3-8 ELA by Ethnicity Level 3 or 4 - Statewide Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 3 or * 2007 – There were 42 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander students not included in above chart – There were 44 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander students not included in above chart – There were 49 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander students not included in above chart. ** 2007 – There were 4 Multi-racial students not included in the above chart – There were 73 Multi-racial students not included in the above chart – There were 265 Multi-racial students not included in the above chart Asian/Pacific Islander Black HispanicAmerican Indian/Alaskan Native White

10 2,202 2,4342,50 6 2,3022,4712,531 Number With Valid Scores 2,682 Final: April 2009 Performance of Students with Disabilities in Alternate Assessments in ELA in School Year The majority of students with disabilities tested on the alternate assessment in ELA performed at an advanced level in all grades.

11 Regents and RCT Examination Results

Regents English Examination & Students with Disabilities Data represents Public Schools, Including Charter Schools In the school year, the number of students with disabilities tested on Regents examination in English decreased compared to a trend of increasing numbers since 2002.

13 Examination Percent Not Tested Students with Disabilities Percent Scoring English38.3%45.6%16.0%17.2%8.8%8.9%36.8%28.3% Mathematics35.3%45.7%16.9%19.8%10.6%8.0%37.1%26.5% Global History35.3%41.2%21.4%19.0%11.4%9.0%32.0%30.9% U.S. History42.7%49.5%11.0%12.6%8.2%7.9%38.1%29.9% Science36.8%41.9%14.5%12.4%10.6%8.4%38.1%37.4% Regents Performance in Selected Cohorts After 4 Years of School More students with disabilities in the 2005 cohort as compared to the 2001 cohort were tested and more passed each Regents exam, but too many students remain not tested within four years.

14 Data represents Public Schools, including Charter Schools  The Regents Competency Tests remain a tool for helping students with disabilities meet graduation requirements.  Approximately half of students with disabilities tested on the reading and math RCT passed it in Statewide Results - January 2010 Percent of Students with Disabilities Passing each Regents Competency Test in 2009

15 Total Cohort Outcomes

16 Although 4-year graduation rates for students with disabilities have not improved, more students are remaining in school and fewer are dropping out. GED 1.9% GED 1.3% GED 1.4% Cohort Membership , , , , ,058 Students with Disabilities Outcomes Results After 4 Years, Through June GED 1.7% GED 2.4%

17 The fifth year of school helps more students with disabilities to meet graduation requirements. Students with Disabilities Graduation Rate After Four Year Through June

Total Cohort 10,7531,6602,6982,48610,277 4, Total Cohort after Four Years as of August Graduation, IEP Diploma and Dropout Rates 32,058 In the High Need Districts (NYC, Large 4 Cities, Urban/Suburban and Rural High Need) graduation rates are lowest, dropout rates are highest and more students with disabilities earn an IEP diploma compared to Average or Low Need districts.

19 Regents Diplomas Awarded to Students with Disabilities Since higher standards were adopted in 1996, more than 14 times as many students with disabilities are earning Regents diplomas.

Total Cohort 77,3788,98316,96414,75872,316 33, Total Cohort of All Students Earning an IEP Diploma after Four Years as of August 224, % In all need resource categories of school districts except the low need districts, the percentage of students earning an IEP diploma exceeds the 1% of students who can demonstrate proficiency on State assessments by using results on the NYSAA for accountability purposes.

21 Selected State Performance Plan Indicators

22 Indicator 3 Performance and AYP

23 Percent of School Districts Making Adequate Yearly Progress For Students with Disabilities in All Required Subjects and Grades NYS exceeded the State’s Performance Plan AYP target in Target 59%

24 Very few of the districts in New York City and no large city is making AYP for the students with disabilities subgroup in all grades and subjects in which they have at least 30 students with disabilities. Number of Districts: NYC:3232 Large City44 Urban-Suburban4343 Rural Average Low Percent of School Districts that Made AYP in All Subjects and Grades in Which they had 30 Students with Disabilities

25 Indicator 4 Suspensions of Students with Disabilities for More than 10 Days Out-of-School

26 The number of school districts that suspend at least 2.7% of students with disabilities for more than 10 days  Percent of school districts with high rates of suspension decreased from 9.4% of all school districts to 5.9% of all school districts.  The number of school districts that suspended 2.7 % or more of students with disabilities for more than 10 days also decreased.

27 Indicator 5 Least Restrictive Setting for School-Age Students with Disabilities

28 5/98 2 Regions - Less than 2% at Separate Public Sites 9 Regions % at Separate Public Sites 12 Regions % at Separate Public Sites 16 Regions - Over 7% at Separate Public Sites National Average : 4.3 percent Separate Settings are defined as schools attended exclusively by students with disabilities; these settings include Chapter 853, Special Act, State Operated and State Supported schools, separate BOCES sites and New York City separate public schools. Indicator 5 Least Restrictive Environment data for school-age students continue to improve… Public and Private Special Education Placements at Separate Sites for Each BOCES Region and New York City

29 Only 2 of 38 regions (5%) placed 7% or more Students with Disabilities in Separate Sites in compared to 28% in /24/10 Separate Settings are defined as schools attended exclusively by students with disabilities; these settings include Chapter 853, Special Act, State Operated and State Supported schools, separate BOCES sites and New York City separate public schools Less than 2% (17) 2-4.3% (10) % (9) More than 6.9% (2) 27 of 38 regions (71%) placed 4.3% or fewer Students with Disabilities in Separate Sites in compared to only 46% in GSGS Students with Disabilities (Ages 4-21) in Separate Settings By BOCES Region and New York City Based on VR-5 Data

30 In the Big Five cities, more than twice as many students with disabilities are placed in general education classrooms for less than 40 percent of the day compared to the national average.

31 Indicator 11 Timely Evaluations of Preschool and School-Age Students for Special Education Eligibility

32 Percent of Preschool and School-age Referrals for Special Education Receiving Timely Evaluations (target is 100%) NYS continues to make progress in the percent of preschool and school age students receiving timely initial evaluations.

33 Indicator 13 Transition IEPs of Youth Aged 15 or Older

34 Secondary Transition – Percent of Youth with IEPs Determined Reasonable to Meet Post Secondary Goals The percent of students aged 15 and over whose IEPs are in compliance with all 8 regulatory requirements has continued to improve over the years, with a different sample of school districts reporting these data annually.

35 Improvement Strategies

Districts Needing Assistance / Intervention 95* school districts (includes 32 in NYC) –75 identified for high drop out rates –55 identified for low graduation rates –3 identified for AYP – 2 or more consecutive years (ELA) –12 identified for continuing noncompliance 39 school districts identified last year that received technical assistance are no longer identified. * Some districts identified for multiple issues

37 Redesign of Special Education Network 10 Regional Special Education Technical Assistance Support Centers (RSE-TASC) –School improvement specialists –Regional special education trainers –Behavior specialists (PBIS) –Transition specialists –Bilingual special education specialists –Nondistrict TA providers

38 Response-to-Intervention Required phase in by school year State Technical Assistance Center Guidance document Parent guide Program development grants to 14 schools/districts

39 44 Schools identified with effective practices –13 received grants to assist other districts Districts needing assistance / intervention for students with disabilities may apply for grant funds to replicate the effective practices S³TAIR Project

40 And… Special Education Parent Centers expanded to 14 statewide 14 Early Childhood Direction Centers assist parents of preschool children and address timely evaluation / services issues Collaborative work with institutions of higher education in low performing schools and to better prepare special education teachers